Professional Documents
Culture Documents
المحفظة الاستثمارية
المحفظة الاستثمارية
2009
2009
2009
.
) (
) (
.
.
:
.
2009
Abstract
This study investigate the impact of credit policy on loans portfolio
in the Jordanian commercial banks. It was found that there is strong
empirical support of a positive relationship between credit policy
(Independent Variables) and loans portfolio (dependent variable).
Moreover, it contains empirical evidence of more lenient credit standards
during boom periods, both in terms of screening of borrows and in
collateral requirements. A robust evidence was also found that during
upturns, riskier borrowers get bank loans, while collateralized loans
decrease.
Strong competition among domestic banks or with other foreign
banks and financial intermediaries erodes margin as both loan and deposit
interest rates get closer to the inter bank rate. To compensate for the fall in
profitability, bank managers might increase loan growth at the expense of
the (future) quality of their loan portfolio.
2009
1.1. Introduction
Banking services are affected by the economic situations and the free
financial system of the country. Banking sector play very important role in
the national economy by performing functions such as accepting deposits
(Liabilities) and make loans (assets). Further more, banks works as
intermediaries by making money available for financing the economic
growth of the country. Credit play very important role in the efficiency of
economic activities. A country can not acquire economic progress without
emphasizing credit mechanisms, and developing it is credit policy. Credit
activity is considered the most important because granted loans for clients
(borrowers) representing the important part of the banks assets.
Credit facilities are considered the most financial sources that gain
profit for commercial banks. Therefore, these banks need to manage, direct
and guide their credit policies because it has direct impact on their returns.
If banks follow lose credit policy, the size of credit facilities will definitely
increase, the opposite will happen when they follow strict policy.
Credit quality is also very important issue, since it is linked with
macroeconomic, competition and banking supervision aspects; and thus it
is especially important and relevant for banks-based economic systems
(Belaish, 2001), It is worth to emphasize that quality of credit, together
with its availability and cost, is important for both resource allocation and
growth. Borrowers credit worthiness need to be evaluated by the banks in
the resource allocation process. Poor credit quality often seen as a signal of
excessive credit risk, may cause greater volatility in total credit with
possible backward linkages to the banking system itself (Berger and Udell,
2004).
The globalization of financial markets, the increasing competition
and the new activities carried out by banks do not diminish the importance
of credit risk. To the contrary, credit quality is an important intermediate
target for regulators in order to dampen possible financial crisis, and it is
the focus of Basel reform in the banking supervision system. In addition,
credit quality is a major instrument in banking competition to the extent
that it may lead to an efficient cost structure. A bad credit screening
moreover makes the bank's lending subject to the winner's curses (Lozano
and Pastor, 2006).
2009
2009
banks must specify the best time to offer credits. However, credits must be
given in different forms to a large number of people in order to accomplish
the main goal of the bank as well as to cope with banking competition.
Accordingly, this study will try to answer the following questions:
1- What are the major factors that influence credit policy in the
Jordanian Commercial banks?
2- What are the obstructions and difficulties facing the commercial
banks in Jordan?
3- What is the importance of credit policy in banking industry?
4- What are the most important advantages of credit facilities, and how
does this effect credit quality?
5- What are the solutions that facilitate and maintain safety for
Jordanian banks when granting loans to clients?
2009
2- Literature Review
Clair (1992) found that, a rapid credit expansion is deemed one of
the most important causes of problem loan. During economic expansions
many banks are engaged in fierce competition for market share in loans,
resulting in strong credit growth rates. The easiest way to gain market share
is to lend to borrowers of lower credit quality. This market share strategy is
even more dangerous if the bank is a new entrant in a product or regional
market. Initially, banks selling new products will probably have more
problem loans in their new business simply because they lack the necessary
expertise.
Berger and De Young (1997) added that, several additional factors
could affect the level of bank problem loans. First of all, loan portfolio
composition plays an important role as an indicator of bank risk profile.
Besides, risk concentration is an additional source of concern as many
banking crises have pointed out. Secondly, inefficient banks performing
poor screening and monitoring of borrowers will have lower portfolio
quality. Thirdly, the overall competitive environment in which banks
operate could also affect the level of credit risk the banks is willing to take.
If the bank has some degree of monopoly power, it has the possibility of
charging higher interest rates in the future. Therefore, a higher number of
firms of lower quality could obtain funds from the bank. This would not
happen in a competitive market where it is not possible to recover in the
2009
future the present losses because the firm, after solving its difficulties,
would not pay an interest rate above the market rate.
