Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HO LONG YI
BA (Hons) Scheme in Fashion and Textiles
(Fashion Technology Specialism)
A Thesis Submitted
in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements
for the Degree of
Bachelor of Arts (Honours)
in
Fashion & Textiles
(Fashion Technology Specialism)
under the Supervision of
Dr.C. H. Chui
by
HO LONG YI
Acknowledgement
The last but not the least, the greatest thanks are expressed
to my family, classmates and friends for their unlimited
support and encouragement at the critical monument.
AUTHORIZATION
I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, it reproduces no
material previously published or written, nor material
that has been accepted for the award of any other degree
or diploma, except where due acknowledgement had been
made in the text.
__________________________________________(Signed)
_________________________________________(Name of student)
II
Abstract
It is a
III
Content
Page
Acknowledgment
Authorization
II
Abstract
III
Content
IV
List of Table
XIII
List of Figures
Chapter 1
XIV
Introduction
1.1
Background of Study
1.2
Objective
1.3
Scope of Study
1.4
Methodology
1.5
Significance of study
1.6
Chapter Summary
Chapter2
Literature Review
2.1
Introduction
2.2
Cotton
2.2.1
Introduction
IV
2.2.2
History
2.2.3
2.2.3.1
2.2.3.2
Morphology
2.2.3.3
Color
11
2.2.4
12
2.2.4.1
Chemical Structure
12
2.2.4.2
13
2.2.4.3
Wrinkle Property
13
2.2.4.4
Thermal Degradation
14
2.2.4.5
Acid Degradation
15
2.2.5
15
2.2.5.1
Strength
15
2.2.5.2
Dimensional stability
16
2.3
16
2.3.1
Woven fabric
17
2.3.2
Plain weaving
18
2.3.3
20
2.4
Wrinkle
21
2.4.1
21
2.4.2
22
2.4.3
Historical development of
traditional resin
24
2.4.4
25
2.4.5
31
2.4.6
34
2.4.6.1
Urea-formaldehyde (U/F)
34
2.4.6.2
Melamine-formaldehyde (M/F)
35
2.4.6.3
N, N-Dimethyl- 4,
5-dihydroxyethylene urea (DMeDHEU)
37
2.4.6.4
2.5
Conclusion
Chapter 3
42
3.1
Introduction
43
3.2
Fabric specification
43
3.3
Parameter of experiment
44
3.4
44
3.4.1
44
VI
3.4.2
Padding
45
3.4.3
Drying
46
3.4.4
Curing
47
3.5
48
3.5.1
48
3.5.1.1
Introduction
48
3.5.1.2
Principle
49
3.5.1.3
49
3.5.1.4
Sample Preparation
50
3.5.1.5
Procedure
51
3.5.1.6
Evaluation
52
3.5.2
52
3.5.2.1
Introduction
52
3.5.2.2
Principle
53
3.5.2.3
53
3.5.2.4
Sample Preparation
54
3.5.2.5
Experimental Procedure
55
VIII
3.5.2.6
Evaluation
56
3.5.3
56
3.5.3.1
Introduction
56
3.5.3.2
Principle
57
3.5.3.3
57
3.5.3.4
Sample Preparation
58
3.5.3.5
Procedure
58
3.5.4
59
3.5.4.1
Introduction
59
3.5.4.2
Principle
59
3.5.4.3
60
3.5.4.4
Sample Preparation
61
3.5.4.5
Procedure
61
3.5.5
VIII
3.5.5.1
Introduction
61
3.5.5.1
Introduction
61
3.5.5.2
Principle
62
3.5.5.3
62
3.5.5.4
Sample Preparation
64
3.5.5.5
Procedure
64
3.5.6
64
3.5.6.1
Introduction
64
3.5.6.2
Principle
65
3.5.6.3
65
3.5.6.4
Sample Preparation
66
3.5.6.5
Procedure
66
Chapter 4
4.1
4.1.1
67
Introduction
67
IX
4.1.2
Result
67
4.1.3
Discussion
69
4.1.4
Conclusion
74
4.2
75
4.2.1
Introduction
75
4.2.2
Result
76
4.2.3
Discussion
77
4.2.4
Conclusion
84
4.3
85
4.3.1
Introduction
85
4.3.2
Result
86
4.3.3
Discussion
87
4.3.4
Conclusion
