Professional Documents
Culture Documents
__________________________ .
_________________________ .
Standard
INSPECTION
OF
DRILL
STEM COMPONENTS
Introduction
.
,
.
- . , .
,
.
Most failures of drill pipe result from some form of metal fatigue. A fatigue failure is one which originates as a result of
repeated or fluctuating stresses having maximum values less
than the tensile strength of the material. Fatigue fractures are
progressive, beginning as minute cracks that grow under the
action of the fluctuating stress. The rate of propagation is related to the applied cyclic loads and under certain conditions
may be extremely rapid. The failure does not normally exhibit
extensive plastic deformation and is therefore difficult to detect
until such time as considerable damage has occurred. There
is no accepted means of inspecting to determine the amount
of accumulated fatigue damage or the remaining life in the
pipe at a given stress level.
- .
,
.
, .
. , .
.
, ; ; .
1 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
, , ,
, .
, ,
.
,
,
.
Content
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4. Procedure
5. Tool Joints
5.1.
Required inspections
5.2.
Optional Inspections
5.3.
General
6. Drill Collar inspection procedure
7. Drill Collar handling System
8. Kellys
9. Setting the Inspection Program
10. Inspection Methods
11. Inspection Program
11.1.
Recommended beginning Inspection Frequency
11.2.
( )
4.
5.
5.1.
5.2.
5.3.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
11.1.
11.2.
11.3.
12.
/
13. ( )
13.1.
13.1.1.
13.1.2
/
13.1.3.
13.2. -
14.
1.
.
:
) ,
) /
. ,
,
.
2 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
,
.
2.
2.
, .
,
,
2%,
.
,
.
3.
3.
( )
2%, , .
, .
4.
4.
Procedure
() 7 24 ( ).
,
2- , , ,
2- , , 2-
e 10 7 .
5.
TOOL JOINTS
5.
5.1.
b)
3 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
)
1-
( 7).
. ,
, 1
)
b)
c)
4 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
, , , ,
.
1
)
,
. ,
.
.
1
5.2.
(
11)
:
) , ,
.
) /
,
.
.
, , 0,006
2 , .
.
)
,
.
, ,
,
,
.
.
,
, .
.
, , , , . ,
body permits.
d)
It is also recommended that any hard banded surfaces of the pin or box tool joint tong space be excluded from the area of tong die engagement as
stated above when minimum tong space is determined.
This practice will ensure that optimum gripping of the
tongs is achieved and that damage to tong dies is
minimized.
In the case where tool joint diameters have been
worn to the extent that the original hard banding has
been substantially removed, the user may include this
area in determining the minimum tong space.
, .
)
.
,
.
, ,
, / ,
- .
,
,
.
.
, ,
.
5.3. General
5.3.
a)
gauging thread wear, plastic deformation, mechanical damage and lack of cleanliness may all contribute
to erroneous figures when plug and ring gauges are
applied to used connections. Therefore, ring and plug
standoffs should not be used to determine rejection
or continued use of rotary shouldered connections.
b)
repair of damaged shoulders when refacing a damaged tool joint shoulder, a minimum of material
should be removed. It is a good practice to remove
not more than 1/32-inch from a box or pin shoulder at
any one refacing and not more than 1/16-inch cumulatively.
)
, , , , .
.
)
.
1/32 ,
1/16 .
,
. ,
.
3/16
, ,
.
1/8 .
,
, .
5 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
6.
6.
6 of 24
Length coverd under drill pipe
classification system/
Tong space/
Tong space/
Coverage
lars is recommended:
a) Visually inspect full length to determine obvious
damage and overall condition
b) Measure OD and ID of both ends
7.
c)
Thoroughly clean box and pin threads. Follow immediately with wet fluorescent magnetic particle inspection for detection of cracks. A magnifying mirror may
be used in crack detection of the box threads. Drill
collars found to contain cracks should be considered
unfit for further drilling service. Shop repair of cracked
drill collars is typically possible if the unaffected area
of the drill collar permits.
d)
e)
Check box bore back diameter for swelling. In addition, use a straight edge on the crests of the threads
in the box checking for rocking due to swelling of the
box. Some machine shops may cut box bore back
larger than API standards, therefore, a check of the
diameter of the bore back may give a misleading result.
f)
Check box and pin shoulders for damage. All field repairable damage shall be reapired by refacing and
beveling. Excessive damage to shoulders should be
repaired in reputable machine shops with API standard gauges.
