Professional Documents
Culture Documents
54
Ateneo School of Medicine and Public Health, Ateneo de Manila University, Don Eugenio Lopez Sr. Medical Complex,
Pasig City 1604, Philippines; 2Department of Chemistry, School of Science and Engineering, Loyola Schools, Ateneo de
Manila University, Quezon City 1108, Philippines; 3Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS),
University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Received: August 7, 2011; Accepted: September 26, 2011; Revised: December 5, 2011
Abstract: This review informs on current literature on patents for biomarkers for asthma from 2009 to 2011. Variable airflow obstruction in asthma is generally triggered by gene-environment interactions that can lead to key symptoms of
cough, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and wheezing. The episodic and variable degrees of airway hyperresponsiveness arise from a variety of inflammatory pathways that can make diagnosis and management difficult. Standard pulmonary function tests used for the diagnosis of asthma may fail to predict individual responses to the standard
bronchodilator and corticosteroid therapies. Phenotypic predispositions can alter the severity of the asthmatic condition
and treatment response. Biomarkers from sputum, exhaled gases, exhaled breath condensates, urine, serum, and broncheolaveolar fluid lavage proteins are currently explored to provide objective metrics for identifying individuals at risk, provide therapy guidance, monitor disease progression and evaluate response to therapy, as a supplement to standard pulmonary function tests. Updates on the refinement of technologies, inherent limitations and benefits of these biomarkers are
discussed to provide insights on how current understanding of pathologic mechanisms has been applied to provide information for addressing gaps in the diagnosis and management of asthma.
cheaper, less invasive, technically simpler and more available, with an acceptable sensitivity and specificity, compared
with standard pulmonary function tests for the assessment of
airway inflammation [3, 4]. Molecular biomarkers may be
correlated with the biochemistry of disease states, often
traceable to the enzymatic proteins involved in pathophysiologic and metabolic processes as well as the genes that encode for these proteins [5-7].
EXHALED BIOMARKERS
Exhaled breath is a complex mixture of low molecular
weight organic and inorganic compounds. Fluctuations in the
relative concentrations of these molecular components may
be clinically monitored. These can also be potentially used as
indices for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring, particularly
for lung and airway diseases. Some of the analytical approaches that have been applied to exhaled breath include
direct measurement of expired gases, analysis of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) from exhaled breath as well as
analysis of volatile and non-volatile compounds in exhaled
breath condensate (EBC). Exhaled breath analysis is noninvasive and thus has a distinct clinical advantage in terms of
ease and convenience in sample collection [8, 9].
FeNO
The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a widely
studied, non-invasive biomarker that evaluates airway inflammation in asthma. FeNO levels have been shown to correlate well with sputum eosinophil count, airway hyperre 2012 Bentham Science Publishers
Biomarkers of Asthma
55
YKL-40, a chitinase-like protein, mediates airway inflammation in mouse models. YKL-40 levels in the serum
correlate with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in
the chitinase-3-like 1 gene (CHI3L1) known to increase in
asthma. The rise in YKL-40 protein levels has been associated with asthma severity and thickness of the subepithelial
basement membrane. Elevations of YKL-40 have been
shown to correlate with blood eosinophils but not with clinical severity, control or IgE levels in a study comparing
asthmatics with healthy controls (r = - 0.05, p = 0.05) [28].
These studies have pointed out a potential for YKL-40 as a
biomarker for asthma and other lung disorders with bronchial hyperresponsivity or reduced lung function [29, 30].
antigen
Cruz et al.
IgE
LAT
PLC
FcRI
Lyn
v
P
P
Fyn
v
PIP
Syk
DA
P
Gab2
IP3
PI3K
PLA2
arachidonic acid
Ca
2+
cytokine
PKC
granule
SNARE
histamine,
tryptase
production of prostaglandins,
leukotrienes
Biomarkers of Asthma
Table 1.
