Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of the PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF LAW
20 November 2014
Hon. Rufus B. Rodriguez
Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee on
the Bangsamoro Basic Law
House of Representatives of the Philippines
HOR Complex, Constitution Hills
Quezon City
Re: House Bill No. 4994 on Bangsamoro Basic Law-Dear Congressman Rodriguez,
As I promised in my last letter to you, I am sending a copy of Dean Merlin
Magallona's "Problem Areas in the Bangsamoro Basic Law", and of Justice Vicente
Mendoza's "The Bangsamoro Bill Needs the Approval of the Filipino People".
Thank you and more power!
Very truly yours,
aff,
791/17//m/6/77
DANIL If . CONCE CION
Dean
H.B. No. 4994, which proposes the Bangsamoro Basic Law, has been filed in
accordance with the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (CAB), which
was signed on March 27, 2014, between the Government of the Republic of the
Philippines peace panel and the counterpart panel of the Moro Islamic Liberation
Front (MILF). The CAB is the second attempt to end the armed conflicts that for so
long have dominated the relationship of the Government with Muslim Mindanao.
The first one, the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain, or MOA-AD,
made in 2008, was declared void by the Supreme Court for being beyond the power
of the Government to make under the Constitution.'
Comparing the two agreements, I find much that has been done in the
proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law to make it conform to the Constitution, although
much remains be done toward this end. Certain concepts and provisions of the Bill,
when pieced together, reveal secessionist inclinations, notwithstanding the claim in
the Preamble of the Bill that it is "consistent with the Constitution" and in its
definition of the "Bangsamoro Territory" that the territory "remains a part of the
Philippines." The recognition in the Bill of the "right [of the Bangsamoro people] to
Expanded version of the statement of Justice Vicente V. Mendoza before the House of
Representatives Ad Hoc Committee on the Bangsamoro Basic Law at the hearing on H.B. No.
4994 on October 28, 2014.
Province of North Cotabato v. Gov't of the Republic of the Philippines Peace Panel on
Ancestral Domain, 568 SCRA 402 (2008).
self-detei iination -- beginning with the struggle for freedom of their forefathers in
generations past and extending to the present -- to chart their political future"2
reinforces the impression that Bangsamoro is a political entity that is only a little
different from the "associated state" called Bangsamoro Juridical Entity in the
MOA-AD which was invalidated by the Supreme Court in 2008.
Let me discuss briefly these concepts and provisions of the Bill which give
special concern.
The Bangsamoro Territory.
The reference in the Bill to the autonomous region in Muslim Mindanao as a
"territory" of the Bangsamoro people is contrary to the Constitution under which
the autonomous region is a part of the Philippine Archipelago.3 The term
"territory", as defined in Black's Law Dictionary, means "A part of a country
separated from the rest and subject to a particular jurisdiction, a geographical area
under the jurisdiction of another country or sovereign power." Such, for example,
was the Philippines, as an "unincorporated territory" of the United States, before it
was granted independence on July 4, 1946, or the trust territories under the Charter
of the United Nations, which are &miner colonies under administration by other
countries under commission by the United Nations, pending the eventual grant of
independence to them, like the Marshall Islands and Mariana Islands in the Pacific,
and the French Cameroons and the British Cameroons in West Africa.
2
3
Id., Preamble, Art. I, Sec. 3, Art. IV, Sec. 1, Art VI, Secs. 1 and 3.
CONST., ART. I, SEC. 1 provides: "The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago,
with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the
Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction. . . ." The phrase "other territories" refer to Philippine
claim to Sabah.
U.N. Charter, Chap. I, Arts. I (2) and 55, Chap. XII, Art. 77 (b). See also U.N. General Assembly
Resolution No. 1514, Dec. 14, 1960, declaring "(1) that "the subjection of peoples to alien
subjugation and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the
Charter of the Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation,
and (2) "all peoples have a right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely
determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural
development."
Para. 2 is reiterated in the U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Art. I, para.
1, Dec. 16, 1966.
6
this jurisdiction other than the Philippine State, much less does it provide for a
transitory status that aims to prepare any part of Philippine territory for
independence."'
The Bangsamoro People.