More recently, Berger and Udell (2003) have developed
complementary hypothesis in order to explain the markedly cyclical profile
of loans and non-performing loan losses. They call it the institutional
memory hypothesis and, essentially, it states that as time passes since the
last loan bust, loan officers become less and less skilled in order to avoid
granting loans to high risk borrowers. That might be the result of two
complementary forces. First of all, the proportion of loan officers that
experienced the last bust decreases as the bank hires new, younger,
employees and the former ones retire. Thus, there is a loss of learning
experience. Secondly, some of the experienced officers may forget about
the lessons of the past and the more far away is the former recession the
more they will forget.
Crockett(2001),described the situation as : banking supervisors,
through many painful experiences, are quite convinced that banks lending
mistakes are more prevalent during upturns than in the midst of a recession.
In good times both borrowers and lenders are overconfident about
investment projects and their ability to repay and to recoup their loans and
the corresponding fees and interest rates. Banks, over optimism about
borrowers future prospects bring a bout more liberal credit policies with
lower credit standards requirements. Thus, some negative net present value
projects are financed just to find later the impairment of the loan or the
default of the borrower. On the other hand, during recessions, when banks
are flooded with non-reforming loans and specific provisions, they
suddenly turn very conservative and tighten credit standards well beyond
positive net present values. Only their best borrowers get new funds and,
thus lending during downturns is saver and credit policy mistakes much
lower.
Salas and Saurina (2002). In their paper they produce clear cut
evidence of a direct, although lagged, relationship between credit cycle and
credit risk. A rapid increase in loan portfolios is positively associated with
an increases in non-performing loan ratios later on. Moreover, those loans
granted during boom periods have a higher probability of default than those
granted during slow credit growth periods. Finally, they show that in boom
periods collateral requirements are relaxed while the opposite happens in
2009
2009
wish to hold the interest rate below the market clearing level in order to
maintain a reasonable level of quality of the loan portfolio, rather than
acquire the direct gains available from a higher rate.
Fama (1985) argue that banks are able to learn about the
characteristics of borrower firms, after they have provided loans to those
firms. Based on this proposition, several studies have proposed models that
relate borrower-lender relationship to the availability/ cost of debt finance.
While previous studies are generally agree that closer lending relationships
will boost availability of credit, they have different views on the impact of
lending relationship on cost of credit. As detailed presently, some studies
suggest that lending relationships will reduce credit cost, and others do not.
Diamond (1991) introduces two mechanisms in which lending
relationship may reduce the cost of credit. First, lenders reject loans to
borrowers who have chosen risky projects and gone bankrupt. This credit
allocation process improves the quality of lenders portfolio, generating
additional profits. Second, borrowers who have been able to repay their
loans and thus have established a good reputation to lenders have incentive
to keep the reputation by choosing safer projects. Thus, credit allocation
criteria to give priority to borrowers who have longer relationships to
lenders will generate additional gain.
Chan and Thakor (1987), note that, the collateral pledged by
borrowers may help attenuate the problem of adverse selection faced by the
bank when lending. Lower risk borrowers are willing to pledge more and
better collateral, given that their lower risk means they are less likely to
lose it. Thus, collateral acts as a signal enabling the bank to mitigate or
eliminate the adverse selection problem caused by the existence of
information asymmetries between the bank and the borrower at the time of
the loan decision. In a context of asymmetric information between the bank
and the borrower, banks design loan contracts in order to sort out types of
borrowers: high risk borrower choose high interest rates and no collateral,
where as low risk ones pledged collateral and get lower interest rates.
Aleksashenko (1999) raised an important issue regarding the
consequences of foreign banks admission at the domestic bank sectors in
number of countries. In others opinion on whether the impact of foreign
2009
banks is (or will be) positive or negative are rather controversial while most
of the researchers agree on following:
i) In the most countries where foreign banks were admitted they
influence substantially the structure of the bank sector and enhance
competition.
ii) In the most cases the domestic banks were placed at the relatively
bad position comparing to the position of foreign ones. Here the
number of factors are distinguished: lack of managerial expertise,
heavy burden of bad loans in the portfolios, and high reserve
requirements or other pressures to finance government deficit.
iii) Foreign banks activity in long-term lending is revealed.
