Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heat Transfer Enhancement in Pool Boiling of A Refrigerant Fluid With Wire Nets
Heat Transfer Enhancement in Pool Boiling of A Refrigerant Fluid With Wire Nets
www.elsevier.com/locate/etfs
a,*
Dipartimento di Energetica L. Poggi, Universita` di Pisa, Via Diotisalvi, 2, 56126 Pisa, Italy
Moscow Power Engineering Institute (Technical University), Krasnokazarmennaya, 14 Moscow 111250, Russia
Received 14 February 2005; received in revised form 3 May 2005; accepted 4 July 2005
Abstract
Among many methods to enhance boiling heat transfer by means of porous coatings, the use of the wire nets covering the heated
surface demonstrates some advantages due to its simplicity and low cost. Easiness of a wire net mounting at the heated wall allows
testing many dierent nets and their combinations. This paper presents the experimental results on heat transfer and crisis using the
dielectric refrigerant R141b pool boiling under atmospheric pressure. The analysis carried out in the present paper demonstrates
that success in boiling heat transfer enhancement is provided not only by the nucleation sites density increase, but also by designing
the channels in the porous structure to escape the generated vapor. Unsatisfactory results in relation to CHF value have been
obtained with rather thick porous coating. In this case the problem is to provide vapor evacuation from the wall. Rather essential
heat transfer coecient and CHF increase has been observed while the porous structure has been formed with 37 layers of nets
using wire of 0.250.40 mm diameter and mesh aperture of approximately 2 mm. The nets of stainless steel gave the greater eect
with respect to copper, aluminium and brass. It is demonstrated that the presence of porous coatings brings about a considerable
enhancement of the thermal stability of the system. An approximate model of crisis in boiling at the surface coated with metallic nets
has been developed.
2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Pool boiling; Heat transfer enhancement; Critical heat ux; Metal mesh structures; Refrigerants
1. Introduction
Heat transfer in pool boiling is one of the most intense ways of heat removal in engineering devices. For
this reason, boiling is extensively used in modern technologies and is expected to be used as cooling method
for future electronic devices. Commonly heat transfer
coecient (HTC) in boiling is high enough in order
not to seek any ways of its enhancement. However, at
rather low heat uxes especially in boiling of liquids with
low thermal conductivity heat transfer enhancement
0894-1777/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.expthermusci.2005.07.002
264
Nomenclature
g
hLG
H
ki
l
L
nc
N
p
q
r
R
Rd
R*
Q
t
t
Tw
Ts
U1
w0
Greek symbols
DTsat wall superheat [K]
d0
average thickness of the macrolm [m]
k
thermal conductivity [W/mK]
U
wire mesh diameter [mm]
q
density [kg/m3]
r
surface tension [N/m]
m
viscosity [m2/s]
Subscripts
calc
calculated
cr
critical
dp
dry patch
e
equivalent
exp
experimental
G
of the vapor phase
l
linear
L
of the liquid phase
265
2. Experiments description
The analysis carried out in the paper seeks to improve
understanding of pool boiling mechanism and of burnout incipience in presence of metallic wire mesh structures. It begins with an experimental investigation. To
investigate the problem a test facility has been used
which permits the measurement of pool boiling heat
transfer from a planar horizontal surface covered with
layers of a wire net.
2.1. Experimental setup
In the experimental facility, schematically represented
in Fig. 2, a metallic dissipator heated from below is
mounted in an insulating teon box (Fig. 3) and inserted
inside a glass cylindrical vessel (diameter 400 mm and
height 1000 mm). The vessel contains about 25 dm3 of
saturated refrigerant uid HCFC141b maintained at a
pressure very close to the atmospheric one. Table 1 presents the thermophysical properties of the uid
HCFC141b. It is seen that this uid is similar to the
refrigerants R11 and R113.
The dissipator of aluminium alloy (thermal conductivity k = 208 W/mK) is insulated by means of glass
266
N 1=U L;
Fig. 3. Test dissipator and position of the wire nets on the test surface.
Table 1
Saturation properties of HCFC141b (1 bar)
Liquid density, qL (kg/m3)
Vapour density, qG (kg/m3)
Enthalpy of vaporization, hLG (kJ/kg)
Viscosity of liquid, lL (Pa s)
Viscosity of vapor, lG (Pa s)
Surface tension, r (N/m)
Specic heat of vapor, cpG (kJ/kg K)
Specic heat of liquid, cpL (kJ/kg K)
Thermal conductivity of liquid, kL (W/mK)
Thermal conductivity of vapor, kG (W/mK)
Boiling temperature, Ts (C)
Critical pressure, pcr (bar)
Critical temperature, Tcr (C)
Molecular weight, M (kg/mol)
1234.9
4.765
224.3
0.000409
0.0000125
0.0184
0.791
1.155
0.098
0.0087
32.2
42.5
204.4
0.117
3. Experimental results
The experimental study has been carried out using a
large number of dierent wire mesh structures. Well
reproducible results have been obtained for heat ux q
vs. wall superheat DT = Tw Ts up to the CHF, with
the maximum dierence of 15% in CHF, while the
experiments repeated with the same wire mesh at the
dierent time moments.