By defining who are to be considered Bangsamoros,5 the Bill in effect gives
the Parliament the power to pass a law, such as the Electoral Code, which it is
authorized to enact,9 limiting suffrage and membership in the Bangsamoro
Government to Bangsamoro people, thus denying the rights and privileges of
national citizenship guaranteed in the Constitution to others.1 Non-Bangsamoros,
although Filipino citizens and residents of the region for the requisite period, can be
disqualified from election to the Parliament and appointment to the Cabinet. This is
because the definition in the Bill of who are considered Bangsamoros performs the
same function that the definition of who are citizens of a nation or state does in a
national constitution, namely, to screen out outsiders from certain privileges of
national life.
The Form of Government.
H.S. No. 4994, Art. II, Sec. 1 provides: "Those who at the time of conquest and colonization
were considered natives or original inhabitants of Mindanao and the Sulu archipelago and its
adjacent islands, including Palawan, and their descendants, whether of mixed or of full blood,
shall have a right to identify themselves as Bangsamoro by ascription or self-ascription. Spouses
and their descendants are classified as Bangsamoro."
9
the framework of the Constitution and the national sovereignty as well as territorial
integrity of the Republic of the Philippines."13
The Powers of Government.
Under the Bill, the Bangsamoro Government will enjoy extensive
"exclusive powers," including the power to trade with ASEAN countries:4 to
contract foreign loans, credits and other forms of indebtedness,15 and to receive
foreign grants and donations.16 It will likewise have "concurrent powers" over
matters enumerated therein.17
In contrast, the powers of the Central Government will be limited to those
enumerated therein' and to those which it shares with the Bangsamoro
Government. These powers, denominated in the Bill as "reserved powers," refer the
following:
1.
2.
Foreign policy;
3.
4.
Postal service;
5.
6.
Immigration;
13
14
15
16
17
M, Art. V, Sec. 1.
18
7.
8.
Common market and global trade, provided however that the power to enter
into economic agreements given to the ARRM under R.A. No. 9054 shall
be transferred to the Bangsamoro Government; and Intellectual property
rights.
2.
Quarantine
3.
Land registration
4.
Pollution control
5.
6.
7.
Auditing
8.
Civil Service
9.
Coastguard
10.
11.
Administration of Justice
12.
13.
Thus, under the Bill, the Central Government would be like the Federal
Government of the United States -- a government of enumerated powers with the
balance of powers retained by the governments of the several states. The Philippine
Government, however, is a unitary government. Under the Constitution, it has all
powers of sovereignty, except only those given to the autonomous regions in the
19
Constitution, to wit:
1.
Administrative organization;
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Educational policies;
8.
9.
Such other matters as may be authorized by law for the promotion of the
general welfare of the people of the region,2
20
21
22
23
l0
Nor can Congress give the Bangsamoro Government the power to "adopt"
or "draw up" policy regarding mining. The mining policy is set forth in the
Constitution and, as such, cannot be changed except by constitutional amendment.
The Constitution provides that the natural resources belong to the State; that with
the exception of agricultural lands, natural resources cannot be alienated; that the
exploration, development, and utilization of the natural resources shall be under the
full control and supervision of the State; that although the State may make
agreements for others to undertake these activities, the party it contracts with must
be Filipino citizens or corporations or associations 60 percent of the capital of
which is owned by Filipino citizens; that the President o the Philippines may make
agreements with foreign owned corporations for technical or financial assistance
for the large-scale exploration, and utilization of minerals, petroleum, and other
mineral oils, the agreement it makes must be "based on real contribution to the
economic growth and general welfare of the country, . . . the State shall promote
the development and use of the local scientific and technical resources." This
constitutional policy applies to mining in the entire country.24
The Bangsamoro Government cannot be given the power to deteuuine the
mining policy in the region without allowing it the power to amend the
Constitution. Obviously this cannot be done.
Another provision of the Bill which is of doubtful constitutionality is
Article VII, Sections 9-11, which create a Bangsamoro Electoral Office. The
Electoral Office will be composed of three members who shall be appointed by the
President of the Philippines upon the recommendation of the Bangsamoro
24
II
Parliament. It will foini part of the Commission on Elections, and it will perfoirn
the functions of the COMLEC in the Bangsamoro.
To be sure, the office will be created not by the Bangsamoro Government
but by Congress in the event the Bill is passed. The question remains, however,
whether Congress can create such office, considering that the organization,
composition, and functions of the COMELEC are provided in the Constitution.25
So here again is the basic flaw in the Bill, i.e., the failure to distinguish
between constituent matters and legislative matters.
