Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
Clovis T eixeir'a
&
Miryam B. Kutner
I -
INTRODUCTION
102 -
o
~----+-------~ 25
rf! Bom
Abri g o Is l a nd
"
L-_~~
48
4-__________
_ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~ 250 10'
103-
104 -
1 00 ~----------------------------------------------------------------,
E XPE.RIMENTAL CURVES:
aoc
60
f-
z
UJ
o:
70
UJ
Q.
40-L-------------------r-------------------r-------------------r---------'
3.0
1.5
TIME
IN
HOURS
4.5
105 -
I O~~--------------------------------------------------------~-----'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
80
!Z
W
U
'w"
a.
-----
----------------- -
- - -
~--------~~========~========~----1
1 - --
lU
20
T I
1 N
1\1 I N U T E S
lO
40
1 20
20 0
10
12
HOURS
22SEPTEMBER
40
14
10
20 SEPTEMBER
' 'l
20 0-j
12
HOURS
12
14
la
10
23 SEPTEM BER
14
40
120
!2
40
1 20
20 0
14
10
12
HO UR S
24SEPTEMBr:R
HOURS
21 SEPTEMBER
200
U R S
Fi g. 3
12
2UO J
14
O":>
I-'
107-
K --- ~
d
'
HydTographical data - The variation of the mean sea leveI (Fig. 3) was determined with a ti de gauge placed at the
Canania laboratory. Salinity was determined by the argentimetry method and for O 2 determination the Winkler's method \\Tas
used; pH was measured with a portable Metrohm pH Meter.
III -
1.
Phytoplankton
'-'
III
..l
..l
ti)
..l
0.0
1. 5
'; "1
4.5
15
20
5/
00
O LOW TIDE
Fig. 4 -
25
I
1
15
20
5 0/
00
.,
.\
30
III
'"o
III
....l
..l
(/)
..l
0.0
215
III
..l
....l
(/)
..l
o:
2 METERS
f..
f..
1.5
o:
x
III 3.
'"::
4.5
oJ
1.5
3.
4.5
15
30
HIGH TIDE
SURFACE
O
20
SO/OO
25
4 METERS
.~
'.
3'0
I-'
O
00
IU!:J
= -
2.
Zooplankton
was
the
The
and
3.
Bacterioplankton
Little information is available concerning the study of bacteria in tropical inshore waters. The purpose of our study was to
determine the natural f lora of bacteria and verify the exist ence
and amount of pollution.
Analysing the bacterial flora of the region, we observed some
degree of pollution, indicated mainly by the water collected at
high ti de just when it is flowing away from the town, being a
consequence of the pollution by sewage.
110-
LOW TIDE
HIGH TIDE
20 SEPTEM8E I,
2 I SEPTEM8E R
22 S E P TE M 8ER
iHi MICROCOCCACEAE
eCOLlFORM
@
Fig. 5 -
BACILLACEAE
%
O
ACHROMOBA CTER1ACEAE
PSEUDOMONADACEAE
T ABLE I -
,
Date
Tide
Ne t plankton
Depth
(m)
111-
Zooplankton
Nano plankton
Phytoplankton
0.0
64
75,890
2 .0
365
150,514
4 .0
2 .536,000
------ -
low
20/9
high
low
21 / 9
high
low
22 / 9
2.742,500
low
23 / 9
0 .0
266
40,866
1.683,450
431
56,181
1 .51 3 ,200
4 .0
300
63,283
1.200,800
0.0
1 35
79,600
3.799,360
2 .0
1 73
184,249
3 .654,800
4.0
214
38,054
3.883, 200
0.0
170
34,750
1 .700,220
2 .0
300
34,381
1.651,200
4.0
2 00
23,700
1.050,750
0.0
1 20
53,094
1 ~0,400
2 .0
118
164,949
3 .512,000
4 .0
281
81,670
0.0
110
31,900
1.146,400
---
--
24/ 9
1 .300,000
230,000
- -- -2 .000,000
3.100,000
4.218,880
2 .0
305
20,775
201.960
4 .0
102
15,481
456,000
0.0
260
28,260
2.301,160
264
112,595
2.670,720
4.0
1 50
25,612
3.093,600
0.0
70
34,900
1 .666,400
2.0
95
18,299
1.092,480
4 .0
322
0.0
135
-- ---
22,025
945,050
70,650
3.415,190
---
--
2.0
300
151,253
3.832,350
4.0
305
184,510
4.445,730
0.0
94
38,525
2.187,500
2.0
264
60,009
1.721,300
4.0
212
79,620
---- - -
high
9.600,000
2.0
low
---
2.0
--
high
1.520,000
-
------
high
Bacterioplankton
112-
4.