3. Theoretical Framework
Credit policy work as an indicator guides the workforce in the
banks. Credit is an important tool in the economic life. Economic progress
can not be acquired without employing credit mechanisms, renewing and
developing credit policy. Credit activity is the most important activity for
commercial banks. Loans granted to clients represent the most important
part of the assets of commercial banks. It is the best source for its returns or
income. Therefore, banks make good plans for it is credit policies and
make good measurement for granting loans and allowances in order to
maintain it is investment assets and to minimize it is losses from bad debits.
Banks use other money deposits to grant credits. Thus credit policy is part
of financial and monetory policy. Moreover, banks are capable to give
loans and allowance, and also capable of issuing different types of credit.
2009
2009
2009
1- Character:
The loan officer must be convinced that the customer has a welldefined purpose for requesting credit and a serious intention to repay. If the
officer is not sure exactly why the customer is requesting a loan; this
purpose must be clarified to the lender's satisfaction. Once the purpose is
known, the loan officer must determine if it is consistent with the lending
institution's current loan policy. Even with a good purpose, however, the
loan officer must determine that the borrower has a responsible attitude
toward using borrowed funds, is truthful in answering questions, and will
marked every effort to repay what is owed. Responsibility, truthfulness,
serious purpose, and serious intention to repay all monies owed make up
what a loan officer calls character. If the loan officer feels the customer is
insincere in promising to use borrowed funds as planned and in repaying as
agreed, the loan should not be made, for it will almost certainly become
problem credit.
2- Capacity:
The loan officer must be sure that the customer requesting credit ha
the authority to request a loan and the legal standing to sign a binding loan
agreement. This customer characteristic is known as the capacity to borrow
money. For example in most states a minor (e.g. underage 18 or 21) cannot
legally be held responsible for a credit agreement; thus the lender would
have great difficulty collecting on such loans. Similarly, the loan officer
must be sure that the representative from a corporation asking for credit has
proper authority from the companys board of directors to negotiate a loan
and sign a credit agreement binding the corporation.
3- Cash:
This key feature of any loan application centers on the question:
Does the borrower have ability to generate enough cash- in the form of
cash flow-to repay the loan? In general, borrowing customer have only
three sources to draw upon to repay their loans: (a) cash flows generated
from sales or income, (b) the sale or liquidation of asset, or (c) funds raised
by issuing debt or equity securities. Any of these sources may provide
sufficient cash to repay a loan.
2009
4- Collateral:
In assessing the collateral aspect of a loan request, the loan officer
must ask; Does the borrower possess adequate net worth or own enough
quality assets to provide adequate support for the loan? The loan officer is
particularly sensitive to such features as the age, condition, and degree of
specialization of the borrower's assets.
5-Conditions:
The loan officer and credit analyst must be aware of recent trends in
the borrower's line of work or industry and how changing economic
conditions might affect the loan.
6- Control:
The last factor in assessing a borrower's creditworthy status is
control, which centers on such questions as whether changes in law and
regulation could adversely affect the borrower and whether the loan request
meets the lender's and the regulatory authorities' standards for loan quality.
(Rose and Hudgins, 2005).
2009
and other cash needs. Faced with liquidity risk a financial institution may
be forced to borrow emergency funds at excessive cost to cover its
immediate cash needs, reducing its earnings. Very few financial firms ever
actually run out of cash because of the ease with which liquid funds can be
borrowed from other banks.
3. Market Risk:
Changes in market interest rates and currency prices, shifting public
demands for bank services and the service offered by non-bank financial
firms, sudden alterations in central bank monetary policies, and changing
invertors perceptions of the riskiness of banks and non-bank financial firms
cause the value of institutional assets, liabilities, and equity to move up or
down frequently, depending on the direction financial winds are blowing.
4- Interest Rate Risk:
Movements in market interest rates can also have potent effects on the
margin of revenues over costs for both banks and their competitors. For
example, rising interest rates can lower a banks margin of profit if the
structure of the institution's assets and liabilities is such that interest
expenses on borrowed money increase more rapidly than interest revenues
on loans and security investments. However, if a bank or other financial
firm has an excess of flexible-rate assets over flexible-rate liabilities,
falling interest rates will erode its profit margin. In this case, asset revenues
will drop faster than borrowing costs.
5- Earning Risk:
The risk to a financial institution's bottom line-its net income after all
expenses are covered-is known as earning risk. Earning may decline
unexpectedly due to factors inside the financial firm or due to external
factors, such as changes in economic conditions or in laws and regulations.
