Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ThirdEdition,Basedon a Remeasurement
ofa RandomSampleof
theMortonCollectionofHumanCrania,"whichwas presented
to
the MacalesterCollege Honors Programin the Departmentof
Geologyon May i, I986. I am gratefulto JanetMonge,Gerald
Webers,JoeV. Michael,and Tom and BonnieMichaelforsupport
and encouragement.
350
1 CURRENT
ANTHROPOLOGY
TABLE
American
Ethiopian
SOURCE:
Sample
Size
Mean
52
Io
i8
87
83
8i
I47
29
82
78
Largest
IO9
93
89
IOO
94
TABLE
Smallest
75
69
64
6o
65
Morton (i839:260).
Lenape
Cherokee
Shoshone, &c.
i8
5
7
II4
I05
Negro Group
Native AfricanFamily
American-Bom Negroes
Hottentot Family
AlforanFamily
Australians
SOURCE: Morton (I849a:viii;
90
97
9I
82
96 92
go J
IO
94
75
84
97
78
87
9I
67
8o
98
84
89
I7
96
66
8o
i8
97
74
88
55
96
68
8o
9I
70
82
20
97
84
82
68
86
83
I55
22
IOI
58
67
75
79
32
70
92
85
79
i
i6x
104
70
8
84
I2
99
89
83
65
73
68
83 18
82 J 3
75
83
63
75
62
i849b:222).
| 35'
Sample
Size
American
Mexican
Peruvian
Various tribes ("Barbarous Tribes")
9I
IO
54
27
Caucasian
Ancient Pelasgic ("Graeco-Egyptians")
Anglo-American
Celtic
Egyptian
English
Fellah
German
Indostanic
Pelasgic ("Persians, Armenians, Circassians")
Semitic
52a
Malayan
Malayan
Polynesian
II
Mongolian
Mongolian ("Chinese")
Negro
AfricanNegro ("Native AfricanFamily")
American Negro ("American-BornNegroes")
Australian
Hottentot
Mixed
Measurement
Mean
Remeasurement
Mean
78
76
88
88
8i
92
go
82
84
95
83
78
86
98
73
89
78
88
84
84
9i
8o
73
84
96
73
88
77
84
8
3
85
86
84
83
84
4
4
87
87
83
83
40
82
84
8o
73
75
79
8i
78
7I
74
8o
77
3
7
I
4
3
6
Io
II
3
3
28
7
4
82
82
352
| CURRENT
ANTHROPOLOGY
TABLE
I849 Table
Mexican
Peruvian
Varioustribes("BarbarousTribes")
Caucasian
Ancient Pelasgic ("Graeco-Egyptians")
Anglo-American
Celtic
Egyptian
English
Fellah
German
Indostanic
Pelasgic ("Persians, Armenians, Circassians")
Semitic
Malayan
Malayan
Polynesian
Mongolian
Mongolian ("Chinese")
Negro
AfricanNegro ("Native AfricanFamily")
AmericanNegro("American-born
Negroes")
Australian
Hottentot
Sample
Size
338
22
I55
i6I
I7I
i8
7
6
55
5
I7
i8
32
I0
23
20
6
6
85
62
I2
8
3
Recalculation
Mean
Sample
Size
79
79
75
335
27
I52
84
--a
88
90
87
8o
96
8o
90
8o
84
89
I57
I85
I7
Io
6
55
5
i8
20
33
I0
Mean
8o
82
75
84
83
87
85
88
8i
96
79
87
8o
84
85
27
23
85
85
83
82
8
8
85
93
82
84
85
86
83
82
83
82
75
75
67
I0
I0
85
8I
75
75
thatmaynothavebeenusedbyMortonin the"Mongolianfamily"
io. Althoughsubgroupsdo not alwaysmatchMorton's"races"in mean.
do. It is quiteprob- i2. Andthisis so eventhoughMortonincorrectly
determined
the
samplesize,theCelticandEgyptiansubgroups
ablethatthedataused to recalculatethesetwomeansareidentical meansfor"groups"and "families"byaveraging
themeansoftheir
to thoseused byMorton.
constituent
"races.'"
353
AlthoughGould is mistaken in many of his assumptionsabout Mortonand his work,he is correctin asserting thatthese tables are scientificallyunsound.He fails,
however,to mentionthe overridingreason forrejecting
them,namely,Morton's acceptance of the existenceof
race. Most anthropologistsfeel that there is too little
evidence to conclude with certaintywhetherthe concept ofrace is a biologicalrealityor simplyan artifactof
classification(Weiss and Maruyama 1976:47). If race
dose not really exist, then Morton's samples are
meaningless, and this criticism overshadows Gould's
I 5. I haveyetto findanyanthropological
workotherthanMorton's
orMeigs'sthatseparatesCaucasiansintoancientandmodempopulations.
i 6. Gould did this even afterhe criticizedMortonforhaving
dropped"Hindu" crania fromthe "Caucasian" sample because
theywerenotablysmallerthantherestofthesample.
