Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FRUIT
NONFOOD USES
Palm oil
Fractionated into
palm olein and
stearin
Palm olein food
Palm stearin
nonfood /
oleochemicals
COMPOSITION OF
PO = TALLOW & PKO = CNO
R, R, R
PO
Tallow
CNO
PKO
C6
0.2
0.3
C8
8.0
4.4
C10
7.0
3.7
48.2
48.3
C12
0.23
C14
1.09
2.5
18.0
15.6
C16
44.02
26.6
8.5
7.8
C18
4.54
21.8
2.3
2.0
C18:1
39.15
42.8
5.7
15.1
C18:2
10.12
2.3
2.1
2.7
C18:3
0.37
4
Availability of lauric
oils
Predictability in
supply
Good Government
incentives
Good infrastructure
Political stability
FAC Tallow = PO
FAC CNO = PKO
The development of
oleochemicals industry
in Malaysia (&
Indonesia)
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
5
Palm Oil
PK Oil
1990
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
3.1
3.4
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.7
4.9
PKO
13.3
51.7
47.6
59.3
50
59.2
58.5
63.6
60.7
Total P
3.4
8.5
10.5
10
10.6
10.5
10.9
11.3
PO
15
14
Capacity
16
Oil used
17
16
Export
17
7
Alcohol
Methyl Ester
Glycerol
MES
Distilled Methyl
Ester
High temp. & High pressure
Hydrogenation
Fatty Alcohol
sulfation
Fatty Alcohol
Sulfates
ethoxylation
Fatty Alcohol
Ethoxylates
Fatty Alcohol
Ether Sulfates
10
CREAM
Isopropyl palmitate
Octyl palmitate
Stearic acid
MCT
Cetyl alcohol
Glycerol
Preservative
Rheological additives
Neutraliser
12
COLLABORATION WITH HR
MARKETING SDN. BHD.
13
14
15
COLOR COSMETICS
LIPSTICKS
LIPGLOSS
DEODORANT STICK
MASCARA
COMPACT POWDER
LOOSE POWDER
LIQUID FOUNDATION
16
EFFICACY TESTING
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
Variation of Hydration
V a r ia tio n o f a *
v a lu e
Soap A
COM2
0.0
-2.0
-4.0
-6.0
-8.0
-10.0
-12.0
-14.0
Soap A
Product
Soap A
COM2
Irritation test
COM2
Product
Soap A
COM2
18
% Increase
Control
DC2
DC3
30
60
90
120
180
Time (minutes)
19
WHITENING EFFICACY
Study49/01 : Effect on skin melanin
between treated and untreated
V ar iatio n in m e lan in
in d e x
V ar iatio n in L
valu e
T0
T4
T6
Time (w eeks)
SLC
-2.0
-4.0
-6.0
T0
T4
T6
Time (w eeks)
Untreated
No. of Volunteers = 20
0.0
SLC
Untreated
20
%Bacterial Count
120
100
80
P. acne
60
40
S. aureus
20
10
0
50
25
12
.5
6.
25
C
on
tr
ol
Dose (mg/ml)
21
Sebum (mg.cm-2)
T0 (Control)
T1 (Week 1)
T4 (Week 4)
T6 (Week 6)
Sebum
(mg/cm2)
% Sebum
Reduction
22
23
OH
CH3 -(CH2)7 -CH-CH-(CH2)7-COOH
OH
MW 316
24
PRODUCTION OF DHSA
COOH
HCO3H or
CH3CO3H)
O
COOH
H+
H2O
OH
COOH
OH
9,10-dihydroxystearic acid
25
NotNot
determine
determined
50uL
75uL
0.8
100uL
0.6
125uL
0.4
Non-Irritant
0.2
Moderate Irritant
0
R10
R11-A
R11-1
R13
DHSA Samples
26
27
28
3 PROCESSES TO PRODUCE
SOAP/SOAP NOODLES
RCH2COO-CH2
RCH2COO-CH
RCH2COO-CH2
NaOH
RCH2COOH
NaOH
RCH2COOCH3
NaOH
3 RCH2COO- Na+
+ CH2OHCHOHCH2OH
Soap noodles
USP glycerin
Soap noodles
Soap noodles
29
Color darker
Color good
Elaborate process
Simplified process
30
Developed by
neutralization of fatty
acids and in
combination with
polyol (i.e. glycerine)
as an agent to impart
transparency to the
soap.
32
pH
(1% solution)
Penetration Transparenc
depth (mm)
y value
Palm-based
transparent soap
for skin care
9.84
1.09
0.90
Commercial 1
10.17
0.18
0.77
Commercial 2
10.46
1.09
0.88
Commercial 3
10.28
3.09
0.86
33
SUMMARY
o