Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 3
Hannah Carnell
Uncertainty about teaching individuals who do not speak the native language
is a common problem amongst teachers (Tomlinson et al., 2003), and one
that is increasingly important to address. Globalisation means that teachers
are experiencing more diverse classrooms which, combined with the focus in
many countries towards mainstreaming as a strategy for cutting educational
costs (Reis & Boeve, 2009), has resulted in many teachers having to address
diversity issues to ensure that all children are performing to the best of their
abilities.
This is an important case study to consider as, not only is this is an issue
affecting many teachers today, but also the issue of equity of opportunities is
a compelling one. We know that many students face barriers to opportunity
within the classroom, with standard teaching practices not working for them
due to issues of personal learning style, specific learning disabilities (such as
dyslexia), economic reasons, or because of language and cultural barriers
(Lou et al., 1996). As such, exploring ways to address, work with and
embrace this diversity within classrooms is of paramount importance to
ensuring that all children are given a fair start in life.
Problem analysis
This paper will explore how Anne can best meet the needs of her class, and
effectively differentiate her teaching within her classroom. We will discuss
and critique the relevant literature in the following sections:
1. Differentiation to meet the needs of all students: what
differentiation is, and why it is appropriate in this context;
2. Understanding the student: An examination of how Anne can
understand and learn from her students most effectively;
3. Implementing differentiation: How Anne can make it work in practice,
with a specific focus on students from diverse cultures;
4. The role of self: Annes role as an individual in implementing a
successful differentiation strategy; and
5. Wider support mechanisms: what support is, or should be available
for Anne.
broadened
(Bender,
2012),
embracing
number
of
different
Issues of race and culture are a central part of Annes problem, given that
many of her class are from immigrant backgrounds, a fact that further
strengthens the case for differentiated instruction. Research in the USA has
found that teachers are less capable of enabling minority students to build the
skills necessary for success out of school (Delpit, 1995; Tomlinson et al.,
2003). Linked to this, immigrant students in the USA have higher than
average dropout rates, particularly as students get closer to graduation (Wang
et al., 2008). Without adequate qualifications, these students will be penalised
in the future: facing limited further education and employment opportunities.
While no data on this issue was available for Belgium, it is important that
teachers, such as Anne, are aware of the long-term impact of their teaching
and the complexity of these issues, and work to deal with them sensitively
(Ryan, 2006).
Student readiness
Student readiness is defined by Tomlinson et al. (2003) as the point at which
a student is unable to learn alone, but is able to do so with support: in other
words when a teacher is able to push a student out of their comfort zone, but
not so far out that they are overwhelmed.
Student interest
Secondly, an understanding of student interests within her classroom will also
assist Anne, and enable her to design or modify her teaching activities
accordingly. Designing materials and activities around student interest can
help to enhance engagement, productivity, creativity and autonomy, and
develop a positive attitude to learning (Tomlinson et al., 2003). This may also
be a particularly salient issue for students of different cultural and ethnic
backgrounds who are likely to have diverse interests.
By asking students about what interests and motivates them, and shaping her
materials accordingly, Anne will also be helping her students to flow, in other
words, get completely absorbed in an activity, with a feeling of energy, vigour,
full involvement and crucially enjoyment (Csikszentmihalyi, 2002).
Tomlinson et al. (2003) suggest that students should be encouraged to select
projects related to what interests them, and to have discussions with their
parents and teachers about what learning brings them pleasure.
Learning style/profile
The third component for Anne to examine is that of her students learning
profiles something that can be affected by a number of different factors
including environment, emotions and physical needs (Tomlinson et al., 2003).
Individuals are products of both nature and nurture, with predispositions for
learning that are shaped by external influences, especially within our
immediate family, extended community, and culture (Tomlinson, 2000).
Whitsett and Hubbard (2009) concur, arguing that the most significant
information available for teachers includes an understanding of students
family makeup, immigration history, favourite activities, perceptions of the
value of school knowledge, and experiences with different subject matters.
