You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices 28465

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE products exported from the United States. The collected information is
States. Most countries require a used for the purposes of identifying
Submission for OMB Review; certification that the animals are disease each specific tortoise and documenting
Comment Request free. The VS form 17–140, U.S. Origin the State of its health so that the animals
Health Certificate, is used to meet these can be transported across State and
May 16, 2007.
requirements. The form is authorized by national boundaries. If the information
The Department of Agriculture has
21 U.S.C. 112. is not collected APHIS would be forced
submitted the following information Need and Use of the Information: The to continue their complete ban on the
collection requirement(s) to OMB for U.S. Origin Health Certificate is used in interstate movement of leopard, African
review and clearance under the connection with the exportation of spurred, and Bell’s hingeback tortoises,
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, animals to foreign countries and is a situation that could prove
Public Law 104–13. Comments completed and authorized by APHIS economically disastrous for a number of
regarding (a) Whether the collection of veterinarian. The information collected U.S. tortoises breeders..
information is necessary for the proper is used to: (1) Establish that the animals Description of Respondents:
performance of the functions of the are moved in compliance with USDA Individuals or households; State, Local
agency, including whether the regulations, (2) verify that the animals or Tribal Government.
information will have practical utility; destined for export are listed on the Number of Respondents: 150.
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate health certificate by means of an official Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
of burden including the validity of the identification, (3) verify to the consignor On occasion.
methodology and assumptions used; (c) and consignee that the animals are Total Burden Hours: 249.
ways to enhance the quality, utility and healthy, (4) prevent unhealthy animals
clarity of the information to be Ruth Brown,
from being exported and (5) satisfy the Departmental Information Collection
collected; (d) ways to minimize the import requirements of receiving
burden of the collection of information Clearance Officer.
countries. The collection of this [FR Doc. E7–9691 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am]
on those who are to respond, including information helps to prevent unhealthy
through the use of appropriate animals from being exported from the
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
automated, electronic, mechanical, or United States. If these certifications
other technological collection were not provided, other countries
techniques or other forms of information DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
would not accept animals from the
technology should be addressed to: Desk United States. Forest Service
Officer for Agriculture, Office of Description of Respondents: Farms;
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Business or other for-profit. Navy Timber Sale Environmental
Office of Management and Budget Number of Respondents: 3,067. Impact Statement
(OMB), Frequency of Responses:
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or Recordkeeping; Reporting: On occasion. AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental Total Burden Hours: 30,024. ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent to
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail prepare an Environmental Impact
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– Animal and Plant Health Inspection Statement.
7602. Comments regarding these Service
information collections are best assured Title: Interstate Movement of Certain SUMMARY: This NOI revises information
of having their full effect if received Tortoises. supplied in the NOI previously
within 30 days of this notification. OMB Control Number: 0579–0156. published in the Federal Register Vol.
Copies of the submission(s) may be Summary of Collection: The Animal 71, No. 14 (pages 3454–3455) on January
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958. and Plant Health Inspection Service 23, 2006. The Department of
An agency may not conduct or (APHIS) regulates the importation and Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare
sponsor a collection of information interstate movement of certain animals an Environmental Impact Statement
unless the collection of information and animal products to prevent the (EIS) on a proposal to harvest timber in
displays a currently valid OMB control introduction into or dissemination the Navy Timber Sale project area on
number and the agency informs within the United States of pests and the Wrangell Ranger District, Tongass
potential persons who are to respond to diseases of livestock. The regulations in National Forest. The Proposed Action is
the collection of information that such 9 CFR part 93 prohibit the importation to harvest 54 million board feet of
persons are not required to respond to of the leopard tortoise, the African sawtimber and 7.7 million board feet of
the collection of information unless it spurred tortoise, and the Bell’s utility from approximately 4,700 acres
displays a currently valid OMB control hingeback tortoise to prevent the in one or more offerings and would
number. introduction and spread of exotic ticks construct approximately 17 miles of
known to be vectors of heartwater National Forest System road and 16
Animal and Plant Health Inspection disease, an acute, infectious disease of miles of temporary road to facilitate
Service cattle and other ruminants. The access for logging. The Proposed Action
Title: U.S. Origin Health Certificate. regulations in 9 CFR part 74 prohibit the includes harvest units and road
OMB Control Number: 0579–0020. interstate movement of those tortoises construction within Inventoried
Summary of Collection: As part of its that are already in the United States Roadless Areas, as identified in the
mission to facilitate the export of U.S. unless the tortoises are accompanied by Forest Plan SEIS. The Proposed Action
animals and products, the U.S. a health certificate or certificate of includes the use of the existing Log
Department of Agriculture, Animal and veterinary inspection. Transfer Facility (LFT) at Anita Bay as
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

