Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thoug~t
IN CO N GRESS.
s:
Id-?
~
f...;4.IP/.
N-..,- + J'./
~,#:..,/._
JULY 4.
'770.
GEORGE
SAND
NEWS
"Not Logical, Consistent, or Comprehensible"
p. 3
Redondo Beach
ARTICLES
Shelley - In Defense of Freedom - Ellen Mardan
FEATURED COLUMNISTS
Tangled Consequences - Ignatz Sahula-Dycke
16
17
18
REGULAR FEATURES
Editorial - Jon G. Murray
Editor-in-Chief
Madalyn Murray O'Hair
Managing Editor
Jon G. Murray
Artist
Felix Santana
Poetry
Angeline Bennett
Robin Eileen Murray-O'Hair
Staff
Production
Ralph Shirley
Richard Smith
Gerald Tholen
Gloria Tholen
Non-Resident Staff
Ignatz Sahula-Dycke
Fred Woodworth
12
. . . ,'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Austin, Texas
17
Help
carry
the ball
$UPPORT
AMERICAN ATHEI$M
Page 1
EDITORIAL
Page 2
Austin,
Texas
Meanwhile, in the case of Nottelson v.Smith Steel workers, decided on February 27th, 1981 there was a development
It was simply a license for insanity, only that and nothing rnore. Yet, it was
which could be destructive of unions.
solemnly reported in the news media as a decision of the United States Supreme
The collective bargaining agreement
Court. You can judge for yourself. Our Washington, D. C. Director, Noel Scott,
between an employer and the union conwent to the Supreme Court and obtained a full text of the opinion and sent it to
tained a union security clause requiring
the American Atheist Center. In relevant part, it follows.
membership in the union as a condition
Thomas v. Review Board, Indiana Employment Security Division
of
work. A member of the Seventh-Day
Argued October 7,1980 - Decided April 6, 1981
Adventist, Church, which teaches that it is
Eddie C. Thomas, a Jehovah's Witness, was initially hired to work in his em:
morally- wrong to be a member of or pay
pioyer's roll foundry, which fabricated sheet steel for a variety of industrial uses.
dues to a labor organization, requested
On his application form, he listed his membership in the Jehovah's Witnesses,
and noted that his hobbies were Bible study and Bible readinq. However, he plac-. that the union accommodate his religious
objection to the payment of union dues
.ed no conditions on his employment; '"
by permitting him to pay an equivalent
Approximately' a year later, the roll foundry closed and (he was) transferred
sum to a charity and NOT be a member
to a department that fabricated turrets for military tanks. On his first day at this
of the union. The union refused the re'new job, Thomas realized that the work he was doing was weapons related. He
quested
accommodation and demanded
'checked the bulletin board ... discovered that all of the remaining departments
that the employer discharge the employee
. .. were engaged directly in the production of weapons .... He quit, asserting'
in accordance with the collective bargainthat he could not work on weapons without violating the principles of his reliing agreement. The employer did so.
gion. . .. He applied for unemployment compensation benefits under the InThe employee filed a discrimination
diana Employment Security Act. (The Board found that he) did quit due to his
complaint "because of religion."
religious convictions, but that this termination was not based upon a "good
.ln question was t701 (j) of Title VII of
cause arising in connection with his work," as required by the Indiana unern-.
the Civil Rights Act which requires that
ployment , .. statute. Accordingly he was not entitled to benefits.
there must be "reasonable accommoda[Through appeals, the case then came to the United States Supreme Court.]
tion" of "religious belief" if this does not
Only beliefs rooted in religion are protected by the Free Exercise Clause, [of
create "undue hardship" onthe employthe First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States] which, by its
er.
terms, gives sp,.ecial protection to the exercise of religion. Sherbert v. Verner,
The court held that this clause does
374 U.S. 398 (1963); Wisconsin v. Yoder 406 U.S. 205 (1971). The determinanot protect the interest of religionists,
tion of what is a "religious" belief or practice is more often than not a difficult
over non-religionists, it does not foster a
and delicate task, as the division in the Indiana Supreme Court attests. See, e.g.,
governmental entanglement and that it
Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961); United States v. Ballard, 332 U.S. 78
has a secular purpose in accommodating
(1944). However, the resolution of 'that question is not to turn upon a judicial
religious persons. _
perception of the particular belief or practice in question; -"eligiousbeliefs need
Without a "religious belief" as motivanot be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to '
tion, no other person could make the
merit First Amendment protection. [Italics added. - ed.]
same request to avoid payment of dues to
... another Jehovah's Witness had no scruples about working on tank turrets;
the union; "religion" was essential..
