The document summarizes a discussion between two individuals who recently passed the CCNP exam. One individual provides details about their experience, noting that while the exam questions and labs were similar to practice materials, some details like IP addresses and router names were changed. They encourage paying attention to these types of details. Another individual passed with a 953/1000 score and confirms the exam content was valid. They provide specific insights on the OSPF, IPv6, redistribution, policy routing, and EIGRP labs. They note that one EIGRP lab showed unexpected route output but that it did not prevent passing. They also encountered a variance question with no matching answers. Both encourage studying various materials like CBT Nuggets, Cisco
The document summarizes a discussion between two individuals who recently passed the CCNP exam. One individual provides details about their experience, noting that while the exam questions and labs were similar to practice materials, some details like IP addresses and router names were changed. They encourage paying attention to these types of details. Another individual passed with a 953/1000 score and confirms the exam content was valid. They provide specific insights on the OSPF, IPv6, redistribution, policy routing, and EIGRP labs. They note that one EIGRP lab showed unexpected route output but that it did not prevent passing. They also encountered a variance question with no matching answers. Both encourage studying various materials like CBT Nuggets, Cisco
The document summarizes a discussion between two individuals who recently passed the CCNP exam. One individual provides details about their experience, noting that while the exam questions and labs were similar to practice materials, some details like IP addresses and router names were changed. They encourage paying attention to these types of details. Another individual passed with a 953/1000 score and confirms the exam content was valid. They provide specific insights on the OSPF, IPv6, redistribution, policy routing, and EIGRP labs. They note that one EIGRP lab showed unexpected route output but that it did not prevent passing. They also encountered a variance question with no matching answers. Both encourage studying various materials like CBT Nuggets, Cisco
SynAck from United States - Aug 06 2013, 7:26 PM Report Spam
passed today.... 100% valid. Answers are not in same order Paul. All questions w ere in this dump plus SIM's from digitaltut. Pay attention, IP's, router names, areas and process ID's are changed in some o f the SIM's. Also, the router process does not exist on the Portland router in the OSPF SIM so that needs created as well. Good luck al l! Jackhammer1369 from United States - Aug 05 2013, 4:36 PM Report Spam 953/1000 a couple days ago. Valid Dump! Here are some things I experienced: OSPF Sim is same, look for different ip addresses but the blocks are the same- u sing /30 etc. etc. Copy-running config startup-config worked for this lab only. I did it on all and you may want to as well just to be safe. IPv6 Virtual Link SIM- Exactly spot on with this and Digitut's lab. It would pro bably help to look at the IPv6 routing table of R1 right off the top so you can have a mental"before" image to reference after you've made corrections. Redistribution SIM- exactly as instructed here with IP address changes only- pin g, traceroute worked fine from R1. Policy Routing SIM - Topology layout is different with a Cloud replacing the AS6 5000/two routers on Digitut etc. "Border Router" was labeled R1 EIGRP SIM- HEADS UP: your sh ip route output may have an issue like mine did. No matter how I summarized the 10.2.0.0 route, R3 showed "1 subnets" Different configs with the summary address DID change output giving it /16, /8 even /24 -y eah, I wasted a lot of time trying to get a different result. BUT For all config s I tried, only "1 subnets" came up for the 10.0.0.0 network. In the end I went with the s ummary address 10.2.0.0 255.255.0.0 which gave it a /16. If you run into this, d on't stress, move on, -again, I received a 953/1000 Questions are the same but with many of them having mixed up answers or an extra answer thrown in. Look for the BAD variance question I had- NONE of the answers listed matched the question. It was something like "which routes will RTA use with a variance of 2 " etc. again, none of the answers were in the Topology graphic at all-Completely different ro uter names were listed. Cisco mistake. Guess it and move on! Studied: Jeremy/CBT Nuggets, Cisco Press Documentation/Route Study guides, GNS3 labs, Digitut and Exam Collection. Thank you All! Good luck! On to Switching, CC NP by 2014! Materials used: CBT nuggets by Master Jeremy Ciora Digitat Tut GNS3