Professional Documents
Culture Documents
pilot program may be treated as [FR Doc. E8–8695 Filed 4–22–08; 8:45 am] B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
developed in part with Federal funds BILLING CODE 5001–08–P This rule will not have a significant
and in part at private expense for cost or administrative impact on
purposes of negotiating rights in contractors or offerors, or a significant
technical data. effect beyond the internal operating
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:54 Apr 22, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM 23APR1
21846 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
procedures of DoD. Therefore, ACTION: Final rule. determining earned value management
publication for public comment under compliance when DoD is the cognizant
41 U.S.C. 418b is not required. SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule Federal agency.
However, DoD will consider comments amending the Defense Federal Æ Requirements for contractor cost/
from small entities concerning the Acquisition Regulation Supplement schedule status reports are eliminated.
affected DFARS subparts in accordance (DFARS) to update requirements for DoD published a proposed rule at 71
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments DoD contractors to establish and FR 3449 on January 23, 2006. Five
should cite DFARS Case 2007–D027. maintain earned value management sources submitted comments on the
systems. The rule also eliminates proposed rule. A discussion of the
C. Paperwork Reduction Act requirements for DoD contractors to comments is provided below.
The Paperwork Reduction Act does submit cost/schedule status reports. 1. Comment: One respondent stated
not apply, because the rule does not EFFECTIVE DATE: April 23, 2008. that the $20,000,000 threshold for
impose any information collection FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
earned value management (EVM) further
requirements that require the approval Mark Gomersall, Defense Acquisition aggravates the ability to mitigate cost,
of the Office of Management and Budget schedule, and technical risks, since
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L)
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. receiving EVM data below that
DPAP (DARS), IMD 3D139, 3062
threshold would be helpful in assisting
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 225 and Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
leadership to make affordable decisions.
252 20301–3062. Telephone 703–602–0302; DoD Response: The rule allows for
Government procurement. facsimile 703–602–7887. Please cite EVM below the $20,000,000 threshold
DFARS Case 2005–D006. when its application is determined to be
Michele P. Peterson, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: appropriate as the result of a cost-
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System. A. Background benefit analysis.
2. Comment: Two respondents stated
■ Therefore, 48 CFR parts 225 and 252 This final rule updates DFARS text that the rule should be revised to
are amended as follows: addressing earned value management specifically state that EVM requirements
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR policy for DoD contracts. The rule do not apply to time-and-materials,
parts 225 and 252 continues to read as supplements the final FAR rule labor-hour, and level-of-effort contracts.
follows: published at 71 FR 38238 on July 5, DoD Response: The rule requires EVM
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR 2006, and establishes DoD-specific to be applied only on cost and incentive
Chapter 1. earned value management requirements, type contracts and subcontracts over
as permitted by the FAR. The DFARS certain thresholds. EVM is discouraged
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION rule is consistent with the policy in the on firm-fixed-price contracts and
memorandum issued by the Under subcontracts of any dollar value.
225.7010 [Removed and Reserved] Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Further, performance-based acquisition
■ 2. Section 225.7010 is removed and Technology, and Logistics) on March 7, management on developmental efforts,
reserved. 2005, Subject: Revision to DoD Earned as described in OMB Circular A–11, Part
Value Management Policy (available at 7, focuses on the use of EVM on cost
225.7010–1 through 225.7010–4
[Removed]
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/ops/ and incentive type contracts.
policy_vault.html). 3. Comment: One respondent
■ 3. Sections 225.7010–1 through
The DFARS changes in this rule expressed support of the rule, but urged
225.7010–4 are removed.
include the following: that the Defense Acquisition
PART 252—SOLICITATION Æ For cost or incentive contracts and Regulations Council work with the
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT subcontracts valued at $20,000,000 or Civilian Agency Acquisition Council to
CLAUSES more, the rule requires an earned value ensure that the final FAR rule is
management system that complies with consistent with the DFARS rule. In
252.225–7023 [Removed and Reserved] the guidelines in the American National particular, the respondent stated that
■ 4. Section 252.225–7023 is removed Standards Institute/Electronic Industries the FAR rule should be revised in four
and reserved. Alliance Standard 748, Earned Value areas to make it consistent with the
Management Systems (ANSI/EIA–748). DFARS rule as follows: Explicitly limit
[FR Doc. E8–8694 Filed 4–22–08; 8:45 am] Æ For cost or incentive contracts and application of EVM requirements to cost
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
subcontracts valued at $50,000,000 or or incentive contracts; establish a fixed
more, the rule requires an earned value dollar value for the applicability of EVM
management system that has been requirements; limit integrated baseline
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
determined by the cognizant Federal reviews to contract post-award; and
Defense Acquisition Regulations agency (as defined in FAR 2.101) to be establish an executive agency (such as
System in compliance with the guidelines in the Defense Contract Management
ANSI/EIA–748. Agency (DCMA)) within the
48 CFR Parts 234, 242, and 252 Æ For cost or incentive contracts and Government responsible for
subcontracts valued at less than Government-wide EVM system
RIN 0750–AF19 $20,000,000, the rule provides that compliance reviews.
application of earned value management DoD Response: The respondent’s
Defense Federal Acquisition
is optional and is a risk-based decision. recommendations regarding the FAR
Regulation Supplement; Earned Value
Æ For firm-fixed-price contracts and were addressed in the preamble to the
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Apr 22, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM 23APR1