Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Industrial Technology Division, Block 34, Malaysian Institute for Nuclear Technology Research (MINT), Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Malaysia
b
Kolej Universiti Kejuruteraan Utara Malaysia (KUKUM), Jalan Kangar-Arau, 02600 Jejawi, Perlis, Malaysia
Received 16 November 2006; received in revised form 26 March 2007; accepted 25 May 2007
Available online 13 June 2007
Abstract
Conventional radiography is one of the common non-destructive testing which employs manual image interpretation. The
interpretation is very subjective and depends much on the inspector experience and working conditions. It is therefore useful to have
pattern recognition system in order to assist human interpreter in evaluating the quality of the radiographed sample, especially
radiographic image of welded joint. This paper describes a system to detect circular discontinuities that are present in the joints. The
system utilizes together two different algorithms, which are separability lter to identify the best object candidate and Circular Hough
Transform to detect the presence of circular shape. The result of the experiment shows a promising output in recognition of circular
discontinuities in a radiographic image. This is based on 81.82100% of radiography lm with successful circular detection by using
template movement of 10 pixels.
r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Non-destructive testing; Algorithm; Welded joints; Separability lter; Circular Hough Transform
1. Introduction
As one of the non-destructive testing (NDT), industrial
radiography plays a vital role in detecting volumetric
discontinuities present in the critical area of engineering
component. The most common critical area is welded joint
that forms part of the structures. A variety of NDT
methods are available for the inspection of welded joint [1].
The emerging trend of radiography as one of the NDT
methods is towards automated inspections [26]. This is
feasible as the information of the discontinuities is in the
form of radiographic images. Interpretation and evaluation
of the radiographic images are very important stages for
acceptance of any engineering component. Realization of
this crucial process dealing with images, image analysis and
Corresponding author. Tel.: +6 03 89250510x1194;
fax: +6 03 89250907.
E-mail addresses: hazal@mint.gov.my (H. Yazid),
haniza.yazid@gmail.com (H. Yazid).
0963-8695/$ - see front matter r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.05.004
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H. Yazid et al. / NDT&E International 40 (2007) 594601
595
Radiographic
Image
Good
Image
Digitization
Manual Film
Quality
Inspection
Contrast
Enhancement
Poor
Image
Digitization
Defect
Segmentation
and Noise
Reduction
Separability
Filter
End result
Circular
Hough
Transform
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H. Yazid et al. / NDT&E International 40 (2007) 594601
596
Original Distribution
After HistogramEqualization
99
165
1400
1200
Pixel Counts
1000
800
600
400
200
253
242
231
220
209
198
187
176
154
143
132
121
110
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
0
Gray Level
Fig. 3. Typical image, which has good contrast and does not require
histogram equalization.
Fig. 4. Typical image, which has poor contrast and requires histogram
equalization.
jGj
p
Gx2 Gy2 .
(1)
The Sobel technique deals with six pixels and thus has a
better average over the neighboring pixels. This approach
with slight blurring can eliminate most noise found in the
image.
Mathematical morphology is considered as region-lling
technique to provide the complete objects. This technique
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H. Yazid et al. / NDT&E International 40 (2007) 594601
597
Fig. 6. Another image, which has poor contrast and requires histogram
equalization.
N
X
Ixi ; yi Pm 2 ,
(2)
i1
B n1 P1 Pm 2 n2 P2 Pm 2 ,
Z
B
,
A
(3)
(4)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H. Yazid et al. / NDT&E International 40 (2007) 594601
598
(5)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H. Yazid et al. / NDT&E International 40 (2007) 594601
599
Fig. 13. Typical image after applying Canny edge detector for image in
Fig. 3.
Fig. 14. Typical image after applying Sobel edge detector for image in
Fig. 3.
Table 1
Success in circular detection
No. of success in circular
detection
Percentage of lm according to
success no. of detection (%)
1
2
3
4
5
100
100
90.9
81.82
54.55
ARTICLE IN PRESS
600
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H. Yazid et al. / NDT&E International 40 (2007) 594601
[8] Yazid H, et al. Object detection using circular Hough transform. Am
J Appl Sci 2005;2(12):16069.
[9] DOrazio T, Guaragnella C, Leo M, Distante A. A new algorithm for
ball recognition using circle Hough transform and neural classier.
Pattern Recognition 2004;37:393408.
[10] Kawaguchi T, Hidaka D, Rizon M. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICRP,
vol. 1; 2000, p. 4952.
601