94
Chapter 5
5.1
97
Introduction
97
5.1.2
Result
98
5.1.3
Discussion
99
5.1.4
Conclusion
106
5.2
5.1.1
107
5.2.1
Introduction
107
5.2.2
Result
107
5.2.3
Discussion
109
5.2.4
Conclusion
116
Chapter 6
6.1
Dimensional Stability
Dimensional Changes in Commercial
Laundering of Woven and Knitted
Fabrics Except Wool (AATCC 96)
118
6.1.1
Introduction
118
6.1.2
Result
119
XI
6.1.3
Discussion
120
6.1.4
Conclusion
130
Chapter 7
7.1
General Conclusion
132
7.2
Recommendation
135
Reference
XII
List of Table
Table 2-1 Properties of Evo Pret RCI-H
Table 3-1 Fabric specification
Table 3-2 Treatment parameter
Table 3-3 Resin chemical recipe
Table 3-4 Summary for the using of the Horizontal padder
Table 4-1 Comparison between control and treated
specimens
Table 4-2 Comparison between control and treated
specimens
Table 4-3 Comparison between control and treated
specimens
Table 5-1 Comparison between control and treated
specimens
Table 5-2 Comparison between control and treated
specimens
Table 6-1 Comparison between control and treated
specimens
XIII
List of Figures
Fig2-1 Layers of cellulose (Cotton Incorporated,2012)
Fig2-2 Convolutions of Cotton Fiber (Cotton
Incorporated,2012)
Fig 2-3 Chemical Structure of Cellulose (Cotton
Incorporated,2012)
Fig2-4 Cellulose Degradation cotton by H+ ion (Lam, 2011)
Fig 2-5 Plain weaving (Kadolph, 1998)
Fig 2-6 Resin crosslinking (Kadolph, 1998)
Fig 2-7 Evo Pret RCI-H
Fig 2-8 Crosslinking of cellulose with DMDHEU (Hauser,
2004)
Fig 2-9 Synthesis of DMDHEU, (Hauser, 2004)
Fig 2-10 Dimethylol urea reactions (Hauser, 2004)
Fig 2-11 Melamine-formaldehyde reactions (Hauser, 2004)
Fig 2-12
Fig 2-13
2004)
Fig 2-14 The activation mechanism of BTCA (Hauser, 2004)
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
resistance
Fig 5-5 Relationship between pick-up ratio and tearing
resistance
Fig 5-6 Relationship between warp and weft in tearing
resistance
Fig 5-7 Relationship between drying temperature and
tearing resistance
Fig 5-8 Relationship between curing time and tearing
resistance
Fig 5-9 Relationship between resin level and tearing
resistance
Fig 5-10 Relationship between pick-up ratio and tearing
resistance
Fig 6-1 Relationship between warp and weft with %
dimensional change
Fig 6-2 Relationship between number of laundering and
dimensional change
Fig 6-3 Relationship between resin level and dimensional
change
XVIII
XIX
Chapter 1
1.1
Introduction
Background of Study
1.2
Objective
There are three objectives for the study. The first one
is to study the anti-wrinkle effect of the resin when
being applied on the 100% cotton light weight plain
fabric under different treating conditions. The second
1
1.3
Scope of Study
1.4
Methodology
4.
would be drawn.
1.5
Significance of study
1.6
Chapter Summary
Chapter2
Literature Review
2.1
Introduction
2.2
Cotton
2.2.1
Introduction
2.2.2
History
2.2.3
2.2.3.1
2.2.3.2
Morphology
2.2.3.3
Color
11
2.2.4
2.2.4.1
Chemical Structure
2.2.4.3
Wrinkle Property
The last but not the least, cotton has very poor wrinkle
resistance and recovery from deformations. It is because
13
off at 120C.
cotton fiber.
