Programa Isocal Taller

Plant Name
Fuel Type
Sampling Location
Stationary Source Information

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja
Carbon
Chimenea Horno
Universidad de la Salle
Operator
Date
Project #
Base Run Number
# of Ports Available
# of Ports Used
Port Inside Diameter
Circular Stack?
Rectangular Stack?
15 de Octubre de 2009
R
4
4
0.1
1
Test Equipment Information

Meter Box Number
Meter Calibration Factor
Orifice Meter Coefficient
Pitot Identification
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Orsat Identification
Nozzle Number
Nozzle Diameter
Probe Number
Probe Length
Liner Material
Sample Case / Oven Number
Impinger Case Number
Acetone Lot Number
(Y)
(DH@)
Apex 572
0.994
48.960
(Cp)
0.850
(Dn)
30
6.200
1.83
Ac. Inox.
Testing Company Information

Company Name
Address
City State Zip Country
Phone Number
Fax Number
Calle 10 concarrera 2
Bogot
3 68 85 96 /97 /98
91-2 44 83 80
mm H2O
mm
m
METHOD 1 - SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR STATIONARY SOURCES

Plant Name
Sampling Location

Chimenea Horno
Date
Project #
15 de octubre de 2009
Operator
Stack Type
Stack Size
# of Ports Available
# of Ports Used
Port Inside Diameter
4
2
0.1
Circular
Large
Circular Stack or Duct Diameter

Distance to Far Wall of Stack
(Lfw)
Distance to Near Wall of Stack
(Lnw)
Diameter of Stack (=Lfw - Lnw)
(D)
Area of Stack (=3.14(D/2/Cunits)2)
(As)
2.87
0.39
2.48
4.831
Distance from Port to Disturbances

8.00
Distance Upstream
(A)
Diameters Upstream (=B/D)
(A/D)
14.00
Distance Downstream
(B)
Diameters Downstream (=A/D)
(B/D)
m
m
m
m2
m
diameters
m
diameters
Number of Traverse Points Required

Diameters to
Minimum Number of1
Flow Disturbance
Traverse Points
Up
Down
Particulate
Velocity
Stream
Stream
Points
Points
2.00-4.99
5.00-5.99
6.00-6.99
7.00-7.99
>= 8.00
0.50-1.24
1.25-1.49
1.50-1.74
1.75-1.99
>=2.00
24
20
16
12
8 or 122
16
16
12
12
8 or 122
Upstream Spec
Downstream Spec
Traverse Pts Required
1 Check the Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream
Number of Traverse Points Used
and Downstream conditions, then use the larger Number.

2 8 for Circular Stacks 12 to 24 inches
12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches
Ports by
12
Across
24
0
Pts Used
Particulate
16
0
Required
Velocity
Traverse
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Traverse Point Locations

Fraction
Distance
of
from
Stack
Inside
Diameter
Wall
m
Distance
Including
Nipple
Length
m
RCES
METHOD 2 - DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE

Plant Name
Sampling Location

Chimenea Horno
Date
Project #
15 de OCTUBRE de 2009
Operator
Stack Type
Pitot Leak Check
# of Ports Used
Pitot Identification
Pitot Coefficient (Cp)
Circular
PreTest
Diameter or Length of Stack

Width of Stack
Area of Stack
Stack Dimensions
(D)
(W)
(As)
PostTest
Velocity Traverse Data
2.48
4.831
m
m
m2
542.00
4.16
542.31
mm Hg
mm H2O
mm Hg
Estimate
0
%
%
%
%
Run Number
Run Time
Traverse
Point
Pressures
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure
Absolute Stack Pressure
(Pb)
(Pstatic)
(Ps)
Stack Gas Composition

