Unit 3
The Diversified Caribbean in the Sixteenth
and Seventeenth Centuries
Overview
The diversity of the Caribbean, reflected in linguistic, ethnic and general cultural
differences, has its origins rooted in the complex history of the region. From the time
Christopher Columbus made known the Caribbean region to Europe in the latter part of
the fifteenth century, the flood gates were opened for successive waves of migrants from
Europe, who not only destroyed the indigenous people but who brought with them
cultural norms which, whether willingly accepted or not, were imposed on the region
These divergent cultural norms have all, in varying degrees of strength, continued to
shape the region to the present day.
Unit 3 traces the developments in Europe that influenced voyages of exploration in the
fifteenth century and ultimately contributed to the historical landseape of the Caribbean.
‘The unit also examines the factors that encouraged various agricultural activities in the
region and finally led to the emergence of sugar cane as the dominant crop by the end
of the seventeenth century. The final session of the unit focuses on the different types of
labour schemes used to pursue the agricultural aetivities of the time and the impact of
these schemes on the population of the region,
‘The unit is divided into three sessions:
Session 1: Maritime exploration and the interlopers
Session 2: Agricultural change and the emergence of ‘King’ sugar
Session 3: Labour diversity and demographic change in Caribbean ‘frontier’ society.
45Unit 3 Learning Objectives
ee
After completing this unit you should be able to:
1. Identify the factors that underlay and made possible fifteenth and sixteenth century
voyages of exploration by Europeans,
2, Account for the various agricultural activities in the Caribbean prior to the
establishment of sugar cane;
3. Discuss the reasons why sugar cane became the dominant plantation crop in the
Caribbean by the seventeenth century;
4. Trace some of the factors that contributed to the complexity of Caribbean society: its
diversity, its multinational beginnings and its earliest introduction to globalisation
by being integrated into a world economy.Session 1
a
Maritime Exploration and the Interlopers
Introduction
In this session we will examine the reasons why Europeans felt it necessary to embark
on voyages of conquest. In this regard, we will focus on two main points, namely
popular ideologies at the time, and advances in nautical technology. The final section of
the session will account for the diversity of the Caribbean by tracing the factors that led
to ‘interloping’ in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
Objectives
On completing this session students should be able to:
* discuss the reasons why Europeans embarked on voyages of discovery in the
fifteenth century;
+ evaluate the extent to which fifteenth century voyages of discovery resulted 1n local
territorial wars and, ultimately, in nationalistic and cultural diversification of the
Caribbean.
The Reasons for Maritime Exploration in the Fifteenth Century
The governments of maritime nations in Portugal, France, England and Spain frequently
supported seafaring expeditions involving hundreds of sailors (and as many ships), into
uncharted and often dangerous waters and territories. The rationale for these voyages
of exploration revolved around two main points. Firstly, those who supported such
explorations justified their actions with specific social, religious, economic and political
theories and ideologies that were being propagated at the time. Secondly, by the
fifteenth century developments in nautical techniques and equipment had taken place.
These developments supported and iacilitated maritime exploration.
We turn now to briefly identify and discuss some of these ideologies and developments
that encouraged and supported maritime exploration.
Theories and Ideologies
Bullionism
The concept of bullionism was one that was never far away from the minds of many
adventurers and national administrators as they contemplated exploration. In brief, the
7concept of bullionism was the belief that the wealth of a nation depended on the stores
of bullion (gold and silver) that it physically held. It was, therefore, in the best interest
of each state to secure as much of the world’s bullion as possible because there was also
the belief that the amount of bullion in the world was finite. As a consequence, failure to
capture as much bullion as possible meant an irretrievable loss to the exploring nation,
as some other nation would then benefit from the bullion that was not acquired. Since
this theory held that one nation could only prosper at the expense of another, voyages of
exploration were deemed necessary to find new lands and untapped reserves of bullion
before other competing nations found them.
Mercantilism
Mereantilist theory was an extension on the earlier bullionist theory. The mercantilists
understood the wealth of the world not only in terms of physical stores of bullion, but
also in terms of trading activities that resulted in wealth creation. Mercantilists argued
that a nation’s trading relations, and the resources that were created through exports
and the control of markets, had a large part to play in the creation and sustenance of the
nation’s wealth.
Mercantilists held the view that to create and sustain wealth, nations must always have
a positive balance of trade. In general te-ms, that meant that the volume and value of
the nation’s exports must always exceed what was imported. In order to achieve this,
mercantilist nations encouraged exports of locally produced goods, reduced their own
imports of goods and services and developed local substitutes.
The mercantilists, like the bullionists, understood economic prosperity in terms of
competition between maritime powers and states. To this end the finding of new lands
also meant new opportunities for trade and wealth creation. To maximise on this, the
mercantilist nations needed to ensure that they secured trade relations with newly
found lands first. Mercantilists argued that their nations were only secure as long as
they excluded other nations from engaging in trade with newly conquered lands. By
so doing the mercantilists achieved their goal of ensuring that all the wealth from trade
would go only to the European ‘discoverer’! of these lands.
Colonialism
Colonialism was the logical concept to emerge from theories that sought to justify
economic advancement and nation building through the control of trade and the
accumulation of wealth. Colonialism usually implies formal political control, involving
territorial annexation and loss of sovereignty for the territory annexed. To be an
effective colonial nation it was necessary to wage military, intellectual and psychological
warfare to ensure that the wealth derived from newly seized territories and their