:
)
)
)
.
-
- . . ,
,
. , ,
, .
)
.
)
.
.
,
,
.
)
.
, ,
.
.
7.
,
.
.
7 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
.
, ..
.
1/16
5 ,
40 60
.
,
.
() , .
8.
8.
KELLYS
b)
3.
Visual thread inspection the thread profile is
checked to detect over-torque, lapped threads, and
stretching. Threads are visually inspected to detect
handling damage, corrosion damage and galling. In
addition, threads are checked for wear resulting from
make-up. Minimum gaps between the tool joints
bearing faces prior to make-up are shown in Attachment 1.
9.
:
)
. (
)
)
:
1.
2. (
), ()
, 90 . . ( )
.
3. , .
, .
.
9.
,
.
8 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
b)
c)
)
)
,
, . " "
, ,
.
10.
15
, . ""
,
.
NAME OF METHOD /
APPLIED TO /
-
1. Visual Tube /
2. OD Gauge Tube /
3. UT Wall Thickness
(ultrasonic) /
WHAT IS DONE /
WHAT IS BEING EVALUATED /
INSPECTION APPARATUS /
Full length visual examination of the inside and outside surfaces of used tubes /
Straightness, mechanical or corrosion damage, debris such as scale or drilling
mud / , ,
,
Paint marker, pit depth gage, and a light capable of illuminating the full length
internal surface of the pipe are required / , ,
Full length mechanical gauging of the outside diameter of used Drill pipe tubes /
Diameter variations caused by excessive wear or mechanical damage, expansions caused by string shot, reduction caused by overpull /
,
Direct reading or Go-No-Go type gages may be used. Gages must be capable
of measuring the smallest and largest permissible tube outside diameter / - .
-
,
.
Measurement of the wall thickness around one circumference of the drillpipe
tube using an ultrasonic thickness gage /
Tube wall thickness below the specified acceptance limits, minimum crosssectional area of the tube / ,
The ultrasonic instrument shall be the pulse-echo type with digital or analog
display. The transducer shall have separate transmit and receive elements. /
9 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
4. Electromagnetic 1
/
1
5. Electromagnetic 2
/
2
6. MPI Slip/Upset
(magnetic particle inspection) /
7. UT Slip/Upset
(ultrasonic) /
8. Elevator Groove /
-
.
.
Full length scanning (excluding upsets) of drill pipe tube using the longitudinal
field buggy type unit / (
)
Transverse flaws such as fatigue cracks, corrosion pits, cuts, gouges, and other
damage that exceed the specified acceptance limits / , , , , ,
Flux leakage detection equipment (unit) used for transverse flow detection shall
utilize a DC coil. The unit shall be designed to allow active inspection of the
tube surface from upset-to-upset. / ,
. ,
.
Full length scanning (excluding upsets) using a unit with both longitudinal EMI
and gamma ray wall thickness capabilities /
( )
, .
Flaws such as fatigue cracks, corrosion pits, cuts, gouges, and other damage
that exceed the specified acceptance limits, full length tube wall thickness /
, , , , , ,
.
a) EMI unit (flux leakage detection unit) / ( ).
b) Gamma ray unit shall employ a configuration capable of detecting eccentricity. The double average wall method shall be used only in conjunction with
backscatter or single wall method. / .
.
Examination of external surface of DP and HWDP upsets and slip areas using
the active-field AC yoke dry visible magnetic particle technique /
, , .
Flows such as a fatigue cracks, corrosion pits, cuts, gouges, exceed the specified acceptance limits / ,
, , , , .
Longitudinal magnetization shall be accomplished with a handheld AC yoke /
, .
Examination of DP and HWDP upsets and slip areas using shear wave ultrasonic equipment /
Flows such as a fatigue cracks, corrosion pits, cuts, gouges, and exceed the
specified acceptance limits / , , , , , .
The ultrasonic instruments for both scanning and prove-up shall be the pulseecho type with A-scan presentation and gain control increments no greater than
2 db. The units shall have both audible and visible alarms. /
, -
- 2 .