Composition Data:
Actual
1
Carbon Dioxide Concentration
(%CO2)
Oxygen Concentration
(%O2)
Carbon Monoxide Concentration
(%CO)
Nitrogen Concentration
(%N2)
Stack Moisture Content
(Bws)
Stack Dry Molecular Weight
(Md)
Stack Wet Molecular Weight
(Ms)
g/g-mole
g/g-mole
Results
Average Stack Gas Velocity
Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate
Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate
(vs)
(Qsd)
(Qsd)
Stack Cross Section Schematic
0.85
m/sec
dscm/hr
dscm/min
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
10A
11A
12A
1B
2B
3B
4B
5B
6B
7B
8B
9B
10B
11B
12B
R-1
Velocity
Head
(Dp)
mm H2O
Stack
Temp
(ts)
C
1.00
3.00
4.50
4.00
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.00
4.00
2.50
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.50
74
75
75
77
77
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
63
64
62
68
69
70
72
71
72
72
72
71
Average1
1 Please report the average of the square roots of
Dp, or, (Dp)1/2avg = 1/nS(Dp1/2)
As = DW/Ku for Rectangular Stacks

As = (p(D/2)2)/Ku for Circular Stacks
where Ku = 1 for metric units
where Ku = 144 (in2/ft2) for English units
Ps = Pbar + Pstatic/13.6
%N2 = 100 - %CO2 - %O2 - %CO
Md = .44(%CO2) + .32(%O2 ) + .28(%N2 + %CO)
Ms = Md(1 - Bws) + 18Bws
(Dp)1/2avg = 1/nS(Dp1/2)
Formulas Used
Ts(avg) = 1/nSts + Tu
where Tu = 273 oK for metric units
where Tu = 460 oR for English units
vs = KpCp(Dp)1/2avg (Ts(avg)/(PsMs))1/2
where Kp = 34.97 for metric units

where Kp = 85.49 for English units
Qsd = 3600(1 - Bws)vsAs(Tstd/Ts(avg))(Ps/Pstd)
where Tstd = 293 oK, Pstd = 760 mm Hg, for metric units
where Tstd = 528 oR, Pstd = 29.92 in Hg, for English units
Local
Velocity
(vs)l
m/sec
METHOD 3 - GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT

Plant Name
Sampling Location

Chimenea Horno
Operator
Fuel Type
Orsat Leak Check
Carbon
Run Number
Sample
Analysis
Time
hh:mm
Oxygen
Volume
(VO2)
ml
4.2
4.1
3.9
14.0
13.9
13.8
hh:mm
(Fo)avg
(%EA)avg
R-2
Carbon
Dioxide
Volume
(VCO2)
ml
Carbon
Monoxide
Volume
(VCO)
ml
Oxygen
Volume
(VO2)
ml
hh:mm
(Fo)avg
(%EA)avg
R-3
Carbon
Dioxide
Volume
(VCO2)
ml
Oxygen
Volume
(VO2)
ml
15:35
Carbon
Monoxide
Concentra.
(%CO)
percent
18:00
Run Stop Time

Nitrogen
Concentra.
(%N2)
percent
Dry
Molecular
Weight
(Md)
g/g-mole
Molecular
Weight
Deviation
(DMd)
g/g-mole
0.00
0.00
0.00
percent
Gas Analysis Data
Run Start Time
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Concentra.
Concentra.
(%CO2)
(%O2)
percent
percent
1
0
Molecular Wt Deviation < 0.3?

Fuel Factor in Handbook Range?
Run Stop Time

Carbon
Monoxide
Concentra.
(%CO)
percent
Nitrogen
Concentra.
(%N2)
percent
Dry
Molecular
Weight
(Md)
g/g-mole
Molecular
Weight
Deviation
(DMd)
g/g-mole
Carbon
Monoxide
Volume
(VCO)
ml
percent
Gas Analysis Data
Run Start Time
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Concentra.
Concentra.
(%CO2)
(%O2)
percent
percent
0
0

Run Stop Time

Carbon
Monoxide
Concentra.
(%CO)
percent
Nitrogen
Concentra.
(%N2)
percent
Dry
Molecular
Weight
(Md)
g/g-mole
Molecular
Weight
Deviation
(DMd)
g/g-mole
Averages
Results
Average Calculated Fuel Factor
Average Excess Air
Fuel Type
Coal, Anthracite
Coal, Lignite
Coal, Bituminous
Oil, Distillate
Oil, Residual
Gas, Natural
Gas, Propane
Gas, Butane
Wood
Wood Bark
# of Ports Used
4
Maximum Fuel Factor
Orsat Identification
Averages
Results
Average Excess Air
Run Number
Sample
Analysis
Time
Carbon
Monoxide
Volume
(VCO)
ml
Gas Analysis Data