Plant Health Inspection Service Need and Use of the Information: well as the construction of a new LTF
(APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS), APHIS will collect information to at the entrance to Burnett Inlet near
maintains information regarding the ensure that the interstate movement of Navy Creek. The Proposed Action
import health requirements of other these tortoises poses no risk of includes a non-significant amendment
countries for animals and animal spreading exotic ticks within the United to the Forest Plan to modify the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 May 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1
28466 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices

boundaries of the Burnett, Anita Bay, laws, regulations, and policies in Draft Environmental Impact
Mosman and Quiet small old-growth making the decision. The rationale for Statement: A Draft Environmental
reserves. The Forest Supervisor will the decision will be included in the Impact Statement (DEIS) will be
decide if and how much timber harvest Record of Decision. prepared for comment. The comment
and road building will occur within the Purpose and Need for Action: The period on the DEIS will be 45 days from
project area, as well as modify the purpose and need for the Navy Timber the date the Environmental Protection
existing small old-growth reserves. The Sale is: (1) To manage suitable lands to Agency publishes the Notices of
decision will be documented in a achieve 1997 Forest Plan goals and Availability in the Federal Register. The
Record of Decision based on the objectives in order to reach the desired Forest Service believes, at this early
information disclosed in the EIS. future conditions prescribed for the stage, it is important to give reviewers
DATES: A public mailing outlining the Land Use Designations; (2) to assist in notice of several court rulings related to
project timeline and public involvement providing a continuous wood supply to public participation in the
opportunities opportunities (Schedule meet society’s needs; (3) and to environmental review process. First,
of Proposed Actions) was distributed contribute to the job market and the reviewers of Draft Environmental
quarterly from January 2006 to April overall economy of southeast Alaska. Impact Statements must structure their
2007. Additional opportunities for Public Participation: Public participation in the environmental
comment will be provided after release participation has been an integral review of the proposal so that it is
of the Draft Environmental Impact component of the study process and meaningful and alerts an agency to the
Statement (DEIS). The DEIS is projected will continue to be especially important reviewer’s position and contentions.
to be filed with the Environmental at several points during the analysis. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
Protection Agency (EPA) in Fall 2007 The Forest Service will continue to seek NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
and will begin a 45-day comment information, comments and assistance environmental objections that could be
period. The Final Environmental Impact from tribal governments, federal, state raised at the DEIS stage but that are not
Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision and local agencies, individuals and raised until after completion of the Final
are anticipated to be published in organizations that may be interested in Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
Spring 2008. or affected by the proposed activities. may be waived or dismissed by the
ADDRESSES: Please send written Written scoping comments have been courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
comments to Wrangell Ranger District, solicited through a scoping package that F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Attn: Navy EIS, PO Box 51, Wrangell, was sent to persons on the project Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