.. , Intrafaith differences of that kind are not uncommon among followers of a
This is the .sinqle best ','union busting"
particular creed, ... and the guarantee of free exercise is not limited to beliefs
technique introduced in ages..
which are shared by all of the, members of a reliqious sect.
Judge Pell dissented, noting that: In
Accordi ngly, Thomas is entitled to receive benefits, ..
imposing upon employers and sometimes
Justice Rehnquist dissented: ... the Court today reads the Free Exercise
on unions, the necessity of reasonably
Clause more broadly than is warranted ... Where, as here, a State has enacted a
accommodating the diverse practices of
general statute, the purpose and effect of which is to advance the State's secular
the many different religions extant in this
goals, the Free Exercise Clause does not in my view require the State to conform
country, government entanglement with
that statute to the dictates oheligious conscience of any group ... today's dereligion cannot be avoided. Therefore,
cision requires a State to provide direct financial assistance to persons solely on
, t701 (j) is unconstitutional.
the basis of their religious beliefs.
"NOT
LOGICAL,
CONSISTENT
OR COMPREHENSIBLE"
r".
The news is chosen to demonstrate, month after month, the dead reactionary hand of religion. It dictates 'your habits, sexual
conduct, family size. It censures cinema, theater, television, even education. It dictates life values andtifestvles. Religion is politics and, always, the most authoritarian and reactionary' politics. We editorialize our news to emphasize this thesis: Unlike any
other magaz!n~ or ne_wsp~~erin the, UnitedStates, we say so.
Austin, Texas
Page 3
do
don
0e
l'
sU\
h\
8''''
seae
~
'.
will
thai
,ent
obIS
'or
U
Page 4
Prairial
(June)
11981
Austin,
Texas
SHELLEY
IN DEFENSE OF FREEDOM
[The following is the text of an address
delivered by Ellen Mardan, San Diego Chapter Director, on the occasion of the First
Annual California State American Atheist
Convention in Solvang, California, on September 14, 1980.]
When John Edwards and I talked about what we could
use for the program here (Solvang) I mentioned that I
was hoping to get Shelley's Necessity of Atheism
printed so everyone could have a copy. John said that he
didn't know that Shelley had written such a piece and
that many others probably were unfamiliar with it;
would I like to give a speech about Shelley for my part of
the program. I said. "There is nothing I would rather do
than talk about Shelleyl"
We can't talk about Shelley without discussing the
people who made up his background. Let's start with
Mary Wollstonecraft.
How many of you recognize the
name Mary Wollstonecraft? For those who don't, Mary
Wollstonecraft
is the first woman to publish a demand
for the emancipation of women.
In 1792. the year in which Shelley was born, she
published A Vindication of the Rights of Women. In it
she asked that women be granted equal education and
access to the professions. She said that the relationshp
between men and women should be a rational fellowship instead of slavish obedience.
With her fame as the author of A Vindication of the
Rights of Women. she gained access to a London
literary. radical group which included Thomas Paine.
who is said to be the first man to advocate justice for
women and Negroes.
If you are as ardent a fan of Tom Paine as I am you
have read The Rights of Women as well as The Rights of
Man.
In thatsame literary group was William Godwin. How
many of you recognize his name? He had been a
nonconformist preacher. as his father had been. Early iA
life he read Rousseau, the French materialists. Helvetius, and Holbach, who wrote the Atheistic Systeme de
la Nature. Through that influence Godwin lost his faith
in his religion. left the ministry and became an Atheist.
He wrote novels. newspaper articles. political pamphlets, etc. In 1793 he published his most famous and
important work. An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice.
This Enquiry was based on the philosophy of Locke
and Hume and was a reply to Burke's attack on the
French Revolution. as Tom Paine's Rights of Man was
written to answer Burke's attack.
