Camel Tobacco Company targeted children with its Joe Camel cartoon mascot advertising campaign in the 1970s. Research showed Joe Camel was more popular among children than other cartoon characters like Mickey Mouse. Within 3 years of the campaign, Camel cigarettes became the choice of one-quarter to one-third of smokers under 18, increasing the brand's market share from children from 0.5% to 32.8%. While successful at increasing sales, the campaign led to more underage smokers and higher overall smoking rates, costing public health. Unethical marketing practices like targeting children can violate ethics standards and harm consumers.
Camel Tobacco Company targeted children with its Joe Camel cartoon mascot advertising campaign in the 1970s. Research showed Joe Camel was more popular among children than other cartoon characters like Mickey Mouse. Within 3 years of the campaign, Camel cigarettes became the choice of one-quarter to one-third of smokers under 18, increasing the brand's market share from children from 0.5% to 32.8%. While successful at increasing sales, the campaign led to more underage smokers and higher overall smoking rates, costing public health. Unethical marketing practices like targeting children can violate ethics standards and harm consumers.
Camel Tobacco Company targeted children with its Joe Camel cartoon mascot advertising campaign in the 1970s. Research showed Joe Camel was more popular among children than other cartoon characters like Mickey Mouse. Within 3 years of the campaign, Camel cigarettes became the choice of one-quarter to one-third of smokers under 18, increasing the brand's market share from children from 0.5% to 32.8%. While successful at increasing sales, the campaign led to more underage smokers and higher overall smoking rates, costing public health. Unethical marketing practices like targeting children can violate ethics standards and harm consumers.
Ethical marketing is a process through which companies generate customer
interest
in
products/services,
build
strong
customer
interest/relationships, and create value for all stakeholders by incorporating
social and environmental considerations in products and promotions (Financial Times Lexicon). In this essay I would like to illustrate how a company used unethical application of marketing its production on the case of targeting children. Children are more easily to be affected and are vulnerable to advertisements. There were many cases when tobacco and even some alcohol companies targeted children as future consumers. Tobacco and cancer are closely connected therefore tobacco products harm consumers health. I will explain it on the case of Camel Tobacco Company. In 1974 the Camel Tobacco Company introduced its advertisement campaign called Old Joe with cartoon mascot Joe Camel. However there are a lot of researches who proved that Camel cigarettes were targeted children because Joe Camel was more popular than Mickey Mouse or Flintstones among children. After 3 years of introducing Old Joe campaign the Camel brand has become the choice of one-quarter to one-third of smokers under the age of 18. It has been a successful strategy as sales from childrens cigarette market increased from 0.5 percent to 32.8 percent. This case shows that unethical marketing practice has been used. Many companies try to violate ethical standards. Marketers should be careful when advertising potentially harmful products or advertising to children. Nowadays in USA there is a Federal Trade Commission - an organization which controls whether certain advertisement is appropriate or not. Also there is an American Marketing Association Code of Ethics which includes ethical values like honesty, responsibility, fairness, respect, openness and citizenship and all these criteria should be followed by marketers. However advertisers and marketers find ways to overcome these standards. Advertising to children and harmful products are the most controversial ethical standards. Nowadays its prohibited to advertise cigarettes on television and radio. Joe Camel advertising campaign began on billboards
and promotional merchandise. Nowadays its prohibited to put tobacco ads
outdoor, on billboards or on and inside public transport. Even Camel ads were unethical they were very successful. Camel company could foresee the possible benefits because 2/3 smokers start smoking in their teen ages therefore targeting underage smokers will definitely increase sales. Moreover smokers show strong brand loyalty, so Camel increased its customer loyalty base because even after reaching 18 years those teens continued to smoke Camel cigarettes. Nevertheless this campaign led to increased number of teens smoking. Consequently, the overall rate of smoking people increased and lead to more health costs. In 1997 anti-smoking activists convinced that Joe Camel ads were intended to children auditory. However competitive tobacco company Marlboro has a bigger market share among underage smokers and consumers would have smoked anyway as there are different brands. The other type of unethical marketing of the companies is charging additional fees on the services, which are not directly presented in advertisements or marketing campaigns. Let us consider several popular types of such approach: a) Banks and credit card companies Credit card and bank fees have become both more common and more expensive in recent years, even as new regulations have sought to keep institutions from taking advantage of consumers. In fact, some of the newest and sneakiest charges are in direct response to government regulation. For instance, after rules were passed in 2010 limiting banks use of overdraft fees, banks responded by quietly increasing maintenance, wire transfer, and other fees and implementing new charges on services like mobile phone deposits. Banks have responded to consumer outrage in a similar fashion; after consumers revolted against Bank of Americas plan to introduce a $5 monthly charge for some debit card users (a plan other big banks intended to implement as well), the banks instead turned toATM surcharge increases to pad their bottom lines. The fees are bad, but even worse is the fact that many of the charges are not disclosed to consumers. According to a recent report from the Pew Charitable Trusts Safe Checking in the Electronic Age project, the ten biggest banks disclose an average of 49 fees on their websites but there are many fees that are hidden, most commonly
regarding account overdrafts. The report recommends that the new
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau require banks to offer customers a one-page fee disclose box, as credit card companies are now required to do. (Although it is an imperfect system, it's at least a start.) b) Cell phone companies. Cell phone companies have also been known to charge customers for servicesthat they do not yet offer and allow third-party companies to attach mystery costs to customers bills a practice called cramming that has cost consumers at least $2 billion since the 1990s, according to a 2011 investigation by the Senate Commerce Committee. An accompanying report concluded that often customers do not know these [third-party] services have been set up for them and mobile providers are reluctant to clarify the process because they make money from the extra charges. c) Airlines Hidden airline fees were always obnoxious, but airlines became much more flagrant about them after the recent financial crisis wreaked havoc on the industry. Fees for things like rebooking a flight have gone up, and its become more common not only to charge for checked bags but also for in-flight snacks. (As anyone whos flown in recent years knows, long gone are the days on in-flight meals, except on the longest excursions.) In conclusion marketing ethics is an important part of marketing as moral dilemmas may cause substantial problems for company. Business standards vary depending on the country therefore companies should adapt and foresee any dilemmas.