Run Start Time
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Concentra.
Concentra.
(%CO2)
(%O2)
percent
percent
14.5
14.4
14.3
Averages
Results
Average Excess Air
Run Number
Sample
Analysis
Time
PreTest
Minimum Fuel Factor

0
PostTest
R-1
Carbon
Dioxide
Volume
(VCO2)
ml
Date
Project #
(Fo)avg
(%EA)avg
Fuel Factor Fo
Minimum
1.016
1.016
1.083
1.260
1.210
1.600
1.434
1.405
1.000
1.003
Maximum
1.130
1.130
1.230
1.413
1.370
1.836
1.586
1.553
1.120
1.130
percent

Formulas Used
%CO2 = VCO2
%O2 = VO2 - VCO2
%CO = VCO - VO2
%N2 = 100 - %CO2 - %O2 - %CO
Md = .44(%CO2)+ .32(%O2 )+ .28(%N2 + %CO)
Fo = (20.9 - %O2 - .5%CO)/(%CO2 + %CO)

%EA=100(%O2-.5%CO)/(.264%NO2-(%O2-.5%CO))
0
0
METHOD 4 - DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES

Plant Name
Sampling Location
Operator
Stack Type
Train Leak Check
Run Number
Total Meter Volume
Avg Meter Temp
Avg Stack Temp
Chimenea Horno
Circular
PreTest
R-1
1.269
23
72
(Vm)
(tm)avg
(ts)avg
Impinger 1
ml
Contents
Final Value
Initial Value
Net Value
(Vf),(Wf)
(Vi),(Wi)
(Vn),(Wn)
Total Volume
Total Weight
Std Meter Volume
Calc Moisture Content
(Vt)
(Wt)
(Vm(std))
(Bws(calc))
Run Number
Total Meter Volume
Avg Meter Temp
Avg Stack Temp
113.00
100.00
(tm)avg
(ts)avg
Total Volume
Total Weight
Std Meter Volume
(Vt)
(Wt)
(Vm(std))
(Bws)
(Vm)
(tm)avg
Avg Stack Temp
(ts)avg
Contents
Final Value
Initial Value
Net Value
(Vf),(Wf)
(Vi),(Wi)
(Vn),(Wn)
Total Volume
Total Weight
Std Meter Volume
(Vt)
(Wt)
(Vm(std))
(Bws)
# of Ports Used
Meter Box Number
Meter Cal Factor (Y)
2
Apex 572
1.01
Moisture Content Data

Run Start Time
dcm
Barometric Pressure
oC
Stack Static Pressure
oC
Avg Orifice Pressure
Impinger 2
Impinger 3
Impinger 4
ml
ml
g
107.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
oC
Impinger 1
ml
Impinger 2
ml
0.00
0.00
ml
g
dscm
%

Impinger 3
Impinger 4
ml
g
Results
Water Vol Condensed
Water Vol Weighed
Sat. Moisture Content
Final Moisture Content

Run Start Time
dcm
Barometric Pressure
oC
oC
Impinger 1
ml
Impinger 2
ml
0.00
0.00
ml
g
dscm
%
Run Stop Time

542.00
(Pb)
4.16
(Pstatic)
2.67
(DH)avg
Impinger 5
Impinger 6
ml
ml
mm Hg
mm H2O
mm H2O
Impinger 7
g
107.62
100.00
Results
Water Vol Condensed
Water Vol Weighed
oC
R-3
Run Number
Total Meter Volume
Avg Meter Temp

Run Start Time
dcm
Barometric Pressure
(Vm)
(Vf),(Wf)
(Vi),(Wi)
(Vn),(Wn)
PostTest
ml
g
dscm
%
R-2
Contents
Final Value
Initial Value
Net Value
Date
Project #

Impinger 3
Impinger 4
ml
g
Results
Water Vol Condensed
Water Vol Weighed
(Vwc(std))
(Vwsg(std))
(Bws(svp))
(Bws)
Run Stop Time

(Pb)
(Pstatic)
(DH)avg
Impinger 5
ml
(Vwc(std))
(Vwsg(std))
(Bws(svp))
(Bws)
Run Stop Time

