Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interpretations of the
International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from
Ships, 1973 as modified by the
Protocol of 1978 relating thereto
and its Annexes
CONTENTS
MPC 1
1988
MPC 2
1988
1988
MPC 4
1988
MPC 5
1990
MPC 6
1997
MPC 7
MPC 8
MPC 9
June 2002
MPC 11
MPC 12
MPC 13
MPC 14
July 2004
MPC 15
July 2004
MPC 16
July 2004
MPC 3
MPC 10
Page 1
MPC 17
July 2004
MPC 18
MPC 19
July 2004
MPC 20
July 2004
MPC 21
MPC 22
July 2004
MPC 23
July 2004
MPC 24
July 2004
MPC 25
July 2004
MPC 26
July 2004
MPC 27
July 2004
MPC 28
MPC 29
MPC 30
MPC 31
MPC 32
Page 2
July 2004
MPC 33
MPC 34
MPC 35
MPC 36
MPC 37
MPC 38
MPC 39
MPC 40
MPC 41
MPC 42
MPC 43
Page 3
MPC 44
MPC 45
MPC 46
MPC 47
MPC 48
MPC 49
MPC 50
MPC 51
MPC 52
MPC 53
MPC 54
Page 4
MPC 55
MPC 56
MPC57
MPC 58
MPC 59
MPC 60
MPC 61
MPC 62
MPC 63
MPC 64
Page 5
MPC 65
MPC 66
MPC 67
MPC 68
MPC 69
MPC 70
MPC 71
MPC 72
MPC 73
MPC 74
MPC 75
Page 6
MPC 76
MPC 77
MPC 78
MPC 79
MPC 80
MPC 81
MPC 82
Sept 2005
MPC 83
Sept 2005
MPC 84
Nov 2005
MPC 85
Jan 2007
Feb 2007
MPC 86
MPC 87
MPC 88
Page 7
MPC 90
Sept 2007
MPC 91
Sept 2007
MPC 92
Oct 2007
July 2008
July 2008
MPC 95
Measurement of Distances
Aug 2008
MPC 96
MPC 97
July 2010
MPC 93
MPC 94
MPC 98
MPC 99
Dec 2011
June 2012
MPC 100
MPC 101
MPC 102
Page 8
July 2012
MPC 103
MPC 104
Jan 2013
Mar 2013
Page 9
MPC1 - MPC2
MPC1
Periodical surveys of oil content meters
(1988)
(Annex I, Regulation 15(3))
A periodical survey of an oil discharge monitoring and control system would include a functional test as
described in Resolution MEPC 13(19) but not a test with oil to verify the continuing accuracy of the oil
content meter.
MPC2
Operational manuals for oil discharge
(1988)
monitoring and control systems
(Annex I, Regulation 15(3) (c))
For compliance with Regulation 15(3) (a) and (c) of MARPOL 73/78 - Annex I and IMO Resolutions
A 496 (XII) and MEPC 13 (19), the Oil Discharge Monitoring and Control System Operational Manual
is to contain all the details necessary to operate and maintain the system and should include at least the
following information. The information may be grouped as indicated, or in an equivalent manner.
Introduction : Particulars of the ship, together with the date on which the system was/is to be installed
and index to remainder of manual.
Text of Regulations 15(3) (a) and 9(1) to be quoted in full.
Section 1
: Manufacturer's equipment manuals for major components of the system. These may
include installation, commissioning, operating and fault finding procedures for the oil
content monitor.
Section 2
Section 3
: Technical manual comprising fault finding schedules, maintenance record and electrical,
pneumatic and hydraulic schematic diagrams and descriptions of the complete system.
Reference may be made to Section 1, where applicable.
Section 4
: Test and check-out procedures to include a functional test at installation and guidance
notes for the Surveyors carrying out initial and in-service surveys.
Reference may be made to Section 1, where applicable.
Appendix II : Copy of Type Approval Certificate and Workshop Certificates for major components.
MPC3 - MPC4
MPC3
Machinery space oil discharge monitoring
(1988)
and control systems
(Annex I, Regulation 16(5))
As neither Regulation 16(5) nor Resolution A444(XI) specifically require it, a Classification Society
cannot insist on automatic recording of date and time in an oil discharge monitoring and control system
provided for 100 ppm oily water separating equipment.
MPC4
Discharge of segregated ballast
(1988)
(Annex I, Regulation 18(6))
For new construction ships, an overboard discharge outlet for segregated ballast should be provided
above the deepest ballast waterline in order to facilitate compliance with Regulation 18(6).
For other ships (without this facility), the Regulation requires that the surface of the ballast water be
examined immediately before discharge, to ensure that no contamination with oil has taken place.
Further guidance from the Committee on how this should be done would be appreciated, particularly in
the case of double bottom tanks. One solution could be the provision of a sampling line to the oil
content meter or an arrangement similar to a part flow system.