General supervision of the Bangsamoro Government.
Under the Constitution the President has general supervision of autonomous
regions "to ensure that laws are faithfully executed."26 This power cannot be
diminished, modified or qualified. The Bill provides, however, that the President
shall exercise shall exercise general supervision over the Bangsamoro Government
"consistent with the principle of autonomy and the asymmetric relation of the
Central Government and the Bangsamoro Government."27
Already reduced to "general supervision," or mere oversight as distinguished
from control, the Bill further emasculates the President's power by providing that
its exercise should be "consistent with the principle of autonomy and the
asymmetric relation of the Central Government and the Bangsamoro Government."
12
This can make the strict enforcement of national laws within the
Bangsamoro territory difficult to secure as law enforcement may have to take
account of the local custom of the people. That can make a mockery of the laws of
the Republic, as the "asymmetric relation" of the two governments can always be
waved to overrule any constitutional objection.
In sum, H.B. No. 4994, which considers the autonomous region to be a
separate territory, with its own territorial waters, recognizes this territory to be the
the "ancestral homeland" of a distinct group of people called Bangsamoros, who
have a right to self determination to chart their political future, whose government
is parliamentary in fowl, possessing almost all powers of internal and external
sovereignty, embodies a concept that is incompatible with the nature of our
Constitution as a social compact. The support shown by foreign governments to
the proposed Bangsamoro can easily translate into support and recognition by them
to make the Bangsamoro claim to self determination, self government, and
eventual statehood legitimate.28 What the Court said in the case of the MOA AD
applies to the H.B. No. 4994:
[The] BJE is a state in all but name as it meets the criteria of a state laid
down in the Montevideo Convention, namely, a permanent population, a defined
territory, a government, and a capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Even assuming arguendo that the MOA-AD would not necessarily sever
any portion of Philippine territory, the spirit animating it which has betrayed
za
13
itself by its use of the concept of association runs counter to the national
sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic.2)
Finally, the Bill cannot be justified on the ground that the relation of the
Central Government and the Bangsamoro Government is "asymmetric", meaning
to say their relationship is "distinct from the inter-governmental relationship in
other regions and other local governments." The question is precisely whether such
relationship can be had if it is contrary to the Constitution. Such relationship
cannot justify the recognition of the right of the Bangsamoro people to "selfdetermination, to chart their political future." The Constitution clearly states (1)
that the autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the Cordilleras must be
created "within the framework of [the] Constitution and the national sovereignty as
well as territorial integrity of the Republic of the Philippines,"30 and (2) that the
laws of the regional governments must be "subject to the provisions of [the]
Constitution and national laws."31 This was emphasized by the Court in its decision
invalidating the MOA- AD of 2008,32 and it is by this standard that the
constitutionality of H.B. No. 4994 must be judged.
Conclusion
Province of North Cotabato, 568 SCRA, at 481-482; Vicente V. Mendoza, The Legal
Significance of the MOA on Ancestral Domain, 83 PHIL. L.J. 489, 493-495 (2008).
29
30
31
32
14
33
Framework Agreement on the Bansamoro, Oct. 15, 2012, VII, 4 (a) (b), Annex on Transitional
Arrangements and Modalities, I, C-D.
* Professorial Lecturer and Former Dean and Professor of Law, University of the Philippines College of
Law.
national community, it is its political and economic formula for selfdetermination, its social framework growing out of the historical
roots of its people.
This holds true whatever may be the fascination or attraction
that any political theory may seize the mind outside of the binding
force of the Constitution. On the same premises, the Constitution as
an act of sovereignty becomes the supreme standard for determining
the validity of the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro,'
together with its implementing instrument in the Bangsamoro Basic
Law as proposed in House Bill No. 4994 and in Senate Bill No. 2408.
1. Reserved powers
The FAB provides that "The Central Government will have
reserved powers ...
."6
After providing the list of reserved powers in Part Ill of the FAB,
the Parties added the stipulation that "This list is without prejudice
to additional powers that may be agreed upon by the Parties".
Indeed, in Section 1, Article V of the BBL, additional reserved powers
are added, as indicated above. These provisions signify that powers
of Government are treated by the Parties as subject-matter of free
stipulation, left to their contractual intention.
only those that are listed in Part III of FAB and finally those listed in
Section 1, Article V of the BBL. In doing this exercise, the Parties have
resorted to the scheme of dividing the so-called reserved powers into
two categories: those that will not be applied by the National
Government in dealing with the Bangsamoro Government and those
that will be applicable in its relation with the Bangsamoro
Government. The second category is referred to in the CAB and in
the BBL as "reserved powers".
