You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69061

Executive Order 13132. This AD will Unsafe Condition Issued in Renton, Washington on October
not have a substantial direct effect on (d) This AD was prompted by reports of the 28, 2005.
the States, on the relationship between failure of two thrust reverser accumulators. Ali Bahrami,
the national government and the States, We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
or on the distribution of power and the thrust reverser accumulators, due to Aircraft Certification Service.
responsibilities among the various fatigue cracking on the female threads, which
[FR Doc. 05–22215 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am]
could result in the loss of hydraulic power
levels of government. and damage to the surrounding airplane BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
For the reasons discussed above, I structure.
certify that this AD:
Compliance DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within Federal Aviation Administration
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the compliance times specified, unless the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures actions have already been done. 14 CFR Part 39
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
Remove Thrust Reverser Accumulator [Docket No. FAA–2005–22255; Directorate
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative, (f) Within 60 days after the effective date Identifier 2005–NM–106–AD; Amendment
of this AD, remove the thrust reverser 39–14362; AD 2005–23–04]
on a substantial number of small entities accumulator, and make the thrust reverser
under the criteria of the Regulatory hydraulic system and the thrust reversers RIN 2120–AA64
Flexibility Act. inoperable, by doing all of the actions
We prepared a regulatory evaluation specified in the Accomplishment Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model
of the estimated costs to comply with Instructions of The Nordam Group Alert SAAB 2000 Airplanes
this AD and placed it in the AD docket. Service Bulletin A3000 78–21, dated
November 25, 2002. Where there are AGENCY: Federal Aviation
See the ADDRESSES section for a location Administration (FAA), Department of
differences between the Master Minimum
to examine the regulatory evaluation. Equipment List and the AD, the AD prevails. Transportation (DOT).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Although the service bulletin referenced in ACTION: Final rule.
this AD specifies to submit certain
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation information to the manufacturer, this AD SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
safety, Incorporation by reference, does not include that requirement. airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Safety. Parts Installation Saab Model SAAB 2000 airplanes. This
Adoption of the Amendment (g) As of the effective date of this AD, no AD requires modifying the manual
person may install a thrust reverser feather-and-unfeather system for the
■ Accordingly, under the authority accumulator having P/N 25–0570–127–1, –3, propellers to make the design of the
delegated to me by the Administrator, –7, –13, or –17 on any airplane. system more robust. This AD results
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as Alternative Methods of Compliance
from reports of in-flight engine
follows: (AMOCs) shutdown caused by uncommanded
operation of the feather pump of the
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (h)(1) The Manager, Special Certification
Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, has the
propeller. We are issuing this AD to
DIRECTIVES prevent uncommanded feathering of the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures propeller, which could result in the
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
found in 14 CFR 39.19. shutdown of an engine during flight and
continues to read as follows:
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in consequent reduced controllability of
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any the airplane.
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
§ 39.13 [Amended] DATES: This AD becomes effective
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding December 19, 2005.
■ 2. The Federal Aviation The Director of the Federal Register
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 District Office.
approved the incorporation by reference
by adding the following new Material Incorporated by Reference of a certain publication listed in the AD
airworthiness directive (AD): (i) You must use The Nordam Group Alert as of December 19, 2005.
2005–23–06 Learjet: Amendment 39–14364. Service Bulletin A3000 78–21, dated ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
Docket No. FAA–2005–20947; November 25, 2002, to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD docket on the Internet at http://
Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–245–AD.
specifies otherwise. The Director of the dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Effective Date Federal Register approved the incorporation Management Facility, U.S. Department
(a) This AD becomes effective December by reference of this document in accordance of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
19, 2005. with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401,
Contact The Nordam Group, Nacelle/Thrust Washington, DC.
Affected ADs Reverser Systems Division, 6911 North Contact Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB
(b) None. Whirlpool Drive, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74117, for Aircraft Product Support, S–581.88,
a copy of this service information. You may
Applicability
review copies at the Docket Management
Linköping, Sweden, for service
(c) This AD applies to Learjet Model 23, 24, Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, information identified in this AD.
24A, 24B, 24B–A, 24D, 24D–A, 24E, 24F, 25, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
25A, 25B, 25C, 25D, and 25F airplanes; Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
certificated in any category; modified by Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or at the International Branch, ANM–116,
Supplemental Type Certificate SA1731SW, National Archives and Records Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
SA1669SW, or SA1670SW; equipped with Administration (NARA). For information on 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Nordam (formerly Dee Howard Company) the availability of this material at the NARA,
thrust reverser accumulators having part call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// Washington 98055–4056; telephone
number (P/N) 25–0570–127–1, –3, –7, –13, or www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- (425) 227–2677; fax (425) 227–1149.
