Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course MBA-Semester-1
Pricing policy is based upon few factors such as a firm's overall marketing
objectives, consumer demand, product attributes, competitors' pricing, and
market and economic trends.
Competitors may define one’s price range. In this case, one can price
higher if consumers perceive the product and/or brand is significantly
better; price on parity if the product has better features; or price lower if
the product has relatively similar features to existing products. An
information client faced this situation with a premium product. Its direct
competitors established the price for a similar offering. As the third player
in this segment, its choices were price parity with an enhanced offering or
a lower price with similar features.
The main three objectives that are to be considered while fixing the prices of
the product are as follows:
3. Price Stabilization
justify the different price. An agreement to charge a better price for the same
laws . A marketer may charge more for one model of a product than for
another in order to add perceived value to the product. For example, makers
of designer jeans charge a premium price for a product that costs no more to
The more prices that are introduced, the greater the sum of the
revenue areas, and the more of the consumer surplus is captured by the
producer.
The firm decides what amount of the total output to sell in each
market by looking at the intersection of marginal cost with marginal revenue
(profit maximization). This output is then divided between the two markets,
at the equilibrium marginal revenue level.
4.What do you mean by the fiscal policy? What are the instruments of fiscal
policy? Briefly comment on India’s fiscal policy.
Ans.
Fiscal policy can be contrasted with the other main type of economic
policy, monetary policy, which attempts to stabilize the economy by
controlling interest rates and the supply of money. The two main instruments
of fiscal policy are government spending and taxation. Changes in the level
and composition of taxation and government spending can impact on the
following variables in the economy:
---Government Spending
----Taxation
Recently, various income transfer and social insurance schemes that reach
into rural areas and the informal sector of the economy have been
announced. While the objectives of such policies are laudable, they introduce
yet additional demands on the budget, which will be difficult to reverse, as
they become viewed as entitlements. Srinivasan (2002) and Rajaraman
(2004) emphasize that the Pay Commission award was not an exogenous
shock, but one that was predictable in the context of institutional and
political economy considerations. Thus, one can argue that pay, pensions and
social insurance are all areas in which there is virtually no uncertainty about
their future costs so that the government will have to do long term planning.
While we have suggested that the broad outlines of technical solutions to
India’s short run fiscal problems are well understood, leaving only the
political difficulties of implementation, in the case of long-term budgetary
commitments, there seems to be a need for an integrated analysis of the
various possibilities. For example, the last Pay Commission award was
followed by increases in the pensions of those who had already retired –
while such ex post adjustments may again have laudable motives, they
represent a contingency that must be allowed for in projecting the future
liabilities of the government. The announcement in the interim budget for
2004-05 of the merger of 50% of dearness allowance of civil servants into
their basic salary is not a good signal. Even more broadly, India’s federal
system needs to develop revenue assignments and authorities that match
expenditure responsibilities more closely. This, in general, can be a positive
step in controlling fiscal laxity. We may note here that in addition to altering
the pattern of existing assignments, some long-run progress may also be
made by redrawing the boundaries of the larger States. In general,
therefore, looking at the longer term and at broader public welfare concerns
can have three benefits. First, it allows for better inter temporal planning of
public expenditures within and across categories. Second, it improves the
pattern of near-term public expenditures toward spending that reduces the
chances of larger expenditures in the future. Third, it emphasizes the need
for a fiscal cushion or self-insurance to meet unavoidable expenditures
should they occur in the future. India’s fiscal situation requires immediate
attention: high growth and low interest rates will not take care of the
problem of long run sustainability of the debt, nor the risks of a crisis in the
short or medium run. However, high reserves and a conservative monetary
policy may not be sufficient insurance against a crisis of confidence. There
are theoretical reasons and previous empirical evidence of high domestic
debt and deficits being associated with such a crisis. Furthermore, there are
numerous potential sources of risk, including interest rate volatility, as well
as exogenous shocks.