For example recent increases in banking competition have tended to narrow
the spread between earning on a bank assets and the cost of raising bank
funds. Thus, a bank's stockholders always face the possibility of a decline
in their earning per share of stock, which would cause the value of the
bank's stock to fall, eroding its resources for future growth.
2009
6- Capital Risk:
Bankers and their competitors must be directly concerned about risks
to their institutions long-run survival, often called capital risk. For example,
if a bank takes on an excessive number of bad loans or if a large portion of
its security portfolio declines in market value, generating serious capital
losses when sold, then its equity capital account, which is deigned to
absorb such losses, may be overwhelmed. If investors and depositors
become aware of the problem and begin to withdraw their funds, regulators
may have no choice but to declare the institution insolvent and close its
doors.
7- Inflation Risk: The probability that an increasing price level for goods
and services (inflation) will unexpectedly erode the purchasing power of a
financial institution's earning and the return to its shareholders.
8- Currency or Exchange Rate Risk:
The probability that fluctuations in the market value of foreign
currencies will create losses by altering the market value of a bank's or
other financial institution's assets and liabilities.
9- Political Risk:
The probability that changes in government laws or regulations, at home or
abroad, will adversely affect a bank's or other financial firm's earnings,
operations, and future prospects.
10- Crime Risk:
The possibility that a bank's or other institution's owners, employees,
or customers may choose to violate the law and subject the institution to
loss from fraud, embezzlement, theft, or other illegal acts. (Tayler, 1996)
3.6.Competitors, Sizes, Location, and Regulatory of Commercial
Banks
2009
2009
2009
Dependent Variable
Economic Situations-cycle
Profitability
Interest Rates
Loans Portfolio
Collaterals
Domestic Competition
Foreign Competition
Risks
Relationship Banking
2009
2009
2009
Relationship Banking:
A selective marketing strategy that focuses on attracting,
maintaining, and improving relations with individual bank customers.
Relationship banking strives to satisfy clients, total financial services
needs.
This factor will be measured by the following question in the
questionnaire (Q 17, Q 19, Q 21).
Loan Portfolio:
This dependent variable can be identified as the total of all loanscommercial, consumer and real estate-held by a financial institution and
managed as a collective whole.
4.4. Study Hypothesis
Based on the previous studies and the theoretical framework of this
study, the following hypothesis are introduced:
A- Major Hypothesis:
HO: There is no statistical relation between credit policy and loans
portfolio.
B- Minor Hypothesis:
HO (1-1): There is no statistical relation between bank liquidity and the
size of granted loans.
HO (1-2): There is no statistical relation between economic situations
and granted loans.
HO (1-3): There is no statistical relation between banks profitability
and the size of granted loans.
HO (1-4): There is no statistical relation between interest rates and the
size of granted loans.
2009
Type
Private
Private
Private
Public
No. of Banks
13
8
2
4
27
2009
2009
2009
2009
and it was found that (calculated t=5.95) is greater than tabulated t (see
table No. 7). According to both interest rates and the size of granted
loans, there is a positive relationship between interest rates and the size
granted loans.
Ho (1-5) There is no statistical relationship between pledged collaterals and
the size of granted loans. One sample t-test was used to test this
hypothesis and it was found that (calculated t=2.848) is greater than
tabulated t (see table No. 8).According to both pledged collateral and the
size of granted loans, there is a positive relationship between pledged
collateral and the size of granted loans.
HO (1-6) There is no statistical relationship between domestic competition
and the size of granted loans. One sample t-test was used to test this
hypothesis and it was found that (calculated t=11.78) is greater than
tabulated t (see table No. 9). According to both domestic competition and
the size of granted loans, there is a positive relationship between domestic
competition and the size of granted loans.
HO (1-7) There is no statistical relationship between foreign competition
and the size of granted loans. One sample t-test was used to test this
hypothesis and it was found that (calculated t = 15.167) is grater than
tabulated t (refer to table No. 10).According to both foreign competition
and the size of granted loans, there is a positive relationship between
foreign competition and the size of granted loans.
HO (1-8) There is no statistical relationship between risk and the size of
granted loans. One sample t-test was used to test this hypothesis and it
was found that (calculated t = 13.238) is grater than tabulated t (see to
table No. 11). According to both risk and the size of granted loans, there
is a positive relationship between risk and the size of granted loans.
