You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 5925

(ii) In the case of a customer who does December 15, 2004, shall remain in full which were the subject of the December
not qualify as an ‘‘institutional force and effect. 15, 2004 final rule. This temporary
customer’’ as defined in § 1.3(g) of this DATES: Effective February 4, 2005. The waiver applies only to import, export
chapter, an introducing broker must new deadline for providing import, and transshipment notification
obtain the customer’s prior consent export and transshipment notification requirements. All other chemical
through a signed acknowledgment, for regulated chemical mixtures control requirements set forth in the
which may be accomplished in containing these 27 listed chemicals final rulemaking published on
accordance with § 1.55(d) of this will be May 14, 2005. December 15, 2004 (69 FR 74957) shall
chapter. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: remain in full force and effect.
* * * * * Christine A. Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief, The new deadline for providing
Drug & Chemical Evaluation Section, import, export and transshipment
Dated: January 27, 2005. notification for regulated chemical
By the Commission. Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, mixtures containing these 27 listed
Jean A. Webb, chemicals will be May 14, 2005.
Washington, DC 20537, telephone (202)
Secretary of the Commission.
307–7183 Provisions of December 15, 2004 Final
[FR Doc. 05–1906 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am] Rule (69 FR 74957) Which Do Not
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M Change
December 15, 2004, the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) For any person distributing,
published a final rule (69 FR 74957) that importing, or exporting any amount of
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE implemented regulations pertaining to a regulated mixture containing a List I
chemical mixtures that contain any of chemical, the CSA requires that person
Drug Enforcement Administration 27 listed chemicals regulated under the to obtain a DEA registration. DEA
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). That recognizes that it is not possible for
21 CFR Parts 1310 and 1313 rulemaking became effective on January persons who are subject to the
[Docket No. DEA–137N] 14, 2005. registration requirement to immediately
Following publication of the final rule complete and submit an application for
RIN 1117–AA31
concerns were raised by various registration and for DEA to immediately
Chemical Mixtures; Temporary Waiver segments of the chemical industry issue registrations for those activities.
of Import/Export Requirements regarding their difficulty in fully Therefore, in order to allow continued
complying with DEA import/export legitimate commerce in regulated
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement notification requirements as specified in mixtures, the December 15, 2004 final
Administration (DEA), Justice. 21 CFR part 1313 by this deadline. DEA rule established a temporary exemption
ACTION: Temporary waiver of import/ received correspondence from two from the registration requirement (in 21
export requirements. national chemical associations and from CFR 1310.09) for persons desiring to
one major chemical producer. engage in activities with regulated
SUMMARY: On December 15, 2004, the Additionally, DEA received verbal mixtures that are subject to registration
Drug Enforcement Administration communication from industry that requirements, provided that DEA
(DEA) published a final rule that expressed concerns regarding the large receives a properly completed
implemented regulations pertaining to number of potentially affected mixtures application for registration or an
chemical mixtures that contain any of and the difficulty industry was having application for exemption (pursuant to
27 listed chemicals regulated under the in meeting deadlines for submitting 21 CFR 1310.13) for their chemical
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. import/export notification. After mixture(s) on or before February 14,
801 et seq.). That rulemaking became carefully considering the concerns 2005. The temporary exemption from
effective on January 14, 2005. expressed by industry, DEA has decided registration for such persons will remain
Following publication of the final to postpone the implementation of the in effect until DEA takes final action on
rule, certain segments of the chemical import/export notification requirements their application(s).
industry expressed concerns to DEA as specified in 21 CFR part 1313 until Any person whose application for
regarding difficulty in fully complying May 14, 2005. This temporary waiver exemption is subsequently rejected by
with DEA import/export notification shall apply only to chemical mixtures DEA must obtain a registration with
requirements as specified in 21 CFR part which became regulated under the DEA. A temporary exemption from the
1313 by this deadline. Therefore, in December 15, 2004 final rule (69 FR registration requirement will also be
order to avoid interruption of legitimate 74957). provided for these persons, if DEA
import/export distributions, DEA is While the submission of import, receives a properly completed
providing a waiver of the import/export export and transshipment information application for registration on or before
reporting requirements as specified in to DEA is an important provision in 30 days following the date of official
21 CFR part 1313 until May 14, 2005. countering the potential diversion of DEA notification that the application for
As such, regulated persons will these materials, this temporary waiver is exemption has not been approved. The
temporarily not be required to submit being provided to allow industry ample deadline for submission of an
advance notification for import, export time to ensure their full compliance application for registration, or an
and transshipment transactions for with CSA import/export regulatory application for exemption, remains
chemical mixtures regulated solely due requirements as specified in 21 CFR part February 14, 2005 in order to obtain the
to the presence of these 27 listed 1313. As such, DEA will be temporarily temporary exemption from registration.
chemicals until May 14, 2005. This waiving the requirement for regulated None of the temporary exemptions
temporary waiver applies only to persons to submit advance notification discussed in this rulemaking suspend
import, export and transshipment for import, export and transshipment applicable federal criminal laws relating
notification requirements; all other transactions for chemical mixtures to the regulated mixtures, nor does it
chemical control requirements set forth which are regulated solely due to the supersede state or local laws or
in the final rulemaking published on presence of the 27 listed chemicals regulations. All handlers of a regulated

