Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UDK: 06.055.2:62-03+620.1+624.001.5(497.1)=861
GRAEVINSKI
DIMK
2014.
MATERIJALI I
KONSTRUKCIJE
GODINA
LVII
BUILDING
MATERIALS AND
STRUCTURES
ASOPIS
JOURNAL
ZA ISTRAIVANJA U OBLASTI
FOR
RESEARCH
MATERIJALA
OF M A T E R I A L S
AND
I KONSTRUKCIJA
STRUCTURES
B-B
B
M
A-A
GRAEVINSKI
MATERIJALI I
KONSTRUKCIJE
BUILDING
MTERILS AND
STRUCTURES
e-mail:folic@uns.ac.rs
Professor Mirjana Maleev, Deputy editor
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad,
Serbia
Fakultet tehnikih nauka, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Srbija
e-mail: miram@uns.ac.rs
Dr Vladimir Gocevski
Hydro-Quebec, Motreal, Canda
Dr. Habil. Miklos M. Ivanyi
UVATERV, Budapest, Hungary
Predrag Popovi
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Northbrook,
Illinois, USA.
Dr Ksenija Jankovi
Institute for Testing Materials, Belgrade, Serbia
PUBLISHER
Society for Materials and Structures Testing of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Kneza Milosa 9
Telephone: 381 11/3242-589; e-mail:dimk@ptt.rs, veb sajt: www.dimk.rs
REVIEWERS:
COVER:
Financial supports: Ministry of Scientific and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
GRAEVINSKI
MATERIJALI I
KONSTRUKCIJE
BUILDING
MTERILS AND
STRUCTURES
CONTENTS
Jan RAVINGER
Jan RAVINGER
STABILITY AND VIBRATION IN CIVIL
ENGINEERING
Original scientific paper ........................................
19
Branko MILOSAVLJEVI
MECHANICAL REBAR SPLICING
Professional paper...................................................
19
Ksenija JANKOVI
Dragan BOJOVI
Marko STOJANOVI
Ljiljana LONAR
RESISTANCE OF CEM III/B BASED MATERIALS
TO ACID ATTACK
Original scientific paper ..........................................
29
39
57
STABILNOST I VIBRACIJE U
GRAEVINARSTVU
Originalni nauni rad ..............................................
Branko MILOSAVLJEVI
MEHANIKO NASTAVLJANJE ARMATURE
Struni rad ................................................................
Ksenija JANKOVI
Dragan BOJOVI
Marko STOJANOVI
Ljiljana LONAR
OTPORNOST MATERIJALA NA BAZI
METALURKOG CEMENTA NA DEJSTVO
KISELINA
Originalni nauni rad ..............................................
29
Anina SARKIC
Milos JOKOVIC
Stanko BRCIC
METODE ANALIZE FLATERA U FREKVENTNOM
I VREMENSKOM DOMENU
Originalni nauni rad ..............................................
39
Anina SARKIC
Milos JOKOVIC
Stanko BRCIC
FREQUENCY- AND TIME-DOMAIN METHODS
RELATED TO FLUTTER INSTABILITY PROBLEM
Original scientific paper ..........................................
57
Jn RAVINGER
INTRODUCTION
q = [u ,v , w]T
(1)
w,2x
w
u,x
,xx
1 2
= v, y
z w, yy
+ w, y
u, y + v,x
2 w,x w, y w,xy
(2)
y,v
pz
px
x,u
py
z,w
q0 = [0 ,0 , w0 ]T
K G ( ) = f
(4)
x
= y = D ( 0 ) + w ,
1
2
( 0 )
F
.
b.t
w0 = 0 S x1 S y 1 ,
(6)
internal forces,
external forces,
where V is the volume of the slender web, is the inplane surface.
(5)
where
1
2
Ui =
defined as
(8)
w = xw , yw , w
(7)
w02, x
w
0 , xx
1 2
0 = w0 , y
z w0 , yy
2
2w w
2 w
0 , x 0 , y 0 ,xy
where
q = B .
(3)
1
E
1
D=
1 2
2x
u = 1 1
+ 2 S x 2C y 2 + 3 S x 2 ,
b
2y
v = 11
+ 2C x2 S y 2 + 3 S y 2 ,
b
iy
ix
where S xi = sin
, . . . C yi = cos
.
b
b
We have divided the variational parameters into:
- plate
D = ,
- in-plane S = [1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 ] .
T
S =
(
16 b
the
(Euler's
dimensionless
elastic
load
of
, 0 =
0
t
the
displacements
= E ( 0 )
as
function
Ui =
final equation
0.34125
02
+1 0 =
cr
(14)
(15)
1 T
. = ( 2 ).( 2 ) = 4
2
U
= ... = 3
i
u ,w 1
(13)
(9)
q = B .