O1'ganic matte1'
5.
T1'anspa1'ency
1.7
d
t-:::-::I
HIGH TIDE
LOW TIDE
3 .00rJJ
..J
..J
"'
tI.
rJJ
Z
o
1.30-
..J
..J
2.
HIGH TIDE
LOW TIDE
15-
rr
"'f..f..
2
u
"o
ti
"'
f..
..J
=>
OI)
f..
ti
o.
..J
f..
O
-
o
Fig. 6 -
( in
metef's)
T ABL E II -
Date
20/9
Tide
high
low
I
I
Depth
(m)
Organic
matter
(mg/l)
Inorganic
matter
(mg/l)
Total parto
matter
(mg/l)
0.0
9.60
22.44
32.04
2.0
7.20
10.80
18.00
4.0
6 .80
11.76
18.56
0 .0
8.80
19.60
28.40
2.0
13.60
24.80
38.40
4.0
15.20
21.60
36.80
0.0
8.40
16.00
24.40
2 .0
6.80
14.00
20.80
4 .0
6.80
14.40
21.20
0.0
12.00
23.60
35.60
2.0
14.40
24.80
39.20
4.0
16.40
28.68
45.08
0 .0
11.20
22.40
36.60
2.0
7 .20
1 8.80
26.00
4 .0
8.00
20.00
28.00
0.0
9.60
24.16
33.76
2.0
15.20
27.00
42.20
4.0
16.80
29 .28
46.08
21 / 9
high
22/ 9
23 / 9
low
high
24 / 9
low
Dat e
t---
Tide
Depth (ro)
0.0
0.3450
0.5434
2.0
4 .0
lo w
rog / ro3
20/ 9
high
low
0.0
0.3000
2 .0
0.0840
4.0
0.6720
0.0
2.0
0.4720
4.0
0.2340
0.0
2.0
0.5005
4.0
0 .2380
21/ 9
high
0.0
2.0
low
4.0
0.5392
1.1480
0.8680
22 / 9
high
lo w
0.0
2.0
0 .1914
4 .0
0 .0980
0.2240
0.0
0 .5214
2 .0
4 .0
1.6940
0.4280
0.0
2.0
0.3234
0.1120
4.0
0.1280
0.0
2 .0
4.0
0.3600
2.1600
23 / 9
high
low
3.6400
24 /9
high
0.0
2.0
0.3432
4.0
0.5600
0.4480
T ABL E IV Date
116-
Tide
low
2 .0
0 .85
high
2 .5
0.68
low
2.0
0 .85
hi g h
2.2
0.77
lo w
1.5
1.33
high
1.5
1.33
low
1 .2
1.41
high
1.5
1 .33
lo w
0.8
2 .12
high
1.0
20 / 9
21 / 9
22 / 9
23 / 9
2 4/9
1 .70
117-
'-
a:
Ul
r
r
:2
50
'" "c
r
..l
<.)
a.
...J
r
o
a:
25
O -L----------------~----------------_,Ir-----------------~---------------l.O
2.0
3
~o
TRANSPARENCY
OEPTH
[in
metersJ
Fig. 7 -- Relation between particulate organic matter and Secchi disc depth.