2.2.5.1 Strength
When comparing with other cellulose fiber such as flax
and rayon, cotton is relatively weaker. Cotton strength
15
2.2.5.2
Dimensional stability
2.3
2.3.1
Woven fabric
2.3.2
Plain weaving
2.3.3
2.4
Wrinkle
2.4.1
2.4.2
the
bonding,
wrinkle
cross-links
recovery.
are
Physically,
applied
to
crosslinking
free
finishing
agent
would
react
with
the
22
its
original
position.
The
resin
finishing
forms
between
stability
molecule
of
the
the
chains
cellulose
bonding
would
chains.
would
more
be
likely
Therefore,
improved
to
return
the
and
the
to
its
resin
agent,
strengthening
cellulous
intermolecular
because
chains
would
of
be
the
able
crosslinks
bonding.
to
hold
As
would
a
the
be
result,
adjacent
However,
the
acidic
catalyst
under
high
to the
crosslinking,
the hand
2.4.3
Company
were
applying
urea-formaldehyde
resin
for
in
pilling
hand
and
and
bad
affinity
odor.
for
Moreover,
oily,
soils,
the
release
static,
of
the
for
the
toxicity.
developed.
The
urea
As
and
result,
alternatives
urea-formaldehyde
resin
were
were
dimethyloldihydroxyethylene
(DMDHEU)
was
developed.
(Kadolph ,1998)
Apart from formaldehyde based cross linking agent,
non-
2.4.4
One
45 % DMDHEU, 9 %
30
2.4.5
Technical Data
Clear liquid with low
viscosity
Approx. 1.26kg/L
Approx. 2-3
As
Therefore,
33
2.4.6
2.4.6.1
Urea-formaldehyde (U/F)
concentrations of the
starting compounds. However, the equilibria are also the
reasons for the high content of easily released free
formaldehyde in U/F products. Comparatively, the modified
Dimethoxymethyl urea is more stable of then the
unmodified one. The reactivity of the unmodified N,N'dimethylol urea
(Sharpe
G, 2003)
2.4.6.2
Melamine-formaldehyde (M/F)
better
is often as a component of
a product mixture which gives a better permanence for
the performance. Moreover, it is used for permanent
chintz (glazing, embossing, Schreinering) of cellulosic.
HMM is found with additional uses in pigment binders.
(Hauser, 2004) (Harriet, 1997) (Kadolph, 1998)
2.4.6.3
(DMeDHEU)
N,N'-Dimethyl- 4,5-dihydroxyethylene urea (DMeDHEU) is
different from DMDHEU. DMeDHEU does not contain
formaldehyde. It is formaldehyde free product.
It is
derived
37
Fig 2-12
Fig 2-13
38
amount of DMeDHEU is
this
39
2.4.6.4
The
41
2.5
Conclusion
42
Chapter 3
3.1
Introduction
3.2
Fabric specification
The light weight 100% cotton plain woven fabric which was
used for the resin treatment was with the following
specifications.
Table 3-1 Fabric specification
Fabric
specification
Fiber content
Fabric structure
Fabric weight
Yarn count
Fabric density
Warp density
Weft density
Fabric to be
studied
100 % Cotton
fabric
Plain weave
125.3 g/m
13 tex
140 yarns per
inch
76 yarns per inch
43
3.3
Parameter of experiment
3.4
30g/L
45g/L
60g/L
60%
70%
80%
110
120
2 mins
2.5 mins
3 mins
3.4.1
44
3.4.2
30g/L
45g/L
60g/L
Acetic acid
60%
1.0g/L
1.0g/L
1.0g/L
Padding
5
1
5
0.8
RPM: revolutions per minute
2
2
45
3.4.3
Drying
3.4.4
Curing
3.5
3.5.1
3.5.1.1
Introduction
48
3.5.1.2
Principle
3.5.1.3
3.5.1.4
Sample Preparation
3.5.1.5
Procedure
3.5.1.6
Evaluation
3.5.2
(AATCC 128)
3.5.2.1
Introduction
52
3.5.2.2
Principle
3.5.2.3
3.5.2.4
Sample Preparation
3.5.2.5
Experimental Procedure
55
3.5.2.6
Evaluation
3.5.3.1
Introduction
3.5.3.2
Principle
3.5.3.3
57
Fig 3-6 Washing machine and tumble dryer for AATCC 124
3.5.3.4
Sample Preparation
3.5.3.5
Procedure
3.5.4
3.5.4.1
Introduction
Principle
3.5.4.3
Fig 3-8 Weight used for the pendulum testing machine for
the cotton specimens
60
3.5.4.4
Sample Preparation
3.5.4.5
Procedure
3.5.5
3.5.5.1
Introduction
3.5.5.2
Principle
3.5.5.3
3.5.5.4
Sample Preparation
3.5.5.5
Procedure
The test specimen was clamped on the two jaws with one
leg in each jaw. The cut was located along the
centerlines of the jaws. The software was started to move
the machine to tear the specimen and record and calculate
the result.
