Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/msec
Received 26 February 2004; received in revised form 16 August 2004; accepted 19 November 2004
Available online 7 January 2005
Abstract
Titanium dioxide doped polyaniline has been prepared by in situ polymerization. TiO2 nanoparticles with an average diameter about
20 nm were used as a dopant of polyaniline. The doping effect of TiO2 was characterized and evaluated by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) and electrical
conductivity measurement. SEM study shows that TiO2 nanoparticles have a strong effect on the morphology of composites. The FT-IR
spectra reveal that the interaction between TiO2 and polyaniline (PANI) is primarily based on the formation of H-bonding. Electrical
conductivity measurements indicate that the conductivity of composites at low TiO2 content is much higher than that of neat PANI,
while with the increasing contents of TiO2, the conductivity shows an orderly decrease.
D 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: Titanium dioxide; Polyaniline; Composites
1. Introduction
Conducting polymers have attracted considerable attention for their wide applications, such as microelectronic
devices, photodiodes, sensors, batteries, and technological
membranes [13]. Among these polymers, polyaniline
(PANI) is unique primarily due to its high chemical
durability and reversible control of conductivity both by
charge-transfer doping and protonation. Generally, polyaniline has two forms, the emeraldine base (EB) and
emeraldine salt (ES, both polaronic and/or bipolaronic),
which can be intercharged by treating with acid or base [4].
Its electrical conductivity is considered a result of motions
of polarons and bipolarons [5].
In recent years, much research has been conducted on
polyanilines composites with various nanomaterials [69].
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 931 8912517; fax: +86 931 8912582.
E-mail address: lihl@lzu.edu.cn (H.-L. Li).
0928-4931/$ - see front matter D 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.
doi:10.1016/j.msec.2004.11.003
2. Experimental
Aniline and ammonium peroxidisulfate (APS) at analytical reagent grade were bought from Beijing Chemical
Factory (Beijing, China). The in situ composites were
445
Fig. 2. SEM images of PANI/TiO2 composites with different contents of TiO2: (a) 5, (b) 25, (c) 50, and (d) 80 wt.%.
446
Table 1
Elemental analysis results of PANI/TiO2 composites with different contents
of TiO2
TiO2/aniline
monomer (wt.%)
Cl
(wt.%)
N
(wt.%)
Ti
(wt.%)
Cl/N
0
5
25
50
80
11.2
10.3
9.1
7.7
6.3
13.8
13.4
12.7
11.6
10.2
0
2.4
10.3
19.5
32.1
0.81
0.77
0.72
0.66
0.62
The doping effect of TiO2 nanoparticles in the composites is further observed by the elemental analysis from
Conductivity (103S.m-1)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
4. Conclusions
TiO2 doped polyaniline has been prepared by in situ
polymerization. SEM study shows that TiO2 nanoparticles
have a strong effect on the morphology of composites. The
FT-IR spectra reveal that the interaction between TiO2 and
PANI is primarily based on the formation of H-bonding.
Electrical conductivity measurements indicate that the
conductivity of composites at low TiO2 content is much
higher than that of neat PANI, while with the increasing
contents of TiO2, the conductivity shows an orderly
decrease.
447
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60171004).
References
[1] M.C. Petty, M.R. Bryce, D. Bloor, An Introduction to Molecular
Electronics, Edward Arnold, London, 1995.
[2] B. Scrosati, Applications of Electroactive Polymers, Chapman and
Hall, London, 1993.
[3] L. Alcacer, Conducting PolymersSpecial Applications, Reidel,
Dordrecht, 1989.
[4] G. Premamoy, K.S. Samir, C. Amit, Eur. Polym. J. 35 (1999) 699.
[5] S. Quillard, G. Louarn, S. Lefrant, A.G. Mcdiardmid, Phys. Rev., B 50
(1994) 12496.
[6] P. Somani, B.B. Kale, D.P. Amalnerkar, Synth. Met. 106 (1999) 53.
[7] F. Fusalba, D. Belanger, J. Mater. Res. 14 (1999) 1805.
[8] I. Krivka, J. Prokes, E. Tobolkova, J. Stejskal, J. Mater. Chem. 9
(1999) 2425.
[9] M. Lira-Gautu, P. Gomez-Romero, J. Solid State Chem. 147 (1999)
601.
[10] T.A. Kerr, H. Wu, L.F. Nazar, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 2005.
[11] C.G. Wu, D.C. DeGroot, H.O. Marcy, J.L. Schindler, C.R. Kannewurf, Y.J. Liu, W. Hirpo, M.G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996)
1992.
[12] H. Zengin, W.S. Zhou, J.Y. Jin, R. Czerw, D.W. Smith, L. Echegoyen,
D.L. Carroll, S.H. Foulger, J. Ballato, Adv. Mater. 14 (2002) 1480.
[13] J. Luo, H.G. Huang, H.P. Zhang, L.L. Wu, Z.H. Lin, M. Hepel, J. New
Mater. Electrochem. Syst. 3 (2000) 249.
[14] J.F. Rubison, H.B. Mark, Conducting Polymer and Polymer Electrolytes, ACS Symposium Series 832, Chapter 9 Eds.
[15] P.R. Somani, R. Marimuthu, U.P. Mulik, S.R. Sainkar, D.P.
Amalnerkar, Synth. Met. 106 (1999) 45.
[16] S.J. Su, N. Kuramoto, Synth. Met. 114 (2000) 147.
[17] C.C. Wang, J.Y. Ying, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 3113.
[18] Y. Ohnuki, T. Ohsaka, H. Matsuda, N. Oyama, J. Electroanal. Chem.
158 (1983) 55.
[19] N. Oyama, Y. Ohnuki, K. Chiba, T. Ohsaka, Chem. Lett. 11 (1983)
1759.
[20] S.P. Armes, S. Gottesfeld, J.G. Beery, F. Garzon, S.F. Agnew, Polymer
32 (1991) 2325.