Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This paper describes a methodology in designing high-performance concrete for simply supported beams, using a hybrid
optimization strategy based on a variable neighborhood search threshold acceptance algorithm. Three strategies have been
applied to discrete optimization of reinforced concrete beams: Variable Neighborhood Descent (VND), Reduced Neighborhood
Search (RNS) and Basic Variable Neighborhood Search (BVNS). The problem includes 14 variables: two geometrical; one
material type; one mix design; and 10 variables for the reinforcement setups. The algorithms are applied to two objective
functions: the economic cost and the embedded CO2 emissions. Firstly, this paper presents the application of these three different
optimization strategies, which are evaluated by fitting the set of solutions obtained to a three-parameter Weibull distribution
function. The Variable Neighborhood Descent with Threshold Accepting acceptance strategy algorithm (VND-TA) results as the
most reliable method. Finally, the study presents a parametric study of the span length from 10 to 20 m in which it can be
concluded that economic and ecological beams show a good parabolic correlation with the span length.
Keywords: Structural optimization, Reinforced concrete, Sustainable construction, CO2 emission, High-performance concrete,
Heuristics.
1. Introduction
In the field of structural design, the traditional goals of
engineers were the design of a safe and economical structure.
Nowadays, there is a growing concern for sustainability,
which leads to a change in the accounting of resource
consumption. In this context, the objective of structural design
becomes to optimize the consumption of materials not only
from an economic point of view, but also environmental. It is
worth to note that concrete is the most widely used material on
Earth [1]. Portland cement, the principal hydraulic binder used
in modern concrete, is responsible for large emissions of
carbon dioxide (CO2). Worldwide, the cement industry alone
is estimated to be responsible for about 7% of all CO2
generated [2]. Therefore, it seems vital to include design
International Journal of Civil Engineering, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, June 2013
F1 (x1 , x2 ,..., xn ) = pi mi
(1)
i =1
r
F2 (x1 , x2 ,..., xn ) = ei mi
(2)
g j ( x1 , x2 ,..., xn ) 0
(3)
i =1
In the expressions above, note that x1, x2, ..., xn are the design
variables of the problem. The objective functions considered
in Eq. (1) and Eq. (2) are defined as the sum of the unit costs
prices (pi) for economical optimization or CO2 unit emissions
(ei) for the embedded CO2 optimization multiplied by the
measurements of construction units (mi) such as concrete,
steel, formwork, etc. Unit prices and CO2 unit emissions
considered for the problem optimization are given in Table 1
and are obtained from the BEDEC PR/PCT ITEC materials
database of the Catalonia Institute of Construction Technology
[42] in November 2011.
Constraints in Eq. (3) include the serviceability and ultimate
limit states (SLSs and ULSs) as well as the geometric and
constructability constraints of the problem. In this study, only
feasible solutions have been considered and therefore, penalty
functions have not been applied. Given the variables of the
present problem, the measurement and cost evaluation of a
particular solution is straightforward.
2.1. Variables
A total of 14 variables define a solution for the simply
supported HSC beam (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). These variables
define the geometry, the type of steel grade, the passive
reinforcement of the beam and the HPC mix design. The first
two variables are geometric and they correspond to the height
(h) and the width (b) of the cross section. The next 10 variables
correspond to the definition of a passive reinforcement setup.
Each reinforcement setting is defined by two variables:
number of bars (n) and diameter (). The longitudinal upper
reinforcement is displayed throughout the beam length (n1,
!
#
!
(%()
(&()
91
Fig. 1 Design variables of the simply supported HPC beam: cross section
*
+
.