3.5.6
3.5.6.1
Introduction
64
3.5.6.2
Principle
3.5.6.3
65
Fig 3-12 Washing machine and tumble dryer for AATCC 124
3.5.6.4
Sample Preparation
3.5.6.5
Procedure
66
Chapter 4
4.1
4.1.1
Introduction
4.1.2
Result
Recovery angle: 86 to
140
4.1.3
Discussion
Recovery angle
120.0
100.0
80.0
Resin 30
60.0
Resin 45
40.0
Resin 60
20.0
0.0
60
60
60
2.5
70
70
70
80
80
80
2
2.5
3
2
Pick up % , Curing Time
2.5
From the above graph (Fig 4-1), the changes of the angle
recovery due to the change of resin concentration were
shown.
Recovery angle
120.0
100.0
80.0
Pick up 60%
60.0
Pick up 70%
40.0
Pick up 80%
20.0
0.0
2
2.5
30
30
2.5
2.5
30 45 45 45 60 60
Curing Time, Resin concentation
60
70
From the above graph (Fig 4-2), the changes of the angle
recovery due to the change of pick-up ratio were shown.
It was shown that with the same drying temperature,
curing time and resin concentration level, the recovery
angle would increase when pick-up ratio increased.
However, for some specimens, there were exceptional
cases. For example, for specimens which had been cured
for 2 min and with 30g/L resin concentration, the average
recovery angle would slightly decrease when the pick-up
ratio changes from 70% to 80%. Yet, when comparing with
the specimens with 60% pick-up ratio, the recovery angles
of 70% and 80% were still higher.
There was a general trend that for a higher pick-up ratio,
the resin treated specimens would have a high degree of
angle recovery with the other perimeters constant. It
shown that the factor, pick-up ratio, would improve the
wrinkle recovery performance of the light weight 100%
cotton plain fabric which was being studied in this
project.
treated fabrics.
REcovery angle
100.0
80.0
2 min
60.0
2.5 min
3 min
40.0
20.0
0.0
30
45
60
45
60
30
45
60
30
Resin level
From the above graph (Fig 4-3), the changes of the angle
recovery due to the change of curing time were shown.
It was shown that with the same drying temperature, resin
concentration level and pick-up ratio, the recovery angle
would increase when the curing time increased in general.
There was a general trend that for a longer curing time,
72
treated fabrics.
Recovery angle
100.0
80.0
110C
60.0
120C
40.0
20.0
0.0
30
60
45
60
60
60
30
70
45
From the above graph (Fig 4-4), the changes of the angle
recovery due to the change of drying temperature were
shown.
4.1.4
Conclusion
4.2.1
Introduction
The smoothness
4.2.2
Result
The result for the AATCC Test Method 128 was generated
according to the standard method stated on the Chapter 3.
Methodology. The grading was based on the 3-dimensinal
reference standards.
