Professional Documents
Culture Documents
consultants
educators
d
t
researchers
April 2008
+ + +
Gordon Hui
VP, Consulting
Peer Insight
(703) 778-5543
ghui@peerinsight.com
+ + +
i
in
alone,
association with this guide.
However, our research program has proved that, while business
model innovation attempts are frequent, the methods used are
crude and highly variable,
variable even among different teams within
the same firm. For the six methods below, we found that only
12 of the 100 projects in our recent study used more than half of
them. Yet, when these so-called secrets were employed, the
results were remarkable. Here are the six methods, in headline
form:
Secret #1
Secret #2
Secret #3
Secret #4
Secret #55
Secret #6
+ + +
Description (+ examples)
y
to enable mass produced,
p
, yet
y customized services
Use IT systems
Ex: Dell direct build-to-order PCs
Business models, often leveraging ICT, that identify and sell unused capacity
Ex: Priceline.com, NextJet
Create a meeting place for buyers and sellers, enabling their transactions
Ex: eBay, Facebook
Use data mining to develop highly targeted offers based on unique insights
Ex: Progressive Insurance, CapitalOne, Harrahs
Use data mining to provide advertisers with access to precisely-defined customers
Ex: Google
Enhanced targeted marketing based on accumulating data through IT systems
Ex: Amazon collaborative filtering, NetFlix recommendations
Company assumes complexity or specific task(s) on behalf of client
Ex: IBM IT Outsourcing
Offer services that are more basic versions of an existing service, at lower cost
Ex: Southwest Airlines
On-demand or per-pay-use services
Ex: Sun Grid Computing, Progressive Insurance TripSense
P id partial
Provide
ti l ownership
shi off a capital
it l asset
ss t
Ex: NetJets
+ + +
Gordon Hui
Gordon is the Partner in charge
g of Peer Insights
g
consulting practice and directs engagements on a
variety of emerging innovation topics, including service
innovation, growth platform development and customer
experience design. Gordon has implemented innovation
and growth strategies at a number of Americas most
well-known companies, including Hewlett-Packard,
St d d & Poors,
Standard
P and
d Procter
P t & Gamble.
G bl He
H holds
h ld an
MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and B.S.
degrees in Finance and International Business from the University of
Maryland at College Park. In his spare time, Gordon is a budding acoustic
guitar player and climbs the occasional mountain in Tanzania.
secret #1 . . .
+ + +
+ + +
Rate
Speedometer Model T,
(1901)
headlamps
(1908)
4 Stroke
Auto
Engine
Electric
(1890) Transmission
Ignition
(1904)
(1910)
Product
Innovation
Business Model
Innovation
Toyota
Scion (2003)
onStar
(1995)
Assembly Line
(1914)
Lean Production
(1980s)
Japanese cars
go premium
(1986, 1989)
Process
Innovation
No Haggle
Pricing
(1985, 1993)
Hybrids
(1990s)
Adapted from Abernathy and Utterback (1978), Grant (2002), Wikipedia 2008
Time
Over the past 20 years, the focus of innovation
efforts in the automobile industry has
t
transitioned
iti
d from
f
operational
ti
l excellence,
ll
which
hi h is
i
now table stakes, to new business models.
+ + +
Business models have a self-supporting structure, part external and part internal
Customer
Experience
Creating Value
(External)
Getting Paid
(Internal)
Customer
Needs
Value
Capture
Customer
Offering
Control
Points
+ + +
10
First focus on creating valuethe external part of your business model development
The external perspective of business models begins with an
understanding of your target customers and their Customer
Needs. In every business, there are functional needs
related to cost, quality, and delivery, plus emotional needs
driven by perception or customer behavior. Strong business
models avoid the Swiss Army knife approach to customer
needs, choosing instead to focus on a narrow set of
customer-desired outcomes.
Customer
Experience
Creating Value
(External)
Customer
Needs
Value
Capture
Customer
Offering
Control
Points
+ + +
11
Then shift to the internal: getting paid for the value you have created
Once the Creating Value piece of the business model is
established, then you can transition to the Getting Paid
part of the Business Model Diamond. This domain has been
thoughtfully considered by a number of people, and we are
indebted to strategists like Adrian Slywotzky and the
survivors of the Dot Com Era (i.e.