++
/0
0
0
12
&
,-
,-
%,
,
,
33
Fig. 2 Design variables of the simply supported HPC beam: longitudinal view
92
International Journal of Civil Engineering, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, June 2013
selection of the initial solution. It can also be seen that VNDTA results have a deviation with regard to the mean value of
11% in cost optimization and 14% in CO2 emissions
optimization. This method is less sensitive to the selection of
the initial solution than the RVNS. Regarding BVNS-TA
method, the results have even a lower deviation with respect to
the mean of 6% in cost optimization and of 12% in CO2
BVNS-TA
VND-TA
RVNS
Table 3 Statistical description of 1,000 results with RVNS, VND-TA and BVNS-TA methods. Cost optimization
Mean
Min
Max
C.I*
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Min
Max
C.I*
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Min
Max
C.I*
Skewness
Kurtosis
10
2,332
683
1,151
5,849
42,34
10.8
5.0
1,065
129
833
1,481
7,97
5.5
-2.1
927
51
833
1,103
3,14
5.8
-1.4
11
2,681
732
1,309
5,560
45,4
9.3
2.7
1,220
166
1,001
1,815
10,27
15.0
5.3
1,100
62
978
1,312
3,82
7.0
-0.5
12
3,004
784
1,492
5,945
48,61
8.2
0.7
1,373
120
1,152
2,194
7,43
19.4
31.0
1,282
69
1,151
1,550
4,31
8.5
3.6
13
3,379
880
1,694
7,485
54,53
9.6
4.0
1,588
109
1,332
1,975
6,76
5.1
-1.8
1,484
82
1,332
1,973
5,05
11.4
11.5
14
3,790
960
1,933
7,646
59,48
9.9
3.9
1,860
165
1,539
2,393
10,2
8.7
0.3
1,713
100
1,539
2,203
6,18
8.6
3.5
L (m)
15
4,252
1,038
2,308
8,644
64,32
10.2
4.5
2,099
180
1,761
2,820
11,16
12.3
7.4
1,965
114
1,761
2,403
7,06
5.6
-2.0
16
4,681
1,142
2,494
10,729
70,77
14.0
12.6
2,387
274
2,004
3,524
17
16.5
10.8
2,215
117
2,000
2,653
7,22
8.7
0.3
17
5,210
1,241
2,746
10,823
76,94
13.0
9.8
2,641
298
2,228
4,088
18,46
19.8
18.4
2,512
141
2,233
3,131
8,72
10.9
6.3
18
5,759
1,366
2,942
12,039
84,67
11.9
8.0
2,948
340
2,501
4,767
21,1
23.5
28.0
2,822
163
2,499
3,543
10,1
11.1
7.0
19
6,365
1,455
3,479
13,283
90,17
11.3
8.1
3,275
401
2,753
5,075
24,84
19.4
15.0
3,109
179
2,754
4,089
11,07
16.3
19.2
20
6,903
1,520
4,032
13,005
94,22
9.6
3.0
3,660
462
3,045
5,613
28,66
15.8
8.4
3,433
216
3,060
4,625
13,39
15.7
18.3
BVNS-TA
VND-TA
RVNS
Table 4 Statistical description of 1,000 results with RVNS, VND-TA and BVNS-TA methods. CO2 emissions optimization
Mean
Min
Max
C.I*
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Min
Max
C.I*
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Min
Max
C.I*
Skewness
Kurtosis
10
5,570
1,910
2,219
13,140
118.4
10.4
2.7
2,037
320
1,344
3,696
19.9
10.1
9.8
1,858
244
1,344
2,461
15.1
3.7
-5.2
11
6,274
1,991
2,730
14,241
123.4
9.6
1.7
2,382
325
1,594
3,737
20.1
7.6
6.2
2,195
286
1,598
2,997
17.7
5.3
-4.5
12
7,011
2,154
2,614
16,428
133.5
9.7
3.2
2,683
352
1,930
3,918
21.8
3.8
-3.4
2,611
328
1,920
3,822
20.4
4.5
-3.2
13
7,797
2,318
3,443
18,474
143.7
9.2
3.0
3,196
417
2,239
4,606
25.9
2.7
-1.1
3,048
378
2,239
4,215
23.5
5.4
-2.8
14
8,809
2,588
3,318
18,771
160.4
9.2
2.7
3,755
495
2,606
6,194
30.7
8.9
10.5
3,530
419
2,573
4,805
26.0
4.7
-2.5
L (m)
15
9,776
2,806
4,592
21,339
173.9
11.3
6.7
4,254
531
3,003
6,785
32.9
8.4
9.2
4,071
509
2,955
5,758
31.6
6.8
-3.0
16
10,740
3,051
5,040
22,528
189.1
11.5
7.2
4,866
624
3,436
8,138
38.7
11.8
13.7
4,595
557
3,379
6,175
34.5
5.2
-3.9
17
10,740
3,051
5,040
22,528
189.1
11.5
7.2
5,506
727
3,788
8,977
45.1