57
Exhaled air
Analyte
Serum
Bronchoalveolar
lavage (BAL)
Urine
FENO
CO
VOC
YKL-40
IL-18
Periostin
Patents (Assignee)
US20107704214
(Siemens Aktiengesselschaft)
US20107678390
US20097606274
(University of Alabama)
WO2010065452
(Tricorntech Corp.)
WO2009144725
WO2011003922
(Universiteit Maastricht)
US20110177963
US20097579147
WO2009148958
(Janssen Pharmaceutical)
US20110123530
(Arron et al.)
DP2 receptors
US20100173313
(AMIRA Pharmaceuticals)
TGFb1/ TGFb2
US20107858763
Description
MSR1 gene mutation indicates increased risk for asthma among other
diseases
Vitamin D binding
protein (DBP)
WO2009072749 (Soonchunhyang
University)
Surfactant protein D
(SP-D)
WO2008124010 (University of
Pennsylvania)
Formate, hippurate,
trigonellin
WO2011082433
(Lineagen, Inc.)
Cruz et al.
and quantified using high resolution proton NMR [48]. Urinary leukotriene E4, in conjunction with exhaled nitric oxide
and sputum eosinophils were noted to have potential value in
monitoring conventional methods for airway control [11].
The use of these markers as potential biomarkers for asthma
has yet to be established in larger studies.
CURRENT & FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
The complexity of inflammatory pathways in the pathology of asthma limits the identification of suitable biomarkers
for the disease. Although a number of small molecule and
protein biomarkers have been identified in patents found in a
search of the literature from 2009-2011, the development of
metabolite signatures or fingerprints (multiple biomarkers)
from metabolite profiling has yet to be explored and validated with larger studies. In addition, since metabolites are
in a mixture and are often found at very low levels, the discovery of biomarkers will rely on more sensitive and selective analytical tools for the analysis of samples. Since asthma
is related to a number of similar inflammatory diseases, the
discovery of selective biomarkers may at best be adjuncts to
conventional tests in the treatment of children with asthma
and in differentiating the various phenotypes. The use of
biomarkers for diagnosing specific phenotypes, monitoring
and guiding therapy remains a significant challenge.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
JPQ thanks the Australian Research Council for a Future
Fellowship (FT100100213).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
This invited review was written by the authors within the
scope of their research and academic positions at the Ateneo
de Manila University, Philippines and the University of
Tasmania, Australia. The authors declare that they have no
competing interests.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Urine Biomarkers
A simple non-invasive and often ignored approach in
asthma biomarker discovery is urine sampling. Targeted metabolite profiling of urine has recently been shown to provide
suitable biomarkers for asthma. Urinary levels of bromotyrosine and F2-isoprostanes are markers of eosinophilcatalyzed oxidation and urinary lipid peroxidation, respectively [47]. McClay also used metabolomics studies to identify formate, hippurate and trigonellin among other urine
metabolites as possible biomarkers for lung function and
disease including asthma. These metabolites were detected
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Global Initiative for Asthma. The Global Strategy of Asthma Management and Prevention. Available at: http://www.ginasthma.org/
pdf/GINA_Report_2010.pdf. (Accessed on: November 22, 2011).
Braman S. The global burden of asthma. Chest 2006; 130: 4s-12s.
Diamant Z, Boot JD, Mantzouranis E, Flohr R, Sterk PJ, Gerth van
Wijk R. Biomarkers in asthma and allergic rhinitis. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2010; 23: 468-81.
Jackson A, Sandrini A, Campbell C, Chow S, Thomas P, Yates D.
Comparison of biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate and
broncheoalveolar lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175:
222-7.
Snell N, Newbold P. The clinical utility of biomarkers in asthma
and COPD. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2008; 8: 222-35.
Deykin A. Biomarker-driven care in asthma: Are we there yet? J
Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 118: 565-8.
Cazolla M, Novelli G. Biomarkers in COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther
2010; 23: 493-500.
