Professional Documents
Culture Documents
that is, the theoretical assumptions and predictions as to the behavior of populations of cells in
chemostat culture is well advanced, and the degree of sophistication of the chemostat technique
continues to increase. The literature is now replete with descriptions of marvelously engineered
chemostats, cytostats, biostats, cytogenerators,
turbidostats, and nephelostats--systems that are
designed to grow cells for indefinite periods at
constant and controllable growth rates.
What are we learning about the dynamic
model of cell structure and function that should
accompany these theoretical and technical advances? It turns out that rather little use has
been made of these exciting tools to investigate
physiological alterations in eukaryotic cells grow,
Presented at the Twenty-fifth Annual Meeting ing at different rates, despite the fact that they
of the Tissue Culture Association in the Paul F. do provide a wide avenue to the study of regulaKruse, Jr. Memorial Symposium on Steady-State tion of gene activity through the manipulation
Culture of Cells.
of controllable environmental factors. Changes
Send requests for reprints to Dr. R. Sinclair,
Dept. of Biology, McGill University, Box 6070, in mammalian cells with growth rate have indeed
been examined, but the experimental systems
Stn. A, Montreal, H3C 3G1 Canada.
295
296
SINCLAIR
u~ed are highly biological and relatively uncontrolled, and include, for example, regenerating
liver, cells released from contact inhibition or
starvation, phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes, virus-transformed cells, hepatomas of
wtrymg growth rate, and similar systems. Generally speaking, physiological profiles, for example, of the protein-synthesizing machinery, or of
the energy-produchlg systems, arc examined in
the quiescent state, and compared with cells that
have been stimulated to grow and divide at some
arbitrary and poorly defined rate. Not only is
the more rapid rate ill defined, it is often a transitory state, and one which the cell will not maintain indefinitdy. This again emphasizes the need
for polmlations of cells growing in controlled
steady-state, and for an examination of the
changing physiology of such cells.
The growth of cells in a ehemostat is controlled by nutrient limitation. Any growth rate
tess than the maximum is a result of starvation
conditions, of cells growing more slowly because
some limiting substrate is unavailable when
needed. Starvation however, is a relative term.
All the factors required to allow mammalian cells
to express their maximal growth potential are not
yet known, and we cannot be sure that even in
the richest medium there is not some factor, yet
unknown, which, when added (or removed), will
urge the cells to faster growth rates. This is a
problem through which the design of mammalian
cell growth media has already evolved; first, the
medium is designed to contain the minimal components to support growth, then supplements are
added to increase the rate of growth, aad finally
the quality of growth becomes more important
than the quantity, and media are constructed
for specific purposes.
The existence, then, of a limiting substrate,
does not present a problem; there will alw:tys be
a limit, whether it be the extrinsic nutrient, or
the intrinsic limitation in the capacity of the cell
to reproduce itself faster than a given rate. The
nature of the limiting substrate, however, is of
great significance, and may, as the microbiologists :dready know, have a profound effect on the
physiology of the cell.
The growth of mammalian cells in steady-state
continuous culture will be considered under five
topics, each of which develops from the preceding
one: (a) Do mammalian cells achieve steadystate in the ehemostat ? (b) Do the steady-st'~te
Some of the earliest attempts to grow cells under chemostat conditions were reported by Cohen
and Eagle (2), who demonstrated that HeLa $8
cells could be grown continuously in a simple
system in normal medium, and under favorable
conditions could be kept in steady-state for as
long as 10 days. They also described considerable
oscillations in the cell population in extended culture, which they ascribed to undefined changes
in the nutrient medium. Work from our laboratory (3), described a "solera" culture in which
medium was added at a constant rate to a stirred
culture and, when the volume had reached 3 to
4 times the starting volume, the excess of cell
suspension was removed and the cycle repeated.
