Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
[hide]
• 1 General overview
• 2 Technical details
o 5.1 Americas
o 5.3 Europe
• 6 See also
• 7 References
• 8 External links
[edit]General overview
MNP is implemented in different ways across the globe. The international and European standard is for a customer
wishing to port his/her number to contact the new provider (Recipient) who will then arrange necessary process with the
old provider (Donor). This is also known as 'Recipient-Led' porting. The UK is the only country to not implement a
Recipient-Led system, where a customer wishing to port his/her number is required to contact the Donor to obtain
a Porting Authorisation Code (PAC) which he/she then has to give to the Recipient. Once having received the PAC the
Recipient continues the port process by contacting the Donor. This form of porting is also known as 'Donor-Led' and has
been criticised by some industry analysts as being inefficient. It has also been observed that it may act as a customer
deterrent as well as allowing the Donor an opportunity of 'winning-back' the customer. This might lead to distortion of
competition, especially in the markets with new entrants that are yet to achieve scalability of operation.
[edit]Technical details
A significant technical aspect of MNP(Mobile Number Portability) is related to the routing of calls or mobile messages
(SMS, MMS) to a number once it has been ported. There are various flavours of call routing implementation across the
globe but the international and European best practice is via the use of a central database (CDB) of ported numbers.
Network operators generally hold local copies of CDB and query it to find out which network to send a call to. This is also
known as All Call Query (ACQ) and is highly efficient and scalable. Majority of the established and upcoming MNP
systems across the world are based on this ACQ/CDB method of call routing. One of the very few countries to not use
ACQ/CDB is the UK where calls to a number once it has been ported are still routed via the Donor network. This is also
known as 'Indirect Routing' and is highly inefficient as it is wasteful of transmission and switching capacity. Because of its
Donor dependent nature, Indirect Routing also means that if the Donor network develops a fault or goes out of business,
the customers who have ported out of that network will lose incoming calls to their numbers. The UK telecoms
regulator Ofcom completed its extended review of the UK MNP process on 29 November 2007 and mandated that
ACQ/CDB be implemented for mobile to mobile ported calls by no later than 1 September 2009, and for all other (fixed
and mobile) ported calls by no later than 31 December 2012. MNP is basically a facility to customers for the change of
network service used by them on their own mobile number (MSISDN). For example, if a customer is using AIRTEL India
Number and wants to switch to Vodafone Operator network, then using the MNP facility, the customer's number will be
same but then the customer will become the customer of Vodafone network.
In India the MNP is still in Implementation phase, not yet commercialized. The Switch, IN & STP engineers of all the
operators are working on it. As per the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) India this facility has to be available to
customers by 1 April 2010. Implementation of the MNP per MSC takes activity time of 10 to 15 working days in India. Prior
to March 2008 it took a minimum of 5 working days to port a number in the UK compared to 2 hours only in USA, as low
as 20 minutes in the Republic of Ireland, 3 minutes in Australia and even a matter of seconds inNew Zealand. On 17 July
2007, Ofcom released its conclusions from the review of UK MNP and mandated reduction of porting time to 2 working
days with effect from 1 April 2008. On 29 November 2007, Ofcom completed its consultation on further reduction to
porting time to 2 hours along with recipient led porting and mandated that near-instant (no more than 2 hours) recipient
In a decentralised model of MNP, a FNR (Flexible Number Register) may be used to manage a database of ported
Mobile Number Portability also impacts the internet telephony, or VOIP (Voice over IP) business. A voice call originated in
the VOIP environment which is routed to a mobile phone number of a traditional mobile carrier also face challenges to
VOIP is clearly identified as a Least Cost Routing (LCR) voice routing system, which is based on checking the destination
of each telephone call as it is made, and then sending the call via the network that will cost the customer the least. With
GSM number portability now in place, LCR providers can no longer rely on using the network root prefix to determine how
to route a call. Instead, they now need to know the actual current network of every number before routing the call.