MPC5
Minimum vertical depth of each double
(1990)
bottom tank or space
(Annex I, Regulation 13E (4) (b))
For the purpose of determining the minimum vertical depth of each double bottom tank or space to be
taken into account when calculating the protecting area PAg, suction wells may be neglected, provided
such wells are not excessive in area and extend below the cargo tank for a minimum distance and in no
case more than half the height of the double bottom tank or space.
MPC6
MPC6
Calculation of the aggregate capacity of
(1997)
SBT
(Regulation 13F (3) (d) 4.12
In calculating the aggregate capacity under regulation 13F (3) (d), the following should be taken into
account:
.1
the capacity of engine-room ballast tanks should be excluded from the aggregate capacity of
ballast tanks;
.2
the capacity of ballast tank located inboard of double hull should be excluded from the aggregate
capacity of ballast tanks (see figure 1).
A
SBT
SBT
APT
E/R
SBT
SBT
SBT
SBT
FPT
P/R
SBT
SBT
SBT
SBT
SBT
SBT
SBT
COT
COT
SBT
Assumed double hull line
SECTION A-A
Fig. 1
Note: This IACS Unified Interpretation was submitted to IMO and is contained in MEPC/Circ. 316 of
25th July 1996.
MPC6
MPC6
(1997)
.3
spaces such as void spaces located in the double hull within the cargo tank length should be
included in the aggregate capacity of ballast tanks (see figure 2).
VOID SPACES
SBT
SBT*
SBT*
APT
E/R
FPT
P/R
SBT*
SBT
SBT*
VOID SPACES
VOID SPACES
SBT*
COT
SBT*
VOID SPACES
SECTION B-B
Fig. 2
MPC7
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC 8
MPC8
Interpretation of installed on board
(Oct.1999)
(MARPOL 73/78, Annex VI/16(2)(a))
Deleted in Oct 2005
MPC 9
MPC9
Interpretation of Width of Wing Tanks and
(June 2002)
Height of Double Bottom Tanks at Turn of the
Bilge Area
(MARPOL 73/78, Annex I/13 F (3)(c))
The requirements of Reg. 13F(3)(c) at turn of the bilge areas are applicable throughout the
entire tank length.
Note: 1. This UI MPC 9 is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Members and Associates from
1 January 2003.
MPC 9-1
MPC 10
SC183
(Nov 2003)
(Rev.1, Nov.
2005)
LL67
(Nov 2003)
(Rev.1, Nov.
2005)
(Rev.1, Nov.
2005)
Interpretation
For application of the above resolutions, the following IACS Unified
Interpretation applies:
The Completion date of the survey on which this certificate is based, is the date of
the last initial/renewal survey visit on which all statutory and class items, required to
be surveyed, have been surveyed (regardless if they were found satisfactory or with
minor deficiency).
Note:
1.
2.
MPC10-1
MPC10
(Nov 2003)
MPC11
MPC
MPC
11
11
(May
(cont)
2004)
(Rev.1
Nov
2012)
In port, the initial metacentric height GMo, corrected for the free surface measured at 0
heel, shall be not less than 0.15 m;
.2
* f is the angle of heel at which openings in the hull superstructures or deckhouses which
cannot be closed weathertight immerse. In applying this criterion, small openings through
which progressive flooding cannot take place need not be considered as open.
Note:
1. This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Members and Associates from 1 April
2005.
2. The damage stability requirements in MARPOL I/28 shall not apply for the purpose of
demonstrating compliance with MARPOL Reg. I/27.
3. Rev.1 of this UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1 July 2013.
Page 1 of 3
MPC11
MPC
11
(cont)
2
The requirements of paragraph 1 of this regulation shall be met through design
measures. For combination carriers simple supplementary operational procedures may be
allowed.
3
Simple supplementary operational procedures for liquid transfer operations referred to
in paragraph 2 of this regulation shall mean written procedures made available to the master
which:
.1
.2
indicate those cargo and ballast tanks which may, under any specific condition of
liquid transfer and possible range of cargo densities, be slack and still allow the
stability criteria to be met. The slack tanks may vary during the liquid transfer
operations and be of any combination provided they satisfy the criteria;
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
are prominently displayed in the approved trim and stability booklet and at the
cargo/ballast transfer control station and in any computer software by which
stability calculations are performed.
Interpretation
For proving compliance with Reg. I/27, either paragraph 1 or 2, below, shall be applied.
