Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alankrit Pareek
Sovan Satyaprakash
Shweta Singh
Strategic Staffing
Assignment-1
1. Evaluate the recruitment strategy and process at BHC.
Job Title- Associate
Recruitment period- October-March (6 months)
Types of recruitment- On campus & correspondence
Recruitment on campus- Campus at Harvard, Wharton, Darton
Recruitment by correspondence- Kellogg, Tuck, Duke, Chapel Hill, Stanford
Recruiter strength- 4 Teams (3 for each on campus institute and 1 for correspondence)
Team structure- One Vice President & minimum one associate
Recruitment Committee Manager- Managing Director
Recruitment on campus process
2. Make a list of attitudes & competencies for the position of an Associate at BHC Inc.
Competencies
To excel as an associate one needed to take initiative, have strong analytical &
conceptual skills, be a good writer, have excellent interpersonal skills with fellow
employees and with clients
To excel as MD, the ability to manage and motivate BHC members, develop client
relationships, generate new business were imperative
Rahul Mishra
Alankrit Pareek
Sovan Satyaprakash
Shweta Singh
Associate must help the deal team engage a prospective client by creating a marketing
pitch (BHC capabilities+ explaining process at BHC+ providing preliminary analysis
and valuation of the prospective company)
He/ she must know interpretation of financial statements
3. Create an evaluation sheet for 20 resumes given with red flags and pros.
Must have qualifications
1. Investment banking experience/banking experience(min 2 years)
2. Leadership display (associate or higher post held)
3. Work exp in USA
4. Special business achievements (initiatives or targets)
Applicant
Recruiter 1- Kelly L
Katterhagen
Recruiter 2- Robert G
Calton
Recruiter 3- John W
Pollock
1. Glenn T Mitchell
2. Claudius D
Thomas
3. Rose Von Mehren
4. Mark Philips
5. Pieter Van Der
Meer
6. Jamie M Palmer
7. Christopher R
ONiel
8. Sean Flynn
9. John J Marquez
10. Patrick D OBrien
11. Jeffrey P Nystrom
12. Christiana T
Wunderlich
13. Winston S
Rutherford
14. Pierre Lacroix
15. Edward Bristol
16. John R lucas
17. James D Hennesey
Qualification
1
Qualification
2
Qualification
3
Qualification
4
Rahul Mishra
Alankrit Pareek
Sovan Satyaprakash
Shweta Singh
4. Select top five candidates for the interviews. Evaluate them based on their pros and
cons- for those five.
The 5 candidates selected for interview are
Applicant
1. Glenn T Mitchell
2. Claudius D
Thomas
3. Jamie M Palmer
4. Christopher R
ONiel
5. Sean Flynn
Applicant
Glenn T Mitchell
Claudius D Thomas
Jamie M Palmer
Christopher R ONiel
Sean Flynn
Qualification
1
Qualification
2
Qualification
3
Qualification
4
Pros
Has investment banking
experience, has worked in
USA, has performed many
financial tasks in
Served in Air Force, hence
will have high team
building and leadership
quality & time
management
Has served as VP and has
many achievements
Associate in corporate
banking, has performed
tasks related to investment
banking
Has analyst experience
and prior experience in
client meetings and
drafting, transactions
Cons
Has not worked as
associate or above so may
not be a good team leader
Has only summer intern
experience in the finance
field as associate
Rahul Mishra
Alankrit Pareek
Sovan Satyaprakash
Shweta Singh
5. Which two will be given offer if you are the panel? Why?
The 2 candidates who will be given offer would be
Applicant
Claudius D Thomas
Pros
Served in Air Force,
hence will have high
team building and
leadership quality &
time management
Cons
Has only summer
intern experience in
the finance field as
associate
Sean Flynn
Has analyst
experience and prior
experience in client
meetings and drafting,
transactions
Only limited
investment banking
experience as
associate (summer)
Driving Factor
Already knows
about how to run
projects, build
team and have the
best ability to
learn fast
Has just worked
as an associate in
summer and has
good experience
and skills with
analytics and
others talents are
also in sync with
the requirements.
Keywords
The resume screening process presumes a well written job description. From this job
description, 3 to 5 carefully chosen keywords are selected. These keywords are used to
narrow down a large pool of candidates to a more manageable set of resumes that will be read
in more detail.
The keywords selected are derived from required skills or activities in the job description. To
minimize the number of desirable candidates dropped in this first step, consider using
synonyms and closely related terms in addition to the keywords selected.
This step of the process can often be aided by computers. For example, if one has a resume
database, these keywords are the search queries used to find potential candidates in the
database.
Further, this step is sometimes delegated to a junior person who can be trained to look for
keywords and perform the initial sort.
Rahul Mishra
Alankrit Pareek
Sovan Satyaprakash
Shweta Singh
Evaluation
Once a resume has been initially screened for keywords, it needs a more careful review. This
second pass is designed to verify some of the second order criteria of the job description are
met. For instance, level of education, years of experience required by the position, salary
range and current location. Other functions of this evaluation include a closer look at job
functions performed by the candidate and comparing them to the job description.
This phase often requires a more in depth understanding of the job description and
requirements. For instance to determine relevant years of experience, the reviewer must add
the number of years at the relevant jobs to come up the years' experience. It can often be a
judgment call on which parts of a job history are relevant to a job search. This means the
person performing this step must have a suitable depth of understanding about the job
description and requirements for the position.
Qualitative review
Resumes that reach this step of the process are from candidates that meet many of the
requirements of the job description. This final pass is to examine the more subtle subjective
qualities of the candidate. The objective is remove candidates with red flags that could mean
potential job fraud and to separate the top candidates from the remaining resumes.
Resume red flags
There are a number of red flags when looking at resumes that should, at the very least, be
noted and questioned as part of any phone screen with the candidate. Gaps in employment
and job hopping are often considered to be red flags. Other possible red flags include multiple
moves to different states, using years instead of months/years for employment history and
noting a college and degree program without indicating graduation.
Other factors
Other factors is a broad term that is somewhat subjective when it comes to reviewing
resumes.
Does the candidate have a history of advancement including more responsibility and
challenge in each subsequent position?
Does the candidate have experience working at a company of similar size and
resource?
If this person applied directly for the position, would it be a significant drop in
responsibility or challenge?
Is the person over qualified? Are they willing to accept a much lower salary?
Rahul Mishra
Alankrit Pareek
Sovan Satyaprakash
Shweta Singh
These other factors are best used to further evaluate candidates already deemed to meet the
basic qualification. They serve to initially prioritize the next phase of the recruitment process,
which is to make initial contact with the candidates.