One such solera culture of strain L cells in defined medium was maintained in this way for
more than 300 d'tys. This was later developed
into a more convention'd constant volume arrangement (4), and it was shown that, from a
high starting concentration of cells, it was possible to reach steady-state cell populations in 5 to
6 days. Pirt and Callow (5), working with more
elaborately mech,mized equipment, showed that
ERK and strain L cells could also achieve steadystate conditions. This is best illustrated in a later
paper (6), which shows one culture in which the
dilution rate was shifted repeatedly, after steadystate had been confirmed. In every case, 4 to 8
days were required to reach constant conditions.
Perhaps the most painstaking analyses were
carried out by Moser and Vecchio (7), who main-
297
298
SINCLAIR
9
I
$
!
4.5
!
DOUBLING
3
!
TIME,
.:"
"1
1.5
,
1.1
,
'"...........
0.3.
i " ';'"
.,,;...
'..
9*""
Za
1.3
~
..." "...
..
.~'""'" ,,,,,,,:'"
- 3
DAY
2
r
m
0.2
10
~1
0.1
I
"11
I
0.1
i
0.2
DILUTION
|
O.3
RATIO,
i
0.4
DAY -I
i
0.5
J
0.5
:FIG. 1. Steady-state concentrations of cell numbers, DNA, and protein at various dilution ratios. LS mouse cells were grown semicontinuously in defined medium, and appropriate
fractions were replaced at 8-hr intervals for 10 to 12 days. Points represent means of the
three samples taken during 1 day.
would certainly be difficult to visualize, in mammalian cells, a greater accumulation of toxins at
high than at low dilution rates. A more likely
explanation is a more fundamental one, based
on the model of cell growth proposed by Williams
(12). He regarded cell growth as a two-stage
process: uptake of nutrients into the cell, and
synthesis and processing of macromolecules from
the nutrient pool. On this basis, the steady-state
concentration of cells with respect to dilution
rate turned out to be a linear relationship, the
cell concentration declining steadily with increasing dilution rate. If nutrient uptake followed
Michaelis-Menten kinetics, and had superimposed on it a constant time period for macromolecular synthesis, then this may well lead to
a relationship closer to that found experimentally.
The decline found at low dilution rates has
been attributed to the reduced availability of
energy. Stated simply, as the cells grow more
slowly, more of the available energy must be
Of the principal causes of the decline, we regard energy deprivation as predominant. This is
shown in Fig. 2, illustrating the steady-state
concentration of glucose and lactate in the
Td ,
growth medium. At low dilution rates, no glucose is detectable in the output medium until a
doubling time of 2 days; at shorter doubling
times the more rapidly growing cells are not
using all the available glucose, and the increasing
amount detected mirrors the declining steadystate concentration of cells. This is evidence that
mammalian cells can grow in steady-state, with
glucose as the limiting nutrient. Lactate is not
produced by slowly growing cells; the maximal
concentration is found in the culture in which
the steady-state cell concentration is also highest. These simple nutrient measurements may be
converted to metabolic quotients (Fig. 3), by
normalizing and multiplying by the dilution rate,
and reveal that the glucose consumption p~r
million cells per day increases almost linex:ly
with dilution rate, as does lactate output, ~ppearing to reflect the more rapid rate of gro~th
of the cells.
It turns out, however, that when the nmtabolic quotient of O~ consumption is measured,
this does not reveal the same linear increase
with dilution rate. Oxygen is supplied to the
day
+!s
299
,.s
1,
1.1
......................................................
STEADY
STATE
SO
CONCENTRATION
.A.
~
A'''~176
"'"'......+~
4
,<
9_
...........