1. The vessel shall be loaded with all cargo tanks filled to a level corresponding to the
maximum combined total of vertical moment of volume plus free surface inertia moment at 0
heel, for each individual tank. Cargo density shall correspond to the available cargo
deadweight at the displacement at which transverse KM reaches a minimum value, assuming
full departure consumables and 1% of the total water ballast capacity. The maximum free
surface moment shall be assumed in all ballast conditions. For the purpose of calculating
GMo, liquid free surface corrections shall be based on the appropriate upright free surface
inertia moment. The righting lever curve may be corrected on the basis of liquid transfer
moments.
2. An extensive analysis covering all possible combinations of cargo and ballast tank loading
is to be carried out. For such extensive analysis conditions it is considered that:
(a)
Weight, centre of gravity co-ordinates and free surface moment for all tanks are to
be according to the actual content considered in the calculations.
(b)
The extensive calculations are to be carried out in accordance with the following:
Page 2 of 3
MPC11
MPC
11
1.
The draughts are to be varied between light ballast and scantling draught.
2.
Consumables including but not restricted to fuel oil, diesel oil and fresh
water corresponding to 97%, 50% and 10% content are to be considered.
3.
4.
Cargo densities between the lowest and highest intended to be carried are
to be considered.
5.
Sufficient steps between all limits are to be examined to ensure that the
worst conditions are identified. A minimum of 20 steps for the range of
cargo and ballast content, between 1% and 99% of total capacity, are to be
examined. More closely spaced steps near critical parts of the range may
be necessary.
(cont)
At every stage the criteria described in MARPOL Reg. I/27 paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 are to be
met.
End of
Document
Page 3 of 3
MPC 12
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation the term all ships shall be interpreted as applicable to all
ships (as defined by MARPOL 73 Article 2 (4)).
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
12-1
MPC 13
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation the term new installations shall be interpreted as follows:
(a)
For new ships, installations on board ships the keels of which are laid or which are at a
similar stage of construction on or after 19 May 2005.
(b)
For existing ships, new installations with a contractual delivery date to the ship on or
after the entry into force date or, in the absence of a contractual delivery date, the actual
delivery of the equipment to the ship on or after 19 May 2005.
The same interpretation shall apply with regard to new HCFC installations but with the
substitution of 1 January 2020 in place of the 19 May 2005.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
13-1
MPC 14
Interpretation:
It shall be interpreted that all marine diesel engines over 130 kW except those exempted by
Regulation 13 and Regulation 19 are to comply with the Regulation 13 limit regardless of the
gross tonnage of the ship onto which the engine is installed. In this context such engines must
have an approved Technical File and must be issued with an EIAPP certificate in accordance
with the NOx Technical Code in all cases.
However the application of the ship surveys as given in Regulation 5 to ships under 400 GT
would be at the discretion of the relevant Administration.
Note:
14-1
MPC 15
Note:
15-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 16
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation it shall be interpreted that the term installed relates to an
engine that is permanently secured or connected to the ships structure, fuel / coolant / exhaust
systems or power systems.
Note:
16-1
MPC 17
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation the date of commencement of the major conversion shall be
that detailed in the contract for conversion or, in the absence of a contractual commencement
date, the actual date the engine was made unavailable for normal operational service according
to the ships log.
Note:
17-1
MPC 18
Interpretation:
Regulation 13 does not apply to an engine which is used solely in response to emergencies on
the ship on which the engine is installed.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
18-1
Note:
MPC 19
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation the term on a ship which undergoes a major conversion,
shall be interpreted as an error inserting the concept of ship in place of engine, ship
conversion is not given elsewhere within the Annex. In order to be consistent with regulation
13 (1) (a) (i) & (ii) this shall be read as or engine which undergoes a major conversion.
Note:
19-1
MPC 20
Interpretation:
This section shall be interpreted as follows:
(a)
For application of this regulation the term replaced shall be interpreted as being
applicable to an engine installed either as a direct replacement for an existing engine or
one installed as an addition to the original engine complement as at 1 January 2000 to
meet revised ship requirements; and,
(b)
For application of this regulation the term new shall be interpreted as applying to
engines that left the manufacturers works for the first time on or after 1 January 2000.
20-1
Note:
MPC 21
Note:
21-1
MPC 22
(ii)
45.0 x n(-0.2) g/kWh when n is 130 or more but less than 2000 rpm
(iii)
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation it shall be interpreted that the limit and determined NOx
values, in g/kWh for the appropriate application cycle, are to be given and compared to a
precision of one decimal place.
Note:
(July 2004)
22-1
MPC 23
an exhaust gas cleaning system, approved by the Administration in accordance with the
NOx Technical Code, is applied to the engine to reduce onboard NOx emissions at least
to the limits specified in sub-paragraph (a), or
(ii)
any other equivalent method, approved by the Administration taking into account
relevant guidelines to be developed by the Organization, is applied to reduce onboard
NOx emissions at least to the limit specified in sub-paragraph (a) of this paragraph.