10.0
9.2
5,238
681
3,798
6,966
42.2
5.7
-3.3
18
12,854
3,478
5,141
27,716
215.5
9.6
3.5
6,258
905
4,297
9,908
56.1
12.1
7.5
5,865
756
4,263
8,326
46.8
6.7
-1.8
19
14,171
3,743
6,465
30,606
232.0
9.9
4.0
6,837
971
4,914
10,601
60.2
11.4
5.4
6,568
810
4,786
9,565
50.2
9.1
2.4
20
15,456
3,903
7,109
29,530
241.9
8.8
1.4
7,623
1,115
5,488
12,073
69.1
11.6
5.2
7,342
927
5,341
11,235
57.5
8.3
2.4
94
International Journal of Civil Engineering, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, June 2013
5. Parametric study
This section describes the parametric study of practical
simply supported beams in HPC concrete. The parameter
considered is the span length of the beam (L, see Fig. 2). The
considered values of L amount to a total of eleven lengths
varying from 10 to 20 m in steps of 1 m. Eleven beam types
were investigated, adding a total of 11,000 computer runs:
Table 5 Main characteristics of the optimal HPC beams with span length 15 m
RVNS
VND-TA
BVNS-TA
Objective
Cost
CO2
Cost
CO2
Cost
CO2
Height (m)
0.75
0.90
0.75
0.95
0.75
0.85
Width (m)
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
As1
312
310
7 6
11 6
7 6
96
As2
1025
825
925
7 25
925
1220
As3
920
9 6
1110
6 12
1110
416
As4
510
4 8
4 6
46
46
46
As5
625
9 6
4 6
46
46
46
Mix design
79
105
49
48
48
49
fck (MPa)
55
70
80
90
90
90
400
400
500
500
500
500
fyk (MPa)
where:
As1: Upper reinforcement
As2: Lower continuous reinforcement
As3: Lower central reinforcement
As4: Shear reinforcement in the L/3 length near the supports (stirrups per meter)
As5: Shear reinforcement in the L/3 central length of the beam (stirrups per meter)
C. Torres-Machi, V. Yepes, J. Alcal, E. Pellicer
95
Table 6 Parameters of the Weibull distribution of the optimal HPC beams. Cost optimization
BVNS-TA
VND-TA
RVNS
L (m)
Min
Min
Min
10
1,151
1,132
1.838
1,352
0.998
833
799
2.153
300.9
0.992
833
826
2.066
114.8
0.986
11
1,309
1,293
1.999
1,568
0.997
1,001
991
1.434
253.1
0.983
978
969
2.315
148.0
0.993
12
1,492
1,484
2.032
1,720
0.995
1,152
1,130
2.424
273.0
0.982
1,151
1,135
2.310
166.4
0.993
13
1,694
1,662
2.096
1,938
0.998
1,332
1,309
2.772
314.0
0.984
1,332
1,319
2.211
185.5
0.992
14
1,933
1,924
2.076
2,111
0.993
1,539
1,507
2.292
400.5
0.985
1,539
1,515
2.143
224.1
0.985
15
2,308
2,295
1.999
2,295
0.995
1,761
1,718
2.373
429.7
0.987
1,761
1,745
1.983
249.1
0.985
16
2,494
2,467
2.203
2,493
0.992
2,004
1,994
1.516
437.3
0.989
2,000
1,990
2.028
255.3
0.986
17
2,746
2,701
2.303
2,825
0.993
2,228
2,199
1.712
492.5
0.982
2,233
2,221
2.302
328.0
0.991
18
2,942
2,923
2.340
3,201
0.987
2,501
2,461
1.724
539.6
0.977
2,499
2,484
2.298
380.8
0.990
19
3,479
3,419
2.257
3,317
0.997
2,753
2,735
1.540
592.9
0.988
2,754
2,737
2.473
418.3
0.987
20
4,032
4,002
2.042
3,273
0.997
3,045
3,025
1.373
705.3
0.984
3,060
3,039
2.111
442.5
0.984
Where:
: Location parameter of the Weibull distribution
: Shape parameter of the Weibull distribution
: Scale parameter of the Weibull distribution
: Correlation coefficient to Weibull distribution
BVNS-TA
VND-TA
RVNS
Table 7 Parameters of the Weibull distribution of the optimal HPC beams. CO2 emissions optimization
Min
Min
Min
10
2,219
2,162
1.887
3,843
0.997
1,344
1,270
2.678
864
0.991
1,344
1,283
2.501
649
0.987
11
2,730
2,679
1.893
4,056
0.997
1,594
1,521
2.984
965
0.993
1,598
1,532
2.502
749
0.982
12
2,614
2,597
2.244
4,995
0.984
1,930
1,863