Godwin's Enquiry became so famous that poor workmen clubbed together to buy copies of it.
by ELLEN MARDAN
Austin, Texas
!I
Pege6
Deism made a strong but short-lived appeal to Shelley. The god of deism did not satisfy his logical mind. The
notion of a deity who created the universe and then
retired. helpless and impotent. did not make sense. He
. wrote in one letter: "I will say that my rejection of
revealed religion (Christianity) proceeds from my perfect conviction of its insufficiency to the happiness of
man - to this course I can trace murder. war. intolerance. I was was an enthusiastic deist. but never a
Christian."
Because of his disbelief he was persecuted at home.
He lost his first love. his cousin. Harriet Grove. over his
difference in religion. His mother lamented that her son
was an eccentric.
In 1B1O. Shelley's father enrolled him in University
College. Oxford. where he looked forward to a freer.
happier life as a student.
He immediately met another student. Thomas Jefferson Hogg, with whom he formed a close friendship.
. The two spent their time together to the exclusion of
other students. They collaborated in writing a pamphlet
The Necessity of Atheism."
Shelley sent copies to bishops. archbishops. and
professors. These authorities traced authorship to Shelley and Hogg. In the trial which followed neither would
claim the pamphlet. so both were expelled March 25.
1B11.
In August. 1811. Shelley eloped with and married
Harriet Westbrook. a striking beauty. daughter of a wine
merchant. and a school friend of his sisters.
Page 8
Austin, Texas
Austin, Texas
Page 7
The other argument, whieh is founded on a man's dietory qualities. From this hypothesis we invent this
knowledge of his own existence, stands thus. A man general name, to conceal our ignorance of causes and
knows not only that he now is, butthatoncehewas
not; essences. The being called god by no means answers
consequently there must have been a cause. But our with the conditions prescribed by Newton; it bears every ,
idea of causation is alone derivable from the constant
mark of a veil woven by philosophical conceit, to hide
conjunction of objects and the consequent inference of .' the ignorance of philosophers even from themselves.
one from the other; and, reasoning experimentally, we They borrow the threads of its texture from the anthropocan only infer from effects causes exactly adequate to morphism of the vulgar. Words have been used by
those effects. But there certainly is a generative power sophists for the same purposes, from the occult qual iwhich is effected by certain instruments: we cannot ties of the peripatetics to the effluvium of Boyle and the '
prove that it is inherent in these instruments; nor is the crinities or nebulae of Herschel. God is represented as
contrary hypothesis capable of demonstration: we ad- . infinite, eternal, incomprehensible;
he is contained
mit that the generative power is incomprehensible; but under every predicate in non that the logic of ignorance
to suppose that the same effect is produced by an .could fabricate. Even his worshippers allow that it is
eternal, omnisicient, omnipotent being leaves the cause impossible to form any idea of him: they exclaim with
in the same obscurity, but renders it more incompre-the
French poet,
hensible.
Pour dire ce qu'it est, if faut etre lui-meme.
3d, Testimony. It is required that testimony should
Lord Bacon says that Atheism leaves to man reason,
not be contrary to reason. The testimony that the deitY
philosophy, natural piety, laws, reputation, and everyconvinces the senses of men of his existence can only
thing that can serve to conduct him to virtue; but
be admitted by us, if our mind considers it less probable
superstition destroys all these, and erects itself into a
that these men should have been deceived than that the
tyranny over the understandings of men: hence Athedeity should have' appeared to them. Our reason can' ism never disturbs the government, but renders man
never admit the testimony of men, who not only declare
more clear-sighted, since he sees nothing beyond the
that they were eye-witnesses of miracles, but that the
boundaries of the present life.-Bacon's
Moral Essays.
