Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00520-001-0333-0
Christina Hempen
Elisabeth Weiss
Clemens F. Hess
O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E
Abstract In order to minimize neurological symptoms and treatment-related side-effects, patients with primary or secondary brain tumors receive dexamethasone. The goal of
this study was to analyze dosage and
duration of dexamethasone intake and
to compare the advantages and disadvantages of this medication during the
course of radiation therapy (RT). Data
from 138 consecutive patients were
therefore analyzed retrospectively.
During the course of therapy, the dosage of dexamethasone was evaluated,
as were the indications for and duration of this treatment, its side-effects
and any clinical changes reported during dexamethasone intake. The dosage of dexamethasone was higher at
the outset and during RT (median
712 mg/day) than at the end of RT
(median 16 mg/day). The average
duration of dexamethasone intake
was 23 weeks for patients with primary, and 7 weeks for patients with
secondary brain tumors. The most
frequent side-effects were a rise
in serum glucose level, peripheral
edema, psychiatric disorders, and
Introduction
Brain metastases develop in 2040% of all cancer patients
[22]. They are the main cause of central neurological deficiencies in patients with intracranial neoplasms [10]. Malignant gliomas account for half of all primary brain tumors
[20]. Among these, glioblastoma multiforme is the most
malignant, treatment-resistant, and frequent tumor [19].
323
provement is often seen within the first 24 h after dexamethasone has been administered [9]. For this reason, an
initial dexamethasone treatment in patients with symptomatic intracranial neoplasms has become a standard
therapy. However, high-dosage dexamethasone treatment
can also have a multitude of side-effects, which in some
cases not only reduce the quality of life (e.g. muscular
weakness, increased blood sugar level or Cushings syndrome), but can also become life threatening (e.g. gastrointestinal ulcer or thromboembolism) [8, 22].
There are few analyses concerning the benefits and
risks of administering dexamethasone to patients with
primary and secondary brain tumors. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the duration of dexamethasone treatment and to compare the advantages and
disadvantages of this medication in patients with brain
metastases and primary brain tumors. We also discuss
whether it is necessary to give dexamethasone in each
individual patient.
Results
Dexamethasone dosage at diagnosis, during RT
and at the end of RT
At the time of diagnosis all patients received dexamethasone (324 mg). The exact dose depended on the physicians decision. Higher doses were prescribed in patients
with pronounced edema or neurological symptoms.
Some patients who did not have any neurological symptoms or extensive edema and who appeared to be able to
assess their own symptoms critically, started RT without
dexamethasone.
Figures 1 and 2 show that the majority of patients, not
only those with cerebral metastases, but also those with
primary brain tumors, were receiving 712 mg dexamethasone per day at diagnosis and during RT.
A subgroup of 13 patients (9.4%) did not receive
dexamethasone during RT.
Fig. 1 Dexamethasone dose of patients with brain metastases: initial dose / maximum dose during radiotherapy (RT) / dose at the
end of RT
324
Side-effect
Brain metastases
(N=91)
43
3
2
1
6
1
3
47.3
3.3
2.2
1.1
6.6
1.1
3.3
9.9
34
6
1
2
4
1
3
72.3
12.8
2.1
4.3
8.5
2.1
6.4
10.6
10
4
4
11
4.4
4.4
1
7
4
1
2.1
14.9
8.5
2.1
325
Table 2 Dexamethasone administration in patients with brain metastases: indications, clinical response and side-effects (HIP high intracranial pressure, s symptomatic, p prophylactic)
Time
At diagnosis
During RT
After RT
Indication for
dexamethasone
(n)
s (64)
p (2)
s (59)
p (15)
s (18)
p (5)
No
change
No sign
of HIP
6.3
100
44.1
17
66.7
11.1
11.1
40
Deterioration
Unknown
0
0
23.7
6.7
16.7
0
60.9
15.2
26.6
61.1
60
Side-effects
(%)
No
side-effects
(%)
12.5
50
15.2
26.7
83.3
40
87.5
50
84.8
73.3
16.7
60
Table 3 Dexamethasone administration in patients with primary brain tumors: indications, clinical response, and side-effects
Time
At diagnosis
After surgery/
before RT
During RT
After RT
Indication for
dexamethasone
(n)
s (30)
p (0)
s (18)
p (4)
s (30)
p (12)
s (16)
p (4)
No
change
36.7
10
No sign
of HIP
22.2
50
100
40
26.7
100
6.3
25
100
Deterioration
Unknown
3.3
22.2
0
33.3
0
37.5
0
50
5.6
31.2
Side-effects
(%)
No
side-effects
(%)
33.3
0
63.3
33.3
62.5
50
100
66.7
100
36.7
66.7
37.5
50
Discussion
The use of dexamethasone for treatment of neurological
symptoms caused by primary brain tumors or brain metastases and the administration of dexamethasone for the
prevention or attenuation of treatment-related sequelae is
generally accepted. However, there is no detailed analy-
326
roids include endocrine disorders such as Cushings syndrome and disturbances of the blood sugar level ranging
up to diabetes mellitus, muscular weakness, an increasing risk of infectious diseases, gastrointestinal complications such as ulcers or bleeding, atrophic changes of the
skin, and hematological and psychiatric disorders [7,
22]. In addition, corticosteroid intake can also cause
thromboembolism [8].
