GO

Search

TJHO!VQ"

BCPVU!VT

OFX T

LFZ!JTTVFT

SFTFBSDI

DPOTVNFS!HVJEFT

TVQQPSU!PVS!X PSL

EPOBUF

UBLF!BDUJPO

Sf t f bsdi !?!CQB!Dpbut !Dbt i !Sf hjt uf s!Sf df jqut

MBUFTU!OFX T
Blog Post: Teflon-Killing Canaries
and the American Dream
Reports & Consumer Guides:
Poisoned Legacy

TUESDAY, JULY 27, 2010

by Sonya Lunder, Senior Analyst; David Andrews, Senior Scientist; and Jane Houlihan, Senior VP for
Research

CQB!DPBUT!DBTI !SFHJTUFS!SFDFJQUT
Tests Find Chemical-Laden Receipts at National Retailers

News Release: The Toxic Truth

About A New Generation of
Nonstick and Waterproof
Chemicals
Blog Post: Senate Environmental
Champions: Making the Best of
Bad Chemistry

Update: see report on green chemistry pioneer John Warner's new research on BPA in receipts here.
The plastic component bisphenol A (BPA) has been in the headlines nonstop as scientists, health experts and
consumers press for a federal ban on food packaging made with this synthetic estrogen, shown to leach readily into
infant formula, beverages and canned food. But most Americans are probably unaware that they are regularly exposed
to the same endocrine-disrupting chemical in cash register receipts.
Two-fifths of the paper receipts tested by a major laboratory commissioned by Environmental Working Group were on
heat-activated paper that was between 0.8 to nearly 3 percent pure BPA by weight. Wipe tests conducted with a damp
laboratory paper easily picked up a portion of the receipts' BPA coating, indicating that the chemical would likely stick
to the skin of anyone who handled them. The receipts came from major retailers, grocery stores, convenience stores,
gas stations, fast-food restaurants, post offices and automatic teller machines (ATMs).
Major retailers using BPA-containing receipts in at least some outlets included McDonald's, CVS, KFC, Whole Foods,
Walmart, Safeway and the U.S. Postal Service. Receipts from some major chains, including Target, Starbucks and
Bank of America ATMs, issued receipts that were BPA-free or contained only trace amounts.

GJOE!FX H(T
SFTFBSDI
I FMQGVM@

Scientists have not determined how much of a receipt's BPA coating can transfer to the skin and from there into the
body. Possibilities being explored include:
Oral exposure -- BPA moves from receipts onto fingers and then onto food and into the mouth.
Dermal exposure -- BPA from receipts is directly absorbed through the skin into the body.
A study published July 11 by Swiss scientists found that BPA transfers readily from receipts to skin and can
penetrate the skin to such a depth that it cannot be washed off (Biedermann 2010). This raises the possibility that the
chemical infiltrates the skin's lower layers to enter the bloodstream directly. BPA has also been shown to penetrate
skin in laboratory studies (Kaddar 2008).
EWG collected 36 receipts and commissioned the University of Missouri Division of Biological Sciences laboratory to
investigate their BPA content. This laboratory is considered one of the world's foremost research facilities in its
capability to detect environmentally relevant BPA concentrations.

FX H(T!TLJO!EFFQ
EBUBCBTF

The Missouri scientists found that the total mass of BPA on a receipt is 250 to 1,000 times greater than the amount of
BPA typically found in a can of food or a can of baby formula, or that which leaches from a BPA-based plastic baby
bottle into its contents. These data should not be interpreted to suggest that policymakers shift their focus from BPA
contamination of food, which is widespread, to receipts. BPA exposure from food sources is ubiquitous and should
remain the first priority of U.S. policymakers. However, a significant portion of the public may also be exposed to BPA
by handling receipts. Since many retailers do not use BPA-laden thermal paper, this particular route of exposure is easy
to correct.
Biomonitoring surveys by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have found BPA in the bodies

FX H(T!HVJEF!UP

of 93 percent of Americans over age 6. EWG analysis of CDC data has found that people who reported working in
retail industries had 30 percent more BPA in their bodies than the average U.S. adult, and 34 percent more BPA than
other workers. (CDC 2004). As of May 2009, 1 in 17 working Americans -- 7 million people -- were employed as retail
salespersons and cashiers, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