I7. I have chosento followStanton'sinterpretation
becauseit is
directlysupported
byhistoricalreferences.
Crania iI9I,
354
CURRENT
ANTHROPOLOGY
criticismsof the size and sexual distributionsin Morton's samples. Gould nowhere questions the scientific
authenticityof racial classificationand in fact,by presentinga "Corrected"table,lends supportto the notion
of racial c4assificationas a biological reality.
Morton'stables containmiscalculationsand omissions
of data, but his I849 data are reasonablyaccurate and
thereis no clear evidence that he doctoredthese tables
forany reason. His tables are neverthelessscientifically
unsound because his so-called samples were never adequately defined.His failureto define"race" makes his
workstatisticallymeaningless.I do not arguethatostensibly objectiveresearchmay not sometimesbe affected
by the unconscious desires of the researcher;I simply
suggestthattheworkofMortonis not a clearexampleof
this phenomenon.His workis flawed,and the scientific
communitywithin which it took place was racially
biased, but a connection between Morton's errorsand
this conventionalracismis simplynot supportedby the
evidence at hand.
DepartmentofAnthropology,Universityof Calgary,
Calgary,Alta., Canada T2N iN4. i8 VI 87
Nonadelphic polyandry,definedfor this paper in culturalratherthan biologicalterms,2is a sexual union between a woman and two or more unrelatedmen such
that the children born to the woman are considered
legitimateoffspring.
Implied in this definitionis a temporal aspect; a series of monogamous unions does not
qualify as polyandry.Also implied is an agreement
amongthe partiesinvolvedin the union; cuckoldrydoes
not qualify.
The early literature on polyandryamong human
groups stressed its rarity. Murdock (I949:25) flatly
ReferencesCited
statedthat"the polyandrousfamilyoccursso rarelythat
it may be regardedas an ethnological curiosity"and
C. C. Editor.I974. Dictionaryofscience
GILLISPIE,
mentionedonly the inhabitantsof the Marquesas and
biography.New York: Scribner.
the Toda of India as usual practitioners.Nonadelphic
cranial
S. J. I978. Morton'srankingofraces by
GOULD,
has been found only among the Nayar (see
polyandry
200:503-9.
capacity.Science
Gough i968) and the Marquesans as a normalpractice;
1 I98I.
The mismeasureofman. New York:
sporadic polyandryis found occasionally among other
Norton.
groups,
usually relatedto infanticide(MurdockI949).
from
MEIGS,
J. A. I857. Catalogue ofhuman crania
The
recentliteraturehas studiedthe phenomemore
of
Sciences
Natural
of
the
Academy
of
collection
the
Philadelphia. Philadelphia:Merrihewand Thompson non froma sociobiologicalperspective,examiningpolyandry as a reproductivestrategy.Wrangham's (i980:
Printers.
263) definitionof strategy,"a set of decisions which
G. I839. Crania Americana. PhilaSAMUEL
MORTON,
produce
behaviour patterns with a particular result:
delphia: J.Dobson.
the
ultimate probable outcome is to increase
namely,
. I849a. 3d edition.Catalogue ofskulls ofman
the
access to a given resourcespecificto the
behaver's
and
Merrihew
and the inferioranimals. Philadelphia:
strategy,"is used here.As Mulder (i987:6) has reminded
Thompson Printers.
us, "The evolutionaryargumentis essentiallythatdeci. I849b. Observationson the size ofthe brainin
sions, choices and customarypatternsofbehaviourhave
of
the variousraces and familiesofman. Proceedings
the
ultimate effectof increasingreproductivesuccess,
Philadelphia
Natural
Sciences,
theAcademy of
whetherthis is a conscious goal or not."
4:22I-24.
Most studies of polyandryassume that the evolutionSpringfield:
G. I969. Practical anthropology.
OLIVIER,
benefitsto females are obvious. In cultural terms,
ary
Thomas.
polyandry
may be describedas benefittingfemales by
spots.
The
leopard's
I960.
WILLIAM.
STANTON,
makingthe labourand resourcesoftwo men available to
Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press.
These are benefitsin termsof reproducI976. Archeology, theiroffspring.
K. M., AND T. MARAYAMA.
WEISS,
tive
the
emotional costs,as shown in the intersuccess;
anpopulationgenetics,and studies of human racial
view
with
a
shared
wifein the i982 AustralianfilmFirst
Anthropology
Physical
of
Journal
American
cestry.
Contact,may be high.
44:3I-49.
Benefitto males has receivedmorethoroughexamination. Followingthe lead of Trivers(I972), notions such
i. ? I988 by The Wenner-Gren
FoundationforAnthropological
Research.All rightsreservedOOII-3204/88/2902-0006$I.00.
ofpolyandry
is morespecific.In biolog2. The biologicaldefinition
ical terms"cooperativepolyandry"
is the union of two or more
males with a singlefemaleduringa singlebreedingseason and
theircooperationin raisingthe subsequentoffspring
(Faaborgand
Pattersoni 981).