3.1. Nucleate boiling and crisis
A preliminary analysis (some results are summarized
in Fig. 6) was carried out by using various wire nets and
Smooth surface
q [kW/m2]
100
50
10
12
14
16
18
(TW - TS) C
Fig. 6. Eects of wire net packaging on boiling and CHF.
20
267
268
Table 2
CHF obtained with the metallic wire nets used
L [mm]
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
304
304
304
304
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
AISI
304
304
304
304
304
304
304
304
304
304
304
304
0.13
0.12
0.13
0.12
1.6
0.48
2.4
1
Smooth surface
2
0.7
1.58
0.4
2
0.5
1.8
0.7
1.91
0.4
2.38
0.4
2.12
0.4
1.99
0.32
2.06
0.25
2.38
0.4
2.12
0.4
2.17
0.36
No. of layers
182
70
3
6
5
3
6
6
6
8
4
3
3
7
108
195
122
122
146
103
120
146
145
103
120
120
=0.12 m m , L=0.13 m m
smooth surface
100
90
80
70
60
50
10
16
20
qcr,exp [kW/m2]
nc
1
15
5
2
200
q [kW/m2]
U [mm]
58.5
76.9
143.0
187.3
198.0
199.0
202.7
208.3
212.0
232.1
252.7
262.1
261.5
262.3
262.9
265.0
281.4
qcr,calc [kW/m2]
qcr,exp/qcr,calc
224.5
211.3
0.64
0.886
218.1
232.1
232.7
213.9
241.2
252.6
246.5
255.0
271.3
252.6
246.5
253.3
0.913
0.873
0.895
0.991
0.962
1.00
1.063
1.025
0.967
1.041
1.075
1.11
300
200
q [kW/m2]
Material
100
90
80
70
60
50
10
16
20
q [kW/m2]
Summarizing:
200
100
90
80
70
60
50
10
16
20
300
q [kW/m2]
200
100
90
80
70
60
50
10
269
16
20
Table 3
Inuence of the material of the metallic wire nets
Material
L [mm]
U [mm]
No. of layers
nc
qcr,exp [kW/m2]
qcr,calc [kW/m2]
qcr,exp/qcr,calc
Aluminium
1.4
0.24
282
180.7
251.6
0.718
Brass
AISI 304
1.58
1.58
0.4
0.4
6
6
195
195
194.9
202.7
232.1
232.1
0.84
0.873
Copper
AISI 304
2.17
2.17
0.36
0.36
7
7
120
120
211.5
281.4
253.3
253.3
0.835
1.11
270
Fig. 11. Typical sequence of boiling crisis development for a wire mesh
structure.
Table 4
Eect of superposition of dierent mesh
Material
qcr [kW/m2]
AISI 304
194.6
AISI 304
215.3
AISI 304
275.9
Fig. 12. Sequence of boiling crisis development for ns [19].
AISI 304
200
180
TW [C]
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
1050
271
t (s)
Fig. 13. The wall temperature growth after crisis incipience for wire
mesh coating and for a nned surface.
120
100
=0.4 mm
L=2.12 mm
6 layers
6 layers
= 0.25 mm
L= 2.064 mm
=0.4 mm
L=1.58 mm
brass
=0.4 mm
L=2.12 mm
3 layers
=0.32 mm
L=1.99 mm
=0.4 mm
L=1.58 mm
=0.4 mm
L=2.38 mm
inox
3 layers
=0.7 mm
L= 2 mm
80
TW [C]
=0.4 mm
L=2.38 mm
60
=0.12 mm
L=0.13 mm
40
=0.36 mm
L=2.14 mm
20
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 1400
1600
1800
t (s)
Fig. 14. Post-CHF trend of the heated surface temperature for various
wire nets coatings.
4. Discussion
From the above analysis it is evident that an inuence
of wire nets on pool boiling heat transfer can be related
to the combination of an extended surface area, a capillary assist to liquid ow and an increased nucleation site
density eect. These eects depend on the thermophysical properties of surface and uid and on the parameters
of porous coating [20,21]. In the particular case of wire
nets the parameters of the porous coating analyzed are:
the wire diameter, U, the mesh aperture, L, the material
used and the number of layers.