I FBMUI Z!DMFBOJOH

EWG's biomonitoring study of minority newborns, published last December, found BPA in 9 of 10 samples, marking
the first detections of the chemical in the cord blood of U.S. infants. EWG has published a Safe Baby Bottle and
Formula Guide to help parents of infants avoid BPA and other harmful substances during this critical window of
development.
In animal tests, scientists have produced evidence that BPA can induce abnormal reproductive system
development, diminished intellectual capacity and behavioral abnormalities and can set the stage for other serious
conditions, such as reproductive system cancer, obesity, diabetes, early puberty, resistance to chemotherapy, asthma
and cardiovascular system disorders. It has caused epigenetic changes, meaning alterations in the way genes switch off
and on and genetic changes that can be passed on to the next generations.
Frequent exposures to relatively large amounts of BPA in receipts are an obvious concern to every shopper, but even
more so to the legions of people who staff cash registers and bag groceries at tens of thousands of retailers across the
country. These workers handle BPA-loaded receipts hundreds of times a day, with as yet unknown consequences for
their health (Biedermann et al 2010). According to the U.S. Department of Labors Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of
May 2009, the two largest U.S. occupations were retail salespersons and cashiers, with more than 7 million
Americans in those jobs.
Retail workers carry an average of 30 percent more BPA in their bodies than other adults, It is unclear how much
BPA-coated receipts contribute to people's total exposure to the ubiquitous plastics chemical. What is certain, however,
is that since many retail outlets already use BPA-free paper for their receipts, this is one source of contamination that
could easily be eliminated completely.
Thermal paper is widely used for point-of-sale receipts, prescription labels, airline tickets and lottery tickets. Thermal
printers use paper that is coated with a dye and developer (BPA or an alternative chemical). Heat from the thermal
printing head triggers a reaction between the dye and developer, allowing the black print to appear.
In an effort to quantify how much BPA would transfer to a persons hand, the laboratory performed wipe tests on four
BPA-laden receipts. In all four cases, BPA transferred from the receipts to the wipes. An average of 2.4 percent of
the receipts total BPA content wiped off, suggesting that a person who handled receipts would be exposed to some
BPA in the thermal paper. There have been no published studies of BPA residues inside pockets, purses and wallets,
on wet produce in grocery bags or on the hands of people after they crumpled and discarded a receipt.
Since 60 percent of the receipts EWG collected did not have significant levels of BPA, it is apparent that many retailers
are using alternatives. The leading U.S. thermal paper maker, Wisconsin-based Appleton Papers Inc., no longer
incorporates BPA in any of its thermal papers (Raloff 2009). Reacting to concerns about the toxicity of BPA, the
Japan Paper Association began to halt the use of BPA in 1998, completing the phase-out by 2003 (AIST 2007). EWG's
analysis of three receipts collected in Japan at KFC, McDonald's and Starbucks found only trace amounts of BPA. In
addition, 11 of 13 U.S.-based retailers whose receipts EWG tested used non-BPA paper in at least one outlet.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has initiated a program to evaluate the safety and availability
of alternatives to BPA in thermal paper (EPA 2010).
EWG urges retailers to use BPA-free paper and to consider paperless options such as emailed electronic receipts.
These measures could greatly reduce the volume of BPA disseminated by the retail industry and save paper in the
bargain. Retailers should make public the identity of any chemicals used in the alternative they select. Very little
information is publicly available on the now-common BPA alternatives for thermal receipts.
TIPS TO REDUCE EXPOSURES TO BPA IN RECEIPTS
Minimize receipt collection by declining receipts at gas pumps, ATMs and other machines when possible.
Store receipts separately in an envelope in a wallet or purse.
Never give a child a receipt to hold or play with.
After handling a receipt, wash hands before preparing and eating food (a universally recommended practice even
for those who have not handled receipts).
Do not use alcohol-based hand cleaners after handling receipts. A recent study showed that these products can
increase the skin's BPA absorption (Biedermann 2010).
Take advantage of store services that email or archive paperless purchase records.
Do not recycle receipts and other thermal paper. BPA residues from receipts will contaminate recycled paper.
If you are unsure, check whether paper is thermally treated by rubbing it with a coin. Thermal paper discolors
with the friction; conventional paper does not.
Methodology and Findings. EWG collected 36 receipts from retailers in seven states and the District of Columbia:

FX H(T!TI PQQFS(T
HVJEF!UP
QFTUJDJEFT!JO
QSPEVDF

Ten national retail and service chains, including Walmart, Chevron and McDonald's;
Three government establishments - the U.S. Postal Service and the cafeterias in the U.S. House of
Representatives and Senate; and
One local supermarket in Colorado.
We contracted with the analytical laboratory at the University of Missouri-Columbia's Division of Biological Sciences to
perform the analysis. The laboratory weighed, measured and photographed the receipts, dissolved them in an alcohol,
then analyzed them for BPA using a sensitive, standard BPA test method (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC) with CoulArray detection).
The laboratory detected substantial amounts of BPA on 16 of 36 receipts at an average amount of 1.9 percent by
weight, and a range of 0.8 to 2.8 percent (Table 1).
TABLE 1. TEST RESULTS - BPA IN STORE RECEIPTS
Establishment where
receipt was obtained