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:01 Feb 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM 04FER1
5926 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

mixture must comply with applicable Compliance Division, Health determining various costs. In light of the
state and local requirements in addition Administration Center, Department of passage of time since publication of the
to the CSA regulatory controls. Veterans Affairs, P.O. Box 65020, proposed rule, and in order to reflect the
Dated: January 28, 2005. Denver, CO 80206, telephone 303–331– most up-to-date data, this reference has
William J. Walker, 7552. (This is not a toll-free number.) been changed to FY 2003 throughout the
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a final rule.
Diversion Control. document published in the Federal The proposed rule stated that for
[FR Doc. 05–2212 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am] Register on July 29, 2003 (68 FR 44507) services that VA did not have occasion
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P we proposed to amend VA’s medical to pay for in Alaska in FY 2002, and for
regulations at 38 CFR part 17 to provide services represented by CPT codes
for the payment of non-VA physician established after FY 2002, VA will take
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS services in Alaska that are associated the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
AFFAIRS with either outpatient or inpatient care Services’ rate for each unpaid code and
provided to eligible VA beneficiaries at multiply it times the average percentage
38 CFR Part 17 non-VA facilities. We provided a 60-day paid by VA in Alaska for Centers for
comment period that ended on
RIN 2900–AK94 Medicare and Medicaid Services-like
September 29, 2003. We received one
codes. Applying this rule only to
Payment for Non-VA Physician and comment, in which the commenter
services that VA had no occasion to pay
Other Health Care Professional suggested that VA adopt the Official
during the previous Fiscal Year was
Services Associated With Either Alaska Workers’ Compensation Medical
unnecessarily narrow and would limit
Outpatient or Inpatient Care Provided Fee Schedule as a basis for such
payments. No changes are made based VA’s ability to accurately gauge a
at Non-VA Facilities reasonable payment. It is also
on this comment, as adoption of the
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. Official Alaska Workers’ Compensation inconsistent with other provisions of
ACTION: Final rule. Medical Fee Schedule would not this rule, which require a minimum of
achieve the dual goal of ensuring that eight occurrences. Therefore, the final
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the rule has been revised to apply this rule
the amounts paid to health care
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) providers better represent the local cost to services that VA provided less than
medical regulations concerning to furnish a service, while continuing to eight times in Alaska during the
payment for non-VA health care achieve program cost reductions. previous Fiscal Year. Clarification was
professional services that are associated also made that this rule would be
A number of technical changes of a
with either outpatient or inpatient care applicable to unit-based codes as the VA
non-substantive nature have been made
provided to eligible VA beneficiaries at moved from a single payment per code
in this final rule. The proposed rule
non-VA facilities. Currently, the irrespective of units to unit-based
described the title of this rule as
medical regulations require all VA payment in FY 2004, and development
Payment for Non-VA Physician Services
facilities to reimburse for non-VA health of a fee schedule that is not unit-based
Associated with Either Outpatient or
care professional services based upon would be inconsistent and inaccurate.
Inpatient Care Provided at Non-VA
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Facilities. The use of the phrase ‘‘non- The proposed rule stated that VA
Services (CMS) physician fee schedule
VA physician,’’ both in the title of 38 would increase the amounts on the VA
in effect at the time the services are
provided. However, if the standard CFR 17.56 and throughout the Fee Schedule for Alaska annually in
payment methodology is implemented regulation, is imprecise, as the rule accordance with annual inflation rate
in Alaska, VA payments will be applies to all non-VA physician and adjustments published by CMS. The VA
significantly less than the usual and other health care professional services will use the national Medicare
customary charges for the state. This associated with outpatient or inpatient Economic Index (MEI) for that purpose.
may limit VA patient access to non-VA care provided at non-VA facilities. In The MEI measures inflation in
health care. Since a large portion of VA order to reconcile the terminology used physician practice cost and general
health care provided in Alaska is in this rule with common practice in wage levels. The VA will not make
obtained from non-VA sources, this VA, the phrase ‘‘non-VA physician’’ modifications to the MEI based on
could negatively impact the quality of will be replaced with ‘‘non-VA health regional factors because doing so would
care provided veterans living in that care professional services.’’ not achieve the dual goal of ensuring
state. This rule establishes an Alaska- Additionally, the language was clarified that the amounts paid to health care
specific payment methodology for to state the rates payable are based on
providers represent the local cost to
inpatient and outpatient non-VA health the geographic location of where the
furnish a service, while continuing to
care professional services within that services were rendered.
achieve program cost reductions.
state. The rule ensures that amounts The proposed rule stated that VA
paid to health care providers represent would rely on Current Procedural Administrative Procedure Act
the local cost to furnish a service, while Terminology (CPT) codes utilized by
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid The modifications in this final rule
continuing to achieve program cost are logical and reasonable outgrowths of
reductions. Services (CMS) to pay for these non-VA
services. The reference to CPT codes the proposed changes set forth in the
DATES: Effective Date: This rule shall was too restrictive, as CMS uses other proposed rule and are intended to
become effective on March 7, 2005. national coding sets for health care clarify the intent of the proposed rule.
Applicability Date: This rule shall be professional services. Therefore, the Based on the rationales set forth in the
applicable to all claims for payment for references to CPT codes were removed. proposed rule and those contained in
services rendered on or after April 1, The final rule refers generally to the use this document, we are adopting the
2005. of national standard code sets. provisions of the proposed rule as a
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The proposed rule referenced Fiscal final rule with the modifications
Susan Schmetzer, Chief, Policy & Year (FY) 2002 as the base year for described above.

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:01 Feb 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM 04FER1

You might also like