deity was irrational; for he commanded that he should
[Beginning here, and to the paragraph ending with
be believed, he proposed the highest rewards for faith,
"Systeme de la Nature," Shelley wrote in French. A free
eternal punishments for disbelief. We can only comtranslation has been substituted]
Page 8
Austin, Texas
Austin, Texas
Page-9
iri_vt!1~rblitin
Page 10
formamque quaerere imbecillitatis humanae reor. Quisquis est Deus (si modo est alius) et quacunque in parte,
totus est sensus, totus est visus, totus auditus, totus
animae, totus animi, totus sui .... Imperfectae vero in
homine naturae praecipua solatia ne deum quidem
posse omnia. Namque nee sibi potest mortem consciscere, si velit. quod homini dedit optimum in tantis
vitae poenis; nee mortales aeternitate donare, aut
revocare defunctos; nee facere ut qui vixit non vixerit,
qui honores gessit non gesserit, nullumque habere in
,praeteritum ius praeterquam oblivionis, atque (ut facetis quoque argumentis societas haec cum deo copuletur) ut bis dena viginti non sint., et multa similiter
efficere non posse.-Per quaedeclaratur haud dubie
naturae potentiam id quoque esse quod Deum vocamus.-Plin. Nat. His. cap. de Deo.
The consistent Newtonian is necessarily an Atheist.
See Sir W. Drummond's Academical Questions. chap.
iii.-Sir W. seems to consider the Atheism to which it
leads as a sufficient presumption of the falsehood of the
system of gravitation; but surely it is more consistent
with the good faith of philosophy to admit a deduction
from facts than an hypothesis incapable of: proof.
although it might militate with the obstinate preconceptions of the mob. Had this author. instead of
inveighing against the guilt and absurdity of Atheism.
demonstrated its falsehood. his conduct would have
been more suited to the modesty of the skeptic and the
toleration of the philosopher.
Austin. Texas
The Evangelist
Austin, Texas
1/
Page 11
,.~~
~~~
l!~l:-r:~="=~:"I':~="=~:"I':~=,,=~::or=~="=~=-r='II~=~=-r='II~=~::"I'
{~~
-;j~
~~~~~~~~!!.~
.
,.~
-.-.-.~~
~ ~~~
BERTRAND RUSSELL
0 N YOUTHFUL CYNICISM
Page 12.
Austin, Texas
Austin, Texas
Page 13
I"
PJ>oema
~~~----------
FRAGILE M~N
A SAVIOR
Fragile, fragile man,
A mere word shatters him,
A mere look crushes his soul.
Break not, break not, man!
As a delicate one,
A figure seeming sound,
Which breaks at a mere glance,
So all is broken.
If the bugle sounds
To start the reconstruction,
What can be done at all,
But to shed hot tears?
Page 14
Austin, Texas
NATURE'S WAY
GERALD THOLEN
"THE HANDWRITING
,-
ON THE WALL"
AustiR, Texas
v>
Page 16
ON OUR WAY
TANGL.ED CONSEQUENCES
Way back in the early twenties
when the post-war ideas of the
century's new generations were
being shaped by Watson, and his
interpretation of Pavlov Behaviorism, and young Dewey's developing Darwinian
Neo-pragmatism,
the heated clash between the emerging permissiveness and theism's
traditional outlook produced an
atmosphere which, taken at face
value, modified
mass thinking
throughout the rest of the century's initial half. The educational
contingent tried, in self-defense,
but too late, to point out how its
particular thinking, if followed,
could well placate the intellectual
revolt that already, well before the
thirties, threatened to revolutionize
established beliefs and comportment. .
All this was happening to some
extent accelerated by the people's
existing disapproval of Prohibition.
Resentment of the Volstead Act
signified how strong was the country's desire to be rid of the cares
that burdened everyone during the
war that ended in victory in 1918.
In our rejoicing over having "won
the war for democracy" we completely ignored whatever sympathy
we still retained for the common
people of our defeated opponents .'
. The indemnities we demanded from
them reflected how poorly the
"Christien ethic" penetrated the
armor of our ethos, not to mention
how shamefully and hypocritically
that ethic had been serving us.
Our exorbitant demands produced
the worst inflationary
situation
Europe ever experienced, culminating here in the US in the "Great
Depression" of 1929.
None of these mistakes
and
blights fitted into the pigeonholes
in which such dire events are to be
filed and forgotten. These calamities against which so many people believed their god safeguarded
Plge 16
Austin, Texas
NATURE'S WAY
GERALD THOLEN
said press aide Barbara Pardue.