Ryter SW. Special issue on carbon monoxide and exhaled biomarkers in human disease. J Breath Res 2010; 4: 040201.
Jackson A, Sandrini A, Campbell C, Chow S, Thomas P, Yates D.
Small airways function and molecular markers in exhaled air in
mild asthma. Thorax 2005; 60: 639-44.
Murugan A, Prys-Picarda, Calhoun WJ. Biomarkers in asthma.
Curr Opin Pulm Med 2009; 15:12-8.
Biomarkers of Asthma
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
59
gene alter risk of prostate cancer, asthma and cardiovascular disease. US20097579147 (2009).
Zhang, J., D'Andrea, M., Belkowski, S.M. Biomarker for assessing
response to chymase treatment. WO2009148958 (2009).
Patil S, Wisnivesky J, Busse P, Halm E Li XM. Detection of immunological biomarkers correlated with asthma control and quality
of life measurements in sera from chronic asthma patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 106: 205-13.
Willis-Karp M, Luyimbazi J, Xu X, Schofield B, Neben TY, Karp
CL, et al. . Interleukin-13: Central mediator of allergic asthma. Science 1998; 282: 2258-61.
Corren J, Lemanske, Jr. RF, Hanania NA, Korenblat, PE, Parsey
MV, Arron JR, et al. Lebrikizumab treatment in adults with
asthma. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1088-98.
Arron, J., Fahy, J., Modrek, B., Woodruff, P. Composition and
methods for treating and diagnosing asthma. US20110123530
(2011).
Hollander C, Sitkauskiene B, Sakalauskas R, Westin U,
Jaciauskiene S. Serum and bronchial lavage fluid concentrations of
IL-8, SLPI, sCC14 and sICAM-1 in patients with COPD and
asthma. Respir Med 2007; 101: 1947-53.
Wu J, Kobayashi M, Sousa E, Liu W, Cai J, Goldman S, et al.
Differential proteomic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in
asthmatics following segmental antigen challenge. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4: 1251-64.
Duvernelle C, Freund V, Frossard N. Transforming growth factorbeta and its role in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2003; 16: 181-96.
Ghosh, B., Sharma, S., Nagpal, K. Transforming growth factor 1
gene (TGF1) haplotypes and prediction of susceptibility for immunological disease. US20107858763 (2010).
Howell JE, McAnulty RJ. TGF-beta: Its role in asthma and therapeutic potential. Curr Drug Targets 2006; 7: 547-65.
Jingjing J, Gorge S. TGF-B2 reduces nitric oxide synthase mRNA
through a ROCK-dependent pathway in airway epithelial cells.
Curr Drug Targets 2011;7: 547-65.
Park, C., Rhim, T. Biomarker for diagnosing asthma and therapeutic agent of asthma controlling expression of vitamin D binding
protein. WO2009072749 (2009).
Sutherland ER, Goleva E, Jackson L, Stevens A, Leung D. Vitamin
D Levels, lung function, and steroid response in adult asthma. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 699-704.
Atochina-Vasserman E, Winkler C, Abramova H, Schaumann F,
Krug N, Gow A, et al. Segmental allergen challenge alters multimeric structure and function of surfactant protein D in humans.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 856-64.
Cheng, G, Ueda T, Numao T, Kuroki Y, Nakajima H, Fukushima
Y, et al. Increased levels of surfactant protein A and D in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids in patients with bronchial asthma. Eur
Respir J 2000; 16: 831-5.
Panettieri, R., Beers, M.F., Haczku, A.F., Sims, M.W. Surfactant
protein D is a biomarker for steroid responsiveness in asthma and
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. WO2008124010 (2008).
Wedes SH, Khatri SB, Zhang R, Wu W, Comhair SAA, Wenzel S,
et al. Noninvasive markers of airway inflammation in asthma. Clin
Transl Sci 2009; 2: 112-7.
McClay, J. Metabolomics-based biomarkers for lung function.
WO2011082433 (2011).