Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
he pathologic features, clinical correlations and differential diagnoses of the major causes of kidney allograft dysfunction are
reviewed. Rejection is an inflammatory process of the recipient
during which donor cells bearing alloantigens are destroyed; the rejection
process is classified traditionally as hyperacute, acute or chronic. Hyperacute
rejection is caused by high titers of preformed antibodies to donor
endothelial cell antigens that lead to thrombosis in the renal vasculature and
ischemic death of the graft. Acute cellular rejection is primarily mediated by
contact-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The indicator lesions are interstitial
infiltrates composed predominantly of T-lymphocytes and tubuli tis, with or
without intimal arteritis. Acute humoral rejection is caused by donor-specific
HLA class I antibodies. The morphological features include complement 4d
positivity along the peri tubular capillaries, neutrophils in the peri tubular
and glomerular capillaries, micro thrombi in the rnicrovesscls and
transmural arteritis, with or without fibrinoid necrosis. Chronic rejection is
mediated by humoral and/or cellular alloimmune mechanisms and is
characterized morphologically by obliterative intimal fibrosis in the arteries,
double-contoured glomerular capillary loops and circumferentially
multiplied and split basement membrane in the peri tubular capillaries.
Chronic allograft nephropathy is the result of a series of alloimmune and
non-immune insults that cumulate and subsequently manifest in arterial
intimal fibroelastosis, focal-global glomerular sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis
and tubular atrophy. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity may cause acute toxic
tubulopathy and/or acute vascular toxicity or chronic hyaline artcriolopathy,
Prolonged warm or cold ischemia prior to transplantation leads to
posttransplant acute tubular necrosis. The indicator lesions are diffuse
tubular damage (loss of brush border, focal epithelial necrosis, desquamation
of cells into the tubular lumen, etc.,) and interstitial edema.
Introduction
The gold standard for the assessment of structural abnormalities in the
transplanted kidney is the morphological examination of a core-needle
biopsy specimen. The biopsy is performed at the time of a graft dysfunction,
when the etiology cannot be explored by clinical or non-invasive means, or
at predetermined intervals, in order to recognize subclinical rejection, to
identify drug toxicity or to determine the efficacy of new
immunosuppressive drugs. The standard evaluation procedure (at least two
cores whenever possible) involves light microscopic staining on serial
sections (H&E, PAS, trichrome and methenamine silver) and
immunostaining for complement (C) 4d.!-3The biopsy is regarded as
adequate if 1 0 or more glomeruli with at least 2 arteries can be investigated
by light microscopy (LM). For optimum interpretative power of the
histologic changes, comparison with a time-zero biopsy is
strongly advised.' Some pathologists also perform elastin staining, apply the
full immunofluorescence (IF) panel (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, Clq and fibrinogen)
and investigate the up regulation of tubular HLA- D R antigen,4.5 because
such stainings sometimes furnish additional diagnostic information. Tissue
sampling for electron microscopy (EM) is suggested if there is a clinical
suspicion of de novo or recurrent glomerular disease. The ultrastructural
examination of glomerular and peri tubular capillaries facilitates a more
definitive identification of glomerular and peri tubular capillary lesions of
chronic rejection, 6 but it is not routinely performed because of cost-benefit
concerns.
This survey discusses the pathologic features (summarized in Tables 1
and 2), clinical correlations and differential diagnoses of the major causes of
allograft dysfunction (for more details, see refs. 5 and 7). Chapter 38 in this
book is dedicated to the topic ofBK polyomavirus nephropathy.
c
';::
U)
o
o
Transplant Rejection
Rejection is an inflammatory response of the recipient during which
donor cells bearing antigens recognized as foreign (allogenic) are destroyed.
The targeted antigens are the HLA class I and II antigens, the non HLA
minor alloantigens and the ABO blood group antigens. The class I antigens
are expressed by all renal parenchymal cells, but most intensely by the
vascular endothelial cells. The class II antigens are displayed by capillary
endothelial cells," mesangial cells, proximal tubular epithelial cells and
interstitial dendritic cells. Interferon-y, produced by activated Tlymphocytes, enhances HLA antigen expression and particularly the
expression of class II antigens in the tubules. Two types of alloantigen
presentation exist. In the direct pathway, the CD8+ and CD4+ Tlymphocytes of the recipient recognize the allogenic molecules on the
surface of the antigen-presenting cells in the graft. The CD8+ cells then
differentiate into cytotoxic T-lymphocytes and cause the contact-dependent
killing of the target cells. The CD4 + T-cells differentiate into Thl effector
cells, which produce cyrokincs that induce a local delayed hypersensitivity
reaction and stimulate B-lymphocytes and CD8+ T-lymphocytes. In the
indirect pathway, the T-lymphocytes of the recipient recognize alloantigens
after they are presented by the recipient's own antigen-presenting cells. T hI
effector cells are generated and these mediate tissue injury via a local
delayed hypersensitivity reaction and B-cell rcsponses.v'"
Traditionally, three forms of rejection are distinguished: hyperacute,
acute and chronic. Acute rejection is subclassified into cell-mediated and
antibody-mediated types. Acute cellular rejection is primarily initiated by
direct allorecognition and chronic rejection by indirect allorecognition. The
pathology of rejection has an intrinsic focal nature.
