Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heat Exchanger
Models
Pressure Drop
The pressure drop across a heat exchanger (normal to the face) is defined as
the product of a dynamic pressure and a friction factor,
1
2
P heat exchanger = --- f m ean U min area
2
(9-1)
where
f
m ean
U min area
147
(9-2)
entrance effect = ( K c + 1 1 )
(9-3)
2
2
exit effect = ( 1 2 K e ) ----1
(9-4)
(9-5)
A m
core friction = f c ----- -----A c 1
(9-6)
where
1
Kc
Ke
Ac
fc
1
2
Note: In UH3D, the definitions of the area ratios, 1 and 2 , use the heat
exchanger face area for both the inlet area and the exit area, making 1 and
2 equivalent.
The flow acceleration term, Equation (9-5), accounts for velocity increases
related to density reductions which occur when heat is added to a flow stream,
148
and must be considered in the data reduction and data correlation process.
However, the effect of the flow acceleration term is inherently included in the
Navier-Stokes equations, and therefore, is set to zero when calculating the
UH3D momentum source terms to avoid double counting its effect.
From the above definitions, the velocity at the minimum flow area can then be
defined as
U cell
U min area = ---------1
(9-7)
where
U cell
(9-8)
(9-9)
K c = 0.4 + 0.4 ( 1 1 )
K e = 1 2.4 2 + 2
For triangular fin designs, the loss coefficients are taken from flat duct turbulent flow, and are defined as follows:
2
(9-10)
(9-11)
K c = 0.4 ( 1 1 )
Ke = ( 1 2 )
149
f c = aRe mi n
(9-12)
where
a
Re min
(9-13)
where
m
1
mean air density = --- ( 1 + 2 )
1
mean air viscosity = --- ( 1 + 2 )
Dh
hydraulic diameter
The hydraulic diameter, D h , is found from the core thickness, L , and the ratio
of the minimum flow area to the surface area, A c A ,
Ac
D h = 4L -----
A
(9-14)
The values of all the flow dependent variables in the pressure drop model are
determined on a cell-by-cell basis within the context of the current solution
iteration, i.e., the flow quantities, such as velocity and density (mean and
absolute), used in the pressure drop equations are the local values within the
heat exchanger cells at the current iteration. These values change and converge as the entire solution converges.
150
exchanger transverse directions were ten times greater than those in the normal flow direction.
(9-15)
where
i
cell effectiveness
151
mi
cp
T hot
T offi
Ti
inlet air temperature entering the heat exchanger, found from the
streamline that passes through the cell.
The total heat transfer from the heat exchanger is calculated by summing the
heat transfer from all of the cells in the heat exchanger, as shown by
Q appli ed =
(9-16)
where
Q appli ed
and i represents each cell in the heat exchanger. The total, Q appli ed , will not
normally be exactly equal to the user specified heat load, Q . To bring the two
values into closer agreement, the value of T hot is adjusted after each iteration
and the adjusted value is used in the next iteration. Thot is actually a fictitious
value which is used to balance some of the simplifying assumptions, and its
value is not reported to the user. The net effect of this process is to provide an
improved heat distribution function as compared the more simple, and less
physically based assumption of heat being distributed uniformly over the heat
exchanger face.
In the actual implementation of the above heat distribution concept in the
UH3D code, the process is slightly different than described in order to make
the equations more implicit, and thus improve numerical stability and convergence. At convergence, the processes are equivalent.
152
1.0
<comp_min_to_face_area>
1.0
<comp_core_const>
0.0
153
A zero resistance grille can also function as a flow meter, and a zero resistance grille offers more flexibility regarding the shape of the area which can
be covered, as compared to a heat exchanger.
154