Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Behavioural Perspective
Edited by
M. Ganesh Babu, G. Vani
and Dr. N. Panchanatham
INTRODUCTION
India has traditionally been known for its spice and culinary herb production. It is one of the
largest spice producing and consuming country. Also it is known for its excellent cuisine, its
unique regions of cooking, and a pleasant dining experience. It is famous for distinguished
vegetarian dishes. One thing all the regional cuisines of India have in common is its use of
spices. Thus spices are the heart of Indian Cuisine. We Indians love to have spicy foods. We
have a long history of spices used in medicine and other therapy; spices have taken centre
stage in Indian cuisine and household kitchens. Popular variants of Indian spices are Haldi,
Dhania, Garam masala, Lal mirch, Methi and many more as everybodys liking e.g. Chana
Masala, Sambhar masala, Chicken or Meat Masala etc.
The strategic location, climatic conditions, advanced production processes and availability of
cheap labour in India makes it advantageous for the producers to ensure large scale production
of quality spices and herbs. Due to this Indian Spices have become popular overseas as well.
Spice manufacturers have encashed this trend and are exporting these spices to countries like
USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Middle East and Asian countries. Major Manufacturers are Pravin
Masale, Badshah, MDH Industries, ITC, Everest group. Thus India accounts for nearly 45%
in terms of volume and 30% in terms of value in the world spice trade.
*
**
116
To identify the most common types of branded spices used to cook at home
To study the major factors which influence purchasing of the branded spices in and
around Karad city.
To identify the most popular brand in spices in and around Karad city.
To offer meaningful suggestions to Pravin Masale.
Hypothesis
1.
2.
In rural area, women use homemade masala than branded masala to cook at home.
Branded spices are used only for taste than its price.
Research Methodology
To fulfill the objectives stated earlier, the data necessary for the research work basically
was obtained from 50 respondents in and around Karad city. The research type of this study
is exploratory and descriptive. Simple random sampling technique was used for collection of
data while sample size was 50. Sampling unit i.e. respondents to be interviewed were house
wives in and around Karad city.
Sources of data collection:The data was collected with the help of primary as well as
secondary sources. A questionnaire was prepared to study and evaluate consumer preference
towards branded spices in and around Karad city.
1.4 a Primary sources: The primary data for the research work was collected with the
help of a structured questionnaire. Personal interviews of respondents were
conducted and with the questionnaire supplemented by personal observation.
1.4 b. Secondary sources: The secondary sources such as literature from text books,
periodicals, magazines, news papers etc. were obtained by visiting well known
libraries and also from websites and company records.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
After the survey all the completed questionnaires were scrutinized and tables, graphs and
charts were prepared. Percentages were calculated and inferences were drawn after tabulation
of the data collected.
To study the consumer preference towards branded spices, respondents were categorized
into different age groups, as follows:
Table 1: Age group wise analysis
SN
Age Group
No. of
respondents
Percentage(%)
1.
20-30
19
38
2.
30-40
15
30
3.
40-50
10
20
4.
50-60
06
12
Total
50
100
15
10
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
No. of
respondents
117
The above table indicates that 38% of the respondents were from the age group 20 years
to 30 years followed by 30% in the middle aged group of 30 to 40 and 20% belonged to 40 to
50 years, 12% belonged to 50 to 60.The thrust was on the young housewives to understand
the trend of buying in the new generation.
Table 2: Occupation wise analysis
SN
Occupation
No. of respondents
Percentage (%)
1.
Business
12
24
2.
Professionals
15
30
3.
Service
13
26
4.
House wife
10
20
Total
50
100
24%
26%
30%
Business
An effort was made to correlate the occupation and the purchasing of branded spice.
30% respondents were professionals followed by 26% who were in service, 24% had their
own business while 20% were pure housewives.
Table 3: Preference of type of spice:
SN
Specification
of spices
No. of
Percentage
respondents (%)
1.
Garam Masala
18
2.
Pickle Masala
Specification of spices
36
14
28
3.
Sambhar
12
4.
10
5.
Kanda Lasun
15
30
6.
Biryani
10
20
7.
14
Total
75
100
10
18
15
14
5
Garam
Masala
Pickle
Masala
Sambhar
Chat / Tak
Masala
Kanda
Lasun
Biryani
Kesari Dudh
Masala
In this question, a single respondent has opted for more than one option hence the total
number of the respondents exceeds 50.