Thus, knowing each student's culture and background is essential for
providing successful learning opportunities, and will help educators facilitate,
structure, and validate successful learning for every student (Guild & Garger,
1998).
Culture is also likely to have an impact upon learning style, something that will
be particularly significant for Anne. As Guild and Garger (1998) note:
A deep understanding of both culture and learning style is important for
all educators, though the subject must be addressed carefully. The
relationship of the values of the culture in which a child is currently living,
or from which a child has roots, and the learning expectations and
experiences in the classroom is directly related to the child's school
success academically, socially, and emotionally (Marching to Different
Drummers, ch.3, para.6).
Indeed, although some teachers may be fearful of exploring these issues too
deeply, with concerns about stereotyping, these cultural reflections can be
interesting and useful for teachers. For example, research has shown that for
Mexican Americans, family and personal relationships are particularly
important, and as such they tend to seek out a personal relationship with a
teacher; while African American students' report their comfort with oral
experiences, physical activity, and strong personal relationships, meaning that
collaborative, discursive and active projects work well (Guild & Garger, 1998).
with the school, and may be at a loss about how to adequately support their
children. This perceived lack of interest may simply relate to a lack of
information, resulting in low levels of participation at school-related activities
(Whitsett & Hubbard, 2009), something that could easily be rectified.
3. Implementing differentiation
Alongside building an understanding of her students, Anne also needs to
consider how to practically implement differentiation in her classroom.
Thorough planning is key, as differentiated instruction works best when it is
designed, with a whole system approach, rather than simply reacting and
adapting what exists (Hootstein, 1998; Tomlinson et al., 2003). Stanford and
Reeves (2009) compare successful differentiation to architectural principles,
citing how it is much easier to build an accessible, functional home from
scratch, taking into consideration the specific needs of the individual, than it is
to adapt an existing building that needs substantial modifications. This
concept can be applied to classroom material, strategies and tools, where
teachers tend to take the approach of adapting what is already there, rather
than starting from core principles and reworking the whole system. In this
way, learners are expected to fit into modified existing programme, which is
unlikely to be robust enough to meet their needs (Tomlinson et al., 2003).
Here, we will explore how Anne can design and modify her content,
processes, products and learning environment (Tomlinson, 2000; Tomlinson
et al., 2003), to ensure that her students are given the best opportunities to
learn within her classroom.
Content
It is important to consider in detail the content that will be taught to students
(Stanford and Reeves, 2009). Simply put, content refers to what students
need to learn, and differentiating this content allows students to begin at
different places in the curriculum and proceed at varying rates according to
their readiness, interest and learning style (Tomlinson et al., 2003). In many
countries, including Belgium, the content of teaching is influenced by national
curriculum guidelines, and so to some extent, content is a given, and can
only be varied a limited amount (Bender, 2012). However, despite this there
are a number of ways in which Anne can differentiate the content within her
classroom, and these will be discussed below.
Tomlinson (2000) notes that the most important factor in differentiation is the
provision of high-quality curriculum and instruction. Teachers should have a
sound understanding of their subject area, enabling them to identify key
concepts, skills and ideas that will serve as a framework from which to make
appropriate modifications (Tomlinson et al., 2003). This should allow the
teacher to provide a level of challenge for all students and scaffold
appropriately (Hite & Evans, 2006). Teachers need to ensure that curriculum
is clearly focused, that materials and tasks are interesting and relevant to
students; and that there is joy and satisfaction in learning (Tomlinson, 2000).
Anne therefore needs to look carefully at the curriculum for her class, and
establish the most valuable elements to focus upon, and then develop her
learning materials accordingly.
Process
The next area to be examined when thinking about differentiated learning is
the process. Tomlinson et al. (2003) define process as how students learn or
master the content. Given that students learn in different ways, teachers are
encouraged to offer a variety of options for learning to best meets the needs
of individual students (Bender, 2012).