Location

Total mass
of BPA on
receipt
(milligrams)

Size of
receipt
(square
centimeters)

Mass of
BPA
relative
to mass
of
receipt

Mass of BPA
relative to
surface area of
receipt
(micrograms of
BPA per
square
centimeter)

Berkeley,
CA

20.7

1,006

2.8%

35.9

Boulder, CO

20.6

1,575

1.8%

14.9

Washington,
DC

41.0

2,671

2.1%

10.1

Superior,
CO

10.8

902

1.8%

25.7

Portland,
OR

0.0005

1,911

0.0%

0.00

Berkeley,
CA

0.0084

456

0.002%

0.06

Portland,
OR

4.89

382

1.6%

52.9

Stafford, VA

2.98

400

0.8%

27.3

Sacramento,
CA

0.0008

1,258

0.0%

0.00

Clinton, CT

0.0009

882

0.0%

0.00

Kensington,
MD

28.8

2,294

1.7%

9.68

Boulder, CO

0.0000*

739

0.0%

0.00

Ames, IA

0.0206

805

0.003%

0.05

Wheaton,
MD

0.0208

938

0.003%

0.04

Portland,
OR

0.0164

739

0.003%

0.05

9.36

591

2.2%

48.6

Ames, IA

0.0001*

498

0.0%

0.00

Wheaton,
MD

10.64

836

1.7%

27.0

Percent
of BPA
that
rubbed
off of
receipt
onto
wet
wipe

U.S. retailers
National
Supermarkets

Safeway

Whole
Foods

Gas station

Pharmacy

Food

Chevron

CVS

Starbucks

KFC

Boulder, CO

3.80%

0.71%

2.88%

McDonalds

0.0002

724

0.0%

0.00

Clinton, CT

13.3

703

2.7%

48.9

Washington,
DC

9.07

739

1.4%

25.0

Albany, CA

ND

765

ND

ND

Superior,
CO

0.0001*

617

0.0%

0.00

Wheaton,
MD

ND

1,126

ND

ND

Ames, IA

0.0001*

2,069

0.0%

0.00

Portland,
OR

0.0003

1,325

0.0%

0.00

16.3

1,091

2.1%

25.2

Berkeley,
CA

ND

805

ND

ND

Clinton, CT

ND

954

ND

ND

Wheaton,
MD

ND

765

ND

ND

Boulder, CO

0.145

994

0.017%

0.22

Boulder, CO

23.6

1,600

2.0%

16.4

Clinton, CT

22.7

1,539

2.0%

17.0

Washington,
DC

16.6

1,249

1.9%

19.1

U.S. House of
Representatives Cafeteria

Washington,
DC

5.42

494

1.3%

32.8

U.S. Senate Cafeteria

Washington,
DC

0.00

540

0.0%

0.00

Superstores

Target

Walmart

Superior,
CO

Stafford, VA
Banks

Local
supermarket

Bank of
America

Sunflower
Farmers
Market

Government establishments
U.S. Postal Service

2.21%

Retailers in Japan
Kentucky Fried Chicken

Sendai,
Japan

0.0014

570

0.0%

0.01

McDonalds

Sendai,
Japan

ND

352

ND

ND

Starbucks

Sendai,
Japan

ND

826

ND

ND

Source: EWG compilation of BPA test results from the University of Missouri Division of Biological Sciences Laboratory, for receipts collected by
EWG.
* Only trace BPA levels were detected on wipe samples of receipts not coated with BPA.

Safeway supermarket receipts had the highest levels by several measures. Safeway receipts had 3 of the top 6 highest
overall BPA levels. A store in the District of Columbia had the greatest total estimated mass of BPA (41 milligrams).
A Berkeley, CA Safeway had the highest concentration of BPA relative to the paper mass (2.8 percent of the receipt
weight). Safeway was one of two retailers that had detectable BPA in all three store locations sampled.
The receipt for a McDonald's Happy Meal purchased in Clinton, Conn. on April 21, 2010 had an estimated 13
milligrams of BPA. That equals the amount of BPA in 126 cans of Chef Boyardee Overstuffed Beef Ravioli in Hearty
Tomato & Meat Sauce, one of the products with the highest concentrations of BPA in EWG's 2007 tests of canned

foods (EWG 2007).