2.452
928
0.987
1,920
1,824
2.556
1,824
0.987
13
3,443
3,341
2.035
5,033
0.999
2,239
2,048
3.010
1,285
0.996
2,239
2,137
2.590
1,028
0.986
14
3,318
3,254
2.392
6,262
0.992
2,606
2,427
3.061
1,484
0.995
2,573
2,487
2.655
1,178
0.988
L (m)
15
4,592
4,430
2.078
6,024
0.999
3,003
2,878
2.919
1,543
0.996
2,955
2,935
2.380
1,289
0.980
16
5,040
4,911
2.087
6,569
0.998
3,436
3,309
2.875
1,745
0.993
3,379
3,313
2.461
1,450
0.987
17
5,040
4,599
2.534
8,107
0.985
3,788
3,732
2.791
1,990
0.993
3,798
3,684
2.430
1,759
0.986
18
5,141
5,061
2.531
8,780
0.987
4,297
4,264
2.572
2,241
0.985
4,263
4,134
2.490
1,954
0.987
19
6,465
6,410
2.295
8,760
0.990
4,914
4,825
2.349
2,264
0.994
4,786
4,700
2.480
2,167
0.980
20
7,109
7,048
2.399
9,486
0.986
5,488
5,443
2.159
2,462
0.988
5,341
5,231
2.448
2,390
0.988
Where:
: Location parameter of the Weibull distribution
: Shape parameter of the Weibull distribution
: Scale parameter of the Weibull distribution
: Correlation coefficient to Weibull distribution
International Journal of Civil Engineering, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, June 2013
16
1.10
1.29
0.30
1.00
41.73
1.39
476.5
0.78
21.3
0.70
137.8
1.20
137.8
1.20
80
0.89
500
1.00
17
1.10
1.29
0.30
1.00
39.78
1.00
544.8
0.76
29.3
0.68
143.8
1.20
179.8
1.50
90
1.00
500
1.00
18
1.10
1.22
0.30
1.00
42.00
1.13
682.0
0.82
30.8
0.74
152.8
1.15
152.8
1.15
90
1.00
500
1.00
19
1.30
1.44
0.30
1.00
53.07
1.13
654.3
0.68
38.0
0.67
183.4
1.31
227.5
1.62
90
1.00
500
1.00
20
1.50
1.50
0.30
1.00
74.30
1.60
686.4
0.69
33.9
0.57
212.6
1.36
212.6
1.36
70
0.78
500
1.00
97
6. Conclusions
In the light of the results obtained in this study, the following
conclusions may be derived:
- The proposed VND-TA algorithm is an efficient procedure
for the optimum design in terms of cost and CO2 emissions of
HPC beams. BVNS-TA method provides less effective
References
[1]
[2]
Fig. 7 Volume of concrete ratio (CO2/cost)
Gartner, E.: 2004, Industrially interesting approaches to lowCO2 cements, Cem. Concr. Res., 34(9), 1489-1498.
Malhotra, V.M.: 2000, Role of supplementary cementing
materials in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In: O.E. Gjorv,
K. Sakai (eds.), Concrete technology for a sustainable
development in the 21st century, pp. 226235, E&FN Spon,
10
11
12
a
49
49
49
Mix design
b
49
49
49
a
90
90
90
fck (MPa)
b
90
90
90
a
382 382 382
3
Cement (kg/m )
b
382 382 382
a
99
99
99
3
Water (kg/m )
b
99
99
99
Coarse aggregate
a
539 539 539
(kg/m3)
b
539 539 539
Fine aggregate
a
359 359 359
(kg/m3)
b
359 359 359
Superplasticizer
a
4.8
4.8
4.8
(kg/m3)
b
4.8
4.8
4.8
a
0
0
0
Silica fume (kg/m3)
b
0
0
0
(a) CO2 emission-optimized beams characteristics
(b) Cost-optimized beams characteristics
98
13
14
49
90
90
429
382
150
99
1089
539
741
359
7.3
4.8
45
0
14
49
49
90
90
382
382
99
99
539
539
359
359
4.8
4.8
0
0
L (m)
15
49
49
90
90
382
382
99
99
539
539
359
359
4.8
4.8
0
0
16
50
49
80
90
382
382
99
99
539
539
359
359
4.8
4.8
0
0
17
49
49
90
90
382
382
99
99
539
539
359
359
4.8
4.8
0
0
18
49
49
90
90
382
382
99
99
539
539
359
359
4.8
4.8
0
0
19
49
49
90
90
382
382
99
99
539
539
359
359
4.8
4.8
0
0
20
115
49
70
90
400
382
140
99
1196
539
744
359
5.6
4.8
0
0
International Journal of Civil Engineering, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, June 2013
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
London.