Anne will play a central role here in how students master the content, and as
such she should also bear in mind the importance of verbal communication
with her students, particularly those Dutch language learners. The links
between talk and improvements in language learning, particularly one to one
conversation, with either a teacher or in a group have been clearly
demonstrated (Lou et al., 1996). Where teachers differentiate and adjust their
language, these improvements have been shown to be even higher, and
likewise the supported use of the students mother tongue (even if the
teachers do not know or understand the language) is also beneficial (Hite &
Evans, 2006).
Small, flexible working groups have also been shown to work well in
classroom differentiation, particularly with language learners. Lou et al. (1996)
undertook a detailed meta-analysis of class group work, which found that
students working in groups of three or four people achieved more than
students working individually, and these students also had more positive
attitudes to learning. Additionally, group work provides opportunities for
informal social conversation, which can help in language acquisition (Hite &
Evans, 2006), and helps to improve understanding when interacting with
technology (Gormley & McDermott, 2014). Furthermore, classroom groups
should not necessarily be fixed: sometimes students benefit from working with
peers who have similar levels of readiness, sometimes with mixed levels, and
Products
The third area for Anne to consider is product, or how students are able to
demonstrate what they have learned: the importance of which cannot be
underestimated. Teachers often utilise a range of materials and activities in
their classroom, but tend to always measure performance in the same way: in
other words, their attitudes and practices are contradictory (Tomlinson et al.,
2003). In addition, through varied demonstrations of learning, the teacher is
able to determine which students have mastered the material and which may
need further guidance (Bender, 2012). Cassidy (2011) also notes that student
self-monitoring and self-evaluation are important factors in the development of
self-regulated learners.
Assessment should also be varied, and include choices for the students to
demonstrate their knowledge: perhaps including art projects, role-play
minidramas, library or web-based research, multimedia projects, and written
or oral reports (Bender, 2012).
Learning environment
The final element to explore in differentiated learning is the learning
environment,
which
should
be
supportive
of
self-regulated
learning
(Zimmerman, 2002). Bender (2012) emphasises the role of ensuring that the
environment is safe and comfortable, to enable students to focus on new
material. He notes that research on learning has demonstrated that the brain
serves as a filter focusing first on sounds, sights, and other stimuli that may
be threatening, next, relating to emotional response information, and finally,
as a last priority, the brain processes information for new nonthreatening
learning tasks.
supportive and so on. Therefore, for Anne the learning environment is crucial:
as such she could consider making a home corner or an area of the
classroom that is comfortable (Bender, 2012), perhaps with materials that
reflect a variety of cultures and home settings (Tomlinson, 2000). Other things
to consider include soft lighting, provision of water and fruits (Bender, 2012),
desks that are arranged in ways to support group work and collaboration (Hite
& Evans, 2006), and encouraging students to move around to learn if they
prefer (Tomlinson, 2000).
We also know that teachers may regard issues of diversity as deficits on the
part of the student, rather than seeing the responsibility for working with these
differences as lying with the teacher (Tomlinson et al., 2003). Research has
also shown that when two people interact, their minds influence each other,
and they can match one others moods and emotions, through voice volume,
tone, and even body language (Bender, 2012). As such, it is imperative to
ensure that Anne is committed to her classroom activities and approach, as it
is highly likely that her emotions will be reflected back from the students
through their moods, emotions, and actions.
Anne would therefore benefit greatly from a wide range of support (Brighton,
2003), and also could be hindered without it (Hertberg-Davis & Brighton,
2006). At a strategic level, the Flemish Ministry of Education and Training
could provide greater support for differentiated learning through national
The role of Annes school is also crucial in helping to support her efforts. They
could set up opportunities for peer-to-peer support (Willis & Mann, 2000);
make time available for teachers to work on content, process, and activities;
and provide opportunities to share best practice within and between schools.
The role of a senior leader who buys-in to the concept of differentiated
instruction is also vital: someone who is able to align staff development,
curriculum, and materials (Whitsett & Hubbard, 2009).
Conclusions
This paper has presented the case of Anne, and explored various strategies
and approaches for her to meet the needs of her diverse class, particularly
those that do not speak Dutch as a first language.