Source: BPA test results from the University of Missouri Division of Biological Sciences Laboratory, for
receipts collected by EWG.
* BPA at trace level or not detected.

EWG also collected receipts from stores and bank ATMs in three or four cities for
each of the ten national retail and service chains sampled. Analysis of the laboratory
tests found that of the 10 stores and bank ATMs:

One,
Safewa
issued
BPAcontain
receipt
in all
cities.
Six
issued
a
BPAladen
receipt
in at
least
one,
but
not all,
outlets
CVS,
Walma
KFC,
Whole
Foods,
Chevro
and
McDon
indicati
that
these
retailer
use
BPAfree
receipt
at
some
outlets
Three
provide
receipt
that
were
BPAfree
or
contain
only
trace
amoun

at all
location
Bank
of
Americ
Target
and
Starbuc
EWG also collected receipts from post offices and government cafeterias. All receipts from the U.S. Postal Service
contained BPA. A receipt from the U.S. House of Representatives cafeteria contained BPA, while a receipt from the
U.S. Senate cafeteria did not.
The laboratory performed four wipe samples on four BPA-laden receipts - 0.7-to-3.8 percent of the BPA detected on
the receipt easily wiped off onto a lightly moistened, BPA-free laboratory paper, with an average of 2.4 percent wiping
off.
EWG also collected receipts from three retailers in Japan, at KFC, Starbucks and McDonald's outlets in the city of
Sendai. None contained BPA above trace levels. In our U.S. samples, KFC and McDonald's issued BPA-containing
receipts in at least one location.
Sources of Americans' exposures to BPA. BPA exposure is ubiquitous in the U.S. population. The CDC's
National Biomonitoring Program found the chemical in the urine of 93 percent of Americans age six and older
(Calafat 2008).
Researchers have considered BPA contamination of canned foods and beverages to be the primary sources of
exposure in most populations, especially for infants and children.
In 2007, Environmental Working Group published a ground-breaking study documenting that BPA had
leached from epoxy can linings into more than half the canned foods, beverages and canned liquid infant formula
randomly purchased at supermarkets around the country. In the absence of any U.S. regulation on BPA contamination
of food, EWG has published an online guide to baby-safe bottles and formula.
However, a recent study suggests that other sources may also be important (Stahlhut 2009). These researchers
measured urinary levels of BPA in 1,469 adults after variable periods of fasting. They expected BPA levels in urine to
fall rapidly in the absence of new food exposures, since the chemical is excreted very quickly from the body. Instead,
BPA levels dropped only slowly, leading them to theorize that BPA from sources other than food may be significant, or,
alternatively, that BPA may be stored in human fat and released slowly and constantly into the body.
EWG assessed CDC biomonitoring data from Americans tested between 2003 and 2004 to learn if retail workers carry
higher amounts of BPA in their bodies than other adults. CDC provided employment information for 916 of 1,862 adults
tested. EWG analysis found that the 195 people who reported working in retail industries had 28 percent more BPA in
their bodies than the average U.S. adult, and 34 percent more BPA than other workers. EWG also found that four of
the five occupations with the highest BPA measurements may come in contact with receipts, including those in retail
department stores, communications, retail food stores, and eating and drinking establishments (Table 2).
Table 2. CDC biomonitoring studies indicate that retail workers are exposed to more BPA than other adults
Population tested

Number of people tested

Geometric mean concentration of BPA (ug/L)

Male (age 18 and above)

801

2.7

Female (age 18 and above)

864

2.3

1,665

2.5

All workers

916

2.5

Non-retail workers

721

2.4

Retail workers*

195

3.2

All adults (age 18 and above)

Source. EWG analysis of CDC biomonitoring data from samples collected from 2003-2004 (CDC 2004).
* Retail workers include people designated in CDC employment groups 23-28 (CDC 2004).

EWG recommends that retailers switch to non-BPA receipt technologies immediately to help reduce their employees'