Juenger, M.C.G., Winnefeld, F., Provis, J.L. and Ideker, J.H.:
2011, Advances in alternative cementitious binders, Cem.
Concr. Res., 41(12), 1232-1243.
Hardjito, D., Wallah, S.E., Sumajouw, D.M.J. and Rangan, B.V.:
2004, On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer
concrete, ACI Mater. J., 101(6), 467-472.
Meyer, C.: 2009, The greening of the concrete industry, Cem.
Concr. Compos., 31(8), 601-605.
Ashour, S.A.: 2000, Effect of compressive strength and tensile
reinforcement ratio on exural behavior of high-strength
concrete beams, Eng. Struct., 22(5), 413-423.
Chen, B. and Liu, J.: 2004, Effect of aggregate on the fracture
behavior of high strength concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 18(8),
585-590.
Cheng, A. S., Huang, Y.L., Huang, C.H. and Yen, T.: 2011,
Effects of fly ash particle sizes on the compressive strength and
fracture toughness of high performance concrete, Adv. Mat.
Res., 284-286, 984-988.
Ding, Y., Zhang, Y. and Thomas, A.: 2009, The investigation on
strength and flexural toughness of fiber cocktail reinforced selfcompacting high performance concrete, Constr. Build. Mater.,
23(1), 448-452.
Do, M.T., Chaallal, O. and Aitcin, P.C.: 1993, Fatigue behavior
of high-performance concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 5(1), 96-111.
Donza, H., Cabrera, O. and Irassar, E.F.: 2002, High-strength
concrete with different fine aggregate, Cem. Concr. Res., 32
(11), 1755-1761.
Duval, R. and Kadri, E.H.: 1998, Influence of silica fume on the
workability and the compressive strength of high-performance
concretes, Cem. Concr. Res., 8(4), 533-547.
Hoe, K.W. and Ramli, M.: 2010, Rational mix design approach
for high strength concrete using sand with very high fineness
modulus, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(12), 15621568.
Khatri, R.P., Sirivivatnanon, V. and Gross, W.: 1995, Effect of
different supplementary cementitious materials on mechanical
properties of high performance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res.,
25(1), 209-220.
Ko, M.Y., Kim, S.W. and Kim, J.K.: 2001, Experimental study
on the plastic rotation capacity of reinforced high strength
concrete beams, Materials and Structures, 34(239), 302-311.
Kodur, V.K.R., Cheng, F.P., Wang, T.-C. and Sultan, M.A.:
2003, Effect of strength and fiber reinforcement on fire
resistance of high-strength concrete columns, ASCE J. Struct.
Eng., 129(2), 253-259.
Kumar, P.S., Mannan, M.A., Kurian, V.J. and Achuytha, H.:
2003, Investigation on the flexural behavior of highperformance reinforced concrete beams using sandstone
aggregates, Build. Environ., 42(7), 2622-2629.
Li, J. and Yao, Y.: 2001, A study on creep and drying shrinkage
of high performance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 31(8), 12031206.
Lim, C.-H., Yoon, Y.-S. and Kim, J.-H.: 2004, Genetic
algorithm in mix proportioning of high-performance concrete,
Cem. Concr. Res., 34(3), 409-420.
Mazloom, M., Ramezanianpour, A.A. and Brooks, J.J.: 2004,
Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength
concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 26(4), 347-357.
Meddah, M.S., Suzuki, M. and Sato, R.: 2011, Influence of a
combination of expansive and shrinkage-reducing admixture on
autogenous deformation and self-stress of silica fume highperformance concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 25(1), 239-250.
Oztekin, E., Pul, S. and Husem, M.: 2003, Determination of
rectangular stress block parameters for high performance
concrete, Eng. Struct., 25(3), 371-376.
zturan, T. and ecen, C.: 2003, Effect of coarse aggregate
type on mechanical properties of concretes with different
strengths, Cem. Concr. Res., 27(2), 165-170.
Persson, B.: 2000, Correlating laboratory and field tests of creep
in high-performance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 31(3), 389-395.