One can simply state that there needs to be some short run fiscal
adjustment, otherwise the probability of a crisis or collapse may soon
increase dramatically. Furthermore, there are some obvious expenditure
adjustments that can be made, such as cutting or overhauling poorly
designed subsidies, and at least improving the efficiency of government
expenditures. There are also some steps that can be taken to enhance
revenues while simultaneously cutting distortions in the tax system, including
improving the efficiency of tax collection.
Thus the rural poor face an increasing challenge to meet their basic
needs, the most basic of which is food security. This situation is exacerbated
by ongoing environmental impoverishment, which may in turn lead to a loss
of forest products, the depletion of soil nutrients, the pollution of soils and
the contamination of water. The impact of these problems is especially felt by
rural women, whose livelihood depends on access to natural resources, which
are the factors of production.
For the poor, the family is the significant unit of economic production.
The labour of its members is maximised and pooled through the family. This
mode of organising labour at the micro level shapes gender relations and the
role of women as the biological reproducers of labour High infant and child
mortality thus constitutes a compounding factor that further spurs fertility
towards the goal of labour maximisation. This is especially so for smallholder
agricultural producers and landless rural workers. In their labour-intensive
mode of production, children are producers, labour recruits, workers,
parental investments for upward social mobility, and pension providers for
the elderly family members.
· adequate nutrition
· potable water
· decent sanitation
· adequate rest and relief from hard physical labour and drudgery
The excessively high mortality rates among the rural population are a
result of unequal life chances between rural and urban populations, and
between rich and poor. The rural population's poor health conditions account
for the higher infant and child mortality rates as compared to those of the
urban population.
All these badly effect the total economy of the community.
where Y is log value of the actual output, Yn is log value of the "natural" level
of output, a is a positive constant, P is log value of the actual price level, and
Pe is log value of the expected price level. Lucas assumes that Yn has a
unique value.
This differs from other views of the Phillips curve, in which the failure to
attain the "natural" level of output can be due to the imperfection or
incompleteness of markets, the stickiness of prices, and the like. In the non-
Lucas view, incorrect expectations can contribute to aggregate demand
failure, but they are not the only cause. To the "new Classical" followers of
Lucas, markets are presumed to be perfect and always attain equilibrium
(given inflationary expectations).
Subtracting last year's price levels P-1 will give us inflation rates, because
and
where π and πe are the inflation and expected inflation respectively.
Stagflation:
ASSIGNMENT
Name S.AMEER ABBAS
Course MBA-Semester-1
2.What are the factors that determine the Demand curve? Explain.
Ans.
The shift of a demand curve takes place when there is a change in any
non-price determinant of demand, resulting in a new demand curve. A non-
price determinant of demand are those things that will cause demand to
change even if prices remain the same. In other words, what things might
cause a consumer to buy more or less of a good even if the goods own price
remained unchanged. Some of the more important factors are the prices of
related goods (both substitute and complementary), income, population and
expectations. However, demand is the willingness and ability of a consumer
to purchase a good under the prevailing circumstances; so, any relevant
circumstance can be a non price determinant of demand. As an example,
weather could be factor in the demand for beer at a baseball game.
3.A firm supplied 3000 pens at the rate of Rs 10. Next month, due to a rise
of in the price to 22 rs per pen the supply of the firm increases to 5000
pens. Find the elasticity of supply of the pens.
Ans.
Later price = 22
Ans.
The model
It is to be noted with great care that a firm has to maximize its profits after
taking in to consideration of various factors in to account. They are as
follows-
1. Pricing and business strategies of rival firms and its impact on the
working of the given firm.
8. Avoiding any sort of clash between short run and long run profits in
the business policy and maintaining proper balance between them.
5.What is Cyert and March’s behavior theory? What are the demerits
Ans.
Richard Cyert and James March were the two “founding fathers” who
introduced one of the disciplines that shaped thinking about organizational
learning over the past decades.
Demerits:
1. The theory fails to analyze the behavior of the firm, but it simply
predicts the future expected behavior of different groups
2. It does not explain equilibrium of the industry as a whole
3. It fails to analyze the impact of the potential entry of new firms in
to the industry and the behavior of the well established firms in
the market.
4. It highlights only on short run goals rather than long run
objectives of an organisation.