(Pb)
(Pstatic)
(DH)avg
Impinger 5
ml
(Vwc(std))
(Vwsg(std))
(Bws(svp))
(Bws)
scm
scm
%
%
542.00
4.16
2.67
Impinger 6
ml
mm Hg
mm H2O
mm H2O
Impinger 7
ml
0.000
0.000
scm
scm
%
%
542.00
4.15
mm Hg
mm H2O
Impinger 6
ml
mm H2O
Impinger 7
ml
0.000
0.000
scm
scm
%
%
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA

Plant Name
Sampling Location

Chimenea Horno
Date
Project #
Operator
# of Points Across
12
Run #
# of Ports Used

Avg Stack Temp
Avg Gas Meter Temp
Avg Pitot Tube Diff. Pressure

Stack Moisture Content
Stack Dry Molecular Weight
Estimated Orifice Flow Rate
Slide Rule Set-Up

(Cp)
(ts)
(tm)
(DH@)
(Dpavg)
(Bws)
(Mds)
(Qm)
(K)
0.850
72
24
49.78
9.62
5.0
28.94
21.20
3.30
Meter #
Nozzle #
Actual Nozzle Diameter
Ideal Nozzle Diameter
Probe # / Length
Liner Material
Sample Case / Oven #
Impinger Case #
oC
oC
mm H2O
mm H2O
%
g/g-mole
acmm
Pre
Post
Pitot OK?
Pressures
Barometric Pressure
Absolute Meter Pressure
Traverse
Point #
1B
2B
3B
4B
5B
6B
7B
8B
9B
10B
11B
12B
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
Sampling
Time
(Q)
min
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
35.0
37.5
40.0
42.5
45.0
47.5
50.0
Clock
Time
hr:min
15:35
16:10
17:25
(Pb)
(Pstatic)
(Ps)
(Pm)
542.00
4.15
542.31
545.66
mm Hg
mm H2O
mm Hg
mm Hg
Dry Gas
Meter
Reading
(Vm)
m3
Velocity
Head
(Dp)
mm H2O
Desired
Orifice
(DH)
mm H2O
Actual
Orifice
(DH)
mm H2O
Stack
Temp
(ts)
21.662
21.702
21.749
21.803
21.861
21.912
21.978
22.037
22.099
22.156
22.208
22.245
22.280
22.315
22.361
22.413
22.472
22.531
22.595
22.659
22.720
5.50
9.00
11.50
12.00
13.00
14.50
15.00
14.50
13.00
11.00
6.00
4.00
5.00
8.50
11.00
12.50
14.50
15.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
18.15
29.70
37.95
39.60
42.90
47.85
49.50
47.85
42.90
36.30
19.80
13.20
16.50
28.05
36.30
41.25
47.85
49.50
52.80
52.80
52.80
18.00
30.00
38.00
39.50
43.00
48.00
49.50
48.00
43.00
36.00
20.00
13.00
16.50
28.00
36.00
41.00
48.00
49.50
53.00
53.00
53.00
68
70
73
76
76
76
77
77
77
76
75
74
72
76
78
78
78
79
80
80
79
oC
10A
11A
12A
Ultimo
Final Values
Average Values
52.5
55.0
57.5
60.0
18:00
22.782
22.840
22.889
22.931
60.0
18:00
22.931
12.50
10.00
7.00
11.38
41.25
33.00
23.10
41.00
33.00
23.00
78
78
77
37.54
76
G DATA
19 de enero de 1998
R-1
of Ports Used
2
Sampling Equipment
Apex 572
(Y)
1.010
(Dna)
(Dni)
6.200
6.335
1.83
30