(12)
=
, ( cr = 4 E ) and the dimensionless
4 E cr
parameters
)[ ,1,1 + , ,1,1 + ]
(
stress),
1
2
= u ,x + w,x 2 z .wxx 2
2 Et 2
E =
12 1 2 b 2
Introducing
critical
02
b
F
=
b.t
cr = 4.0 E
=0.3
0
=
0.34125 2 02 + 1
1
0 =
0
0.01
0.1
0.5
du du
f =
= u,x
dx dx
For the increments
of the function
(16)
d ( u + u )
du du du du
+
=
f =
dx
dx
dx
dx dx
f = f
=
d u
= u , x
dx
(17)
d ( w + w )
dw 1 d ( w + w )
f
=
dx
dx
dx 2
2
2
2
1 dw
1 dw
dw dw dw
.
+
=
+2
(19)
2 dx
2 dx
dx dx dx
f = f
1 dw
dw dw 1 dw
.
+
=
=
2 dx
dx dx
2 dx
1
= w,x .w,x + w,x 2
2
,x = u , x + w,x .w,x +
1
w, x 2 z .wxx
2
(20)
t1
t0
t0
(T U )dt + Wdt = 0
where T =
2 q
(22)
kinetic energy,
U = . + . dV
the
= D
1 2
dw 1 dw
f
=
= w,x
dx
2
dx
2
u = B S . S ,
w = BD . D ,
(23)
u = BS 1 . S (t ),
w = BD1 . D (t )
(24)
where
T
K M D = B D1
AB D1 dx is the mass matrix of
D
D
, =
S
S
the
incremental
K INC DL =
T
BD1
XX EIB D1 XX dx
K INC DG =
T
B D1
X EA
3 2 1 2
w,x w0 ,x B D1 X dx
2
2
the
the
T
T
f INT D = B D1XX
EI (w,xx w0 ,xx )dx + B D1X
EA( u ,x +
)dx
forces,
a
axial displacements,
a
T
K INC S = BSX
1 EABSX 1 dx
K
K M = M D
K
K INC = INC D
K INC SD
1
1
the
K INC DS
K INC S
f EXT D
f EXT D
f IND D
, f EXT =
f INT =
f EXT S
f EXT S
f INT S
f EXT =
Static behaviour
The inertial forces can be neglected for the solution
1 3
of 1the static
behaviour
of the structure
2
K M . 0
(27)
(28)
f INT f EXT = 0
T
It can be proved that
K INC SD = K INC
DS
incremental axial bending stiffness matrix,
,
K M S
1 2
w,x u ,x w0 ,x u ,x + w,x
2
2
2
f EXT D = BTD1 p D dx
(26)
where
(25)
(29)
forces, f EXT S =
BST1 pS dx
valid that
f INT f EXT = 0
(30)
= K INC f EXT
(31)
D i = D + D
(32)
D = K INC
r i = f INT f EXT
(33)
= K INC .r
The new
parameters is
approximation
of
the
(34)
displacement
i +1 = i + i
(35)
n =
( i + 1 )T . i + 1 ( i )T . i
(
i +1 T
) .
0.001,( 0.0001 )
(36)
K INC = J
(37)
J ij
*
K Gnel
ij
i
(38)
*
where K Gnel is the system of non-linear (in our case
cubic) algebraic equations.
> 0 , Dk > 0 .
(39)
D = K INC
det
=0
(40)
f EXT = 0
(41)
K M + K INC = 0
(42)
= sin( t )
(43)
K INC 2 K M
det
=0.
(45)
w = 1 sin
, w0 = 0 sin
2x 2
, u = x , sin
l 3
l
l
2 =
F 2 2
2 1 02 , 3 =
12 02
EA l
8l
u = [x , sin( 2x / l )][. 2 , 3 ]T
F
2 EI
F = 1 0 , where F =
is
, FEU = 2
1
FEU
l
K INC =
4 EI l
l4
2 l
l2 2
K INC =
2 = 02 .(1 F )
where
2 l
l2 2
2 = 02 . 1 F +
4 EI
is the square of the circular
=
Al 4
(46)
F + EA
4 l 12
l4 2 2
where r =
I
A
(47)
E,A,I,
1 12
2 r2
w0
z,w
l4
02
4 EI l
w0
N=-F
z,w
x
E,A,I,
F/F
F/F
1.0
1.0
0.1
0.5
B
w0/r=0.
1
w0/r=1.
0.5
wc
STATIC
VIBRATION
N=-F
A
0
0.5
5.0
A
B
w0/r=0.
5
w0/r=1.
