Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The best practices report illustrates a way-of-thinking that is combining results of the BIOCHEM
project as represented in the toolbox. The best practices mainly focus on aspects of intellectual
property management and business model developing. These aspects are the key strategic aspects of
a business that successfully commercializes bio-based applications. Both larger corporate, key
players active in the bio-based business as well as small and medium size enterprises from all over
the world are represented in this best practices report.
Northwestern University
Northwestern University is a private institution founded in 1851 to serve the Northwest Territory
(Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and parts of Minnesota). Total awards
and grants for R&D represent approximately $477 million. Northwestern
University has a long history of leadership in interdisciplinary research programs
and centers. 27 University Research Centers and three research centers at Medical
Affiliates support interdisciplinary research that spans a wide spectrum of areas.
In addition, the group has an Enterprise Technology function which identifies and integrates new
technology into Crodas global business structure which has a strong track record in renewable raw
materials and biomanufacturing.
TMO Renewables
TMOs approach has been to focus on developing a bio-process that can tolerate a wide range of
feedstocks in conversion to ethanol. They decided this would allow them to develop the most robust
technology for biofuel production. They developed a thermophilic bacterium technology that
allowed a bolt on solution to an existing corn ethanol plant with large savings in energy. The
process requires a wet feedstock, which eliminates the cost of drying the feedstock. They develop
the technology and demonstrate in on scale and aim to sell the licenses. In Sept 2010 they
announced a $500m contract with a US company. The bacteria break down cellulose based material
more quickly than existing processes.
Basically, after the initial period with royalty business models, the RegMed companies all refocused
to other financial resources allowing an integrated business model with R&D, in-house
manufacturing, sales, and marketing, all done by the SME itself. This requires financial resources like
Business Angels, Venture capitalists, and perhaps longer times of public funding. All instead of the
coprporate venturing approach adopted by early RegMed companies (based on early biotech
companies).
Often life science companies, like the RegMed companies, in the beginning sell their knowledge,
their research expertise, their lab to bigger companies, generating an income stream that then
enables the initial R&D of their own company.
The companies described below all focus on applications with blockbuster potential. All applications
developed, manufactured, sold and marketed via their own resources.
Histogen
Histogen, Inc. is a regenerative medicine company based on naturally-produced products from
newborn fibroblasts grown in a proprietary bioreactor that mimics the embryonic environment.
Histogen has developed a rich product portfolio from one core technology process that fulfills market
needs without the use of embryonic stem cells or animal products, thereby not being subject to
regulative barriers as much as many other RegMed companies.
The purpose and focus of the company is on the research, development,
manufacturing and sales of products derived from the company's core
technology. Using this proprietary tissue-engineering platform, the company has created products
that offer unique commercialization opportunities ranging from research tools to biological products
in various markets and segments of the biomedical industry. The product portfolio is also aimed at
large markets instead of niche markets for which RegMed developments also offer unique
opportunities.
EpiStem
EpiStem is an epithelial stem cell company focusing on gastrointestinal disorders, oncology, and
dermatology applications. The Company also provides preclinical contract research services and is
not involved with embryonic stem cells or stem cell transplants. These latter two, mean that EpiStem
generates revenue via their research instead actual physical products that are not
yet commercially available, and that EpiStem is circumvents regulative barriers by
not using embryonic cells or stem cell transplants. Other ways of revenue
generation, besides contract research services (fee on service basis), is via their other business
divisions; Biomarkers and Novel Therapies. The company exploits its combined business model to
advance its own therapeutic candidates to late preclinical stage development.
NanoDel Technologies
NanoDel develops and produces drug-carrier systems based on polymeric
nanoparticles, and also offer solutions for diseases of the Central Nervous System.
End of 2008 NanoDel merged their business with Capsulation to form Capsulation
Pharma, deepening their drug delivery expertise based on nanoparticles.
NanoDels technology platform was initially (during commercialization process) patent-protected for
the preparation methods of the particles, the type of application (gene therapy), the administration
method (oral application using nanoparticles), and the targeted delivery into the central nervous
system. All patents issues in big relevant markets, but especially in the most relevant R&D countries.
