Levitt, via attorney John Devine, claims defamation in "Mt Pleasant Lawyer suing student admit to fake award and marijuana tweets," asks for legal retraction
Levitt, via attorney John Devine, claims defamation in "Mt Pleasant Lawyer suing student admit to fake award and marijuana tweets," asks for legal retraction
Levitt, via attorney John Devine, claims defamation in "Mt Pleasant Lawyer suing student admit to fake award and marijuana tweets," asks for legal retraction
Joun J. Devine, JR.
MT, PLEASANT, MICHIGAN 45856
March 12, 2015 recor
The Morning Sun
711 W. Pickard Street
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
Attn: Rick Mills, Editor
Re: “Mt. Pleasant Lawyer Suing Student Admits to Fake Award
and Marijuana Tweets”, Published August 10, 2014
Attorney Todd L. Levitt
Dear Mr. Mills:
| represent Todd L. Levitt He was defamed by the Moming Sun's
headline, as captioned, and the article written under the byline of Lisa Yanick-
Jonaitis,
The headline is patently, and knowingly, false. Mr. Levitt made no such
“admission” to a “fake award”, nor is there any such admission in the “court
documents” referenced in the article
The article further defames Mr. Levitt by stating that he “admitted in court
documents filed Friday that he created a ‘top college lawyer’ recognition and
awarded it to himself.” There is no such admission in the “court documents”
referenced in the article.
The article also falsely states, “One of those claims, supported by HTML
coding information entered as an exhibit in the case, is that Levitt himself created
the website topcollegelawyers.com, and then proclaimed himseff ‘College Lawyer
of the Year’, and used the manufactured award to promote himself.” There is no
such admission in the “court documents” referenced in the article, and the
author's statement is, knowingly, false.
Finally, the balance of the article, in the context of the headline and these
false statements, portrays Mr. Levitt in a false and negative light.
Mr. Levitt demands an appropriate retraction. Under the applicable
statute, the Morning Sun has a reasonable time in which to print such a
retraction, in the same size type, in the same editions, and, as far as practical, in
substantially the same position as the original defamatory headline and article.Rick Mills
March 11, 2015,
Page 2
Mr, Levitt also demands that you take appropriate steps so that Google, or
any other Internet search engine, is no longer able to index and/or post the
headline and the defamatory article.
After that “reasonable time” provided in the statute for retraction, | have
been instructed to commence a lawsuit against the newspaper, publisher, and
author of the article for Mr. Levitt's damages and losses resulting from this
defamation.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions in this regard
Otherwise, | trust you are adequately advised.
Sincerely,
J jevine, Jr.
JuD/sh
c: Lisa Yanick-Jonaitis