(/0
wc/r
10.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
F/Fcr
F/Fcr
1.0
1.0
F
w0=0.01 w01+0.1
w02
0.5
0.5
wd
1
w01
STATIC
0
5.0
w0=0.05 w01+0.5
VIBRATION
w02
(/0)2
wd/r
10.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Figure 6. Stability and vibration of imperfect column with the initial displacement as the second mode of buckling
10
Side view
Screw
Ball
bearing
Manometer
Tested beam
Top view
Tested beam
l
* 0.015
K M = A + 2 * 0.06 * sin
2
l
where the length of the beam is given in meters.
11
F/Fcr
F/Fcr
1.0
1.0
Jckl
0.5
Jckl
0.5
(/0)2
wc/r
0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
Figure 10. Results from measurements of the steel hollow thin-walled section Jckl
Timber beams
Timber beam
47 / 47 mm , A = 2209 mm
, I = 406640 mm
, r = 13 . 57 mm , l = 2040 mm
Timber beam
42 / 32 mm , A = 1344 mm
, I = 114888 mm
, r = 9 . 24 mm , l = 1650 mm
F/Fcr
F/Fcr
1.0
1.0
Timber
0.5
Timber
47/47
42/32
Timber
47/47
Timber
42/32
0.5
wc/r
0
5.0
10.0
(/0)2
0
0.5
1.0
12
,x = E .( ,x 0 ,x ) + w
The residual stresses produce the addition in the
increment of the potential energy
F/Fcr
1.0
w0 = 0.0433
0.8
w0 = 0.173
w 0 = 0 . 433
0.4
0.3
0.6
Fcr=14.54*106 N
E=20 GPa, =2500 kg/m3
w
w0 = 0
r
9.0 m
6.0
0.4
0.3
wc/r
0
0.4
0.8
1.0
1.4
Figure 12. Load versus displacement for different values of initial displacements
F/Fcr
1.0
w 0 = 0 . 0433
0.8
w 0 = 0 . 173
w 0 = 0 . 433
STATIC
w
w0 =
0.4
Mode of buckling
Fcr=14.54*106 N
Modes of vibration
F*= F/ Fcr
F*=0, 201=4567 s-2
F*=0, 202=15170 s-2
F*=0.6, 2=3121.3 s-2
F*=0.95, 2=520.5 s-2
w0
r
VIBRATION
Fcr=14.54*106 N
012=4567 s-2
(/0)2
0
0.4
0.8
1.0
13
2 = 02 .(1 + K (3 2 02 ))
(49)
V
0A
where 02 =
4 Et 2
is the square of the circular
3b 4 1 2
0
A
A
wdA = 0 , z. wdA = 0
A
... . w dV = 0
(48)
V
t / 2
t / 2
u = S x 2 .C y 2 . 2 + S x 2 . 3 ,
v = Cx 2 .S y 2 . 2 + S y 2 . 3
2 = 02 . 1 +
21 12 9 2 2 3 1 2 2
0 (50)
8
8
2 = 02 .(1 xw yw + K (3 2 02 ))
where
xw =
xw
, yw = yw
cr
cr
(51)
fy
wy
fy
Figure 14. The distribution of the residual stresses in the slender web
14
Figure 15. General view of experimental arrangement for the test of thin-walled panel
wc
Thickness
C
p0
t = 3.49 mm
Flanges 60/8
p0
p
p= 0
pCR
p=
3
p0
pCR
1.0
Theory
1.0
Experimen
0.5
0.5
=
0
0.5
1.0
wc
h
0
0
0.5
1.0
Figure 16. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results for the panel with t=3.49 mm thick web
15
t = 2.505 mm
p=
cr = 65.95 Nmm-2
p0
pCR
0 = 861.5s-1 w* = 0.38
p=
2.0
2.0
Theory
1.0
p0
pCR
Experimen
2
1
1.0
=
0
1.0
wc
h
2.0
1.0
2.0
Figure 17. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results for the panel with t=2.505 mm thick web
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Local vibration
Multi-storey frame
Figure 18. Scheme for non-destructive investigation of structure properties
16
5
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
REFERENCES
Baant, Z. P. Cedolin, L.: Stability of Structures:
Elastic, Inelastic, Fracture and Damage Theories.
Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 1991.
Bolotin, V. V.: The Dynamic Stability of Elastic
System. CITL. Moscow, 1956 (In Russian. English
translation by Holden Day. San Francisco, 1994.)
Burgreen, D.: Free Vibration of Pined Column with
Constant Distance Between Pin-ends. J. Appl.
Mechan., 18, 1951. 135-139.
Ravinger, J.: Vibration of an Imperfect Thin-walled
Panel. Part 1 : Theory and Illustrative Examples.