deal Nozzle Diameter
Probe # / Length
Liner Material
Sample Case / Oven #
mpinger Case #
0.00057
mm
mm
m
Ac. Inox.
m3/min
m3/min
m3/min
Leak Checks
@
@
mm Hg
mm Hg
Yes?
Orsat OK?
Meter
Inlet
Temp
(tmi)
Meter
Outlet
Temp
(tmo)
Filter
Temp
Impinger
Temp
oC
oC
oC
oC
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
150
150
150
150
152
151
152
152
152
150
151
151
151
151
152
152
151
151
152
152
151
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
12
12
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
11
11
12
12
Exit
mm Hg
Square
Root
(Dp1/2)
(mm H2O)1/2
Local
Stack
Velocity
(vs)l
m/sec
Cumulative
Meter
Volume
(Vm)std
scm
1.2
1.5
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.2
2.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.35
3.00
3.39
3.46
3.61
3.81
3.87
3.81
3.61
3.32
2.45
2.00
2.24
1.50
2.00
2.00
2.50
3.87
4.00
4.00
4.00
10.37
13.31
15.11
15.50
16.14
17.04
17.36
17.06
16.16
14.84
10.95
8.92
9.95
13.05
14.88
15.87
17.09
17.41
18.00
18.00
17.98
0.029
0.062
0.101
0.142
0.179
0.226
0.268
0.312
0.353
0.390
0.417
0.442
0.466
0.499
0.536
0.579
0.621
0.667
0.712
0.756
0.800
Pump
Vacuum
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
24
150
150
151
12
13
13
3.0
Maximum Vacuum
24
151
2.5
2.0
2.0
12
3.54
3.16
2.65
15.87
14.19
11.86
Final Values
3.09
14.87
0.841
0.876
0.906
0.906
Cumulative
Percent
IsoKinetic
(I)
%
104.1
99.6
99.0
100.2
97.4
99.3
98.5
98.8
98.7
98.6
98.2
98.7
98.5
98.5
98.4
98.8
98.6
98.8
98.9
98.6
98.5
98.6
98.5
98.5
98.5
METHOD 5 - SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA SHEET

Plant Name
Sampling Location

Chimenea Horno
Date
Project #
Operator
Acetone Lot Number

Run History Data
R-1
15:35
18:00
rjr
rjr
1/19/1998
Run Number
Run Start Time
Run Stop Time
Train Prepared By
Train Recovered By
Recovery Date
Relinquished By
Received By
Relinquished Date
Relinquished Time
R-2
R-3
(hh:mm)
(hh:mm)
(mm/dd/yy)
C.Q.
(mm/dd/yy)
(hh:mm)
Equipment Identification Numbers
117
10
10
Filter
Acetone Wash
Silica Gel
Impinger Case
Sample Box
Oven
Final Volume
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Comments
Final Weight
Initial Weight
Net Weight
Comments
12
1
1
Impingers 1, 2, and 3 - Water Volume
216.0
(Vf)
200.0
(Vi)
16.0
(Vn)
Impinger 4 - Silica Gel Weight

206.7
(Wf)
200.0
(Wi)
6.7
(Wn)
ml
ml
ml
g
g
g
Total Water Collected

Total Volume
Vn = Vf - Vi
(Vlc)
Wn = Wf - Wi
22.7
Formulas Used
Vlc = Vn + Wn/rw where rw = .9982 g/ml
SHEET
19 de enero de 1998
METHOD 5 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS - RESULTS

Plant Name
Sampling Location

Chimenea Horno
Date
Project #
Operator
Universidad de La Salle
Stack Type
Historical Data
Run Number
Run Start Time
Run Stop Time
(Y)
(Cp)
(Dna)
Initial Meter Volume

Final Meter Volume
Total Meter Volume
Total Sampling Time
(Vm)i
(Vm)f
(Vm)
(Q)
R-1
R-1
R-1
18:00
1.010
0.850
6.200
1.010
0.850
6.200
1.010
0.850
6.200
Average
Stack Test Data
Average Meter Temperature

