Professional Documents
Culture Documents
260
Nigel Clark
261
sustained inquiry.8 But Derrida did make it clear from early on that
the structural logics he identified worked against the closure or selfsufficiency of the human, and of life more generally. What always
interested him, in his own words, was the: . . . arch-phenomenon of
memory, which must be thought before the opposition of nature and
culture, animality and humanity, etc., . . . . this trace is the opening of
the first exteriority in general, the enigmatic relationship of the living
to its other and of an inside to an outside; spacing.9
While this excerpt from Of Grammatology may not be unfamiliar,
its worth noting that I sourced it, word for word, from an article in
a biology journal. Rather than taking Derrida to task for his scientific
or environmental oversights, natural scientists who find his approach
useful have recognised that deconstruction characteristically sets out
from those experiences, texts and fields with which researchers are
accustomed in order to unleash the strangeness harboured within
the familiar (Craw and Heads, 507). Citing Derrida to the effect that
The movements of deconstruction do not destroy concepts from the
outside (Of Grammatology, 24), biologists Robin Craw and Michael
Heads, among others, have reworked the resources of their own
discipline to explicitly deconstruct the opposition biology/geology
(510, 513).
Following recent reassertions by Vicki Kirby, Martin Hgglund and
Karen Barad that Derridas logic of the trace was always intended
to apply to fields beyond the human,10 it is timely to consider the
contributions deconstruction has made and might yet make to a
speculative geophysics. It is, at this moment, necessary to ask how
our species became a geologic agent of such forcefulness that we are
undermining the material conditions of our existence.11 However, a
sensitivity to the complexity and enigma of origins the suspicion
that beginnings might be already alive with what has yet to come
can pull this question in different directions (Kirby, 30). It prompts us
to also inquire what kind of planet is this that births a creature capable of
doing such things?
Taking inspiration from the prescient attempts of deconstructionist
biologists to work through the imbrications of biology and geology,
I look at some recent hypotheses about the role of active tectonic
processes in the emergence of our own species. In the light of
speculation about the volcanic origins of human fire use, I ask how
262
Nigel Clark
263
264
Nigel Clark
265
266
landmasses were composed of multiple, heterogeneous and often longjourneying fragments from disparate sources.30
The key to current global distributions of life, then, lay not
so much in existing landform, but in the earths major tectonic
processes and upheavals. In other words, where orthodox Darwinian
biogeography told a story of living things moving on or across relatively
enduring topographies, the approach favoured by the New Zealand
deconstructionist biogeographers posited a much more complicated
relationship between biology and geology. In place of a genesis at
unitary centres, biological novelty was seen to emerge along zones
of geological deformation; sutures where oceans have closed, rifts
where continents are stretching, coastlines which shifted as seas or
landmasses rose and fell.31 In this view, not only does geology play
a much more dynamic role in biological differentiation, but life
too is credited with playing a major part as a geological force:
influencing rock weathering and sedimentation, and forming coral
reefs, and chalk and oil deposits.32 Extrapolating from the passage
on writing in the general sense in Of Grammatology that includes
reference to processes of information inside the living cell (9),
Craw and Heads move beyond the more familiar association of
textuality with the operations of the genetic code, and propose that
biological life in its role as a geological agent is fundamentally
inscriptive. Under the heading of Writing, Earth and Life, they
make the claim that Derridas writings would. . . also include
the inscriptions made by plants, animals and rocks on (or as)
the landscape, for example in movement/growth/architecture and
biogeography.33
Craw and Heads make it quite clear that this understanding of life
as an active geological stratum constitutes a deconstruction of existing
epistemic distinctions between biology and geology, the living and
non-living:
We can also note here the crude distinction animate/inanimate
(living/dead life/earth) as deconstructed in Croizats view of life
as the top geological layer. That the living permeates its other the
dead; that fossil and living organisms integrate; that earth and life
merge in space/time as the landscape . . . these deconstructions raise
the issue of the opposition biology/geology. (Reading Croizat, 513)
Nigel Clark
267
268
Nigel Clark
269
270
Nigel Clark
271
272
Nigel Clark
273
274
Nigel Clark
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
275
of Life (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 2008); Karen Barad, Quantum
Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities,
SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come, Derrida Today 3:2 (2010):
24068.
See Tom Cohen, The Geomorphic Fold: Anapocalyptics, Changing Climes and
Late Deconstruction, The Oxford Literary Review 32:1 (2010): 7189 (71).
Stephen J. Pyne, World Fire: The Culture of Fire on Earth (New York, Henry Holt,
1995), 312.
Jacques Derrida, Edmund Husserls Origins of Geometry: An Introduction, translated
by John P. Leavey, Jr. (Lincoln, NE, University of Nebraska Press, 1989), 81.
Mike Davis, Cosmic Dancers on Historys Stage? The Permanent Revolution in
the Earth Sciences, New Left Review 217 (1996), 4884.
See Peter Westbroek, Life as a Geological Force: Dynamics of the Earth (New York,
W. W. Norton, 1992), chapter 4; Vaclav Smil, The Earths Biosphere: Evolution,
Dynamics, and Change (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2003), chapter 5.
Michel Serres, Hermes III, La Traduction (Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1974) 21,
quoted in Christopher Johnson, System and Writing in the Philosophy of Jacques
Derrida (Cambridge, NY, Cambridge University Press, 1993), 3. See also Alberto
Gualandi, Errancies of the Human: French Philosophies of Nature and the
Overturning of the Copernican Revolution, Collapse V (2009), 50148.
Jacques Derrida, Limited Inc, translated by Samuel Weber (Evanston,
Northwestern University Press, 1988), 134.
Kirby, Quantum Anthropologies, 6.
Jacques Derrida, As if it were Possible, within such limits . . . , in Questioning
Derrida: With his Replies on Philosophy, edited by Michel Meyer (Burlington, VT,
Ashgate, 2001), 115, quoted in Henry Staten, Derrida, Dennett, and the EthicoPolitical Project of Naturalism, Derrida Today 5:1 (2008), 1941 (20), italics
added.
See Jacques Derrida, Dissemination, 332.
Craw and Heads, Reading Croizat, 514.
John R. Grehan, Panbiogeography and Conservation Science in New Zealand,
New Zealand Journal of Zoology 16:4 (1989), 73141 (734).
Robin Craw and George Hubbard, Cross Pollination: Hyphenated Identities and
Hybrid Realities (or ALTER/NATIVE to What?), Midwest 3 (1993), 323; Roger
Cooper, New Zealand Tectonostratigraphic Terranes and Panbiogeography,
New Zealand Journal of Zoology 16 :4 (1989), 699712.
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (London,
Murray, 1859 (382), quoted in John R. Grehan, Panbiogeography and Evolution,
Rivista di Biologia Biology Forum 81:4 (1988), 46998 (471).
276
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Copyright of Oxford Literary Review is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may not be
copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.