Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Notices 42399
Microscope, Model FP 5600/XX Titan
Krios cryo–EM. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 72 FR 36961, July 6,
2007.
Docket Number: 07–039. Applicant:
Regents of the University of California,
Los Angeles, CA. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model FP 5600/30 Titan
80–300 S/TEM. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 72 FR 36961, July 6,
2007.
Docket Number: 07–043. Applicant:
Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
Technai G2 Spirit TWIN. Manufacturer:
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: See notice at 72 FR 36961, July 6,
2007.
Docket Number: 07–044. Applicant:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
MD. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
Model Technai G2 Spirit TWIN.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, The
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
72 FR 36961, July 6, 2007.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated July 26, 2007.
Faye Robinson,
Director.
Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. E7–14926 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–911]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe from the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Postponement of
Preliminary Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damian Felton or Nancy Decker, AD/
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:46 Aug 01, 2007 Jkt 211001
CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0133 and (202)
482–0196, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 27, 2007, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated
the countervailing duty investigation of
circular welded carbon quality steel
pipe from the People’s Republic of
China. See Notice of Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation:
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe from the People’s Republic of
China, 72 FR 36668 (July 5, 2007).
Currently, the preliminary
determination is due no later than
August 31, 2007.
Postponement of Due Date for
Preliminary Determinations
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a countervailing duty
investigation within 65 days after the
date on which the Department initiated
the investigation. However, if the
Department concludes that the parties
concerned in the investigation are
cooperating and determines that the
investigation is extraordinarily
complicated, section 703(c)(1)(B)(i) of
the Act allows the Department to
postpone making the preliminary
determination until no later than the
130 days after the date on which the
administering authority initiated the
investigation.
The Department concludes that, thus
far, the parties concerned are
cooperating. Furthermore, due to the
complexity of the alleged
countervailable subsidy practices being
investigated, which include provision of
goods or services for less than adequate
remuneration and government restraints
on exports, it is not practicable to
complete the preliminary determination
of this investigation within the original
time limit (i.e., August 31, 2007).
Therefore, in accordance with section
703(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we are fully
extending the due date for the
preliminary determination to no later
than 130 days after the day on which
the investigation was initiated. As this
deadline falls on a weekend, however,
the fully extended deadline is the next
business day, November 5, 2007.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act.
PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM
Dated: July 26, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–15032 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–821]
Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Products
from India: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Longest or Robert Copyak, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3338 or (202) 482–
2209, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 2, 2007, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published a notice of
initiation of the administrative review of
the countervailing duty order on certain
hot–rolled carbon steel flat products
from the India covering the period of
review January 1, 2006, through
December 31, 2006. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 72 FR 5005
(February 2, 2007). The preliminary
results are currently due no later than
September 4, 2007.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to make a
preliminary determination within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of an order or finding for which
a review is requested. Section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further states that
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within the time period specified,
the administering authority may extend
the 245-day period to issue its
preliminary results by up to 120 days.
Due to new subsidy allegations and
the large number of companies and
programs in this administrative review,
we have determined that it is not
02AUN1