Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by Dr.Jimi that the effect is resulting from the usage of the slimming product. So
there is no breach of causation in this case. Applying the but-for test, Keanggunan
Abadis product is the only reason for the damage suffered by Boncet. As such,
Keanggunan Abadi is responsible for the damage.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the last element also has been fulfilled since
the slimming product manufactured by Keanggunan Abadi is the only cause for
Boncets suffering.
To conclude, Boncet has negligence as a cause of action against Keanggunan
Abadi for the damage suffered by her.