, .
Measurement of elevator groove dimensions such as collar OD, groove length,
10 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
grooves /
9. Visual Connection
/
10. Dimensional 1 /
1
11. Dimensional 2
2
12. Dimensional 3 /
3
11 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
14. UT Connection
(ultrasonic) /
( )
HWDP tool joints
BHA connections
(all) /
()
Non-magnetic BHA
connections /
Torsional capacity of HWDP pin and box, drill collar BSR, evidence of torsional
damage, excessive shoulder width, proper dimensions on stress relief features
to reduce connection, wear on HWDP center upset /
,
, ,
,
,
,
.
A metal rule, a metal straight edge, a hardened and ground profile gage, a lead
gage, and a lead setting standard, and ID and OD calipers are required / , , ,
,
.
Fluorescent wet magnetic particle inspection using active DC current / , . .
The existence of fatigue cracks /
1. Particle Bath Medium/
2. Blacklight Equipment /
3. Coil (a DC coil) / ( )
4. Magnetic particle field indicator /
5. A mirror to examine box thread roots /
Compression wave pulse-echo ultrasonic inspection of connections /
The existence of fatigue cracks/
The ultrasonic instrument shall be the pulse-echo type with with and A-scan
presentation / -
With liquid penetrant inspection of connections /
The existence of fatigue cracks/
11.
Service Category 1: very shallow, very routine wells in well-developed areas. When
drill stem failures occur, failure costs are so
minimal that the cost of extensive inspection
would not have been justified (OFS Definition = Vertical and Direction wells from 0 m
to 1500 m measured depth)
2.
, .
, , . - ,
, -1, :
12 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
1.
1: , . ,
,
(
- 0 1500 ).
2. 2: ,
, (
- -
3.
4.
5.
1500 2500 50 ).
3. 3: , .
.(
, -, S 2500
4000 . , 600 )
4. 4: , 3. ( 3,
600 800 ) .
Component /
Drill Pipe and Kellys /
5.
11.1
Service Category /
12
3 -4
When picked up /
13 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
5: .
( 4000
, , , , 800 .
11.2
Tool Joint /
Visual connection
/
Visual Tube
/
Acceptance Criteria /
(See
Table 24 API RP
7G for classification requirements
for API pipe/ .
24
7 - )
Class 2 / 2
Visual
connection /
Dimensional 1
/ 1
Visual Tube /
OD Gage /
UT-wall thickness /
Class 2 or
Premium
Class
(depending
on
loads to be
applied) / 2-
Visual connection /
Dimensional 2 /
2
Visual connection /
Dimensional 2 / 2
Visual Tube /
OD Gage /
UT-wall thickness /
Electromagnetic1 /
Visual Tube /
OD Gage /
UT-wall thickness /
Electromagnetic1 /
1
MPI Upsets /
Premium Class
Premium Class
Component /
Connection /
Service Category /
1
2
Visual connection /
11.3
Visual connection /
Blacklight connection /
14 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
Visual connection /
Dimensional 2 / 2
Blacklight
connection /
Visual Tube /
OD Gage /
UT-wall thickness /
Electromagnetic1 /
1
MPI Upsets/
UT Upsets /
Premium Class /
3-5
Visual connection /
Blacklight connection /
Elevator groove /
Visual tube /
Elevator groove /
Visual tube /
Dimensional 3 / 3
Elevator groove /
Visual tube /
MPI upsets /
, (
) .
After defining Service categories 1 5, the operator determines the drill stem inspection program in a given well or area
using a three-step process:
1 5, - ,
:
1:
2:
3:
( ,
)
,
. ,
.
12.
1)
.
2)
/
, .
3)
( )
4)
5)
. . 1.8" 0.125".
6)
,
80% ,
.
7)
.
.
8)
1" .
15 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
. (
7 )
9)
Pressure test all drill string assemblies to pressure,
needed for used drill string.
9)
10)
Inspect all members visually as they are being handled. Reject bent tubes and tubes and tool joints that exhibit
eccentric wear.
10)
11)
Watch tubes for exfoliation. Exposure to salt water
causes some aluminum alloys to peel in hand-sized layers.
11)
12)
Reject tubes with excess slip marks.