Therefore, VOIP solutions also need to handle MNP when routing a voice call. In countries without a central database like
UK it might be necessary to query the GSM network about the home network a mobile phone number belongs to. As
VOIP starts to take off in the enterprise markets because of least cost routing options, it needs to provide a certain level of
assuring that the voice call will actually work, VOIP companies give businesses the necessary reliability they look for in an
internet telephony provider. Some messaging operators provide a Voice/Network Query service, which helps not only
traditional voice carriers but also VOIP providers to query the GSM network (HLR Lookup) to find out the home network of
a ported number.
In countries such as Singapore, the most recent Mobile Number Portability solution is expected to open the doors to new
business opportunities for non-traditional telecommunication service providers like wireless broadband providers and
Last but not least, in November 2008 the North American FCC (Federal Communications Commission) released an order
extending number portability obligations to interconnected VOIP providers and carriers that support VOIP providers.
Service providers and carriers who route messages and voice calls to MNP-enabled countries might use HLR query
services to find out the correct network of a mobile phone number. A number of such services exist, which query the
operator's home location register (HLR) over the SS7 signalling network in order to determine the current network of a
specified mobile phone number prior to attempted routing of messaging or voice traffic.
Implementation Time to
Country date port Price Short notes References
yyyy.mm.dd days
[1]
Brazil 2008.09.01 5 Free The plan started in March 2007
Dominican [2]
2009.09.30 3–10 80.00DOP
Republic
The user will assume the cost of the new sim card of
Peru 2010.01.01 7-9 Free the new mobile company that will cost around
15 PEN
[edit]Asia Pacific
Implementation Time to
Country date port Price Short notes References
yyyy.mm.dd days
Previously prefixes
04x1, 04x2, 04x3 referred toOptus
04x4, 04x5 and 04x6 referred toVodafone [4]
Australia 2001.09.25 1 Free
043x, referred to Vodafone Hutchinson
Australia formally known as Hutchinson Australia.
04x7, 04x8, 04x9 and 0410x referred to Telstra
India 2010.03.31 max 19INR circles: Kolkata, Tamil Nadu including Chennai,
Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh,
Malaysia 2008.08.29 25.00MYR The nationwide launch of the service in October 2008 [10]
Previous prefixes DiGi - 016, 014-32, 014-35, 014-
Can port numbers between 021, 027, 029 and the new
022 mobile networks. Customers can port between
prepay and post pay options. Mobile numbers are in
blocks associated with the service provider. Some [11][12]
New Zealand 2007.04.01 Free
mobile plans include credit minutes for calls within
the network, you may be charged unexpectedly for a
call to a mobile that has been ported form a different
network.
Pakistan 2007.03.26 Service handled by Telcordia Technologies
Singapore 2008.06.13 Vendor for database installation is Syniverse
Taiwan 2005.10.??
Thailand 2010.??.??
[edit]Europe
Implementation Time to
Country date port Price Short notes References
yyyy.mm.dd days
[13]
Czech Republic 2006.01.15
Estonia 2005.01.01
[16]
Finland 2003.07.25 Free Handled by the company Numpac
Heavily improved since May 2007 with a 10-days
France 2003.06.?? 10 maximum lead time (was taking 2 months in most
cases beforethen)
Italy 2002.01.15
Spain 2000.??.??
The largest operators formed independent company,
SNPAC AB, to procure central database (CRDB)
Sweden 2001.09.01 21 Free
solution. Implementation of CRDB is carried out by
Cap Gemini & Oracle.
Implementation Time to
Country date port Price Short notes References
yyyy.mm.dd days
Nigeria 2007.??.??
South Africa 2006.11.10 The three operators, Vodacom SA, MTN SA,
and Cell C, formed an independent company for the
implementation and management of the central
solution. After delays, the implementation of this
solution was awarded to local company Saab Grintek
teamed up with Telcordia Technologies.