(i e not Pets.com)
Pets com) for their
pioneering efforts.
Customer
Experience
Customer
Needs
Getting Paid
(Internal)
Value
Capture
Customer
Offering
Control
Points
+ + +
12
Congruent facets make a stronger diamond. Consider Southwest: low cost, high value
The nations low fare,
high customer
satisfaction airline
Customer
Experience
Customer
Needs
Value
Capture
Customer
Offering
Control
Points
Rapid Rewards program
Customer service
Brand
Point to point nodes
Personal reservation
system
secret #2 . . .
touch point
moment of truth
a moment of high
emotional significance
+ + +
14
Customer ABC
emotional concerns
Customer ABC
business goals
Shared interactions
between Customer ABC
and your firm
+ + +
A good journey map will have 40 to 60 nodes and tells us where to look
Once we have mapped the customer journey, we
analyze it for potential moments-of-truth and
blind spots (where we cant see well enough into
the customers workflow or emotional journey).
In the B2B example at right, there were 2
moments of truth (one early, and one late) and 8
blind spots. These became the focus areas for
four weeks of field research performed by the
d
development
l
t team.
t
A quick glance at the pattern of interactions tells
you something about the challenge for this
company. There is little interaction upstream in
the customer
customerss work flow (the green nodes). Then
a big hand-off occurs, and the work is all on the
vendors side (the lower set of pink nodes). Not
surprisingly, the primary moment of truth occurs
when control is handed back to the customer (the
cluster of pink hearts).
Lumpy interaction models such as this one have
the potential to create anxiety for both parties.
The business model solutions envisioned by this
firm include creating greater transparency and
establishing earlier,
earlier smaller moments of truth.
truth
15
Field research lets us test our hypotheses and arrive at deeper insights
There was a time (the 1990s, to be exact) when business models
were the exclusive domain of strategists and financial analysts. In
the Services Era, the social sciences have emerged as a critical
part of the business model innovation team.
Customer interviews and observation is best done in the subjects
natural environment. Peer Insight social researchers and clients
often team up to go into the field and perform ride-along research
to understand the user environment in full context. We have found
the best approach is to have two researchers and a single subject,
subject
as the photo at right depicts (the second researcher took the
photograph of Peer Insights Katie Waterson and a research
subject).
We cannot design a unique experience for each customer, so we
need to organize the field insights into patterns and clusters.
When we find a cluster that (a) captures a common unmet need
and (b) fits the capabilities of the firm, that becomes the focus
area for business model innovation activities. In the picture at
right, Tamzyn Peterson of Peer Insight is organizing field research
into clusters to be used for customer co-creation.
co creation
Sense-making from qualitative research is a unique skill, one that
your firm may find unfamiliar at first. It requires an aptitude for
pattern recognition that we predict you will grow into quickly. (In
fact, humans are far more naturally skilled at pattern recognition
than at making precise calculations.)
+ + +
16
+ + +
17
Prototype it fast, and customers will show you their priorities with their actions and
expressions
Business models are not built upon our initial conclusions about
customer priorities, but low-resolution prototypes are.
Remember, the best business models base themselves on fresh
i i h into
insights
i
l
latent
customer needs.
d
Deep insight
i i h emerges
slowly, based upon trial and error. The photos at right show
testing of early, low-resolution (2D) prototypes with customers,
in a B2C setting (upper photo) and a B2B setting (lower). Facial
expressions offer important clues and the B2C setup allows
researchers to capture both their choices and their feelings.
feelings
Deep customer insights are the essential starting point for
successful business models.
For example, when Pfizer
developed its smoking cessation program, ActiveStop (later
acquired
q
byy J&J),
) it was based on a subtle but crucial customer
insight:
secret #3 . . .
