Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BD 150611002
BD 150611002
03
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
To:
APPTEX SOURCING.
Contact:
Md.Muddassir Rashid
Address:
Issue Date:
INSPECTION RESULT
Tel:
01716069690
E-mail:
merchandise@apptexsourcing
Copy To:
rodrigo.magnago@3tlconsumerdgoods.com
A. General Information
CONFORMED
NON-CONFORMED
HOLD
NOTE: RATING IS BASED ON MTS INSPECTION RESULTS.
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION IS PER CLIENT DECISION
ONLY.
MTS Inspector:
Abu Sayed
Product Description:
Country of Destination:
Vendor- Address:
100
% of Finished Goods
without Packaging:
% of Goods Still
under Production:
D.P.I
BD150527002
Re-Inspection
NC
Conformed
Non-Conformed
X
X
X
-
COMMENTS
Remark# 1, 2, 3
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
C. Inspection Reference
Clients Product Specification:
Clients Approval Sample:
Clients Special Instruction:
Inspection Protocol:
1. Carton stacking
2. Master carton
Hold
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
E.2 Labeling
8. Composition label(Front)
9. Composition label(Back)
13. Logo
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
on poly bag
-
Non Conformed
Hold
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
Findings
Sample Size:
200 pieces
Defect Allowed:
Critical (0), Major (10), Minor (14)
Defect Found:
Critical (0), Major (08), Minor (12)
Details of Defect Found:
Pressing mark at front
Odd shape at back moon
Hole at front
Up-down zipper attached at front
Uneven joint at neck panel
Poor trimming at embroidery
Untrimmed thread at arm hole/ bottom
Slanted attached at front zipper
Needle mark at back moon
Dirty at sleeve
Spot at sleeve
Photo Ref. #
3033
34-35
36
37
38-39
40-41
42-43
44-45
46-47
48
49
Total:
Critical
0
Major
04
02
01
01
08
Minor
02
02
02
02
02
01
01
12
Defect Photo
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
Additional Photos
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
20
23
460
46
36
Pass
(AS_AS)
GARMENT INSPECTION
REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
MTS Report No.:
Inspection Date:
BD150611002
June 11, 2015
Issue Date:
Remarks
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Details
The supplier offered 4620 pieces against of booking form quantity 7390 pieces. Short by 2770 pieces
(37.48%)
During inspection color RED front zipper puller found paint pill off, out of 42 pieces inspected 15 pieces were
found paint pill off. .(Refer to Photo#51-52)
Color: Shade variation was observed against pc to pc.
For color Wild Dove: Out of 54 pieces inspected 10 pieces were found lighter in shade with iso grey scale
rating 3-4.(Refer to Photo#53)
During inspection we checked embroidery placement provided pattern by supplier. (Refer to Photo#54-58)
CNC label attached position checked with bulk goods. (Refer to Photo#60-61)
Inspection was carried out based on P.O. sheet, Measurement spec. sheet & packing approval papers
provided by client and PP sample taken from factory.
Factory provided PP sample found without approved tag.
03 pieces (shade variation sample-02 pcs + Paint pill off zipper sample-01 pcs) were sealed by MTS gum
tapes and handover to factory for client evaluation. .(Refer to Photo#74)
Attachment: Hand written measurement sheet.
Conclusion
According to the reference documents, the inspection findings do not comply with acceptance
criteria. It is concluded that the shipment is considered as non-conformance with clients
requirement.
(AS_AS)