Arkansas became the first state
in the country to pass such a bill in.
both houses of the Legislature. An
opponent of the bill said similar
measures have failed in 14 others
states.
The creationism bill does not
require a given text book or class
lectureto present a balanced view.
But an entire class - biology,
anthropology,
chemistry or any
other dealing with the history of
man - would have to present
'balanced treatment to creationscience and evolutionscience.'
Once signed, the bill would be
effective in the fall of 1982.
Well, there you are, dear readers.
What direction will the education
of young Arkansans take now?
Will it be improved by the addition
of superstition into the public classrooms? Is it just coincidence that
Arkansas, the state where military
forces were required to support
equal educational .opportunities
for Black youngsters, is now trying
Austin, Texas
make-either
adamantly seeking
cure for ignorance now or quietly
allowing it to spread like cancer.
Dr. AI's medical practice is ultimately in more danger of having
the Jehova
Witnesses prohibit
blood tranfusions than he is in
getting them to accept them. He I
would have been burned for witchcraft at another time. Does 'he
think that such neurotic practices
have faded from humanity? Read
the newspapersJ You'll find ignorance just as prevalent today as .
ever. We even have a trembling
ghost-worshiper in the White House.
Page 17
THE FIFTH
~----.itCOMMANDMENT
Hello there, this is Madalyn Murray O'Hair. American
religious belief and to the promotion of tribal unity, one
Atheist, back to talk with you again.
biblical quotation is sufficient.
The fifth commandment is the subject of discussion
We see this in Deuteronomy, Chapter 13, verses 6 to
today, 'and I rely on the ideas and remarks of Joseph
11.
.
Lewis, recent American Atheist author, in his well6. If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy
researched volume titled The Ten Commandments.
son, or thy dauqhter, or thewife of thy bosom, or
This commandment, again usi'ng the Protestant verthy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice
sion since the Roman Catholic is found in the fourth
thee secretly, saying Let us go and serve other
commandment, is:gods
which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy
"Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days
fathers;"
may be long upon the land which the Lord thy
7. Namely, of the gods of the people which are
God giveth thee."
round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from
found in Exodus, Chapter 20, verse 12 and Deuterthee, from the one end of the earth even unto
onomy, Chapter 5, verse 16.
the other end of the earth.
Mr. Lewis points out that the fifth' commandment
I might interrupt here to note that once again in the
does riot say love thy father and mother, but rather it bible, Moses in interpreting god's rules, gives full and
says honor thy father andthv mother.
ample evidence that god knew there were other gods.
The provisions of this commandment bear a dose
Tris is a sy~tem. of polytheism and the claims of the
relationship to those of the second commandment in " JddClic-Christian religion that it established a system of
which the Hebrew deity threatens to punish "unto the
monotheism is entirely specious. Throughout the bible,
third and fourth generation" the children of those including the new testament, the repeated themes of
parents who "serve other gods" in violation of the
other gods is there. Indeed, the new testament speaks
injunction to "have no other gods before rne.',AThe constantly of the three gods of the 'trinity'. But to get
"honor" demanded in this commandment was the strict
back to this quote from Deuteronomy conformity of the child to the religion of the parent.
'God, through Moses, admonishes that if anY1Tlember
To the biblical Jew, the land upon which he lived and . of the tribe seeks to entice another member to serve one
from which he derived subsistence was the most pre- of these other gods something should follow. I read now
ciousthing in the world and could therefore only be a what Should follow, as a rule from god:
.
gift from the god he worshiped. To retainthis posses8. Thou shall not consent unto him, nor hearksion, nothing must be done to arouse the anger of this
en unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him,
jealous deity, and therefore children were warned to
neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou
honor their parents by imitating them in the observance
conceal him.
of what god called "my statutes and my command-9.
But thou shalt surelv kill him; thine hand
merits."
shall be first upon him to put him to death, and
The words "land which the Lord thy God giveth thee"
afterward the hand of ali the people.
had deep significance for the Hebrew because their land
10. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that
was the bindihg tie between them and their god. To be
he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee
removed form their homeland meant to be deserted by
away from the lord thy god,which brought thee
their god. The bible is replete with many such reout of the land of Egypt. from the house of
ferences of their concern lest some act should provoke
bondage.
the loss of this valuable bequest to them.