+ + +
19
+ + +
20
Dominant logic
Physical flows
Occurs in established indoor venues
Events scheduled in evenings
Live band or DJ on stage
New acts appear every few days
Amplified music
Alcoholic beverages are sold
Information flows
Advertised in the media
Aimed at a specific audience
Limited data available in advance
Limited data captured or reused
Financial flows
Pay a fixed fee to get in
Single-use fee model
+ + +
21
Dominant logic
Physical flows
Occurs in established indoor venues
Events scheduled in evenings
Live band or DJ on stage
New acts appear every few days
Amplified music
Alcoholic beverages are sold
Information flows
Advertised in the media
Aimed at a specific audience
Limited data available in advance
Limited data captured or reused
Financial flows
Pay a fee to get in
Single-use fee model
Wireless headphones
+ + +
22
Successful contradiction prepares you for the next phase: combinatorial play
secret #4 . . .
+ + +
23
+ + +
24
1.
2.
Value creation
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
What unmet needs do those customers have (including their end user customers)?
How can I create a compelling customer experience (cX) to meet those needs?
What assembled capabilities are necessary to fulfill the cX?
Who are the other actors in the ecosystem?
What are the possible ways to create value with and for those actors?
8.
9.
10.
Customer
Offering
Control
Points
Value capture
(the architecture of
the revenues)
+ + +
When do you partner and when do you not? Use an eco-system map
The decision to partner or not to partner can feel like an
extremely complex make-versus-buy decision.
We find that
creating an eco-system map allows senior executives to better
visualize the opportunities and trade offs of open innovation.
To begin your map,
map first determine what are the key offerings
that fulfill the ideal customer experience and create value. For
each of these offerings, assess if your capabilities are adequate
to develop, produce, and bring to market that product or service.
p out the offerings, decide if each offering is core,
As yyou map
adjacent, or distant to what you will fundamentally provide to
the target customer.
Think twice about partnering (and
potentially giving away IP) on anything that is core. Starbucks,
for example, is highly willing to partner to create music or sell ice
cream, but the coffee retailer never partners on anything related
t coffee
to
ff or tea
t that
th t is
i actually
t ll sold
ld in
i a Starbucks
St b k store.
t
The figure on the right is an eco-system map for Nike+iPod from
Apples perspective. For the purposes of illustration, the map
has been simplified, but the point is clear. Anything that
g
directlyy to the iPod and iTunes p
platforms is core and
integrates
should be protected by Apple. Any offerings that are related to
the iPod lifestyle are adjacent. Shoes are clearly distant.
For those aspects that cannot be effectively fulfilled by existing
capabilities and that are not core to your business, determine
who
ho may
ma be reasonable partners to complete your
our offering.
offering In
addition, think about the implications of eliminating a partner.
Dell had a good run with its direct model that disintermediated
retailers.
iTunes
iPod
iPod
Receiver
Attachment
(R,D,M,C)
Nike+iPod
iTunes
Software
Nike+iPod
Website
Core
Nike+Shoe
Transmitter
(R,D,M,C)
Adjacent
Nike+
Shoe
(R,D,M,S,Di,C)
Distant
25
+ + +
26
The key question became one of enabling real-time proof of driving habits.
Progressive tested a solution in Houston during 1997 that provided drivers
with a GPS system and reported their (a) time and date of use, (b) average
speed relative to the speed limit, and (c) aggressive braking and acceleration.
Unfortunately, the potential customer savings of $300 per year was not
enough to offset the $500 cost of a GPS system. But Progressive learned
+ + +
27
17
18
19
20
K
S
22
23
24
25
K
K
K
26
27
S
K
28
29
30
31
K = keep, S = share
+ + +
28
There are effective ways to protect your IP without formal patent rights
Working with partners means exposing at least some of
your intellectual property to another entity. In the
Services Era, very little of the IP qualifies for formal
patent protections.
protections For too many firms,
firms the fear of
losing control of their IP limits their potential
innovation partners to smaller firms they can dominate.
There are effective ways to protect services IP without
formal patent rights. There are two categories of IP
protection that should support your partnership
strategy:
1.
2.
Purpose
Documentation
Confidentiality
Concealment
Prevent individual
P
i di id l workers
k
ffrom h
having
i access to
the totality of the business model
Recycling of tasks
Defensive publication
* Source: IP Management for Services, Tekes, Finnish Agency for R&D (2007).
secret #5 . . .