118 -
6.
DISCUSSION
TABLE V -
Date
Tide
2.0
4.0
20/9
hi g h
low
21/9
---hi g h
low
I
15.44
I
I
23/9
high
low
pH
4.61
7 .7
4.62
23.40
19.31
4.86
8.1
2.0
22.62
4.85
4.0
24.39
4 .37
0.0
14.64
22.80
4.65
7.8
2.0
17.92
4.97
4.0
20.67
5.32
0.0
24.88
4.73
8.1
2.0
24.96
4.76
4.0
26.29
4.76
22.60
0.0
17.92
22.24
4.22
7.7
2.0
19.62
5.01
4 .0
19.42
5.08
0.0
25.32
4.47
7 .8
2.0
26.64
4 .0
27.75
18.8.7
22.70
22.00
4.22
7.6
2.0
20.38
4.32
4.44
- -_. ._
--
4 .0
20.76
0.0
24.42
2.0
25.71
4.0
26.36
0.0
15.84
2 .0
17.98
4 .0
18.02 .
0.0
21.24
2.0
22.62
4.0
22.54
22.20
4.43
7.8
4.43
4.42
4.72
7 .5
4.19
22.40
4.20
5.06
8.0
4.81
24 / 9
high
0, cc/!
0.0
0.0
low
I
20.60
20.07
22 / 9
high
T<'C
%0
0.0
low
119-
22.60
23 / 9
22/ 9
21 / 9
20 / 9
Date
10
80
100
10
lo w
high
50
90
10
10
low
70
80
20
--
--
10
10
O,
(%)
( %)
70
Achro mobacteriaceae
Pseudo'I11onada ceae
50
10
10
70
(%)
MicTOcoccaceae
10
20
(% )
Bacillaceae
10
(% )
Oorynebacte riaceae
high
10
high
10
low
low
10
10
Tide
high
Number
of
colonies
tested
TABLE VI -
10
(%)
Coliform
I:\:)
,...
O
121-
122-
v -
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are indebted to Dl'. Marta Vannucci whose criticism has been of great help during the investigations, to Dr. Ko
Watanabe for the bacteria studies and to Mr. J. Tundisi for the
zooplankton countings.
VI -
SUMMARY
1 -
2 -
123 3 -
The total organic matter varied from 6.80 to 16.80 mgl l and the dry
organic matter of net plankton varied from 0.084 to 3.64 mg/ m 3 . These
results are presumably due to a great portion of the particulate matter
that may be originated from nanoplankton and fine detritus .
5 -
The average of nanoplankton was 97 % greater than net phytoplankton and the net phytoplankton was in average 99,7 % greater than
zooplankton.
VII -
RESUMO
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
VIII -
REFERENCES
POOLE,
RILEY,
124
H. H. & ATKINS, W . R. G.
1929. Photo-electric measurements of submarine illumination throughout the year. Jour. Mar. BioI. Ass. U. K., voI. 16, n.o 1,
p . 297-324.
G.
A.
1941 .
Sound.
1959.
Bull.
Bingham
G. W.
1957. Interrelations of dissolved organic matter and phytoplankton.
Bot. Rev., voI. 23, n.o 6, p. 389-409.
SAUNDERS,
STEEMANN NIELSEN, E.
1957.
C. & KUTNER, M. B.
1961. Contribuio para o conhecimento das diatomceas da regio
de Canania. BoI. Inst. Ocean., voI. XI, n.o 3, p. 41-74.
TEIXEIRA,
WOOD, E. J .
1956.
F. & DAVIS, P. S.
Importance of smaller phytoplankton elements.
177, p . 438.
Nature, Lond.,
C. S . & RYTHER, J . H.
1959. Relative significance of the n et phytoplankton and nanoplankton
in waters of Vineyard Sound. Woods Hole Oceano Instit., Coll.
Repr., Contr. n.o 984.
YENTSCH,