Grade 2 to Grade 3
76
4.2.3
Discussion
Grade
2.5
2.0
Resin 30
1.5
Resin 45
1.0
Resin 60
0.5
0.0
60
60
60
2.5
70
70
70
80
80
80
2
2.5
3
2
Pick up %, curing time
2.5
78
Grade
2.0
1.5
Pick up 60%
Pick up 70%
1.0
Pick up 80%
0.5
0.0
2
2.5
30
30
30
2.5
2.5
45
45
45
60
Curing time, resin level
60
60
However,
80
Grade
2.5
2 min
2.0
2.5 min
1.5
3 min
1.0
0.5
0.0
60
60
60
70
70
70
80
80
80
pick up ratio
treated fabrics.
Grade
2.5
2.0
1.5
110C
120C
1.0
0.5
0.0
60
70
80
60
70
80
60
70
80
2.5
2.5
2.5
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
pick up ratio, curing time, resin level
60
It
83
4.2.4
Conclusion
4.3
4.3.1
Introduction
4.3.2
Result
The result for the AATCC Test Method 124 was generated
according to the standard method stated on the Chapter 3.
Methodology.
cycle and 5th cycle. For reporting the result, the grading
of each set of sample was averaged for the same washing
cycle.
4.3.3
Discussion
Grade
2.5
2.0
1st
1.5
3rd
1.0
5th
0.5
0.0
60
60
60
2.5
70
70
70
2
2.5
3
Pick up % ,Curing time
80
80
80
2.5
On the
performance of
88
Grade
2.5
2.0
Resin 30
1.5
Resin 45
Resin 60
1.0
0.5
0.0
60
60
60
2.5
70
70
70
80
80
80
2
2.5
3
2
Pick up %, Curing time
2.5
Grade
2.5
2.0
Pick up 60%
1.5
Pick up 70%
1.0
Pick up 80%
0.5
0.0
2
2.5
30
30
2.5
2.5
30
45
45
45
60
60
Curing time, Resin concentration
60
90
treated fabrics.
91
Grade
2.5
2.0
2 min
1.5
2.5 min
3 min
1.0
0.5
0.0
30
45
60
30
45
60
30
45
60
Resin level
Grade
2.5
2.0
1.5
110C
120C
1.0
0.5
0.0
60
70
80
60
70
80
60
70
80
2.5
2.5
2.5
3
Pick up % , curing time
93
Meanwhile, the
treated fabrics.
4.3.4
Conclusion
96
Chapter 5
5.1
5.1.1
Introduction
97
5.1.2
Result
98
5.1.3
Discussion
8.5
Resistance (N)
7.5
6.5
Warp
Weft
5.5
4.5
3.5
6.0
Resistance (N)
5.0
4.0
110C
3.0
120C
2.0
1.0
0.0
60
70
80
60
70
80
60
70
80
pick up %
101
REsistance (N)
5.0
4.0
2 min
3.0
2.5 min
2.0
3 min
1.0
0.0
60
60
60
70
30
45
60
30
70
70
80
45
60
30
pick up %, resin level
80
80
45
60
treated fabrics.
Resistance (N)
5.0
4.0
3.0
Resin 30
Resin 45
2.0
Resin 60
1.0
0.0
60
60
60
2.5
70
70
70
80
80
80
2
2.5
3
2
pick up %, curing time
2.5
Similar
104
Resistance (N)
5.0
4.0
3.0
Pick up 60%
Pick up 70%
2.0
Pick up 80%
1.0
0.0
2
2.5
30
30
30
2.5
2.5
45
45
45
60
curing time, resin level
60
60
From the above three graph (Fig 5-5), the change of the
tearing resistance due to the change of resin
concentration were shown.
Similar
5.1.4
Conclusion
poorer
5.2
5.2.1
Introduction
5.2.2
Result
Methodology.
108
5.2.3
Discussion
Resistance (N)
6.00
5.00
Warp
4.00
Weft
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Resistance (N)
5.00
4.00
3.00
110C
2.00
120C
1.00
0.00
2
2.5
60
60
60
2.5
2.5
70
70
70
80
curing time, pick up %
80
80
treated fabrics.