Nucleation sites density is the most important internal characteristic of nucleate pool boiling. This parameter strongly depends on the wall superheat and in its
turn to the great extent determines the strong dependence of HTC on the wall superheat and on heat ux.
A porous coating presents a lot of ready nucleation
sites, which are probably numerous dierent cavities
lled at rst by gas and later in boiling process by vapor.
An activation of these nucleation centres requires very
low wall superheats and usually occurs at low heat
uxes. This can explain very high heat transfer enhancement in boiling due to porous coating at low heat uxes
and a weak general dependence of HTC on heat ux,
which is experimentally established in many studies
[13,17].
In distinction to other types of porous coatings, the
wire nets are featured with a regular structure. The
points of contact of the wire with the heated surface
(furthercontact points) are probably the most
favorable for vapor nucleation. Really, near these points
a liquid is in a stagnant state and can be easy superheated in comparison with the other points of the heat
transfer surface. The nucleation sites are activated
mainly in the contact points. Their density can be estimated as to be proportional to N2, where N is determined by Eq. (1). This simple estimation for the nets
used in the present experiments gives the reasonable values of the nucleation sites density, which are consistent
with the experimental measurements [22] and approximate theoretical predictions [23,24] for a clean surface.
272
;
U d0
dr
273
10
Rd /
d0 qL
m qG U
2=3
g Dq
1=3
11
1=2 4=3
qL =g Dq
1=3
12
274
1=4
1 L=U
1=4
13
where the numerical factor (0.33) is chosen for best tting the present experimental data. The experimental
data obtained with stainless steel nets agree rather well
with the Eq. (13) except for the nets of the third line
(U = 0.48 L = 1.6) from Table 2, the maximum deviation is 12.7%. The above point is probably an accidental
surge, because the other very similar points demonstrate
rather good agreement with the calculations. The experimental points obtained with the nets of brass, copper
and aluminium (Table 3) deviate 1628.5% from the
calculated values.
The eect of thermal conductivity of wire nets material was not taken into account in the model and can be
explained only qualitatively. The higher thermal conductivity of wire leads to the higher rate of heat removal
from the contact points. As a result the nucleation sites
density decreases and the probable size of the dry spots
before crisis increases.
Eq. (13) appears to be surprisingly similar to the
well-known equation by Kutateladze for CHF in boiling on a smooth surface. In particular, it does not contain liquid viscosity, although in the intermediate
transformations the viscosity eect has been taken into
account. It is pertinent to mention that the expression
for CHF in boiling on a smooth surface at high reduced pressures obtained in [26] includes viscosity in
very low power. Certainly, Eq. (13) should be considered as the rst approximation, because only one liquid
and one pressure have been checked. It is necessary to
search other experimental results, which could be compared with the calculations. The model itself may be
improved, in order in particular to account for an eect
of a modulated porous structure, which allows separating vapor and liquid ows, as proposed in [17]. The
possibility of obtaining this eect by means of wire nets
is conrmed in the present paper.
5. Conclusions
The metallic wire mesh structures, considered as simple and cheap method to obtain porous coatings in pool
boiling, have been investigated both experimentally and
theoretically. The metallic wire nets coating provides a
lot of additional nucleation sites and additional capillary
pressure gradient for liquid inow into the region of an
intense evaporation in comparison to pool boiling on
clean surfaces. As a result
boiling commences at the wall superheats appreciably
lower than those on the smooth surface;
275
[20] W. Wu, J. Du, X. Hu, B. Wang, Pool boiling heat transfer and
simplied 1-D model for prediction on coated surfaces with
vapour channels, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer 45 (2002) 11171125.
[21] G.N. Danilova, A.V. Tikhonov, R113 boiling heat transfer
modelling on porous metallic matrix surfaces, International
Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 17 (1996) 4551.
[22] T.G. Theofanous, T.N. Dinh, J.P. Tu, A.T. Dinh, The boiling
crisis phenomenon. Part II: dryout dynamics and burnout,
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 26 (2002) 793810.
[23] D.A. Labuntsov, Physical fundamentals of power engineering.
Selected works on heat transfer, Hydro-dynamics and Thermodynamics, MPEI Publisher, Moscow, 2000.
[24] V.V. Yagov, Heat transfer with developed nucleate boiling of
liquids, Thermal Engineering 35 (2) (1988) 6570.
[25] V.V. Yagov, A physical model and calculation formula for CHF
with nucleate pool boiling of liquids, Thermal Engineering 35 (6)
(1988) 333339.
[26] V.V. Yagov, The mechanism of pool boiling crisis, Thermal
Engineering 50 (3) (2003) 175183.
[27] D.A. Labuntsov, V.V. Yagov, Mechanics of Two-Phase Media,
MPEI Publisher, Moscow, 2000.