Chronic Allograft Failure: Natural History, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management, edited by Nasimul Ahsan. 2008 Landes Bioscience.
5::
o
o
00
8
~
223
Table 1. Lesions of acute rejection, acute calcineurin inhibitor (CN/) nephrotoxicity and posttransplant acute tubular necrosis
(ATN)
Acute Rejection
ATN
Cellular
of brush border
Humoral
Tubulopathy
';::
Glomerular microthrombi
Neutrophils in peritubular capillaries
Ischemic tubular damage
Complement 4d localized along peritubular
capillaries
U)
Hyperacute Rejection
This is produced by high titers of preformed antibodies targeting
antigens on donor endothelial cells, such as blood group antigens or
HLA class I antigens. The antibodies initiate complement fixation,
platelet activation, the lysis of endothelial cells and activation of the
clotting system, with thrombosis, circulation blockage and ischemic
death of the grafted kidney. 11
Morphology
LM reveals swelling and lysis of the endothelial cells, denudation
of the basement membrane, margination of the neutrophils and
thrombi in the arteries, arterioles and glomeruli. The ncutrophils are
typically incorporated into the thrombi. The renal compartments
undergo ischemic injury. Within 1 day, cortical and medullary infarcts
develop. IF discloses strong staining for fibrin in the microvasculature
and often in the interstitium. IgM or IgG, C3
and C4d may be observed in the walls of the arteries and arterioles
and along the glomerular and peri tubular capillaries.
Clinical Correlation
Hyperacute rejection is extremely rare in consequence of the
regular screening for donor-specific antibodies prior to transplantation. However, certain cases fail to be identified for some reason 12 and
within minutes after the vascular anastornes have been established,
the implanted kidney becomes cyanotic, edematous and flaccid and
anuria develops. Hyperacute rejection is irreversible and the graft
must be removed.
Differential Diagnosis
Other conditions that can cause a primary graft failure are acute
tubular necrosis (ATN), perfusion injury and major arterial occlusion.
A common feature of all these is that IF reveals no immunoglobulin
deposits along the endothelial surfaces.
Table 2. Lesions of chronic rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CN/) nephrotoxicity and BK
polyoma virus nephropathy
Chronic Rejection
CAN
Intimal fibroelastosis in
the arteries
Hyaline
Double-contoured glomerular
capillaries
Transplant capillaropathy
No change or subendothelial
hyalinosis in the arterioles
Nonspecific segmental or
global glomerular sclerosis
Cytopathic changes
Nonspecific segmental or
global glomerular sclerosis
Cytolytic changes
5::
o
o
00
arteriolopathy
Absent elastosis
Transplant glomerulopathy
Interstitial inflammatory
infiltrates
224
Morphology
The rejection process affects the interstitium, tubules, glomeruli and
arteries, in varying combinations and with varying degrees of involvement. Three patterns are distinguished: tubulointcrstitial, vascular and
glomerular.
Clinical Correlation
Acute cellular rejection is the most common cause of a graft dysfunction in the first 3 months after transplantation. However, it may
develop even yeats later. The cardinal sign is a sudden asymptomatic
increase (> 20%) in the serum creatinine level. With current immunosuppression regimens, symptoms such as pain, fever or oliguria ate
rate. Conventional tubulointerstitial rejection responds well to highdose intravenous corticosteroid therapy. In contrast, the B-cell-rich or
plasma cell-rich subtypes ate usually steroid-resistanc."'"!" Vascular
rejection can be reversed with anti-lymphocyte antibody preparations.
Refractory cases have a poor outcome. A rate complication of acute
cellular rejection is spontaneous rupture of the kidney allograft. 19
';::
U)
o
o
Differential Diagnosis
Acute tubulointerstitial rejection must be differentiated from BK
polyoma virus nephropathy (rejection: lack of nuclear inclusion bodies
in the tubular epithelial cells), acute bacterial tubulointerstitial
nephritis (rejection: lymphocytic, but not neurroph il ic" rubulitis),
drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (rejection: intense tubular
HLA-DR staining) and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease
(rejection: predominance of T-Iymphocytes, not B-Iymphocytes).