It was noted that 36% purchased Garam Masala followed by 30% purchased Kanda Lasun
Masala, 28% purchased Pickle Masala, 20% purchased Biryani Masala. 12% purchased Sambhar
masala, 10% purchased Chat/ Tak Masala and 14% purchased Kesari Dudh Masala.
Thus the most preferred product appeared to be Garam Masala and then Kanda Lasun
Masala closely followed by pickle masala.
118
SN
Specification
of spices
No. of
respondents
Percentage
(%)
1.
Badshah
01
2.
Bawadekar
05
10
3.
Kepra
04
4.
Everest
09
18
5.
Sangam
03
6.
Ambari
01
7.
Katdare
11
22
8.
Pravin
11
22
9.
Bedekar
04
10.
Mahila Udyog
01
11.
Any other
00
Total
50
100
Specification of brand
0%
2%
8%
2%
10%
8%
22%
18%
22%
Badshah
Sangam
Bedekar
2% 6%
Bawdekar
Ambari
Mahila Udyog
Kepra
Katdare
Any other
Everest
Pravin
There was a significant difference in the percentage of brands preferred. The highest
percent of spices preferred was 22% that of Katdare and Pravin. This was followed by
Everest which was preferred by 18% and then brand Bawadekar Masala by 10%.
Badshah(2%), Kepra(8%), Sangam(6%), Ambari(2%),Bedekar, Mahila Udyog were preferred
by less than 2%. Thus the most preferred brands were Katdare and Pravin.
Table 5: Preferred frequency of buying branded spices:
SN
Frequency
No. of
respondents
Percentage
(%)
1.
Once in a month
09
18
2.
Once in 2 month
04
08
8%
3.
02
04
4%
4.
As per requirement
35
70
Total
50
100
18%
70%
Once in a
m onth
Once in 2
m onth
Once/ Twice
every year
As per
requirem ent
It was seen that 70% of respondents purchased the spices as per requirement. 18% of
respondents purchased spices once a month followed by 8% of them who bought twice a
month. Very few i.e. 4% of respondents purchased spices once/ twice every year.
119
Package size
No. of
respondents
Percentage
(%)
1.
500 gm
04
08
20
2.
100 gm
11
22
15
3.
50 gm
15
30
4.
Sachets
20
40
Total
50
100
20
15
11
10
4
50 0 gm 1 00 gm
50 g m
Sa che t
No. of
respondents
From the above table, it is observed that 40% of respondents purchased sachets i.e. to use
as per requirement followed by 30% respondents who purchased 50gm branded spices.
Very few respondents i.e. 8% purchased 500 gm package size.
Table 7: Factors considered while choosing a brand:
SN
Specification
of brand
No. of
Percentage
respondents (%)
1.
Availability
16
32
2.
Quality
18
36
3.
Taste
20
40
4.
Price
12
24
5.
Habit
13
26
6.
Advertisement
07
14
7.
Recommendation
10
20
8.
15
30
Total
50.
16
Taste
10
Price
18
13
20
12
Habit
Advertiseme
nt
Recommenda
tion
Convenient
packagesize
100
As respondents preferred multiple factors while choosing a brand, total number exceeds
The most important factor considered while choosing the brand was taste of the spice
opted for by 40% closely followed by quality 36% , availability 32%, convenient package size
was considered by 30%. 26% respondents chose brands out of habit and 24% considered
price also while selecting a brand, advertisement and recommendations were considered by
only 14% and 20% respectively. Thus taste and quality are the most crucial factors in selecting
branded spice.
120
SN
Most preferred
brand
No. of
respondents
Percentage
(%)
1.
Badshah
00
00
2.
Bawadekar
05
10
Badshah
3.
Kepra
04
Bawdekar
4.
Everest
09
18
5.
Sangam
03
6.
Ambari
00
00
7.
Katdare
12
24
8.
Pravin
13
26
9.
Bedekar
04
10.
Mahila Udyog
00
00
Mahila Udyog
11.
Any other
00
00
Any other
Total
50
100
Kepra
8% 0% 10%
8%
Everest
26%
Sangam
Ambari
18%
24%
Katdare
0%6%
Pravin
Bedekar
It was seen that 26% respondents preferred Pravin masale closely followed by Katdare
masale i.e. 24% and then Everest preferred by 18% followed by Bawadekar Masale i.e. 10%.