The side-effect of dexamethasone most frequently reported in this study was a rise in the serum glucose level
to over 100 mg/dl (in 47% of patients with brain metastases and in 72% of those with primary brain tumors). In
3 patients (3.3%) with cerebral metastases and 6 patients
(12.8%) with primary brain tumors, pre-existing diabetes
mellitus was known. The serum glucose level was higher
than 300 mg/dl in 3.3% of the patients with brain metastases, as against 10.6% of those with primary brain tumors. In this retrospective analysis, patients were not
been assumed to have had their serum glucose levels
checked on an empty stomach.
Psychiatric problems such as anxiety states, depressive disorders and insomnia were reported in 9.9% of patients with brain metastases and 10.6% of patients with
primary brain tumors. Although a correlation is seen between psychiatric symptoms and corticosteroid intake,
the precise mechanism of emergence of these symptoms
is as yet unknown [14]. In view of the gravity of primary
and secondary brain tumors and the hopeless prognosis
the patients are confronted with, such psychic changes
are surely not attributable solely to the dexamethasone
medication but also to the patients reaction to the diagnosis or to the disease itself.
Peripheral edema was also noted in many cases, especially among the patients with brain metastases (11%). In
a study by Vecht et al. [25] peripheral edema was one of
the most frequent side-effects of dexamethasone. This is
particularly surprising, as dexamethasone is preferred
because of its minimal mineral-corticoid effect, and peripheral edema should therefore be rare [13].
Cushings syndrome is also a known side-effect of
dexamethasone treatment. It was one of the most frequent complications in patients with malignant gliomas
in this study (14.9%) [24].
Life-threatening complications such as gastrointestinal ulcers and bleeding were not noted, and thromboembolism remained rare in this study. Gastric disorders
such as stomach ache were reported by 3.3% of the patients with brain metastases and 6.4% of the patients
with primary brain tumors, proportions comparable to
the 4.8% published by Shenouda et al. [21]. In a study
by Messer et al. [15] it was concluded that steroids increased the incidence of peptic ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding, even if they were given for less than
30 days and in a prednisone-equivalent dose of less than
1,000 mg in total. Prophylactic administration of antacids or H2-blockers made it possible to avoid gastrointes-
327
of dexamethasone and no scale was used to define improvement or deterioration of neurological status. In addition, it was often not possible to distinguish unequivocally whether complications were due to dexamethasone,
the tumor itself, to the RT, or a combination of all of
these.
Nevertheless, despite these shortcomings, a similar
conclusion to that reached by Cairncross and Posner [4]
can be drawn from this study. Because life-threatening
complications remained rare and, in view of the short
survival time, a neurological improvement is important
for the quality of life, dexamethasone should not be
withheld from patients with primary or secondary brain
tumors. However, the dosage should be adapted to each
patients individual needs. For symptomatic patients the
rule should be: as high as necessary, as low as possible.
The observations that up to 50% of the patients who
took dexamethasone prophylactically suffered from sideeffects and that 13 out of 14 patients tolerated RT well
without dexamethasone justify attempting to start RT
without dexamethasone initially and only starting to administer it in the case of neurological deterioration. Lack
of neurological symptoms, good general condition or
minimal cerebral edema could be possible reasons for
not giving dexamethasone at first. This aspect will have
to be examined in a prospective study with special emphasis on the evaluation of quality of life criteria.
References
1. Bamberg M, Hess CF, Kortmann RD
(1996) Zentralnervensystem. In:
Scherer E, Sack H (eds) Strahlentherapie: Radiologische Onkologie, 4th edn.
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Tokyo, pp 763808
2. Borgelt B, Gelber R, Kramer S, et al
(1980) The palliation of brain metastases: final results of the first two studies by the Radiation Therapy Oncology
Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
6:19
3. Brown SB, Brant-Zawadzki M, Eifel P,
Coleman CN, Enzman DR (1982) CT
of irradiated solid tumor metastases to
the brain. Neuroradiology 23:127131
4. Cairncross JG, Posner JB (1983) The
management of brain metastases. In:
Walker MD (ed) Oncology of the nervous system. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston
The Hague Dordrecht, pp 341377
5. Cairncross JG, Kim JH, Posner JB
(1980) Radiation therapy for brain metastases. Ann Neurol 7:529541
328