Intimal arteritis is pathognomic of acute cellular rejection. Transplant
glomerulitis must be distinguished from recurrent or de novo
proliferative glomerulonephritis. In the latter conditions, IF demonstrates glomerular immune deposits.
Morphology
Figure 1. Acute cellular tubulointerstitial rejection. Lymphocytes
infiltrate the interstitium (IS) and tubules. The latter phenomenon is
termed tubulitis (asterisk). PAS staining.
5::
o
o
00
8
~
225
Morphology
c
';::
U)
o
o
Clinical Correlation
Acute antibody-mediated rejection is a relatively infrequent condition
Differential Diagnosis
Figure 4. Chronic allograft nephropathy. At the asterisk, the interstitium displays fibrosis (blue) and the tubules lack segment-specific
features indicating atrophy. G-glomerulus. Trichrome staining.
00
8
~
5::
o
o
226
Differential Diagnosis
The main conditions to be differentiated are chronic CNI nephrotoxicity, de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis and BK polyomavirus
nephropathy. Hyaline arteriolopathy indicates CNI nephrotoxicity.
Glomerulonephritis can be readily detected if the full immunohistochemical panel is used and embedding for EM is carried out. Nuclear
inclusion bodies in the tubular cells, tubular epithelial injury, a varying
degree of interstitial inflammation and tubular atrophy suggest polyomavirus nephropathy. Ancillary techniques, such as immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections with antibody to the SV 40 large T-antigen
or electron microscopy of infected tubular epithelial cells (virions 40
nm in diameter, often arranged in paracrystalloid arrays), confirm the
diagnosis of polyomavirus nephropathy.
Figure 6. Chronic rejection, transplant glomerulopathy. Doublecontoured capillary loops (arrowheads). Silver impregnation.
c
';::
U)
o
o
Acute Nephrotoxicity
This may appear as functional toxicity, a delayed recovery from
post-transplant ATN, toxic tubulopathy or vascular toxicity.s.7.3o
Toxic Tubulopathy
Figure 7. Chronic rejection, transplant capillaropathy. Electron
microscopy reveals the multiplied and split basement membrane of
the peritubular capillary profile (asterisk). L -I urncn, E-endothelial
layer.
Clinical Correlation
Chronic rejection/CAN is the major cause of graft loss after 1 year.
It is manifested by an insidious, progressive decline in the glomerular
filtration rate, frequently accompanied by proteinuria (often in the
nephrotic range) and hypertension.
5::
o
Morphology
00
Clinical Correlation
Differential Diagnosis
The features of this tubulopathy are indistinguishable from those of
radiocontrast nephrotoxicity or osmotic nephrosis, conditions to be
considered while making the diagnosis.
Vascular Toxicity
CNIs may have a direct toxic effect on endothelial cells, with or
without platelet aggregation. Two types of toxicity have been
identified: acute arteriolopathy and TMA.
References
Acute
1. Arteriolopathy
Solez K, Axelsen
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Clinical Correlation
Chronic CNI nephrotoxicity occurs several months after transplantation; the incidence increases with time. There is a slow, insidious rise
in the serum creatinine level. Some patients have an elevated serum
level of cyclosporine or tacrolimus. The kidney damage is irreversible.
The appropriate management is a dose reduction or discontinuation of
cyclosporine or tacrolimus, with the administration of an alternative
immunosuppressive agent.
227
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
';::
U)
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Morphology
The features include dilation and flattening of the tubular profiles,
the loss of brush borders, individual necrosis of the tubular epithelial
cells, cytoplasmic basophilia and enlarged regenerative nuclei. The
desquamation of tubular epithelial cells into the tubular lumen may be
observed. The tubular changes are accompanied by interstitial edema
and sparse lymphocytic/mononuclear infiltrates, without tubulitis."
Clinical Correlation
The condition is a common complication of cadaveric renal transplantation. It manifests as oligoanuria in the immediate postoperative
period, which resolves spontaneously over days and sometimes weeks.
The recipients are maintained on dialysis until the urine output has
been restored and the renal function has been recovered. Because of
potential exaggeration of the ischemic tubular damage, CNIs are
introduced only when the allograft function has been established.
Differential Diagnosis
A renal biopsy is often necessary to differentiate from acute rejection. In ATN, tubular damage and interstitial edema are the leading
features; marked interstitial inflammation, tubuli tis or intimal arteritis
indicates rejection.
5::
o
o
00
8
~