You are on page 1of 2

30376 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

absence of a prior existing requirement This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as PART 52—[AMENDED]
for the state to use voluntary consensus defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
to disapprove a SIP submission for Air Act, petitions for judicial review of continues to read as follows:
failure to use VCS. It would thus be this action must be filed in the United Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
inconsistent with applicable law for States Court of Appeals for the
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, appropriate circuit by July 25, 2005. Subpart U—Maine
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission Interested parties should comment in
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of response to the proposed rule rather ■ 2. Section 52.1020 is amended by
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the than petition for judicial review, unless adding paragraph (c)(55) to read as
requirements of section 12(d) of the the objection arises after the comment follows:
National Technology Transfer and period allowed for in the proposal.
§ 52.1020 Identification of plan.
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. Filing a petition for reconsideration by
272 note) do not apply. This rule does the Administrator of this final rule does * * * * *
not impose an information collection not affect the finality of this rule for the (c) * * *
burden under the provisions of the purposes of judicial review nor does it (55) Revisions to the State
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 extend the time within which a petition Implementation Plan submitted by the
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). for judicial review may be filed, and Maine Department of Environmental
The Congressional Review Act, 5 shall not postpone the effectiveness of Protection on July 29, 2004.
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small such rule or action. This action may not (i) Incorporation by reference.
Business Regulatory Enforcement be challenged later in proceedings to (A) Chapter 148 of the Maine
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides enforce its requirements. (See section Department of Environmental Protection
that before a rule may take effect, the 307(b)(2).) Regulations, ‘‘Emissions from Smaller-
agency promulgating the rule must List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Scale Electric Generating Resources’’
submit a rule report, which includes a effective in the State of Maine on
Environmental protection, Air
copy of the rule, to each House of the August 9, 2004.
pollution control, Incorporation by
Congress and to the Comptroller General reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, (ii) Additional materials.
of the United States. EPA will submit a Reporting and recordkeeping (A) Nonregulatory portions of the
report containing this rule and other requirements. submittal.
required information to the U.S. Senate, ■ 3. In § 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is
the U.S. House of Representatives, and Dated: May 9, 2005.
Robert W. Varney,
amended by adding a new state citation,
the Comptroller General of the United 148, to read as follows:
States prior to publication of the rule in Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
the Federal Register. A major rule ■ Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code § 52.1031 EPA—approved Maine
cannot take effect until 60 days after it of Federal Regulations is amended as regulations.
is published in the Federal Register. follows: * * * * *

TABLE 52.1031.—EPA-APPROVED RULES AND REGULATIONS


State Date adopted Date approved
Title/Subject Federal Register citation 52.1020
citation by State by EPA

* * * * * * *
148 .... Emissions from Smaller-Scale Electric 7/15/04 5/26/05 [Insert FR citation from published date] (c)(55).
Generating Resources.

* * * * * * *

Note. —1. The regulations are effective ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUMMARY: Due to incomplete
statewide unless stated otherwise in AGENCY information contained in the
comments section. Commonwealth’s submission, EPA is
[FR Doc. 05–10508 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52 withdrawing an individual source that
was included as part of a direct final
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[R03–OAR–2005–PA–0008; FRL–7917–2] rule to approve Pennsylvania’s SIP
pertaining to source-specific volatile
Approval and Promulgation of Air organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen
Quality Implementation Plans; oxides (NOX) RACT determinations for
Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX RACT eleven individual sources located in
Determinations for Eleven Individual Pennsylvania. The direct final rule was
Sources; Partial Withdrawal of Direct published on March 31, 2005 (70 FR
Final Rule 16416). Subsequently, EPA is
withdrawing the one provision of that
AGENCY: Environmental Protection direct final rule.
Agency (EPA). DATES: The addition of the entry for Dart
ACTION: Partial withdrawal of direct Container Corporation in 40 CFR
final rule. 52.2020 (d)(1) published at 70 FR 16419
is withdrawn as of May 26, 2005.