BPA exposures.
REFERENCES
AIST. 2007. Risk ASsessment Document Series No. 4: Bisphenol A. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science
and Technology (AIST), November 2007. AIST07-A00001-4.
Biedermann S, Tschudin P, Grob K. 2010. Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal Bioanal
Chem. Published online: July 11, 2010.
Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. 2008. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environmental Health Perspectives 116(1): 39-44.
CDC 2004. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data 2003-2004. US Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control andPrevention: National Centre for Health Statistics (NCHS). Hyattsville, MD,
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2003-2004/nhanes03_04.htm
EWG. 2007. Bisphenol A: Toxic plastics chemical in canned foods. Environmental Working Group, March 2007.
http://ewg.org/reports/bisphenola
EWG. 2009. Body Burden: the Pollution in Minority Newborns. Environmental Working Group, March
2007.
EPA. 2010. BPA Alternatives in Thermal Paper Partnership. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Design for the
Environment. Washington DC. http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/bpa/index.htm
Kaddar N, Harth C, Dchaud H, Mappus E, Pugeat M. 2008. Cuteanous Penetration of Bisphenol A in Pig Skin.
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. 71(8):471-73.
LaKind JS, Naiman DQ. 2010. Daily intake of bisphenol A and potential sources of exposure: 2005-2006 National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology:1-8
Raloff J. 2009. Concern about BPA: Check your receipts. Science News. October 7, 2009.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/48084/title/Science_%2B_the_Public__
Concerned_about_BPA_Check_your_receipts
Stahlhut RW, Welshons WV, Swan SH. 2009. Bisphenol A data in NHANES suggest longer that expected half-life,
substantial nonfood exposure, or both. Environmental Health Perspectives 117(5): 784-89.
APPENDIX - LABORATORY METHODOLOGY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL
PROCEDURES
Laboratory Methodology - EWG staff collected receipts in seven U.S. states -- California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Iowa, Maryland, Oregon and Virginia -- and the District of Columbia.
Samplers wore clean, powder-free nitrile gloves (Dynarex). They received the receipt from the cashier and held it
gently between two fingers. Once away from the cashier, samplers rolled the receipts with minimal handling and placed
them into clean polyurethane 50 mL tubes (Fischer Scientific). They noted the time, date, location, items purchased,
temperature and humidity as well as the location where receipts were rolled and tubed. ATM and gas station receipts
were collected directly from the machines in most cases.
EWG sent receipts to a laboratory at University of Missouri-Columbia, Division of Biological Sciences in Columbia, Mo.
The laboratory weighed, measured and photographed the receipts, analyzed for BPA and screened for bisphenol B,
bisphenol S and bisphenol F, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with CoulArray detection. The
standard curve in our assay ranges from 0.05 -4 nanograms per HPLC run. Four receipts that had values below and
above the range of the standard curve are considered to be outside the limit of quantitation of the assay. These
estimated values were different from five samples labeled as "non-detectable (ND)," in which there was no evidence of
BPA.
Digestion analysis: Lengths of receipt weighing 200 mg each were cut and placed in a glass tube. No attempt was
made to control for the amount of printing on the receipt. The receipts were incubated in methanol (15 ml, to cover the
receipt) for 3 hours at room temperature, with occasional agitation. The methanol was then poured into clean glass
tubes and diluted for analysis.
Migration analysis : EWG selected 9 of the collected receipts for migration analysis. For these, a piece of lab wipe
(KimWipe) was lightly dampened with methanol and wiped in a zigzag fashion across the top (printed) surface of a 5
cm by 5 cm piece of receipt. This wipe was then soaked in methanol for 3 hours at room temperature, and the
methanol then decanted and analyzed for BPA.

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

The laboratory found no detectable BPA on sampling materials, including KimWipes, gloves and shipping tubes.
The laboratory assessed recoveries of BPA from paper by spiking a piece of filter paper approximately 8-by-8
centimeters with BPA and soaking it in methanol, as described for the sales receipts. This method only approximates
BPA recovery from receipts since the paper and coating matrices are different.
The laboratory also analyzed samples with added BPA to determine whether the sample extract quenches or augments
BPA measurements. Recoveries in positive controls averaged 92 percent. Sample data values presented in this study
are not corrected for recovery.
The laboratory did not detect BPB, BPF and BPS in the receipts tested. Unidentified peaks were seen in some receipt
samples that did not contain BPA. Some of these appeared to reflect high concentrations.
TOXICS

KEY ISSUES:

CHEMICAL POLICY (TSCA)

BPA

BCPVU!VT

OFX T

LFZ!JTTVFT

SFTFBSDI

Board Members

Agmag

Midwest

By Year

Staff

EnviroBlog

Toxics

Offices

Policy Plate

Consumer Products

Funding

News Releases

Energy

Successes

Videos

Farming

Job Openings

Testimony & Official Food

Correspondence
Water

Annual Reports

DPOTVNFS!HVJEFT TVQQPSU!PVS!X PSL UBLF!BDUJPO

Ways To Donate
Stay In Touch

Privacy policy and Terms & Conditions updated M arch 2015.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Reprint Permission Information | Copyright 2015, Environmental Working Group. All rights reserved.