111
5.00
Resistance (N)
4.00
3.00
2 min
2.5 min
2.00
3 min
1.00
0.00
60
70
80
30
30
30
60
70
80
45
45
45
pick up %, resin level
60
70
80
60
60
60
treated fabrics.
Resistance (N)
5.00
4.00
Resin 30
3.00
Resin 45
2.00
Resin 60
1.00
0.00
2
2.5
60
60
60
2.5
2.5
70
70
70
80
Curing time, pick up %
80
80
113
114
Resistance (N)
5.00
4.00
Resin 30
3.00
Resin 45
2.00
Resin 60
1.00
0.00
2
2.5
60
60
60
2.5
70
70
70
curing time, pick up %
2.5
80
80
80
Similar
5.2.4
Conclusion
to the result of
117
Chapter 6
6.1
Dimensional Stability
6.1.1
Introduction
Growth is the
118
6.1.2
Result
6.1.3
Discussion
% dimensinal change
0.5
0
-0.5
Warp
Weft
-1
-1.5
-2
(Kadolph 1998)
Growth
For the weft yarn, the relaxation shrinkage effect
mentioned above was a lot lesser. Therefore, the
reduction in length was not significant. Meanwhile, the
increase in length for the weft direction was because it
was because of the hygral expansion of the cotton fiber.
It is a process in which the fiber swells when moisture
is absorbed. The hygral expansion behavior depends
largely on the magnitude of the weave crimp. The effect
of weave construction on the fabric hygral expansion is
very small at high moisture regains; at low regains,
plain-weave fabrics tend to show slightly higher
expansion than the corresponding twill structures of
similar crimp magnitude. (R.C. Dhingra 1985)
122
0.5
% of Area Change
1st
-0.5
5th
-1
-1.5
-2
124
% of Area Change
0
-0.2
2.5
2.5
2.5
60
60
60
70
70
70
80
80
80
Resin 30
-0.4
Resin 45
Resin 60
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
30
30
30
45
45
45
60
60
60
-0.2
pick up 60%
-0.4
pick up 70%
pick up 80%
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
resin level
127
% of Area Change
0
-0.1
-0.2
2.5
2.5
2.5
60
60
60
70
70
70
80
80
80
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
-0.3
110C
120C
-0.4
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
-0.8
% of Area Change
0.20
0.10
0.00
-0.10
2 min
60
60
60
70
70
70
80
80
80
30
45
60
30
45
60
30
45
60
2.5 min
3 min
-0.20
-0.30
-0.40
-0.50
It
treated fabrics.
6.1.4
Conclusion
131
Chapter 7
7.1
General Conclusion
1.
7.2
Recommendations
However,
1.
Curing time
Resin solution
Cotton-blend fabric
135
Reference
2009,pp.359-367.
Nathan S. Mosier, Christine M. Ladisch and Michael R.
Ladisch (2002),Characterization of acid catalytic
domains for cellulose hydrolysis and glucose
degradation, Agricultural and Biological Engineering,
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
National Cotton Council (2007),Cotton Session
Undermines WTO Process; Is Unfair to U.S. Cotton
Farmers
http://www.cotton.org/news/releases/2007/wtoconf.cfm/
(accessed on 10.2.2012)
P. R. Lord and M. H. Mohamed (1973), Weaving:
conversion of yarn to fabric, Watford : Merrow Pub.
Parker, J. (1998), All about cotton: a fabric
dictionary & swatchbook ,Seattle, Wash.: Rain City
Publishing.
Phillip J. Wakelyn, et al. (2007), Cotton Fiber
Chemistry and Technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Project Cotton (2008), The University of Missouri,
Cotton Classroom
http://cotton.missouri.edu/ClassroomChemical%20Composition.html (accessed on 30.12.2011)
R.C. Dhingra (1985), Hygral Expansion of Woven Wool
Fabrics, Textile research journal, January 1985 vol.
55 no. 1 28-40.
R.G. Steadman (1997), Cotton Testing, The Textile
Institute, Textile Progress Volume 27 Number 1.
S. Adanur (2001), Handbook of weaving, Lancaster, Pa. :
Technomic Pub. Co. Inc.