Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
Contents
1 Etymology
2 Onomastics and nomenclature
4.4 Toponyms
5 Scientific nomenclature
o
5.2 Biology
5.3 Astronomy
5.4 Chemistry
5.5 Metallurgy
5.6 Physics
5.7 Archaeology
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
9 Further reading
Etymology
The word nomenclature is derived from the Latin nomen - name, calare - to call; the Ancient
Greek from or onoma meaning name, and equivalent to the Old English
nama and Old High German namo which is derived from Sanskrit nama. The Latin term
nomenclatura refers to a list of names, as does the word nomenclator which can also indicate a
provider or announcer of names.
Names provide us with a way of structuring and mapping the world in our minds so, in some
way, they mirror or represent the objects of our experience.
Folk taxonomy
Main articles: Folk taxonomy and Binomial nomenclature
Modern scientific taxonomy has been described as "basically a Renaissance codification of folk
taxonomic principles."[7] Formal scientific nomenclatural and classification systems are
exemplified by biological classification. All classification systems are established for a purpose.
The scientific classification system anchors each organism within the nested hierarchy of
internationally accepted classification categories. Maintenance of this system involves formal
rules of nomenclature and periodic international meetings of review. This modern system
evolved from the folk taxonomy of pre-history.[8] Folk taxonomy can be illustrated through the
Western tradition of horticulture and gardening. Unlike scientific taxonomy, folk taxonomies
serve many purposes. Examples in horticulture would be the grouping of plants, and naming of
these groups, according to their properties and uses: annuals, biennials and perennials (nature of
life cycle); vegetables, fruits, culinary herbs and spices (culinary use); herbs, trees and shrubs
(growth habit); wild and cultivated plants (whether they are managed or not), and weeds
(whether they are considered to be a nuisance or not) and so on.
Folk taxonomy is generally associated with the way rural or indigenous peoples use language to
make sense of and organise the objects around them. Ethnobiology frames this interpretation
through either "utilitarianists" like Bronislaw Malinowski who maintain that names and
classifications reflect mainly material concerns, and "intellectualists" like Claude Lvi-Strauss
who hold that they spring from innate mental processes.[9] The literature of ethnobiological
classifications was reviewed in 2006.[10] Folk classification is defined by the way in which
members of a language community name and categorize plants and animals whereas
ethnotaxonomy refers to the hierarchical structure, organic content, and cultural function of
biological classification that ethnobiologists find in every society around the world.[11]
Ethnographic studies of the naming and classification of animals and plants in non-Western
societies have revealed some general principles that indicate pre-scientific mans conceptual and
linguistic method of organising the biological world in a hierarchical way.[12][13][14][15] Such studies
indicate that the urge to classify is a basic human instinct.[16][17]
in all languages there are about five or six ethnobiological categories of graded
inclusiveness
the ranks at which particular organisms are named and classified is often similar
in different cultures
level 3 - "generic name" ------e.g. oak, pine, robin, catfish This is the most
numerous and basic building block of all folk taxonomies, the most frequently
referred to, the most important psychologically, and among the first learned by
children. These names can usually be associated directly with a second level
group. Like life-form names these are primary lexemes.
level 4 - "specific name" ------e.g. white fir, post oak More or less equivalent to
species. A secondary lexeme and generally less frequent than generic names.
In almost all cultures objects are named using one or two words equivalent to "kind" (genus) and
"particular kind" (species).[7] When made up of two words (a binomial) the name usually consists
of a noun (like salt, dog or star) and an adjectival second word that helps describe the first, and
therefore makes the name, as a whole, more "specific", for example, lap dog, sea salt, or film
star. The meaning of the noun used for a common name may have been lost or forgotten (whelk,
elm, lion, shark, pig) but when the common name is extended to two or more words much more
is conveyed about the organism's use, appearance or other special properties (sting ray, poison
apple, giant stinking hogweed, hammerhead shark). These noun-adjective binomials are just like
our own names with a family or surname like Simpson and another adjectival Christian or
forename name that specifies which Simpson, say Homer Simpson. It seems reasonable to
assume that the form of scientific names we call binomial nomenclature is derived from this
simple and practical way of constructing common names - but with the use of Latin as a
universal language.