HO (1-9) There is no statistical relationship between bank relation and the
size of granted loans.One sample t-test was used to test this hypothesis
and it was found that (calculated t = 9.65) is greater than tabulated t (see
to table No. 12). According to both bank relation and the size of granted
loans, there is a positive relationship between bank relation and the size
of granted loans.
2009
6. Results
After analyzing the data and testing the hypothesis, the following
results were extracted:
1. It was found that there is a positive relationship between all the
independent variables and dependent variable.
2. All the respondents of the Jordanian commercial banks agree that there
is a very close relationship between loans portfolio and the economic
situation cycle. During recessions the problem of loans portfolio
increase as a result of firms' and households, financial distress. When
the economy grows strongly, the income of non-financial firms and
household expands and they can repay loans easily.
3. A rapid credit expansion is deemed one of the most important causes
of loan portfolio problem. During economic expansions many
Jordanian banks are engaged in fierce competition for market share in
loans, resulting in strong credit growth rates. The easiest way to gain
market share is to lend to borrowers of lower credit quality. This
market share strategy is even more dangerous for the Jordanian
commercial banks.
4. Loan portfolio composition plays and important role as an indicator of
bank risk profile.
5. Inefficient Jordanian commercial banks performing poor screening
and monitoring of borrowers will have lower portfolio quality.
6. The overall competitive environment where the Jordanian commercial
banks operate could also affect the level of credit risk.
7. It was found that entry by foreign banks into the world of the
Jordanian commercial banks increases both competition and sector
stability, factors that should benefit all borrowers. As well as these
banks reduce both the profitability and expenses of domestic banks.
8. In order to avoid loan default most Jordanian commercial banks ask
borrowers to pledge collaterals.
9. It was found borrowers who have longer relationship with banks will
get lower lending rates.
10.Lenders of the commercial banks of Jordan initially charge borrowers
an above-market interest rate and require collateral, but after the
borrowers have succeeded their projects they advance loans to them,
without collateral requirement at a lower interest rate.
2009
7. Recommendations
The researcher mainly recommends the following in order to enable
the bankers in the commercial banking sector of Jordan to seriously apply
them in their banks:
1. Jordanian commercial banks need to improve their loans portfolio by
increasing the production of good output and reducing bad outputs.
2. Monitoring and liquidity creation emphasize the role of Jordanian
commercial banks in the evaluation of borrowers credit worthiness and
hence in the resource allocation process.
3. Jordanian bankers need to bear in mind that excessive credit risk could
impair the efficient allocation of capital. But bad credit may also
impair the performance of banking institutions.
4. It is worth to emphasize that quality of credit, together with its
availability and costly, is important for both resource allocation and
growth. Poor credit quality, often seen as a signal of excessive credit
risk, may cause greater volatility in total credit with possible backward
linkages to the banking system in Jordan.
5. Many credit risk mistakes are made during the expansionary phase of
the economic cycle. Therefore, it is necessary to improve bank
manager's awareness of credit risk.
2009
2009
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26
27
28
29
30
3.6667
4.3810
2.5833
3.0952
4.0476
3.9524
3.5714
3.8214
3.7619
3.8929
3.8571
3.1429
3.0238
4.1667
3.4167
4.5714
3.4643
0.99799
0.79007
0.82445
1.07119
1.22134
1.00486
1.00942
1.05466
1.05988
1.00622
1.13161
1.08819
1.27039
1.06232
1.28202
0.78057
0.85653
It was found that, there are negative attitudes toward q (8, 13, 16),
meanwhile there are positive attitudes toward the rest question because
their means are greater than the mean of the scale.
Hypothesis (1):
Table (3)
Test of hypothesis (3)
t calculate
t tabulated
t Sig
Result of Ho
22.449
t calculate
8.607
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (2):
Table (4)
Test of hypothesis (4)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (3):
Table (5)
reject
Result of Ho
reject
2009
t calculate
18.995
t calculate
2.861
t calculate
5.95
t calculate
2.848
t calculate
11.78
t calculate
15.167
Test of hypothesis (5)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (4):
Table (6)
Test of hypothesis (4)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (5):
Table (7)
Test of hypothesis (5)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (6):
Table (8)
Test of hypothesis (6)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (7):
Table (9)
Test of hypothesis (7)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (8):
Table (10)
Test of hypothesis (8)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Result of Ho
reject
Result of Ho
reject
Result of Ho
reject
Result of Ho
reject
Result of Ho
reject
Result of Ho
reject
2009
t calculate
13.238
t calculate
9.65
Hypothesis (9):
Table (11)
Test of hypothesis (9)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Hypothesis (10):
Table (12)
Test of hypothesis (10)
t tabulated
t Sig
1.989
0.000
Result of Ho
reject
Result of Ho
reject
2009
DESCRIPTIVE
VARIES= q1 q2 q4 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 q10 q 11 q 12 q13 q14 q15 q16 q17
q18 q19 q20 q21 q22 q23 q24 q25 q26 q27 q29 q30
STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX
Descriptive
Descriptive Statistics
N Maximum
Maximum
Mean
Std.