However, as discussed in this paper, the rewards for her students, particularly
those that do not speak Dutch as a first language, will be great, and Anne is
likely to have renewed vigour and energy when she starts to see the positive
effects in her classroom. With time, her language learners will be able to
communicate more effectively, and all students (including the Dutch speakers)
are more likely to be engaged, productive, creative and autonomous
individuals (Tomlinson et al., 2003).
References
Bearne, E. (2002). Differentiation and Diversity in the Primary School. Oxford:
Taylor and Francis.
Beasley, J., Gartin, B., Lincoln, F., & Penner-Williams, J., (2013). Teacher
efficacy and practice in meeting the needs of diverse learners: How do
partnerships support teachers? SRATE Journal 22(2). Retrieved from ERIC
database (EJ1015770).
Bender, W.N. (2012). Differentiating Instruction for Students With Learning
Disabilities: New Best Practices for General and Special Educators (Third
Edition). Retrieved from
http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/50371_Bender_Ch1.pdf
Garca, O., Kleifgen, J.A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners
to emergent bilinguals. Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1. Teachers
College, Columbia University: Columbia.
Gormley, K., & McDermott, P. (2014). Differentiating literary instruction
theres an app for that! Language and Literacy Spectrum 24. Retrieved from
http://www.nysreading.org/sites/default/files/Differentiating%20Literacy%20Instructio
n%E2%80%94There%E2%80%99s%20an%20App%20for%20That_0.pdf
Pintrich, P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining selfregulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research 31, 459-70.
Reis, S.M., & Boeve, H. (2009). How academically gifted elementary, urban
students respond to challenge in an enriched, differentiated reading program.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted 33(2). Retrieved from ERIC database
(EJ871028).
Richardson, J.T.E. (2005). Students approaches to learning and teachers
approaches to teaching in Higher Education. Educational Psychology 25(6),
673-80.
Ryan, A.M. (2006). The role of social foundations in preparing teachers for
culturally relevant practice. Multicultural Education 13(3), 10-13.
Shujaa, M.J. (1995). Cultural self meets cultural other in the African American
experience: Teachers' responses to a curriculum content reform. Theory into
Practice (34)3, 194-201.
Stanford, B., & Reeves, S. (2009). Making it happen: Using differentiated
instruction, retrofit framework and universal design for learning. Teaching
Exceptional Children Plus 5(6), 2-9.
Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction.
Personalized Learning 57(1), 12-16.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2000). Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary
Grades. (ERIC Digest). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443572)
Tomlinson, C.A., & Allan, S.D. (2000). Leadership for Differentiating Schools
& Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Tomlinson, C.A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C.M., Moon, T.R.,
Brimijoin, K., Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating Instruction in Response to
Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse
Classrooms: A Review of Literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 27
(2/3), 119-145.
Tomlinson, C.A., & Eidson, C.C. (2003). Differentiation in Practice: A
Resource Guide for Differentiating Curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/2003a_tomlinson/2003a_tomlinsontoc
.html
Tricarico, K., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2012). Teacher learning through selfregulation: An exploratory study of alternatively prepared teachers ability to
plan differentiated instruction in an urban elementary school. Teacher
Education Quarterly 39(1). Retrieved from ERIC database (EJ977360).
Wang, Y., Many, J., & Krumenaker, L. (2008). Understanding the experiences
and needs of mainstream teachers of ESL students: Reflections from a
secondary social studies teacher. TEAL Canada Journal 25(2). Retrieved
from ERIC database (EJ806792).
Whitsett, G., & Hubbard, J. (2009). Supporting English language learners in
the elementary and secondary classrooms: How to get started. SRATE
Journal 18(2), 41-47.
Willis, S., & Mann, L. (2000). Differentiating instruction: Finding manageable
ways to meet individual needs. Curriculum Update. Retrieved from
http://www.ascd.org/ed_topics/cu2000win_willis.html
Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and
academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.