With this protected technology platform NanoDel designed their business model, which was based
on two pillars;
1) The formulation of compounds owned by partners and eventually leading to out-licensing
the nanoparticle technology to the (bio)pharmaceutical industry. This pillar generates early
revenue streams (during feasibility studies already).
2) Developing a NanoDel product pipeline via using patent-free compounds with proven
efficacy but inherent bioavailability, licensed-in products, and co-developments with
industrial partners.
The success of this business model is off course dependent on the technologys added value. In this
case drug delivery with - due to nanotechnology unique drug delivery characteristics. The ability of
NanoDels nanoparticles to make drugs available to the brain potentially adds significant value to
compounds.
Frutarom
Established in 1933, Frutarom is a rapidly growing global flavor and fine ingredients company and is
numbered among the ten leading companies in the world, in the field of flavours & fragrances.
Frutarom creates, develops, manufactures and markets an extensive variety of high quality flavours
and fine ingredients for customers in tehf ood, beverage, functional food, flavor, fragrance,
pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic industries. Frutarom markets and sells over 20,000
products to more than 10,000 customers in 120 countries, has 25 R&D labs and 45 sales and
marketing offices throughout the world and operates 19 production facilities in Europe, North
America, Israel and Asia. Frutarom employs 1,500 employees worldwide. Frutarom Industries Ltd is
a public company whose stock is listed on the Tel Aviv and London Stock Exchanges. As of January 1,
2003 Frutarom was included in the Tel Aviv 100 Index. Frutaroms major shareholder (approximately
37%) is ICC Industries Inc., a New York-based holding company that operates mainly in the chemical,
pharmaceutical and plastic industries.
Frutarom operates through two divisions:
Flavours Division (constituting some two thirds of the companys sales volume) which
develops, produces and markets flavours, savoury solutions, seasonings and food systems.
Fine Ingredients Division, which develops, produces and markets natural flavor extracts,
functional food ingredients, natural pharmaceutical/nutraceutical extracts, specialty
essential oils, citrus products and aroma chemicals.
Frutarom has strongly developed its bio-based products technology as it seeks to comply with EU
legislation regarding the labeling of natural food ingredients. This legislation limits such substances
to those obtained via physical or biotechnological processes from renewable raw materials.
Frutarom
See Other BB Life Sciences SMEs.
Cost competitiveness: Development of a product which is able to compete both technically and cost
wise with petroleum based plastics.
Close market contact: The experience of Dow on plastics contributed to the success.
Communication: The attractive story of replacing fossil-based plastics with renewable and recyclable
products was utilised well from the beginning.
Clear leadership in the initial project phases in Cargill: In the early development phase there were
strong minded champions to carry out the project.
Tecnaro GmbH
Tecnaros innovation: ARBOFORM produces liquid wood from lignin. It is a thermoplastic
material that can be produced at a competitive price compared to conventional thermoplastic
materials.
Background: Plastics used to be the only economically feasible material for designing geometries.
Now wood can be used like a conventional thermoplastic material. Liquid wood is mainly used for
injection moulded wood applications.
Why have they succeeded in the innovation?
Superior functionalities: The product has a number of technological advantages over synthetic
plastics compounds as a strong engineering material.
Strong case in favour of sustainability: Lignin is a by-product of the cellulose industry, i.e. its use does
not compete with food production. The product is based on renewable resources and thus provides
independence from petroleum based materials. The product is also biodegradable and can be burnt
without the release of fossil CO2.
The product is easily applicable in various industries: Utilisation does not require investments in the
clients facilities as it can be processed by conventional plastic fabrication techniques. Products are
already applied e.g. in packaging, furniture, toys, shoes, music instruments and automotive industries
and there is significant potential in many other industries, too.
Strategic partnership: Tecnaro has formed a partnership with a plastics company.
The Business Model: leather companies operating within the district spend less bringing their organic
wastes to ILSA than by ordinarily land filling of their waste, therefore they save money by bringing
their waste to ILSA at a certain price (not for free). ILSA is therefore able to go to the market with the
nitrous-efficient fertilizer at a price economically viable. Payments for the leather waste or not
receiving any contribution by the leather companies would mean the prices of ILSAs fertilizers would
not be competitive to the non-biological fertilizers due to the otherwise high cost raw materials.