The emergent principle under the CAB and the BBL is that the
National Government has no power and authority over the
Bangsamoro Government unless as provided under the CAB and as
implemented by the BBL. This non-retention scheme of powers is the
product of the contractual discretion of the Parties derived outside
the constitutional box; it is proposed under the mistaken notion that
Congress by means of enacting the BBL assumes the competence to
amend the fundamental law through the normal legislative process.
2. Concurrent powers
In Section 2, Article V, the BBL provides that "Concurrent
powers shall refer to the powers shared between the Central
Government and the Bangsamoro Government within
Bangsamoro, as provided in this Basic Law".
the
What is meant by
This
paragraph 2 of the APS which inter cilia provides that "The Central
10
3. Exclusive powers
Section 3, Article V of he BBL is a litany of 57 areas of
governance described as "exclusive powers" of the Bangsamoro
Government; they are "matters over which authority and jurisdiction
shall pertain to the Bangsamoro Government" in its territory. This
provision of exclusive powers necessarily implies that they are
exercisable only by the Bangsamoro Government to the exclusion of
the National Government. In fact, by the nature of these powers the
Bangsamoro Government is the only governing authority in its
11
13
1. Constitutional framework
As to the first element, the Bangsamoro appears to found its
creation not on the Constitution, but on the basis of the contractual
relations between the GPH Peace Negotiating Panel and the MILF to
be implemented by the BBL. As a consequence, the definitive
features of the BBL in terms of powers, jurisdiction, rights and
accountability, charged upon the Bangsamoro Government appear as
implementation of the CAB, together with all the Annexes. In other
words, the CAB is the BBL shaped into legislative form for the
formality of enactment by Congress.
To be emphasized is the extraordinary character of the BBL in
that it affirms in its Preamble common to both House Bill No. 4994
and Senate Bill No. 2408, that its promulgation into law is done by
the Bangsamoro people themselves. It reads as follows:
We, the Bangsamoro people and other inhabitants of the
Bangsamoro, imploring the aid of the Almighty, ... for
genuine and meaningful self-governance as stipulated
under the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro
(CAB); ... do hereby ordain and promulgate this
Bangsamoro Basic Law, through the Congress of the
Republic of the Philippines, as the basic law of the
Bangsamoro ....18
15
16
The
17
2. National sovereignty
The second premise of the Constitution in the creation of an
autonomous region is that it is to be established within the
framework of national sovereignty. Under the fundamental law,
national sovereignty pertains to the people's act of sovereignty
pursuant to the supremacy clause of the Constitution in Section 1,
Article II that "Sovereignty resides in the people and all government
authority emanates from them." The powers of the National
Government that the fundamental law ordains are expressive of
sovereignty, the contravention of which by the CAB and the BBL is
effected by the derogation, of such powers. How the Parties to the
CAB derived their authority to this effect and by what legal capacity
empower them to do so continue to be a juridical vacuum.
To this extent or under these limitations, the BBL suffers from basic
infirmity and may justifiably be pronounced as in contravention of
the fundamental law.
In providing for the organic act of autonomous regions
expressly subjecting their legislative power to be governed by
national laws, the Constitution creates a secondary tier of legislative
enactment, namely, the organic act below and subordinate to
national laws.
3. Territorial integrity
Integrated into national sovereignty is the element of
territorial integrity; in particular, this may pertain to how the
Constitution characterizes the nation's natural wealth and resources.
On two fundamental principles, the Constitution prescribes that
[1] All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal,
petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential
energy, fisheries, forests, or timber, wildlife, flora and
fauna and other natural resources are owned by the
State."27
[2[ The exploration, development and utilization of
natural resources shall be under the full control and
supervision of the Staten
Inherent in the
22
The two Covenants have the force of law on the Philippines, being a
State Party to both.29
On the other hand, both the CAB and the BBL are of the
assumption that the natural
23
Or would congressional
enactments retain their national scope? Beyond this specific area, the
authority of the Bangsamoro Parliament is plenary "on matters that
are within the powers and competences of the Bangsamoro
Government",36 which may embrace all the concurrent powers and
exclusive powers, together with the powers which the CAB and the
BBL exclude from the reserved powers attributed to the National
Government.