Deviation
q1
84
1.00
5.00
3.2381
1.27647
q2
84
.002
5.00
4.1071
.93161
q3
84
1.00
5.00
4.1190
1.31172
q4
84
1.00
5.00
4.1548
.99993
q5
84
1.00
5.00
3.9524
1.17098
q6
84
1.00
5.00
3.4881
1.56385
q7
84
1.00
5.00
4.1429
.88007
q8
84
1.00
5.00
2.8690
1.29670
q9
84
1.00
5.00
3.0476
1.22134
q 10
84
2.00
5.00
4.1190
.94938
q 11
84
1.00
5.00
4.0952
1.07119
q 12
84
1.00
5.00
4.952
1.10442
q 13
84
2.00
5.00
2.8214
.98373
q 14
84
2.00
5.00
3.6667
.99799
q 15
84
1.00
5.00
4.3810
.79007
q 16
84
1.00
5.00
2.5833
.82445
q 17
84
1.00
5.00
3.0952
1.07119
q 18
84
2.00
5.00
4.0476
1.22134
q 19
84
2.00
5.00
3.0952
1.00486
q 20
84
2.00
5.00
3.5714
1.00942
q 21
84
2.00
5.00
3.8214
1.05644
q 22
84
2.00
5.00
3.7619
1.05988
q 23
84
2.00
5.00
3.8929
1.00622
q 24
84
1.00
5.00
3.8571
1.13161
q 25
84
2.00
5.00
3.1429
1.08819
q 26
84
1.00
5.00
3.0238
1.27039
q 27
84
2.00
5.00
4.0667
1.06232
q 28
84
1.00
5.00
3.4167
1.28202
q 29
84
2.00
5.00
4.5714
.78057
2009
q 30
84
Valid N 84
(leastwise)
2.00
5.00
3.4643
.85635
RELIABILITY
Naples= q1 q2 q4 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 q10 q 11 q 12 q13 q14 q15 q16 q17
q18 q19 q20 q21 q22 q23 q24 q25 q26 q27 q29 q30
/SCALE (ALL VARIABLES) ALL/MODEL=ALPHA
Reliability
(Data Set 10) C:\Ptogtam Files\SPSS\
Scale: ALL Variables
Case Processing Summary
N
%
Case Valid
84
100.0
Excluded*
0
.0
Total
84
100.0
Cronbach's Alpha
.817
Liquidity
Economic
Profit
Interest
Collaterals
Domestic
Competition
Foreign
Risk
Relation
Reliability Batistes
N of Items
30
T-Test
(Data Ste 10) C:\Program Flies/SPSS\
One-Sample Statistics
N
Mean
Std.
Std. Error Mean
Deviation
84
3.6607
.70352
.07676
84
3.8036
.38773
.04230
84
3.4881
1.56385
.17063
84
3.3244
.49967
.05452
84
3.2143
.68965
.07525
84
4.0357
.80580
0.8792
84
3.8274
.49996
.05455
84
3.8095
.56047
.06115
84
3.6230
.59173
.06456
2009
One-Sample Statistics
Test Value-3
t
Liquating
Economic
Profit
Interest
Collaterals
Competition
Foreign
Risk
relation
8.607
18.995
2.861
5.959
2.848
11.780
15.176
13.238
9.650
df
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
Sig.
(2tailed
.000
.000
.005
.000
.006
.000
.000
.000
.000
Mean
Difference
.66071
.80357
.48810
.32440
.21429
1.03571
.82738
.80952
.62302
95% Confidence
Inertial of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
.5080
.7194
.1487
.2160
.0646
.8608
.7189
.6879
.4946
.8134
.8877
.8275
.4328
.3639
1.2106
.9359
.9312
.7514
2009
References
2009
2009