In keeping with the "utilitarianist" view other authors maintain that ethnotaxonomies resemble
more a "complex web of resemblances" than a neat hierarchy.[18]
Personal names
Main articles: Anthroponymy and Personal name
Human personal names are presented, used and categorised in many ways depending on the
language and culture. In most cultures (Indonesia is one exception) it is customary for
individuals to be given at least two names. In Western culture, the first name is given at birth or
shortly thereafter and is referred to as the given name, the forename, the baptismal name (if
given then), or simply the first name. In England prior to the Norman invasion of 1066, small
communities of Celts, Anglo-Saxons and Scandinavians generally used single names: each
person was identified by a single name as either a personal name or nickname. As the population
increased, it gradually became necessary to identify people further giving rise to names like
John the butcher, Henry from Sutton, and Roger son of Richard which naturally evolved into
John Butcher, Henry Sutton, and Roger Richardson. We now know this additional name
variously as the second name, last name, family name, surnames or occasionally the byname, and
this natural tendency was accelerated by the Norman tradition of using surnames that were fixed
and hereditary within individual families. In combination these two names are now known as the
personal name or, simply, the name. There are many exceptions to this general rule: Westerners
often insert a third or more names between the given and surnames; Chinese and Hungarian
names have the family name preceding the given name; females now often retain their maiden
names (their family surname) or combine, using a hyphen, their maiden name and the surname of
their husband; some East Slavic nations insert the patronym (a name derived from the given
name of the father) between the given and the family name; in Iceland the given name is used
with the patronym, or matronym (a name derived from the given name of the mother), and
surnames are rarely used. Nicknames (sometimes called hypocoristic names) are informal names
used mostly between friends.
-onym nouns
Main article: -onym
Distinctions may be made between particular kinds of names simply by using the suffix -onym,
from the Greek (noma) 'name'. So we have, for example, hydronyms name bodies of
water, synonyms are names with the same meaning, and so on. The entire field could be
described as chrematonymy - the names of things.
Toponyms
Main article: Toponymy
Toponyms are the names given to places or features of a particular district, region, etc.[22][23] This
could include planets, countries, cities, towns, villages, buildings etc.; it can be further divided
into specialist branches: hodonymy, the names of streets, roads, and the like; hydronymy, the
names of water bodies; and oronomy, the names of mountains. Toponymy has popular appeal
because of its socio-cultural and historical interest and significance for cartography. However,
work on the etymology of toponyms has found that many place names are descriptive, honorific
or commemorative but frequently they have no meaning or the meaning is obscure or lost. Also
the many categories of names are frequently interrelated. For example, many place-names are
derived from personal names (Victoria), many names of planets and stars are derived from the
names of mythological characters (Venus, Neptune), and many personal names are derived from
place-names, names of nations and the like (Wood, Bridge).[24][25]
Scientific nomenclature
Nomenclature, classification and identification
Biology
Main article: Biological nomenclature
Although Linnaeus system of binomial nomenclature was rapidly adopted after the publication
of his Species Plantarum and Systema Naturae in 1753 and 1758 respectively, it was a long time
before there was international consensus concerning the more general rules governing biological
nomenclature. The first botanical code was produced in 1905, the zoological code in 1889 and
cultivated plant code in 1953. Agreement on the nomenclature and symbols for genes emerged in
1979.
Enzyme nomenclature[33]
Gene nomenclature
Medical devices use the naming convention of the Global Medical Device
Nomenclature (GMDN).
Astronomy
Main article: Astronomical naming conventions
Over the last few hundred years, the number of identified astronomical objects has risen from
hundreds to over a billion, and more are discovered every year. Astronomers need universal
systematic designations to unambiguously identify all of these objects using astronomical
naming conventions, while assigning names to the most interesting objects and, where relevant,
naming important or interesting features of those objects.
Planetary nomenclature
Meteorite nomenclature
Chemistry
Main article: IUPAC nomenclature
The IUPAC nomenclature is a system of naming chemical compounds and for describing the
science of chemistry in general. It is maintained by the International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry. The rules for naming organic and inorganic compounds are printed in two
publications, the Blue Book[35][36] and the Red Book[37] available here. A third publication, Green
Book,[38] contains recommendations for the use of symbols for physical quantities (in association
with the IUPAP), while a fourth, the Gold Book,[39] defines a large number of technical terms
used in chemistry. Similar compendia exist for biochemistry[40] (in association with the IUBMB),
analytical chemistry[41] and macromolecular chemistry.[42] These books are supplemented by
shorter recommendations for specific circumstances which are published from time to time in the
journal Pure and Applied Chemistry. These systems can be accessed here.
Metallurgy
The classic English translation of De re metallica includes an appendix (Appendix C) detailing
problems of nomenclature in weights and measures.
Physics
Main article: Units of measurement
Archaeology