Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FD-SOI
Key Advantages & Disadvantages
Amiad Conley
Technical Marketing Manager
Process Diagnostics & Control, Applied
Materials
ChipEx-2014, Apr 2014
Moores Law
The number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles every two years
Traditional:
Shrink the feature size: ArF Immersion Double/Quad patterning EUV
Increase wafer size: 200mm 300mm 450mm
Unique/New
Build vertically: 2D 3D
Cost Trends
Source: Faster, Cooler, Simpler, could FD-SOI be Cheaper too? Semiwiki, 08/2013
Design cost exponentially increases coupled with reverse in cost per gate trend from 20nm
Units (B)
1100
990
880
770
660
550
440
330
220
110
0
Tablet Premium
Smartphone Premium
PC
317
315
322
Tablet Utility/Basic
Smartphone Utility/Basic
Marginal Unit Growth
271
211
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
176
159
2017
2018
158
2019
Smart phones are the market fuel for both Logic AP & Memory
April 30, 2014
Source: http://allthingsvlsi.wordpress.com/
Solution: Make the channel thinner so that it is well controlled by the gate
April 30, 2014
Possible Solutions
FinFET
FD-SOI
What is a FinFET?
Source: Intel
Transistor with 2-3 gates which are wrapped around a Silicon fin
Trigate has 3 gates [2 sidewall vertical gates and one planar/top gate]
What is FD-SOI?
FD-SOI advantages:
Excellent electrostatic
control of the channel
No channel doping
required
Back bias ability if BOX is
also thin
5-20 nm Si
thickness
Excellent VT variability
Low DIBL (Drain Induced Barrier Lowering)
especially at low VDD
Limited Short Channel Effects
Very good Sub-threshold Slope
Minimum junction capacitance and diode leakage
Simpler process: no halo doping, simpler STI (End
Pointed Etch)
10
Source: ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE TECHNOLOGY CHOICES AT 28nm/20nm, IBS Inc, Jun 2012
Despite SOI base wafer cost ~4X higher than bulk, market analysis
estimations lead to lower die costs due to projected higher die yields
11
12
12
Source: ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE TECHNOLOGY CHOICES AT 28nm/20nm, IBS Inc, Jun 2012
Source: FD=SOI Keeps Moors Law on Track, Advanced Substrates, Feb 2014
Bulk FD SOI projected to have lower unit cost than FinFET due to
higher FinFET process complexity and expected lower die yield
April 30, 2014
13
14
14
Spacer
Material selectivity
Material deposition thickness
uniformity on vertical walls
Metal gate composition uniformity/stability
Fin Formation:
Precision etch
Structural integrity (collapse,
erosion, thermal shock)
Precise Recess to control
fin height
Channel materials to
increase mobility
Fin
STI Oxide
Fin Junctions:
Conformal doping
on sidewalls
15
Measurement of
gate CD across the
Fin height
Lg
16
Source: Comparison study of FinFETs: SOI vs. Bulk, SOI Industry Consortium
Natural Isolation between adjacent transistors by BOX, STI etch end points on BOX, minimal
need for trench depth control, with no requirement for implant to complete isolation
17
Possible Solutions
Process
Plasma doping (PLAD) for uniform
sidewall doping
Metrology & Inspection
Tilt CD-SEM measurements
Destructive technologies
April 30, 2014
18
19
FinFet
FD-SOI
x4
Process Complexity
to
To
Die Yields
??????
??????
Unit Cost
??????
??????
Similar
Similar
20
21
Buckling
Drain
22
Summary
FinFET is a major inflection in terms of process and metrology challenges vs. FDSOI which is a simpler path
The long term winner between both approaches will depend on the
device/process scalability, as the cost benefit of FD-SOI vs. FinFET is based on
combination of:
base wafer cost, process complexity/cost and die yield
23
Thank You
24