AK 99929. Electronic comments can be mailing list in November 2005. F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
e-mailed to comments-alaska-tongass- Additional written scoping comments Because of these court rulings, it is very
wrangell@fs.fed.us. Please include the have been solicited through a scoping important that those interested in this
word ‘‘Navy’’ in the subject line. package that was sent to persons on the proposed action participate by the close
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: project mailing list concurrent with the of the comment period so that
Jamie Roberts, Planning Team Leader, or publication of the initial NOI in January substantive comments and objections
Mark Hummel, District Ranger, 2006. Subsistence hearings, as provided are made available to the Forest Service
Wrangell Ranger District, P.O. Box 51, for in Title VIII, Section 810 of the at a time when it can meaningfully
Wrangell, AK 99929, telephone (907) Alaska National Interest Lands consider them and respond to them in
874–2323. Conservation Act (ANILCA), will be the FEIS. To assist the Forest Service in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Navy provided, if necessary, during the identifying and considering issues and
project area is located on central Etolin comment period on the DEIS. concerns on the proposed action,
Island approximately 22 air miles Electronic Filing Address: Electronic comments on the DEIS should be as
southwest of Wrangell, Alaska. The comments can be e mailed to comments- specific as possible. It is also helpful if
project area is within portions of Value alaska-tongass-wrangell@fs.fed.us. comments refer to specific pages or
Comparison Units #464, 465, 466, 467 Please include the word ‘‘Navy’’ in the chapters of the draft statement.
and 468. Portions of three Inventoried subject line. Comments may also address the
Roadless Areas, North Etolin #232, Issues: Based on the comments adequacy of the DEIS or the merits of
Mosman #233 and South Etolin #234, as received from the public and resource the alternatives formulated and
identified in the Forest Plan SEIS, are specialists the issues identified for discussed in the statement. Reviewers
located within the project area. Timber analysis in the EIS include: (1) The may wish to refer to the Council on
harvest and road building is proposed effect of timber harvest on the local and Environmental Quality Regulations for
within the Inventoried Roadless Areas. regional economies; (2) the effect of the implementing the procedural provisions
The project area includes four small old- location of small Old-growth Reserves of the National Environmental Policy
growth reserves (Mosman, Quiet, Anita on wildlife habitat; (3) the effect of Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
Bay and Burnett) as designated in the habitat fragmentation, due to harvest these points. Comments received,
Forest Plan. A Forest Plan amendment and road building, on wildlife habitat; including the names and addresses of
would be required if a decision is made (4) the effect of timber harvest and road those who comment, will be considered
to modify any old-growth reserve. The construction on Inventories Roadless part of the public record on this
Forest Supervisor will decide if and Areas and unroaded areas; (5) and proposal and will be available for public
how much timber harvest and road effects to aquatic resources and from inspection.
building will occur within the project increased access in the Navy Drainage Responsible Official: Forrest Cole,
areas, as well as whether to modify the due to timber harvest, road construction Forest Supervisor, Tongass National
existing small old-growth reserves. The and LTF construction. Forest, Federal Building, Ketchikan,
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