29
NOTES
Executive Order No. 120 constituting the Transition Commission, uses the nomenclature
"Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro".
However, House Bill No. 4994 employs the expression "Comprehensive Agreement on the
Bangsamoro" in the Explanatory Note.
Paragraph 2 of Part IX of the Comprehensive Agreement stipulates:
The Parties commit to work further on the details of the Comprehensive
Agreement in the context of this document and complete a comprehensive agreement
by the end of the year.
The components of the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro are: (1) Framework
Agreement on the Bangsamoro; (2) Annex on Transitional Modalities and Arrangements; (3) Annex on
Revenue General and Wealth Sharing; (4) Annex on Normalization; (5) Annex Power Sharing; and (6)
Addendum on the Matter of Bangsamoro Waters.
2 CAB was signed by both Parties on 27 March 2014, the Comprehensive Agreement on 15 October
2012.
3 Emphasis added.
4 See first paragraph of the Annex on Power Sharing (APS).
5 See Second para. of the APS.
6 CAB Part III, para. 1.
CAB, Part Ill, para. 2. Emphasis added.
8 APS, third para.
9 See supra, note 7.
I See Constitution, Art. X, Sec. 17.
II See APS, Part Three, 11; BBL, Art. V, Sec. 2.
12 APS, Fifth paragraph
13. See APS, Part One, paragraph 2.
14 Exclusive powers in BBL as provided in Section 3, Article V apply to the following areas or
matters: Agricultural, livestock and food security; Economic and cultural exchange; Contract loans,
credit and other forms of indebtedness with any government, private bank and other lending
institutions, except those requiring sovereign guaranty; Trade, industry, investment, enterprises and
regulation of businesses taking into consideration relevant laws; Labor, employment, and occupation;
Registration of business names; Barter trade and counter trade with ASEAN countries; Establishment
of Free ports; Tourism; Creation of sources of revenue; Budgeting; Financial and banking system;
Establishment of Bangsamoro government-owned and/or controlled corporations and financial
institutions; Authority to regulate power generation, transmission and distribution operating
exclusively in the Bangsamoro; Operation of public utilities; Receive grants and donations; Education
and skill training; Science and Technology; Research councils and scholarships; Culture and language;
Sports and recreation; Regulation of games and amusement operations; Libraries, museums, historical,
cultural and archaeological sites; Regulations on manufacture and distribution of foods, drinks, drugs
and tobacco; Haff and Umrah; Customary laws; Declaration of Bangsamoro holidays; Ancestral
domain and natural resources; Protection of the rights of the indigenous people; Land management,
land distribution, and agricultural land use reclassification; Cadastral land survey; Expropriation and
eminent domain; Environment, parks, forest management, wildlife, nature reserve and conservation;
Inland and waterways for navigation; Inland waters; Customary justice; Shariah courts and Shariah
justice system; Public administration and bureaucracy for the Bangsamoro; Health; Social services,
social welfare and charities; waste management; Establishment and supervision of humanitarian
services and institutions; identification, generation and mobilization of international human resources;
Establishment of Ausqaf (endowment) and charitable trusts; Hisbah office for accountability as part of
30
o .
Shariah justice system; Registration of births, marriages, and deaths; Housing and human settlements;
Development planning; Urban and rural development; Water supplies and services, flood control and
irrigation systems in Bangsamoro; Public works and highways within the Bangsamoro; Establishment
of appropriate mechanisms for consultations for women and marginalized sectors; Special development
programs and laws for women, the youth, elderly, labor, the differently-abled, and indigenous cultural
communities; and Local administration, municipal corporations and other local authorities including
the creation of local governments. In addition to these 57 matters which the CAB in Part III also
provides it includes a general welfare clause which says "Establishment or creation of other
institutions, policies and laws for the general welfare of the people in the Bangsamoro.
13 Constitution, Art. X, sec. 17. See also Section 16 of this Article
IS
For reference to national laws as constitutional standards, see sections 16, 17, 18, and 20 of Article X
of the fundamental law.
Constitution, Article IX, Sec. 15. Emphasis added.
18
Emphasis added.
19
Executive Order No. 120, sec. 3(a). This is in pursuance of FAB in Part VII, para. 4(a).
20
Part VII, para. 3.
21
Para. 7.
22
Art. X, Sec. 18.
23
24
31