11. And all Isarel shall hear, and fear, and shall
It is' instructive that the lord god said in Leviticus,
do no more any such wickedness as this is
Chapter 19, verse 3:
among you.
"Ye shall fear every man his mother and his
The import of this quotation lies in the fact that
father, and keep my sabbaths: I am the Lord your
adhering to the belief in the god of the parents was the
God."
most important duty of the child. For merely trying to
There are constant close associations of the fear of entice someone away from that belief, the punishment
parents with the fear of god. To show that the honoring
should be death.
of one's parents meant conformity to the strict tribal
In Ephesians, Chapter 6, verses 1 to 3, we see this
Page 18.
Austin. Texas
..,
Austin, Texas
Page 19
I AUTHORIZE
A CHARGE OF S
PER MONTH FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE BELOW [or until expiration of cardl ON THIS CREDIT CARD BECAUSE I WANT TO
BE COUNTED AS ONE OF THE HELPING ATHEISTS, ONE WHO
CARES ENOUGH TO SEND THE VERY BEST: ....
MONEY.
(VISA or MASTERCHARGE
Only)
ITIIIIJ
DIIIillIIJ
Beginning Date:
~~arure---------------------Neme
~~-------------------------------City
State
Atheist
Blackwelder Realtv
22722 Foothill Boulevard
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
Los AnQeles. CA
Page 20
91 214
Austin,
Texas
SECOND ANNUAL
NATIONAL AMERICAN ATHEIST
SUMMER SOLSTICE PICNIC
(1981)
': .. I HAVE ALWAYS STRENflOOSL'I5VPPORT- "1 DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE CREED PRO Ef) THE RIGHT OF EVRY
MAN TO FESSED BY THE JEWISH CH(JRCH 8Y THE
HISOPINION, HOWEVER
~
OIFFER.. ROMAN
CHVRCH,BY THE
ENT THATOPINIONMIGHT
~
8E TO GREEK
CHVRCH, BY THE
MINE. HE WHO DENIES TO
ANOTHER TURKISH. CHURCH BY THE
THISRIGHT, MAKES A
PROTESTANT CHORe/( NOR
",
BYAN
SLAVOF
11;,
HIM- _'~
SELF TO ~
HIS PRESENT
YCHURCHTHAT
I
"
OF MYOWNMINDISMV
\"""':,,'
OWN CHURCH. ALL NAI))~1/~
TIONAL INST/TUTIONS
OFCHURCHE8,WHETH~
KNO~
~l
OPINIONBECAlJSE HE '
PRECLUDESHIMSLF
TIAN, OR TURKISH,
; G
00
~
~
()
'THER/OLE-MAKERS
HAVE UNDERTAKEN
>u.}
-fJ t:===============~
mlS DOCTRINE OFLOY-
KINDAND MONOPO'
rn LIZEPOWER AND PROFIT:'
r
'THOSE WHOPREACII
<: 1NG
THERE
AND
I i~
>'
fi ~
HAVEfJM-
'70LA~\~
NOTHING BUT'
5 Pr
~/ES,
'AIlE IN
'6ENERAL
THE GREATES
IGNORANCE. THEYMAKE PERSECUTORSANO THEY
TOHAVBEENTHREEf)A'ISACTCONSISTENTLYBY50
~lJIo\
THEIR
v.--~
EN-
-o
APPEAR,TOMENO
OTHERTHAN HU" , MAN INVENTIONS
'STUPTOTERRIFCI
-J
-=======~qS~CAR~"::J
cr
F-
ERJEWIS~CHRIS-
9J
~
==--=-_ -~
!~
-jiJ
~ =~
~~
:I_,~
l~~
~~
THREE
#16#13,EVE - DOINGj FOR THEDOCTRINE
rNGS ANfJ MORNINGS, IS HYPOCRITI(AL
BEFORE THERE WAS AND ITIS NATf/RAL
~
FROM
('1HEA6EPFKEA50N"
;:::=======::::::~
".....
'----
r===