decision will be based on the Range of Alternatives: The range of Alaska 99901, is the responsible official.
information that is disclosed in the EIS. alternatives that are being developed to The responsible official will consider
The Forest Supervisor will consider respond to the significant issues, comments, responses, the disclosure of
comments, responses, the disclosure of besides no action, range from 18–98 environmental effects, and applicable
environmental effects, and applicable million board feet. laws, regulations, and policies in

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 May 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices 28467

making the decision. The rationale for policies and issues; (3) the degree to Interested parties are invited to
the decision will be included in the which the organization is impacted by comment on these preliminary results.
Record of Decision. the U.S. Government’s export policies We will issue the final results no later
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; and regulations; and (4) industry area or than 120 days from the date of
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section academic type of institution publication of this notice.
21) represented. BIS reserves the right to EFFECTIVE DATE: May 21, 2007.
Dated: May 14, 2007.
limit the number of participants based FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot
on time considerations. For planning Fullerton or Christopher Riker, AD/CVD
Forrest Cole,
purposes, BIS requests that (1) that Operations, Office 9, Import
Forest Supervisor. interested parties inform BIS of their
[FR Doc. 07–2507 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] Administration, International Trade
commitment, via e-mail or telephone Administration, U.S. Department of
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M call, to address the DEAC no later than Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
5 p.m. EST May 30, 2007, as well as Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
provide a brief outline of the topics to telephone: (202) 482–1386 or (202) 482–
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE be discussed by this same deadline; and, 3441, respectively.
(2) that once interested parties receive
Bureau of Industry and Security SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
confirmation of their participation at the
meeting, they provide either an Background
Deemed Export Advisory Committee; electronic or paper copy of any prepared
Notice To Solicit Meeting Speakers and The Department received timely
remarks/presentations no later than 5 requests from Shanghai Jinneng
Presentations p.m. EST June 12, 2007. Interested International Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai
The Deemed Export Advisory parties may contact Ms. Yvette Springer Jinneng’’) and Jiangxi Gangyuan Silicon
Committee (DEAC), which advises the at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov or (202) 482– Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiangxi Gangyuan’’)
Secretary of Commerce on deemed 2813. The purpose of this solicitation is on June 23, 2006, pursuant to section
export licensing policy, will meet on only to accept speakers for the June 19, 751(a)(2)(B) the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 from 2007 DEAC meeting. However, all amended (‘‘the Act’’), and in accordance
approximately 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. members of the public may submit with 19 CFR 351.214(c), for new shipper
The DEAC is a Federal Advisory written comments to BIS at any time for reviews of the antidumping duty order
Committee that was established under the DEAC’s consideration. on silicon metal from the PRC. See
the auspices of the Federal Advisory Dated: May 16, 2007. Antidumping Duty Order: Silicon Metal
Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. Yvette Springer, From the People’s Republic of China, 56
app. 2. The meeting location will be Committee Liaison Officer. FR 26649 (June 10, 1991).
Boston, MA, with exact details to be [FR Doc. 07–2509 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] On June 2, 2006, the Department
announced in a subsequent Federal published a notice of opportunity to
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
Register Notice. At this time, the request an administrative review of the
Department of Commerce, Bureau of antidumping duty order on silicon
Industry and Security (BIS), would like DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE metal from the PRC. See Notice of
to solicit stakeholders from industry, Opportunity to Request Administrative
academia and other backgrounds to International Trade Administration Review of Antidumping or
address the DEAC members on June 19 Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
in an open session on issues related to [A–570–806]
Suspended Investigation, 71 FR 32032
deemed exports and, in particular, their Silicon Metal From the People’s (June 2, 2006).
organizations’ perspectives and Republic of China: Preliminary Results On July 25, 2006, the Department
concerns related to U.S. deemed export of the 2005/2006 New Shipper Reviews initiated new shipper reviews of
control policies. Stakeholders are those Shanghai Jinneng and Jiangxi Gangyuan
individuals or organizations who have AGENCY: Import Administration, covering the period June 1, 2005,
some experience in or knowledge of International Trade Administration, through May 31, 2006. See Silicon Metal
export control regulations and policies, Department of Commerce. From the People’s Republic of China:
who must apply these rules in the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Initiation of Antidumping Duty New
course of normal business or whose (‘‘the Department’’) is currently Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 42084 (July 25,
operations are directly impacted by conducting the 2005/2006 new shipper 2006).
those export regulations and policies reviews of the antidumping duty order On December 21, 2006, the
mandated by the U.S. government. BIS on silicon metal from the People’s Department extended the deadline for
seeks to have an equal number of Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). We the preliminary results of the new
presenters from industry, academia, and preliminarily determine that sales have shipper reviews until May 14, 2007. See
other backgrounds. There may be up to been made below normal value (‘‘NV’’) Notice of Extension of the Preliminary
three presenters from each group and with respect to certain exporters and Results of New Shipper Antidumping
speaking time may be limited to 10 that certain exporters are entitled to a Duty Reviews: Silicon Metal from the
minutes or less per speaker depending separate rate in the new shipper People’s Republic of China, 71 FR 76637
on the number of interested parties. reviews. If these preliminary results are (December 21, 2006).
Speakers may be selected on the basis adopted in our final results of these
of one or more of the following criteria reviews, we will instruct U.S. Customs Scope of Order
(not in any order of importance): (1) and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess The product covered by the order and
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

Demonstrated experience in and antidumping duties on entries of subject this review is silicon metal containing at
knowledge of export control regulations; merchandise during the period of least 96.00 but less than 99.99 percent
(2) demonstrated ability to provide review (‘‘POR’’) for which the importer– of silicon by weight, and silicon metal
DEAC members with relevant specific assessment rates are above de with a higher aluminum content
information related to deemed export minimis. containing between 89 and 96 percent

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 May 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1

You might also like