Average Stack Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Average Orifice Pressure Drop
Absolute Meter Pressure
Avg Square Root Pitot Pressure
Impingers 1-3 Water Volume Gain
Impinger 4 Silica Gel Weight Gain
Total Water Volume Collected
Standard Water Vapor Volume
Standard Meter Volume
Calculated Stack Moisture
Saturated Stack Moisture
Reported Stack Moisture Content
Carbon Dioxide Percentage
Oxygen Percentage
Carbon Monoxide Percentage
Nitrogen Percentage
Dry Gas Molecular Weight
Wet Stack Gas Molecular Weight
Calculated Fuel Factor
Percent Excess Air
Average Stack Gas Velocity
Stack Cross-Sectional Area
Actual Stack Flow Rate
(tm)avg
21.662
22.931
1.269
60.0
24.3
76.2
542.00
4.15
542.31
37.54
544.76
3.09
(ts)avg
542.00
(Pb)
4.15
(Pstatic)
542.31
(Ps)
(DH)avg
(Pm)
(Dp1/2)avg
16.0
(Vn)
6.7
(Wn)
22.7
(Vlc)
0.030
(Vw)std
0.906
(Vm)std
3.2
(Bws(calc))
55.8
(Bws(svp))
3.2
(Bws)
Gas Analysis Data
3.9
(%CO2)
9.9
(%O2)
0.4
(%CO)
85.8
(%N2)
29.02
(Md)
28.66
(Ms)
2.512
(Fo)
74.9
(%EA)
Volumetric Flow Rate Data
13.76
(vs)
0.66
0.66
(As)
549
(Qa)
542.00
4.15
542.31
1.269
60.0
24.3
76.2
542.00
4.15
542.31
37.54
544.76
3.09
16.0
6.7
22.7
0.030
0.906
3.2
55.8
3.2
3.9
9.9
0.4
85.8
29.02
28.66
2.512
74.9
13.76
0.66
549
Dry Standard Stack Flow Rate

Percent of Isokinetic Rate
(Qsd)
(I)
Mass of Particulate on Filter

Mass of Particulate in Acetone
Mass due to Acetone Blank
Total Mass of Particulates
Stack Particulate Concentration
Stack Particulate Concentration
Particulate Emission Rate
(mf)
(ma')
(Wa)
(mn)
(cs)
(cs)
(E)
318
104.5
318
104.5
Emission Rate Data
22.6
15.5
0.0
38.1
0.042
0.649
0.80
22.6
15.5
0.0
38.1
0.042
0.649
0.80
- RESULTS
15 de Octubre de 2004
Circular
hh:mm
hh:mm
mm
m3
m3
m3
min
oC
oC
mm Hg
mm H2O
mm Hg
mm H2O
mm Hg
(mm H2O)1/2
ml
g
ml
scm
dscm
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
g/g-mole
g/g-mole
%
m/sec
m2
acmm
dscmm
%
mg
mg
mg
mg
g/dscm
gr/dscm
kg/hr

Programa Isocal Taller

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Programa Isocal Taller

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plant Name

Stationary Source Information

Test Equipment Information

Testing Company Information

METHOD 1 - SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR STATIONARY SOURCES

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja

Circular Stack or Duct Diameter

Distance from Port to Disturbances

Number of Traverse Points Required

Number of Traverse Points Used

and Downstream conditions, then use the larger Number.

12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches

Traverse Point Locations

METHOD 2 - DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja

Diameter or Length of Stack

Velocity Traverse Data

Stack Gas Composition

Stack Cross Section Schematic

Dp, or, (Dp)1/2avg = 1/nS(Dp1/2)

As = DW/Ku for Rectangular Stacks

where Kp = 34.97 for metric units

METHOD 3 - GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja

Run Stop Time

Molecular Wt Deviation < 0.3?

Run Stop Time

Molecular Wt Deviation < 0.3?

Run Stop Time

Gas Analysis Data

Minimum Fuel Factor

Molecular Wt Deviation < 0.3?

Fo = (20.9 - %O2 - .5%CO)/(%CO2 + %CO)

METHOD 4 - DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES

Avg Stack Temp

Moisture Content Data

Stack Static Pressure

Moisture Content Data

Run Stop Time

Moisture Content Data

Avg Orifice Pressure

Run Stop Time

Run Stop Time

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Avg Pitot Tube Diff. Pressure

Slide Rule Set-Up

Meter Calibration Factor

Actual Nozzle Diameter

METHOD 5 - SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA SHEET

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja

Acetone Lot Number

Impinger 4 - Silica Gel Weight

Total Water Collected

METHOD 5 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS - RESULTS

Ladrillera El Rub, Tunja

Initial Meter Volume

Stack Test Data

Average Meter Temperature

Dry Standard Stack Flow Rate

Mass of Particulate on Filter

Emission Rate Data