Part 2: Numerical Results and Experiment. ThinWalled Structures, 19, 1994, 1-36.
[5]
[6]
[7]
SUMMARY
REZIME
Jan REVINGER
Jan REVINGER
17
18
Branko MILOSAVLJEVI
UVOD
INTRODUCTION
19
20
21
22
23
B-B
B
M
a)
A-A
b)
Slika 8. Veza preko zavrtanja i mehanike spojnice
Figure 8. Bolt-Rebar Coupler Connection
Mogunost primene mehanikih spojnica u okviru
smiuih konektora sa elinim zavrtnjem relativno je
slabo istraena, pogotovu za zavrtnjeve veih vrstoa.
Kod veze sa AB stubovima uobiajenih dimenzija, u
zgradarstvu se javlja i problem pojave loma betona usled
blizine ivice. Primena mehanikih spojnica kao
elemenata smiuih konektora predstavlja predmet
istraivanja u okviru ireg programa istraivanja
smiuih veza u spregnutim konstrukcijama na
Graevinskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu.
24
Spojnica
Coupler
ipka
Rebar
Gauge length
LVDT
Merna baza
2D 5D
a)
b)
Slika 9. Ispitivanje mehanikih spojnica ANCON [3]
Figure 9. Mechanical couplers testing ANCON [3]
25
ZAKLJUAK
26
CONCLUSION
6
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
LITERATURA
REFERENCES
Brungraber G. R. Long-Term Performance of
Epoxy-Bonded Rebar-Couplers. PhD thesis.
University of California, San Diego 2009
EN1992-1-1: Eurocode 2 - Design of concrete
structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for
buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee
for Standardization (CEN); 2004.
Fallon J. Testing of reinforcing bar couplers.
CONCRETE, April 2005; 24-25
ISO 15835-1:2009(E). Steels for the reinforcement
of concrete - Reinforcement couplers for
mechanical splices of bars. Part 1: Requirements
ISO 15835-2:2009(E). Steels for the reinforcement
of concrete - Reinforcement couplers for
mechanical splices of bars. Part 2: Test methods
[6]
[7]
[8]
27
REZIME
SUMMRY
Branko MILOSAVLJEVIC
Branko MILOSAVLJEVIC
28
UVOD
INTRODUCTION
29
above all calcium hydroxide, as well as other constituents, with certain substances from water, solutions of
soil, gases, vapours, etc.
A computer model for prediction of concrete
corrosion by acid attack is developed in [1].
The resistance against lactic and acetic acids has
major importance, both for floors in animal buildings and
silos [6]. Lactic acid, which is found in silage effluents
with acetic acid presents a higher aggressiveness [2].
Degradation of cementitious materials by organic acid
were investigated and compared to the acetic acid [13].
Sulphate degradation primarily consists of the impact
of sulphate ions toward cement stone. The sulphate ion
is the cause of one of the most dangerous corrosions,
i.e. the corrosion of expansion and swelling, because it
initiates the occurrence of expansive compounds, the
most important one - ettringite, C3A 3CaSO4 32H2O, in
the shape of prismatic crystals [17]. The concrete
damaged by ammonium sulphate, is not only damaged
by expansion, but also by softening of the cement
matrix.
The chemical reactions between sulphates and
hydrated cement components yield the following reaction
products [14]: secondary gypsum (CaSO4 2H2O),
secondary ettringite (3CaO Al2O3 3CaSO4 32H2O),
thaumasite (CaSiO3 CaSO4 CaCO3 15H2O), brucite
(Mg(OH)2), MSH (3MgO 2SiO2. 2H2O) and silica gel
(SiO2 xH2O).
According to [27, 20] ettringite as well as gypsum
have an expansive and destructive character, while [22]
claim that the contribution of gypsum is limited while the
expansion of ettringite dominates. Thaumasite formation
leads to strength loss due to the decomposition of the
strength-forming hydration products (CSH) [28].
Ammonium nitrate solutions are very corrosive to
cementations materials [19, 23], which leads to
dissolution of cement-based materials according to the
following reaction:
30
(1)
EKSPERIMENTALNI RAD
EXPERIMENTAL WORK
Testing the influence of five aggressive solutions sulphate, nitrate, carbamide, lactic and acetic acid on
mortar and concrete were presented. The chemical
resistance was tested according to the Koch-Steinegger
method.
The specimens were made by using cement CEM
III/B 32.5 N - LH/SR (20 - 34 % Portland cement clinker
and 66-80% additions of slag). The chemical
composition of cement is shown in Table 1.