[25] Song, P.S. and Hwang, S.: 2004, Mechanical properties of highstrength steel fiber-reinforced concrete, Constr. Build. Mater.,
18(9), 669-673.
[26] Wu, K.R., Chen, B., Yao, W. and Zhang, D.: 2001, Effect of
coarse aggregate type on mechanical properties of highperformance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 31(10), 1421-1425.
[27] Zhou, F.P., Lydon, F.D. and Barr, B.I.G.: 1995, Effect of coarse
aggregate on elastic modulus and compressive strength of high
performance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 25(1), 177-186.
[28] Hernndez, S. and Fontan, A.: 2002, Practical applications of
design optimization, WIT Press, Southampton, U.K.
[29] Fletcher, R.: 2001, Practical methods of optimization,
Chichester, Wiley, U.K.
[30] Sarma, K. C. and Adeli, H.: 1998, Cost optimization of concrete
structures, J. Struct. Eng., 124(5), 570-578.
[31] Jenkins, W.M.: 1992, Plane frame optimum design environment
based on genetic algorithm, ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 118(11),
3103-3112.
[32] Rajeev, S. and Krishnamoorthy, C.S.: 1992, Discrete
optimization of structures using genetic algorithms, ASCE J.
Struct. Eng., 118(5), 1233-1250.
[33] Coello, C.A., Christiansen, A.D. and Santos, F.: 1997, A simple
genetic algorithm for the design of reinforced concrete beams,
Eng. Comput., 13(4), 185-196.
[34] Leite, J.P.B. and Topping, B.H.V.: 1998, Improved genetic
operators for structural optimization, Adv. Eng. Softw., 29(7-8),
529-562.
[35] Kaveh, A., Shakouri, M. and Abadi, A.: 2011, Harmony search
based algorithm for the optimum cost design of reinforced
concrete cantilever retaining walls. Int. J. Civ. Eng., 9(1):1-8.
[36] Yepes, V., Alcala, J., Perea, C. and Gonzalez-Vidosa, F.: 2008,
A parametric study of earth-retaining walls by simulated
annealing, Eng. Struct., 30(3), 821-830.
[37] Kaveh, A. and Sabzi, O.: 2011, A comparative study of two
meta-heuristic algorithms for optimum design of reinforced
concrete frames, Int. J. Civ. Eng, 9 (3) :193-206.
[38] Khanzadi, M. and Tavakkoli S.M.: 2011, Optimal plastic design
of frames using evolutionary structural optimization, Int. J. Civ.
Eng, 9 (3): 165-170.
[39] Paya, I., Yepes, V., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F. and Hospitaler A.:
2008, Multiobjective optimization of concrete frames by
simulated annealing, Comput-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng.,
23(8), 596-610.
[40] Paya-Zaforteza, I., Yepes, V., Hospitaler. A. and GonzalezVidosa, F.: 2009, CO2 efficient design of reinforced concrete
building frames, Eng. Struct., 31(7), 1501-1508.
[41] Yepes, V., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F., Alcala, J. and Villalba, P.: 2012,
CO2-Optimization design of reinforced concrete retaining walls
based on a VNS-Threshold acceptance strategy, ASCE J.
Comput. Civ. Eng., 26(3), 378-386.
[42] Catalonia Institute of Construction Technology: 2011, BEDEC
PR/PCT
ITEC
materials
database.
(http://www.itec.es/nouBedec.e/bedec.aspx).
[43] Fomento M.: 2008, EHE: code of structural concrete, Madrid:
Fomento. (In Spanish).
[44] Mladenovic, N. and Hansen, P.: 1997, Variable neighborhood
search, Comput. Oper. Res., 24(11), 1097-1100.
[45] Dueck, G. and Scheuer, T.: 1990, Threshold accepting: a general
purpose optimization algorithm superior to simulated annealing,
J. Comput. Phys., 90(1), 161-175.
[46] Medina, J.R.: 2001, Estimation of incident and reflected waves
using simulated annealing, ASCE J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean
Eng., 127(4), 213-221.
[47] Weibull, W.: 1951, A statistical distribution function of wide
applicability, ASME J. Appl. Mech. Trans., 18(3), 293-297.
[48] Paya-Zaforteza, I., Yepes, V., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F. and
Hospitaler. A.: 2010, On the Weibull cost estimation of building
frames designed by simulated annealing, Meccanica, 45(5),
693-704.
[49] Conover, W.J.: 1971, Practical nonparametric statistics, Wiley,
New York.
99