360-degree
deep slip grooves are stress raisers, generally brought about
by careless handling.
12)
,
.
. ,
, .
.
.
.
0
(360 ) .
.
13.
,
() /
25 (1 )
.
.
(. 6
V), (
7 V) (: -)
, -
.
,
.
13.1
On wear resistant alloys it is normal to find cracks in the transverse or diagonal direction. Typically, these cracks may run
straight across the weld bead or at an angle of between 30
and 45 Occasionally the cracks will interconnect. This is acceptable providing the cracks are less than 1.6mm (1/16)
wide with, in the case of cracks which extend across the full
width of the hard banded region, a minimum spacing or
12.5mm (). If the cracks exceed these criteria then the pipe
should not be run in the well. The reason for this is that
spalling may result, possibly leading to severe casing wear. If
for any reason cracks extend into the HAZ (Heat Affected
Zone), parent metal or main body of the component, then the
joint should be taken out of service.
.
30-45.
. , 1,6 (1/16) , , , 12,5 (1/2 ).
,
. , . - , ,
.
13.1.1.
16 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
>1/2
<1/16
. , 1/16 (1,6 )
, * (12,5 )
.
13.1.2. /
76 (3) , , .
,
- , , . .
. 3
Cracks into
HAZ or parent metal are
not allowed
(), . , .
-
.
13.1.3
17 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
<3
, 1/3 (3,2 ) 1/16 (1,6 ).
13.1.4. /
,
, ..
, 4,8 (3/16).
, .
,
3,2 (1/3)
1,6 (1/16), . , ,
. - .
13.2 -
- .
- , ,
.
14.
a.
, . , , , , .
:
5000 /. (~340 .).
.
.
.
,
18 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
.
. 1,2,3,4 ,
.
. (. ) , , .
.
- (
)
3,2 ,
10 .
CLASSIFICATIONS:
CLASS 1
Status: Re-use
Description:
The internal diameter coating contains minor abrasion and scrapes down the tube and in the critical
transition area
No corrosion products (rust or scale) are present in
the tube or transition area
( )
,
In Tool Joint
19 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
CLASS 2
In Tube Body
Status: Re-use
Description:
(). .
5%
, .
20 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
CLASS 3
Description:
In Tool Joint
In Tube Body
Status: Re-use
3
:
21 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
Note:
Re-use of this pipe is normal drilling operations is acceptable. However, the coating should be re-inspected
after each use.
Note: Re-use of this pipe in deep, high temperature gas wells
with significant amounts of CO2 and or H2S is not recommended
Note: Water blast limitations
CLASS 4
STATUS: Re-coat
Description:
.
,
15%
,
15%, .
.
.
:
.
.
:
:
Coating loss in the tube is 25% or more with the onset of pitting corrosion
25%
.
25%
In Tool Joint
22 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
In Tube Body
Developed by:
:
Brandon Benedict (OFS)
()
Valery Kolotilin (OFS)
()
Roy Richardson (SCM)
()
Andre Georgiesh (NvBN)
()
Vladimir Ryigalov (OBN)
()
Alexander Nikulin (NvBN)
()
Ivan Perepeliatnik (NPRS 1)
(-1)
Bernard Perrot (OFS)
()
23 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict
1 ( , )
Attachment 1 (drill pipes manufactured according to GOST)
.
Tool joint wear limits
,
Nominal size, mm
80
95
108
172
178
203
155
,
Minimum OD, mm
uneven wear
even wear
75
77
89
92
102
105
164
168
167
172.5
191
197
148
151.5
.
Drill pipe body wear limits
,
Nominal pipe
diameter, mm
,
Worn OD, mm
60
73
89
102
57
69
85
98
,
Nominal pipe
diameter
127
147
93
,
Worn OD, mm
124
144
90
(, ).
Allowable wear for tool joint threads (tubes, subs)
,
Tool joint
nominal diameter, mm
Thread designation
80
86
95
105
108
140
155
172/178
197
-66
-73
-76
-83
-88
-117
-133
-147
-152
, ( )
Distance between pin bearing
face and box when stabbing,
mm (minimum)
14
21
14
29
21
14
21
26
26
24 of 24
Prepared by: BBenedict