–17. locations.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:39 Nov 10, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1
69062 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

Examining the Docket Aviation Programs, describes in more 2005–23–04 Saab Aircraft AB: Amendment
detail the scope of the Agency’s 39–14362. Docket No. FAA–2005–22255;
You may examine the airworthiness Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–106–AD.
directive (AD) docket on the Internet at authority.
http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the We are issuing this rulemaking under Effective Date
Docket Management Facility office the authority described in Subtitle VII, (a) This AD becomes effective December
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 19, 2005.
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Affected ADs
section, Congress charges the FAA with
The Docket Management Facility office (b) None.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
air commerce by prescribing regulations Applicability
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
for practices, methods, and procedures
the street address stated in the (c) This AD applies to Model SAAB 2000
the Administrator finds necessary for airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
ADDRESSES section.
safety in air commerce. This regulation numbers –004 through –063 inclusive.
Discussion is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition Unsafe Condition
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
that is likely to exist or develop on (d) This AD results from reports of in-flight
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
products identified in this rulemaking engine shutdown caused by uncommanded
part 39 to include an AD that would operation of the feather pump of the
apply to certain Saab Model SAAB 2000 action.
propeller. We are issuing this AD to prevent
airplanes. That NPRM was published in Regulatory Findings uncommanded feathering of the propeller,
the Federal Register on September 1, We have determined that this AD will which could result in the shutdown of an
2005 (70 FR 52041). That NPRM not have federalism implications under engine during flight and consequent reduced
proposed to require modifying the controllability of the airplane.
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
manual feather-and-unfeather system for not have a substantial direct effect on Compliance
the propellers to make the design of the the States, on the relationship between (e) You are responsible for having the
system more robust. the national government and the States, actions required by this AD performed within
Comments or on the distribution of power and the compliance times specified, unless the
responsibilities among the various actions have already been done.
We provided the public the
levels of government. Modification
opportunity to participate in the
For the reasons discussed above, I
development of this AD. We received no (f) Within 12 months after the effective
certify that this AD: date of this AD, modify the manual feather-
comments on the NPRM or on the (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
determination of the cost to the public. and-unfeather system of the propellers by
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; doing all actions specified in the
Clarification of Alternative Method of (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Accomplishment Instructions of Saab Service
Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures Bulletin 2000–61–006, Revision 01, dated
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and February 17, 2005.
We have revised this action to clarify (3) Will not have a significant
the appropriate procedure for notifying economic impact, positive or negative, Actions Accomplished Previously
the principal inspector before using any on a substantial number of small entities (g) A modification accomplished before the
approved AMOC on any airplane to under the criteria of the Regulatory effective date of this AD in accordance with
which the AMOC applies. Flexibility Act. Saab Service Bulletin 2000–61–006, dated
We prepared a regulatory evaluation December 20, 2004, is acceptable for
Conclusion compliance with paragraph (f) of this AD.
of the estimated costs to comply with
We have carefully reviewed the this AD and placed it in the AD docket. Alternative Methods of Compliance
available data, and determined that air See the ADDRESSES section for a location (AMOCs)
safety and the public interest require to examine the regulatory evaluation. (h)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
adopting the AD with the change ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
described previously. We have List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
determined that this change will neither Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation for this AD, if requested in accordance with
increase the economic burden on any safety, Incorporation by reference, the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
operator nor increase the scope of the Safety. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in
AD. accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
Adoption of the Amendment which the AMOC applies, notify the
Costs of Compliance appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
■ Accordingly, under the authority Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
This AD will affect about 3 airplanes delegated to me by the Administrator,
of U.S. registry. The actions will take Office.
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
about 50 work hours per airplane, at an follows: Related Information
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. (i) Swedish airworthiness directive 1–198,
Required parts will cost about $13,571 PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS dated February 14, 2005, also addresses the
per airplane. Based on these figures, the DIRECTIVES subject of this AD.
estimated cost of the AD for U.S. Material Incorporated by Reference
operators is $50,463, or $16,821 per ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
airplane. continues to read as follows: (j) You must use Saab Service Bulletin
2000–61–006, Revision 01, dated February
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Authority for This Rulemaking 17, 2005, to perform the actions that are
§ 39.13 [Amended] required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
Title 49 of the United States Code otherwise. The Director of the Federal
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue ■ 2. The Federal Aviation Register approved the incorporation by
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 reference of this document in accordance
Section 106, describes the authority of by adding the following new with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, airworthiness directive (AD): Contact Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:39 Nov 10, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69063

Product Support, S–581.88, Linköping, On August 31, 2001 (66 FR 42939, Clarification of Alternative Method of
Sweden, for a copy of this service August 16, 2001), the Director of the Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph
information. You may review copies at the Federal Register approved the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. We have changed this AD to clarify
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
incorporation by reference of Airbus the appropriate procedure for notifying
Street, SW., room PL–401, Nassif Building, Industrie All Operators Telex A320– the principal inspector before using any
Washington, DC; on the Internet at http:// 52A1111, Revision 01, dated July 23, approved AMOC on any airplane to
dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and 2001, including Airbus Industrie which the AMOC applies.