31.82
7.36
1.32
44.21
7.88
2.92
0.42
0.40
0.57
0.736
2.21
0.014
31
28
56
84
38.4
44.5
47.2
10.8
10.9
11
Slika 1. Relativna vrstoa pri savijanju maltera u odnosu na vreme odleavanja u agresivnom rastvoru
Figure 1. Relative flexural strength of mortar vs. time in aggressive solution
Slika 2. Relativna vrstoa pri pritisku maltera u odnosu na vreme uvanja u agresivnom rastvoru
Figure 2. Relative compressive strength of mortar vs. time in aggressive solution
Smanjena vrstoa pri savijanju uoena je kod
uzoraka koji su uvani u mlenoj i siretnoj kiselini.
Skenirajua elektronska mikroskopija (SEM) koriena je
da se ispita efekat agresivnih rastvora na mikrostrukturu
i mehanike osobine maltera.Tranzitna zona kvarcnog
32
33
C1
C2
390
420
1830
1813
147
147
3,1
3,4
34
Tabela 4. Relativna vrstoa betona pri pritisku posle 56 dana u agresivnom rastvoru
Table 4. Relative compressive strength of concrete after 56 days in aggressive solution
Relativna vrstoa pri
pritisku (%)
Relative compressive
strength (%)
10% Na2SO4
2% NH4NO3
5% rastvora
mlene kiseline
2% siretne
kiseline
10% carbamide
5% lactic acid
solution
2% acetic
acid
C1
107.3
98.0
99.6
73.5
79.7
C2
104.0
88.1
90.6
70.3
81.9
DISKUSIJA I ZAKLJUAK
35
ZAHVALNOST
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
36
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
LITERATURA
REFERENCE
Beddoe, R. E., Dorner, H. W., Modelling acid attack
on concrete: Part I. The essential mechanisms,
Cement and Concrete Research, 35, (2005), 2333
2339
Bertron, A., Duchesne, J., Escadeillas, G., Attack
of cement pastes exposed to organic acids in
manure, Cement and Concrete Composites, 27,
(2005), 898909
Bertron, A., Escadeillas, G., Duchesne, J., Cement
pastes alteration by liquid manure organic acids:
chemical and mineralogical characterization,
Cement and Concrete Research, 34, (2004), 1823
1835
Girardi, F., Vaona, W., Di Maggio, R., Resistance
of different types of concretes to cyclic sulfuric acid
and sodium sulfate attack, Cement & Concrete
Composites, 32, (2010), 595602
Gruyaert, E., Van den Heede, P., Maes, M., De
Belie, N., Investigation of the influence of blastfurnace slag on the resistance of concrete against
organic acid or sulphate attack by means of
accelerated degradation tests Cement and
Concrete Research, 42, (2012), 173185
De Belie N., Lenehan, J. J., Braam, C. R.,
Svennerstedt, B., Richardson, M., Sonck, B.,
Durability of Building Materials and Components in
the Agricultural Environment, Part III: Concrete
Structures, Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Research, 76, (2000), 316
De Belie, N., De Coster V., Van Nieuwenburg, D.,
Use of fly ash or silica fume to increase the
resistance of concrete to feed acids, Magazine of
Concrete Research, 49, (1997), 337344
De Belie, N., Debruyckere, M., Van Nieuwenburg,
D., De Blaere, B., Attack of concrete floors in pig
houses by feed acids: influence of fly ash addition
and cement-bound surface layers, Journal of
Agricultural Engineering Research, 68, (1997),
101108
De Belie, N., Verschoore, R., Van Nieuwenburg,
D., Resistance of concrete with limestone sand or
polymer additions to feed acids, Transactions of
the ASAE, 41, (1998), 227233
REZIME
SUMMARY
Ksenija JANKOVI
Dragan BOJOVI
Marko STOJANOVI
Ljiljana LONAR
Ksenija JANKOVI
Dragan BOJOVI
Marko STOJANOVI
Ljiljana LONAR
37
38
UVOD
CD =
D
1 U BL
B
2
2
CL =
INTRODUCTION
L
1 U 2 BL
B
2
CL
and moment
CM =
M
1 U 2 B 2 L B
2
CM
CD ,
(1)
39
FLATER
40
FLUTTER
FREQUENCY-DOMAIN APPROACH
41
Lae =
M ae
z
B
z
1
+ K 2 H 3* + K 2 H 4*
U 2 B KH 1* + KH 2*
U
U
B
2
1
2 2
* z
* B
2 *
2 * z
= U B KA1 + KA2
+ K A3 + K A4
U
U
B
2
(2)
(3)
), as commonly
second order derivatives ( z, , z,
used and presented in [11], as:
(4)
pomou derivata ( H1 , H 2 , A1 , A2 ) i
aeroelastine krutosti i mase, pomou
*
derivata ( H 3 , H 4 , A3 , A4 ).