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:46 May 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM 26MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 30377

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: not institute a second comment period not institute a second comment period
Pauline De Vose, (215) 814–2186 , or by on this action. on this action.
e-mail at devose.pauline@epa.gov. DATES: The direct final rule is DATES: The addition of the entry for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the withdrawn as of May 26, 2005. Koppers Industry, Inc. in 40 CFR
information provided in the direct final FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose 52.2020(d)(1) published at 70 FR 16426
rule located in the Rules and Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by e-mail at is withdrawn as of May 26, 2005.
Regulations section of the March 31, quinto.rose@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2005, Federal Register (70 FR 16416). LaKeshia Robertson, by phone at (215)
EPA is withdrawing only the provision List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 814–2113 or by e-mail at
for one individual source, namely, Dart Environmental protection, Air robertson.lakeshia@epa.gov.
Container Corporation, Upper Leacock pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Township, Lancaster County, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping information provided in the direct final
Pennsylvania. The other actions in the requirements.
March 31, 2005, Federal Register are rule located in the Rules and
Dated: May 16, 2005. Regulations section of the March 31,
not affected.
Donald S. Welsh, 2005, Federal Register (70 FR 16423).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Regional Administrator, Region III. EPA received adverse comments only
Environmental protection, Air Accordingly, the addition of the for one source, namely, Koppers
pollution control, Incorporation by entries for R. H. Sheppard Co. Inc.; Industries, Inc. located in Lycoming
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Wheatland Tube Company; County, PA. The other actions in the
Reporting and recordkeeping Transcontinental Gas Pipeline March 31, 2005, Federal Register are
requirements, Volatile organic Corporation (OP–53–0006); not affected.
compounds. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Dated: May 16, 2005. Corporation (OP–19–0004); and,
Environmental protection, Air
Donald S. Welsh, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Regional Administrator, Region III. Corporation (PA–41–0005A) in 40 CFR
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
52.2020(d)(1) published at 70 FR 16118
Accordingly, the addition of the entry requirements, Volatile organic
are withdrawn as of May 26, 2005.
for Dart Container Corporation in 40 compounds.
CFR 52.2020(d)(1) published at 70 FR [FR Doc. 05–10512 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am] Dated: May 16, 2005.
16419 is withdrawn as of May 26, 2005. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Donald S. Welsh,
[FR Doc. 05–10511 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am] Regional Administrator, Region III.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Accordingly, the addition of the entry
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY of Koppers Industry, Inc. in 40 CFR
52.2020(d)(1) published at 70 FR 16426
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 40 CFR Part 52 is withdrawn as May 26, 2005.
AGENCY
[R03–OAR–2005–PA–0007; FRL–7917–5] [FR Doc. 05–10513 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Approval and Promulgation of Air
[R03–OAR–2005–PA–0011; FRL–7917–6]
Quality Implementation Plans;
Approval and Promulgation of Air Pennsylvania; Partial Withdrawal of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Quality Implementation Plans; Direct Final Rule AGENCY
Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Direct AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Final Rule 40 CFR Part 52
Agency (EPA).
[R03–OAR–2005–PA–0006; FRL–7917–4]
AGENCY: Environmental Protection ACTION: Partial withdrawal of direct
Agency (EPA). final rule. Approval and Promulgation of Air
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. Quality Implementation Plans;
SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment,
Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Direct
SUMMARY: Due to adverse comments, EPA is withdrawing a paragraph that
Final Rule
EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule was included as part of a direct final
to approve Pennsylvania’s State rule to approve reasonable available AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. The control technology (RACT) to limit Agency (EPA).
SIP revision pertains to source-specific nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions from ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
nitrogen oxides (NOX) reasonably fifteen individual sources located in
available control technology (RACT) Pennsylvania. In the direct final rule SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment,
determination for five individual published on March 31, 2005 (70 FR EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule
sources located in Pennsylvania. In the 16423), we stated that if we received to approve reasonable available control
direct final rule published on March 30, adverse comments by May 2, 2005, the technology (RACT) to limit volatile
2005 (70 FR 16115), we stated that if we rule would be withdrawn and would organic compound (VOC) emissions
received adverse comments by April 29, not take effect. EPA subsequently from three individual sources located in
2005, the rule would be withdrawn and received an adverse comment on one Pennsylvania. In the direct final rule
not take effect. EPA subsequently provision of that direct final rule and is published on April 1, 2005 (70 FR
received adverse comments. EPA will withdrawing that provision. EPA will 16717), we stated that if we received
address the comments received in a address the comment received in a adverse comment by May 2, 2005, the
subsequent final action based upon the subsequent final action based upon the rule would be withdrawn and not take
proposed action also published on proposed action also published on effect. EPA subsequently received an
March 30, 2005 (70 FR 16203). EPA will March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16471). EPA will adverse comment on April 1, 2005. EPA

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:46 May 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM 26MYR1

You might also like