Records Administration (NARA). For Technical Disposition 959.1492/01,
information on the availability of this Issue C, dated July 17, 2001. Conclusion
material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD We have carefully reviewed the
or go to http://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ docket on the Internet at http:// available data, including the comment
ibr_locations.html. dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket that has been received, and determined
Issued in Renton, Washington on October
Management Facility, U.S. Department that air safety and the public interest
27, 2005. of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, require adopting the AD as proposed.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401,
Washington, DC. Costs of Compliance
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice This AD will affect about 517
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, airplanes of U.S. registry.
[FR Doc. 05–22218 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am]
for service information identified in this The modification that is required by
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
AD. AD 2001–16–14 and retained in this AD
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim takes about 7 work hours per airplane,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dulin, Aerospace Engineer, at an average labor rate of $65 per work
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, hour. The cost of required parts is
Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 negligible. Based on these figures, the
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington estimated cost of the currently required
14 CFR Part 39 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2141; modification for U.S. operators is
fax (425) 227–1149. $235,235, or $455 per airplane.
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19863; Directorate
Identifier 2003–NM–29–AD; Amendment 39– SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The functional test that is required by
14363; AD 2005–23–05] AD 2001–16–14 and retained in this AD
Examining the Docket takes about 1 work hour per airplane, at
RIN 2120–AA64 an average labor rate of $65 per work
You may examine the airworthiness
directive (AD) docket on the Internet at hour. Based on these figures, the cost
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A319–100, A320–200, and A321–100 http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the impact of the currently required
and –200 Series Airplanes Docket Management Facility office functional test for U.S. operators is
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday $33,605, or $65 per airplane, per test
AGENCY: Federal Aviation through Friday, except Federal holidays. cycle.
Administration (FAA), Department of The Docket Management Facility office For airplanes that have not been
Transportation (DOT). (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on modified in accordance with AD 2001–
ACTION: Final rule. the plaza level of the Nassif Building at 16–14: The new modification (including
the street address stated in the the new placard installation) takes about
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an 17 work hours per airplane, at an
ADDRESSES section.
existing airworthiness directive (AD), average labor rate of $65 per work hour.
which applies to certain Airbus Model Discussion Required parts cost about $5,130 per
A319–100, A320–200, and A321–100 The FAA issued a supplemental airplane. Based on these figures, the
and –200 series airplanes. That AD notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) estimated cost of the new modification
currently requires modification of the to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an specified in this AD is $6,235 per
telescopic girt bar of the escape slide/ AD that supersedes AD 2001–16–14, airplane.
raft assembly, and follow-on actions. amendment 39–12383 (66 FR 42939, For airplanes that have been modified
This new AD requires a new August 16, 2001). The existing AD in accordance with AD 2001–16–14:
modification of the telescopic girt bar applies to certain Airbus Model A319, The new modification (including the
and the installation of placards on the A320, and A321 series airplanes. That new placard installation) takes about 21
modified girt bars, which terminates the supplemental NPRM was published in work hours per airplane, at an average
repetitive functional tests required by the Federal Register on July 21, 2005 labor rate of $65 per work hour.
the existing AD. This AD results from (70 FR 42005). That supplemental Required parts cost about $5,130 per
development of a new, improved NPRM proposed to mandate the airplane. Based on these figures, the
modification. We are issuing this AD to installation of placards on the modified estimated cost of the new modification
prevent failure of the escape slide/raft to girt bars, which terminates the repetitive specified in this AD is $6,495 per
deploy correctly, which could result in functional tests required by the existing airplane.
the slide being unusable during an AD.
emergency evacuation and consequent Authority for This Rulemaking
injury to passengers or airplane Comments Title 49 of the United States Code
crewmembers. We provided the public the specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
DATES: This AD becomes effective opportunity to participate in the rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
December 19, 2005. development of this AD. We have section 106, describes the authority of
The Director of the Federal Register considered the additional comment that the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
approved the incorporation by reference has been received on the supplemental Aviation Programs, describes in more
of a certain publication listed in the AD NPRM. The commenter supports the detail the scope of the Agency’s
as of December 19, 2005. supplemental NPRM. authority.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:39 Nov 10, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1

You might also like