Surprisingly the trend of users of brands seen in Table No 4 is largely reinforced in the
above question. The trend and number of respondents preferring a certain brand are same
for the three brands Pravin, Katdare, Everest and for others the figures are roughly the
same with slight variations of 2% for Mahila Udyog, Badshah and any other.
Table 9: Trial of other brands
SN
Response
No. of
respondents
Percentage
(%)
1.
Yes
26
52
2.
No
24
48
Total
50
100
T ry o f o t h er b ra n d
27
26
25
24
23
Ye s
No
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts
An effort was made to observe whether the customers were loyal towards one brand or
their switched their preferences frequently.
From the above table it is observed that 52% respondents tried other brands while 42%
respondents remained loyal to the same brand.
Thus the percentage of respondents who were loyal and the percentage of respondents
who were switchers were very nearly the same. Thus the brands face the challenge of
converting the switchers to loyal customers.
121
Response
1.
No. of
respondents
Percentage
(%)
Variety
05
19
Yes
Change
14
54
(Switchers)
Lack of
availability
04
15
Specialty of
the brand
03
12
Total
26
100
Variety
Change
Lack of
availability
Specialty of
the brand
24
100
24
100
2.
No
(Loyals)
52% of total respondents switched brands .While analyzing the psyche of switchers ,it
was seen that 54% of these switchers switched the brand for change, 19% for variety and
15% for lack of availability. This last category of respondents can be retained as loyal
customers by ensuring the availability of the product.
48% respondents did not try any other brand indicating they were loyal customers.
Surprisingly just as the percentage of loyal customers was substantial i.e. (48%), the
percentage of switchers was equally large i.e. 52% indicating a need for change rather than
habit and variety seeking buying behaviour on the part of consumers while purchasing spices.
Hypothesis I
The researcher had interviewed 90 respondents amongst whom 50 respondents used
branded masala and the remaining 40 respondents used homemade masala.
Hypothesis: In rural area, women use homemade masala than branded masala to cook at home
Ho: Null hypothesis : In rural area, women do not use homemade masala than branded
masala to cook at home.
For proving this hypothesis, chi square test is used.
Sr. No.
Description
Preferred
Not preferred
Total
1.
Home made
40
50
90
2.
Branded
50
40
90
Total
90
90
180
122
Applying 2 test :
O
O-E
(O-E)2
(O-E)2/E
40
45
-5
25
0.55
50
45
25
0.55
50
45
25
0.55
40
45
-5
25
0.55
(O-E) /E
2.22
Description
Preferred
Not preferred
Total
1.
Taste
30
20
50
2.
Price
20
30
50
Total
50
50
100
Applying test :
2
O-E
(O-E)2
(O-E)2/E
30
25
25
20
25
-5
25
20
25
-5
25
30
25
25
(O-E)2/E
123
The most preferred product appeared to be Garam Masala and then Kanda Lasun Masala.
Purchasing as per requirement was the most preferred purchasing frequency followed
by once a month..
Sachets i.e. low price packs were the most preferred package size.
Taste was the prime factor considered while choosing a branded spice followed by
quality, availability and then convenient package size.
Katdare, Pravin were the most popular brands closely followed by Everest.
The percentage of loyal customers was almost equal to the percentage of swithchers.
Suggestions
The companies should try to promote varieties of spices other than Garam Masala
and Kanda Lasun Masala.
Companies should take efforts to induce trial by distribution of free sample sachets.
The company should take efforts to convert one time customers to loyal customers
by taking conscious efforts to maintain taste and quality and also ensure that the
product is never out of stock.
The manufacturers must engage in one to one interaction with housewives through
the dealers or wholesalers or retailers.
REFERENCES
Kothari, C.R. (2005). Research Methodoly, New Age International (p) Limited, Publishers, New Delhi, Reprint.
Nair, Suja R. (2008). Consumer behaviour in Indian Perspective, Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai, Reprint.
Raju, M.S. Dominique Xardel, (2007). Consumer Behaviour Concepts, Applications and Cases, Vikas Publishing
House Pvt. Ltd., Noida, Third Reprint.
Saranavel, P. and Sumathi, S., (2003). Marketing Research &Consumer Behavior, Vikas Publishing House,
New Delhi.
http://www.zaptron.com/literature/preference.htm.
www.indianspices.com/
www.spice-trade.com/indian-industry-overview.html
http://pib.nic.in/feature/fe0899/f1308991.html