.d
0.2
D,
I
0.4
I
0.6
doy -1
30{)
SINCLAIR
DOUBLING
TIME ,
DAY
4,5
1,5
1,3
1,1
METABOLIC
MICROMOLE
QUOTIENT
PER
10 ~' C E L L S
PER
DAY
:..-.:
-6
2
1
Q .........
z
o
,,,
A,"
.,.,"
D"
A-'""
0,4
-"
DILUTION
RATE
0,6
D A Y -1
Fro. 3. Metabolic quotients of total glucose used, lactate produced, glucose oxidized,
and oxygen used by LS mouse cells grown in suspension at various dilution ratios9
cells by continuous gassing with 5% CO~ in air,
and by using the Florence flask with a relatively
high surface to volume ratio, we find it is possible to maintain 80 to 90% oxygen saturation
in all the cultures except in the densest cultures,
where it may fall to 60 to 65%. Oxygen partial
pressures of 80 to 160 mm Hg usually allow cells
to express their maximal growth (17-19), and
the gassing method is considered to maintain a
nonlimiting supply of 02. Oxygen uptake rates
were measured by an external method. Samples
of cell suspension were transferred from the continuous culture to a standard Clark electrode
polarograph assembly, and after 3 rain equilibration with 5% C02 in air, the rate of O~ consumption was measured. Thus, for each steadystate population of cells, the maximum capacity
for O~ uptake was measured. This was found to
be remarkably stable (Fig. 3) and, except for
the slowest growing cells, remained constant at
4.0 to 4.2 micromoles of 02 uptake per l0 s ceils
per day (18). If we calculate the quotient of
glucose that is consumed, but which does not
appe.qr as lactate in the medium, that is, the
E / x -= E,~ 4- D'Eg
E
6
LDH
TIME,
I
3
4.5
301
DAY
L
2
I
1.5
I
1.3
[
1.1
X 1
MDH
X }0
G6PDH
X 100
..,.I
...'"'"
G6PDH
:J"
|
|. 9176176
I.U.
9~ 1 7 6
PER
t~
.:
~176176176 r"
MG
PROTEIN
|'"I
iii
i::'':1 .........
MDH
........ -I
I
"'''' 9
" 9 1 4 9 1 4 9 1 4 9~1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6
Oo
2
~176149
o~
~
0i2
0.4
~
DILUTION
"tl.
RATE ,
9~
~D~
~176176
~176176149176
0 . i6
DAY -!
302
SINCLAIR
303
S.O
........... C. ............ b
-O
4.0
o:"
3.0
2.0
0~1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0)5
016
lhG. 5. The "efficiency" (D protein/RNA, by weight) of the protein-synthesi~.ing system in HeLa cells grown in Eagle's minimum essential medium plus 10% calf serum, at
various dilution ratios. Different symbols represent separate experiments.
TABLE 1
COMPARATIVE PROPORTIONS OF RIBOSOMES, AS
POLYSOMES, MONORIBOSOMES~ AND RIBOSOMAL
SUBUNITS IN HELA CELLS AT VARIOUS D I L U TION R A T E S
Dilution
Rate
(day-L)
0.12
0.25
0.48
0.57
Polysomes
Monosomes
%
25.7
25.9
35.6
40.5
%
74.3
52.9
43.9
33.0
Ribosomal Polysome
Subunits Monosome
%
0
21.2
20.5
26.5
0.35
0.50
0.81
1.22
netie analysis, which has not yet been made. Experimentally, the addition of a radioactive
compound and its cold carrier, unless completely
inert as a nutrient, will affect the delicately balanced steady-state conditions in the chemostat.
Further, the permutations of pulse and chase
become endless. Is the labeled compound added
to the growth vessel only? If so, is the dilution
continued or stopped ? Is the reservoir supplemented with an equal concentration of cold compound? Is the labeled compound added to the
reservoir only, and its concentration allowed to
build up in the growth vessel? Is the labeled
compound added to both growth vessel and reservoir ? How then can it be chased if this is desired? Each of these situations results in different kinetics of the passage of the radioisotope
through the organism, and of course will vary
enormously with the isotope of interest and the
304
SINCLAIR
TABLE 2
[ 3 H ] - U R I D I N E D I S T R I B U T I O N IN CYTOPLASMIC
RNA
Class
lDgAa
Counts/
miu
Specificb
Activity
28S s.a.
18S s.a.
0.57
28S
18S
28S
18S
21.5
19.2
13.3
11.8
25,740
21,590
2,690
1,330
1197
1124
202
113
1.06
0.12
(s.a.)
1.79
305