Validnost ovog linearnog modela samopobuujuih
sila vezanih za popreni presek mosta predstavlja vanu
temu. Jedan od vanih efekata jeste zavisnost flater
derivata od amplitude kretanja ([23]).
Pored prikazane konvencije za flater derivate postoje
takoe i druge. Primeri se mogu pronai kod [15] i [38].
3.2 Identifikacija flater derivata
Flater derivati se obino odreuju eksperimentalno u
aerotunelu za pojedinane geometrije poprenog
preseka mosta. Za tu svrhu postoje dve glavne
eksperimentalne strategije: metod slobodnih vibracija i
metod prinudnih vibracija. Kod eksperimenata sa
slobodnim vibracijama popreni presek je elastino
oslonjen pomou opruga i eventualno priguivaa i
42
(5)
( H 3 , H 4 , A3 , A4 ).
The validity of this linear model for bridge deck selfexited forces is an important issue. One of the important
effects is the dependence of flutter derivatives on the
amplitude of motion ([23]).
Besides presented convention, there also exist other
conventions for flutter derivatives. Examples could be
found in [15] and [38].
3.2 Identification of flutter derivatives
Flutter
derivatives
are
usually
determined
experimentally in wind tunnel tests for individual bridge
deck geometries. For this purpose, two major
experimental strategies exist: the free vibration method
and forced vibration method. In the free vibration
GRAEVINSKI MATERIJALI I KONSTRUKCIJE 57 (2014) 2 (39-56)
BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES 57 (2014) 2 (39-56)
F0 = F0 ei (t +0 ) , Fw = Fwei (t +w )
gde su
F0 i Fw
amplitude sila, a
0 i w
fazna
where
w are
F = Fw F0
Moe se pokazati da se flater derivati vezani za
torziona kretanja dobijaju iz:
(7)
1
K 2U 2 B H 3* ( K ) + iH 2* ( K ) = L ( K )
2
1
K 2U 2 B 2 A3* ( K ) + iA2* ( K ) = M ( K )
2
(6)
(8)
(9)
1
K 2U 2 z H 4* ( K ) + iH 1* ( K ) = Lz ( K )
2
1
K 2U 2 Bz A4* ( K ) + iA1* ( K ) = M z ( K )
2
(10)
(11)
43
mz + c z z + k z z = L ae
gde su Lae i Mae samopobuujue sile predstavljene u
jednainama (2) i (3), m je masa, a I maseni moment
inercije po jedinici duine i kz i k su krutosti, a cz i c su
44
I + c + k = M ae
(12)
z ( t ) = z e i t , ( t ) = e i t
Posle zamene jednaina (2), (3) i (13) u jednainu
(12), formulisan je problem svojstvenih vrednosti
stabilnosti kretanja, s frekvencijom flatera i kritinom
brzinom vetra kao nepoznatim:
(13)
1
1
*
* z
*
*
2 m 1 + X 2 + i 2 z X H 4 + iH 1 B H 3 + iH 2 = 0
z
A4* + iA1*
+ 2 I 1 + 2 + i 2 z A3* + iA2* = 0
B
X
X
gde su
m = m /( B 2 )
I = I /( B 4 ) bezdimenzio-
where
(14)
m = m /( B 2 )
(15)
and
I = I /( B 4 )
are the
of inertia, respectively,
= / z
is the frequency
R4 X 4 + R3 X 3 + R2 X 2 + R1 X + R0 = 0
(16)
I 3 X + I 2 X + I1 X + I 0 = 0
(17)
gde je:
where:
R4 = 1 +
1
2 m
H 4* +
1 *
1
A3 +
H 4* A3* H 1* A2* H 3* A4* + H 2* A1*
2 I
4 m I
1 *
R3 = H 1* + z
A2
I
2
1 *
R 2 = 1 2 4 z H 4*
A3
2 m
2 I
I3 =
1
2 m
R1 = 0
R0 = 2
1
H 4* A2* H 1* A3* H 3* A1* + H 2* A4*
1 *
H +
A2 +
2 I
4 m I
*
1
I 2 = 2 z 2
I1 =
(18)
*
1 *
H4 z
A3
m
I
2
1 *
H 1*
A2
2 m
2 I
I 0 = 2 z 2 + 2
Na ovaj nain je dobijen sistem jednaina s dve
nepoznate. Nepoznate su X, koja sadri spregnutu
(flater) frekvenciju i kritina redukovana brzina Ucr, od
GRAEVINSKI MATERIJALI I KONSTRUKCIJE 57 (2014) 2 (39-56)
BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES 57 (2014) 2 (39-56)
45
TIME-DOMAIN APPROACH
s
s
L ( s ) ( )d +
Lz ( s ) z( )d
Lae ( s) = qBC L' L (0) ( s) + Lz (0) z( s) +
0
0
s
s
( s ) ( )d +
( s ) z( )d
M ae ( s) = qB 2 C M' M (0) ( s) + Mz (0) z( s) +
M
Mz
0
0
(19)
(20)
il ( s) = 1 ailk exp(bilk s)
k =1
46
(21)
dC
2 *
2 *
1
dC
A1 = M 1 2
H1 = L + C D 1 2 a Lzk *2 2
2
d
U red
U red bLzk + U red
d
a
k
1
Mzk
*2
red
2
Mzk
+
2
4 * dC M
b
dC
bMk
4
A2 =
H 2* = L a Lk *2 2Lk
a Mk *2 2
3
2
3
2
d k
U red bMk +
d k
U red bLk + U red
U red
2
dC M
1
4
dC L
4 2 *
1
2
2
A3* =
1
H
a
=
1 a Mk *2 2
Lk
2
2
3
2
*2 2
2
d
U red bMk +
d
U red
U red b Lk + U red
k
k
(22)
2 *
b
2
dC
b
dC
H 4* = L + C D a Lzk *2 2Lzk
A4 = M a Mzk *2 2Mzk
2
2
2
2
U red bLzk + U red
U red
d k
U red bMzk +
d
k
S obzirom na prirodu ovih relacija, indicijalne funkcije
(s bezdimenzionalnim koeficijentima ailk i bilk kao
nepoznatim) mogu se identifikovati uz pomo nelinearne
optimizacije najmanjih kvadrata. Detalji u vezi s
metodom koja je praena u ovom radu, opisani su u [27].
Vano je napomenuti da je direktna eksperimentalna
identifikacija indicijalnih funkcija takoe teorijski mogua
i jedan primer je zabeleen u [5].
5
KVAZIUSTALJENA APROKSIMACIJA
5
U red =
QUASI-STEADY APPROXIMATION
U UT LW
=
=
fB
B
B
(23)
47
neustaljenog.
Aeroelastine
sile
uz
usvojenu
pretpostavku kvaziustaljenosti mogu se izvesti kao:
dC
z dC L
dC
B
Lqsae = qB L C D +
+ L C D z
d
U
d
d
U
dC
B
dC z dC M
+
M aeqs = qB M
+ M
d
d
U
d U
Ci su koeficijenti sila iz jednaina (1) a dCi/d su njihovi
prvi izvodi. Bezdimenzionalni parametar i predstavlja
parametar ekscentrinosti ([27]). Izvoenje jednaina
(24) i (25) moe se nai u [27].
(24)
(25)
NUMERIKI PRIMER
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE
48
Tabela 1: Koeficijenti sile i njihovi prvi izvodi pri osrednjenom napadnom uglu od = 0
Table 1: Force coefficients and its first derivatives at the mean angle of attack = 0
Statiki eksperiment
Static Experiment
CD
CD
CL
CL
CM
CM
0.0886
-0.0329
-0.0442
5.8513
0.0179
1.3984
49
Circular Frequency
2.5
2
1.5
Ucr
cr
R1
R2
I1
0.5
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Wind Velocity U
80
90
100
50
L (p L ) =
m =1
m
( DL (p L ,U red
) DLm ) 2
2
DLm
m
( E L (p L ,U red
) E Lm ) 2
2
m
E L
(26)
2 *
*
gde je DL = -K H 3 a EL = -KH 2 i K je redukovana
frekvencija. Reprezentacija neustaljenih koeficijenata
pomou DL i EL pogodnija je zbog identifikacione
procedure u odnosu na klasinu reprezentaciju pomou
H*2 i H*3, gde su vrednosti pri niim redukovanim
brzinama umanjene. Stoga bi vrednosti pri veim
redukovanim brzinama imale vei uticaj na totalnu
greku, te bi se kao rezultat dobila slabija aproksimacija
pri niim redukovanim brzinama, gde je neustaljenost
izraenija ([26]). Vektor p L , iz jednaine Eq.(26),
(27)
il / p il and 2 il / 2 p il
developed
by
[26].
51
B[m]
mz[kg/m]
m[kg/m]
fz[Hz]
f[Hz]
z[-]
[-]
18.3
12820
426000
0.142
0.355
0.006
0.005
ZAKLJUCI
CONCLUSIONS
52
Values are taken from [24], where the similar bridge deck
section is considered with the use of multimode analisys. Two
modes, for heave and pitch, are corresponding to the
presented main coupled modes from the related paper.