+ + +
30
REVENUES
use
purchase
understanding, consideration, tryout, purchase, use, reuse, habitual use, and advocacy.
At Peer Insight, we refer to the table at right as the fish
l dd It
ladder.
I shows
h
the
h set off hurdles
h dl our customers must
overcome, just as a salmon must swim upstream to
spawn. For many business models, 99% of the focus is
on the green area, where the system is up and running,
data is accumulating, and everyone is happy.
A successful Services Era offering must address the
yellow area with experience elements that are
comforting, exciting, or otherwise rich with meaning.
This is not simply a role for marketing. It is a crucial
element of the business model.
repeat
use
habitual
use
tryout
seeking
awareness
BENEFITS
+ + +
31
secret #6 . . .
+ + +
32
+ + +
33
The lesson is clear: Business model innovators must learn before they earn
adept at minimizing their risk by using a technique we call
affordable loss.
Affordable loss is the process of calculating How much can I
afford to lose to find out if this works?
works? According to Batten,
Batten
once the growth leader has set his pain threshold and it is
often quite low he can focus his efforts on maximizing the
learning from the experiment.
We call
a these experiments
p
learning
a
g
launches, since they often are not on a
linear path to commercialization, says
Liedtka. In our research, Peer Insight
found something similar: some of the
most
successful
business
model
innovators make a practice of testing
concepts they do not believe will work (in
addition to testing concepts they do
believe will work). When we heard the
term learning launch, it immediately
explained this fascinating practice.
practice
Jeanne Liedtka
Executive Director
Batten Institute
+ + +
34
B.
C.
A tight timeframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
An expert coach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exit criteria
+ + +
35
at
right
contrasts
two
Traditional risk
management approach
Affordable loss approach
Affordable loss-based
senior leader
innovation team
Bonus section . . .
+ + +
36
+ + +
37
Peer Insight recently completed formal research into services business models
A recent Peer Insight global research program analyzed 100
innovation projects from 42 different firms. We looked at three
possible areas to innovate the business model:
Channel: Modify the way your services get to market
Financial Model: Change the way you get paid
Value Network: Collaborate with partners in a new way
For services firms, we found it is fairly common to explore
aspects of the business model. The table below shows how
frequently the three methods were used on the 100 projects in
the research sample.
Figure 1
14
Most successful
28
15
Modestly successful
Used none of the methods
14
52
37
29%
20
Least successful
Used at least one method
71%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
13
100%
Most important,
important the research found that business model
exploration correlates positively with project success. Figure
2 compares the outcomes for the 100 projects. When we
compared the projects based on which ones used at least two
of the three business model innovation methods we found:
Fourteen of the twenty-eight (50%)
(
) most successful
projects used at least two of the methods;
10
20
30
40
50
Number of Projects
+ + +
38
most successful
outcomes
least successful
outcomes
Channel
13
Financial Model
16
10
Value Network
15
0%
10%
20%
30%
37%
48%
32%
40%
50%
Firms that find constructive ways to deal with that anxiety may
earn great rewards. Of the 32 projects that attempted to
innovate the value network way, 15 (47%) were among the
projects with most
most successful
successful outcomes,
outcomes 16 (50%) were
among the modestly successful and only 1 (3%) was among
the least successful.
By comparison, channel innovations led to most successful
outcomes
outco
es in 13
3 out o
of 37 (35%) cases, a
and
d financial
a c al model
odel
innovations led to most successful outcomes in 16 out of 48
(33%) cases. Furthermore, the greatest number of least
Apple
Baxter Healthcare
GE
Hewlett-Packard
Intel
Medtronic
ServiceMaster
Siemens
UPS
York
Two-thirds
Two
thirds of the innovations were pure services (example:
(example
AARP Voices of the Civil Rights initiative). The remaining
one-third were hybrid services that included products or
devices as part of the offering (example: Progressive
TripSense pay-per-use insurance requires a plug-in device
for your car).
+ + +
Peer Insight
Tim Ogilvie
tim@peerinsight.com
(703) 314-3123
Gordon Hui
ghui@peerinsight.com
(703) 535-8175
40