29782 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
99 / Tuesday, May 24, 2005 / Notices
preliminary determination in the
investigation under section 733(b) of the
Act, or, if the preliminary determination
is negative, upon notice of an
affirmative final determination in that
investigation under section 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigation need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigation. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigation.
Background
On April 1, 2005, a petition was filed
with the Commission and Commerce by
Tara Materials Inc., Lawrenceville,
Georgia, alleging that an industry in the
United States is materially injured or
threatened with material injury by
reason of LTFV imports of artists’
canvas from China. Accordingly,
effective April 1, 2005, the Commission
instituted antidumping duty
investigation No. 731–TA–1091
(Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigation and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of April 6, 2005 (70 FR
17467). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on April 22, 2005, and
all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this investigation to
the Secretary of Commerce on May 16,
2005. The views of the Commission will
be contained in USITC Publication 3777
(May 2005), entitled Artists’ Canvas
from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–
1091 (Preliminary).
Issued: May 16, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–10346 Filed 5–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate jul<14>2003 17:36 May 23, 2005 Jkt 205001
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
AGENCY:National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB review;
ACTION:
comment request.
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13.
This is the second notice; the first notice
was published at 70 FR 10416 and no
comments were received. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer
for National Science Foundation, 725–
17th Street, NW., Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, and to Suzanne
H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295, Arlington,
Virginia 22230 or send e-mail to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Comments regarding
these information collections are best
assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of this
notification. Copies of the submission(s)
may be obtained by calling 703–292–
7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Survey of Graduate
Students and Postdoctorates in Science
and Engineering.
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0062.
PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
Proposed Project
Graduate students in science,
engineering, and health-related fields in
U.S. colleges and universities, by source
and mechanism of support and by
demographic characteristics. An
electronic/mail survey, the Survey of
Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in
Science and engineering originated in
1966 and has been conducted annually
since 1972. The survey is the academic
graduate enrollment component of the
NSF statistical program that seeks to
‘‘provide a central clearinghouse for the
collection, interpretation, and analysis
of data on the availability of, and the
current and projected need for,
scientific and technical resources in the
United States, and to provide a source
of information for policy formulation by
other agencies of the Federal
government’’ as mandated in the
National Science Foundation Act of
1950.
The proposed project will continue
the current survey cycle for three years.
The annual Fall surveys for 2005
through 2007 will survey the universe of
712 reporting units (schools) at 592
graduate degree-granting institutions.
There are 12, 262 departments at these
schools that offer accredited graduate
programs in science, engineering or
health. The survey has provided
continuity of statistics on graduate
school enrollment and support for
graduate students in all science &
engineering (S&E) and health fields,
with separate data requested on
demographic characteristics (race/
ethnicity and gender by full-time and
part-time enrollment status). Statistics
from the survey are published in NSF’s
annual publication series Graduate
Students and Postdoctorates in Science
and Engineering, in NSF publications
Science and Engineering Indicators,
Women, Minorities, and Persons with
Disabilities in Science and Engineering,
and are available electronically on the
World Wide Web.
The survey will be sent primarily to
the administrators at the Institutional
Research Offices. To minimize burden,
NSF instituted a Web-based survey in
1998 through which institutions can
enter data directly or upload
preformatted files. The Web-based
survey includes a complete program for
editing and trend checking and allows
institutions to receive their previous
year’s data for comparison. Respondents
will be encouraged to participate in this
Web-based survey should they so wish.
Traditional paper questionnaires will
also be available, with editing and trend
checking performed as part of the
survey processing. In the currently
24MYN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 24, 2005 / Notices
ongoing Fall 2004 GSS survey,
preliminary data indicate that 95% of
the institutions are submitting the data
on the Web-based data collection
system. During the 2003 GSS survey
cycle, 87% of the institutions used the
Web-based data collection system.
The Fall 2003 GSS achieved a total
response rate of 99.4 percent for
institutions and 99.0 percent for
departments. Response rates are not yet
available for the currently ongoing Fall
2004 survey.
Estimate of Burden:
Respondents: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Responses:
12,262.
Estimated Total Annual burden on
Respondents: 39,235 hours.
Frequency of Responses: Annually.
Dated: May 19, 2005.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05–10315 Filed 5–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 64, ‘‘Travel
Voucher’’ (Part 1); NRC Form 64A,
‘‘Travel Voucher’’ (Part 2); and NRC
Form 64B, ‘‘Optional Travel Voucher’’
(Part 2).
3. The form number if applicable:
NRC Form 64; NRC Form 64A and NRC
Form 64B.
4. How often the collection is
required: On occasion.
5. Who will be required or asked to
report: Contractors, consultants and
VerDate jul<14>2003 17:36 May 23, 2005 Jkt 205001
invited NRC travelers who travel in the
course of conducting business for the
NRC.
6. An estimate of the number of
responses: 100.
7. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 100.
8. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: 100 hours (1
hour for each form).
9. An indication of whether Section
3507(d), Pub. L. 104–13 applies: Not
applicable.
10. Abstract: As a part of completing
the travel process, the traveler must file
travel reimbursement vouchers and trip
reports. The respondent universe for the
above forms include consultants and
contractors and those who are invited
by the NRC to travel, e.g., prospective
employees. Travel expenses that are
reimbursed are confined to those
expenses essential to the transaction of
official business for an approved trip.
A copy of the final supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F23, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC Worldwide Web
site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/index.html. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by June 23, 2005. Comments
received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
given to comments received after this
date.
John A. Asalone, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (3150–0192),
NEOB–10202, Office of Management
and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
Comments may also be emailed to
John_A._Asalone@omb.eop.gov or
submitted by telephone at (202) 395–
4650.
The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda
Jo. Shelton, 301–415–7233.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day
of May 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. E5–2587 Filed 5–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
29783
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[IA–05–021; ASLBP No. 05–839–02–EA]
In The Matter Of Andrew Siemaszko;
Establishment Of Atomic Safety And
Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the
Commission dated December 29, 1972,
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR
28,710 (1972), and the Commission’s
regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.202,
2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and
2.321, notice is hereby given that an
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is
being established to preside over the
following proceeding:
Andrew Siemaszko (Enforcement
Action)
This proceeding concerns a request
for hearing submitted on May 11, 2005,
by Andrew Siemaszko in response to an
April 25, 2005 NRC staff ‘‘Order
Prohibiting Involvement In NRC-License
Activities,’’ 70 FR 22720 (May 2, 2005).
Under the terms of that staff order,
because of his alleged failure to report
the presence of boric acid near the
reactor pressure vessel head on a
condition report and a work order
prepared in connection with a refueling
outage at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station that ended in May 2000, that
resulted, in part, in a significant adverse
condition going uncorrected, Mr.
Siemaszko (1) as of the effective date of
the order, is prohibited for five years
from engaging in NRC-licensed
activities; (2) if currently involved with
another licensee in NRC-licensed
activities, must immediately cease those
activities, inform the NRC of the
employer, and provide a copy of the
order to the employer; and (3) for a
period of five years after the five-year
prohibition period has expired, must,
within twenty days of accepting his first
employment offer involving NRC-
licensed activities or his becoming
involved in NRC-licensed activities,
provide notice to the agency of the
employer or the entity where he is, or
will be, involved in NRC-licensed
activities.
The Board is comprised of the
following administrative judges:
Lawrence G. McDade, Chair, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; E. Roy
Hawkens, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; Dr. Peter S. Lam, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall be filed with the
24MYN1