Slika 7. Flater derivati dobijeni direktno na osnovu merenja i korienjem kvaziustaljene aproksimacije
Figure 7. Flutter derivatives obtained directly from the measurements and using quasi-steady approximation
53
Slika 9. Izabrani flater derivati dobijeni direktno na osnovu merenja u poreenju sa optimizovanim vrednostima dobijenim
na osnovu procene indicijalne funkcije L sa slike 8
Figure 9. Selected flutter derivatives obtained directly from the measurements compared with optimized values obtained
from indicial function estimation of the L from Figure 8
54
ZAHVALNOST
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
LITERATURA
REFERENCES
[1]
55
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
REZIME
SUMMRY
Anina ARKIC
Milos JOKOVI
Stanko BRI
Anina SARKIC
Milos JOCKOVIC
Stanko BRCIC
56
modeli
UPUTSTVO AUTORIMA*
Prihvatanje radova i vrste priloga
U asopisu Materijli i konstrukcije tampae se neobjavljeni radovi ili lanci i konferencijska saoptenja sa odreenim dopunama ili bez dopuna. prema odluci Redakcionog
odbora. a samo izuzetno uz dozvolu prethodnog izdavaa
prihvatie se i objavljeni rad. Vrste priloga autora i saradnika
koji e se tampati su: originalni nauni radovi. prethodna
saoptenja. pregledni radovi. struni radovi. konferencijska
saoptenja (radovi sa nauno-strunih skupova). kao i ostali
prilozi kao to su: prikazi objekata i iskustava - primeri.
diskusije povodom objavljenih radova i pisma urednitvu.
prikazi knjiga i zbornika radova. kao i obavetenja o
nauno-strunim skupovima.
Originalni nauni rad je primarni izvor naunih informacija i novih ideja i saznanja kao rezultat izvornih istraivanja
uz primenu adekvatnih naunih metoda. Dobijeni rezultati
se izlau kratko. jasno i objektivno. ali tako da poznavalac
problema moe proceniti rezultate eksperimentalnih ili
teorijsko numerikih analiza i tok razmiljanja. tako da se
istraivanje moe ponoviti i pri tome dobiti iste ili rezultate u
okvirima doputenih odstupanja. kako se to u radu navodi.
Prethodno saoptenje sadri prva kratka obavetenja o
rezultatima istraivanja ali bez podrobnih objanjenja. tj.
krae je od originalnog naunog rada. U ovu kategoriju
spadaju i diskusije o objavljenim radovima ako one sadre
naune doprinose.
Pregledni rad je nauni rad koji prikazuje stanje nauke u
odreenoj oblasti kao plod analize. kritike i komentara i
zakljuaka publikovanih radova o kojima se daju svi neophodni podaci pregledno i kritiki ukljuujui i sopstvene
radove. Navode se sve bibliografske jedinice koriene u
obradi tematike. kao i radovi koji mogu doprineti rezultatima
daljih istraivanja. Ukoliko su bibliografski podaci metodski
sistematizovani. ali ne i analizirani i raspravljeni. takvi
pregledni radovi se klasifikuju kao struni pregledni radovi.
Struni rad predstavlja koristan prilog u kome se iznose
poznate spoznaje koje doprinose irenju znanja i prilagoavanja rezultata izvornih istraivanja potrebama teorije i
prakse. On sadri i rezultate razvojnih istraivanja.
Konferencijsko saoptenje ili rad sopten na naunostrunom skupu koji mogu biti objavljeni u izvornom obliku ili
ih autor. u dogovoru sa redakcijom. bitno preradi i proiri. To
mogu biti nauni radovi. naroito ako su soptenja po
pozivu Organizatora skupa ili sadre originalne rezultate
prvi put objavljene. pa ih je korisno uz odreene dopune
uiniti dostupnim iroj strunoj javnosti. tampae se i
struni radovi za koje Redakcioni odbor oceni da su od ireg
interesa.
Ostali prilozi su prikazi objekata. tj. njihove konstrukcije i
iskustava-primeri u graenju i primeni razliitih materijala.
diskusije povodom objavljenih radova i pisma urednitvu.
prikazi knjiga i zbornika radova. kao i obavetenja o
nauno-strunim skupovima.
Autori uz rukopis predlau kategorizaciju lanka. Svi
radovi pre objavljivanja se recenziraju. a o prihvatanju za
publikovanje o njihovoj kategoriji konanu odluku donosi
Redakcioni odbor.
Da bi se ubrzao postupak prihvatanja radova za
publikovanje. potrebno je da autori uvaavaju Uputstva za
pripremu radova koja su navedena u daljem tekstu.
57
UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU
GRAEVINSKI FAKULTET
departman za
graevinarstvo
DEPARTMAN ZA GRAEVINARSTVO
FAKULTET TENHIKIH NAUKA NOVI SAD
58