Interpretation:
For application of this sub part (i) of this regulation it shall be interpreted that approval in
accordance with the NOx Technical Code be on the basis of the complete assembly of engine
and NOx reduction device. Consequently item 1.15 of the Supplement to EIAPP Certificate
shall give the actual NOx emission value (g/kWh) for the engine with the NOx reduction device
in operation.
Note:
(July 2004)
23-1
MPC 24
Note:
24-1
MPC 25
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation the term installed on board a ship on or after 1 January 2000
shall be interpreted as follows:
(a)
For new ships, installations on board ships the keels of which are laid or which are at a
similar stage of construction on or after 1 January 2000.
(b)
For existing ships, new installations with a contractual delivery date to the ship on or
after 1 January 2000 or, in the absence of a contractual delivery date, the actual delivery
of the equipment to the ship on or after 1 January 2000.
Note:
(July 2004)
25-1
MPC 26
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation it shall be interpreted as applicable to incinerators meeting
either MEPC 59(33) or MEPC 76(40) specifications.
Note:
(July 2004)
26-1
MPC 27
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation it shall be interpreted that possession of an operating manual
is applicable only to MEPC 76(40) incinerators installed on or after 1 January 2000.
Note:
27-1
MPC 28
Note:
28-1
MPC 29
Interpretation:
For application of this regulation it shall be interpreted as applicable to all ships of 400 gross
tonnage or above and, at the Administrations discretion, for ships of less than 400 gross
tonnage.
Note:
29-1
MPC 30
Term
Dimension
pa
kPa
pB
kPa
ps
kPa
Ra
Ta
Interpretation:
For application of the term ps it shall be interpreted that the dry atmospheric pressure is
determined in accordance with the following formula:
pS = pB
Ra pa
100
It shall also be interpreted that the pa term be determined using a temperature value for the
intake air measured at the same physical location as the measurements for pB and Ra.
Interpretation:
For application of the term Ta it shall be interpreted that the temperature of the intake air
temperature is that determined at the engine / turbocharger intake suction filter.
30-1
Note:
MPC 31
Interpretation:
For application of this section the term installed shall be interpreted as per IACS UI MPC
Nos. 14, 16, 17 & 18.
Note:
31-1
MPC 32
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that an increase in emission
characteristics relates to an increase in the application average cycle weighted NOx emission
value.
Furthermore it shall also be interpreted that any modification made on or after 1 January 2000
to such an engine involving alternative duty cycle, rating, components or settings that were
available, but not necessarily utilised, prior to 1 January 2000 shall not be considered as
representing a substantial modification to that engine.
Note:
32-1
MPC 33
Interpretation:
For engines undergoing an on-board certification test, to be issued with an EIAPP Certificate,
the same procedure apply as if the engine had been pre-certified on a test-bed:
(a)
(b)
the on-board test fully meets all of the requirements of a test-bed procedure as specified
in chapter 5 of the NOx Technical Code; and
(c)
the application average weighted NOx emission value meets the requirements of
Regulation 13 of Annex VI;and
(d)
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
33-1
Mar 2006)
MPC 34
An engine does not need to be shown, at the pre-certification survey, to fail to meet the
Regulation 13 NOx emission limit requirements before a NOx reducing device is
installed. Where it is intended from the outset that a NOx reducing device is to be fitted
in accordance with Regulation 13(3)(b)(i) then the whole assembly shall be tested in
accordance with the requirements of the test bed procedure as specified in Chapter 5.
In those cases where it is proposed that the engine with a NOx-reducing device is to be
tested onboard to demonstrate compliance, as a Parent Engine + device the
requirements of 2.2.4 shall apply.
(b)
(c)
In cases (a) and (b) the approval is on the basis of the complete assembly of engine and
NOx reduction device. Consequently Item 1.15 of the Supplement to EIAPP Certificate
shall give the actual NOx emission value (g/kWh) for the engine with the NOx reduction
device in operation.
(d)
Note:
34-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 35
Interpretation:
The text in chapter 2 gives the certification procedures which shall be followed. Where
discepancies exists with figure 1, the text of chapter 2 takes precedence.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
Mar 2006)
35-1
MPC 36
(b)
(c)
36-1
Note:
MPC 37
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that any system or procedure utilised to
monitor engine NOx emissions by the direct measurement method shall meet the requirements
of MEPC Resolution 103(49) Guidelines for On-board NOx Verification Procedure Direct
Measurement and Monitoring Method.
Note:
37-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 38
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that sufficient data shall be collected by the
direct measurement method to enable the weighted average NOx emissions to be determined in
accordance with MEPC Resolution 103(49) Guidelines for On-board NO x Verification
Procedure Direct Measurement and Monitoring Method.
Note:
38-1
MPC 39
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the term engine manufacturer is the
entity which applied for the engine certification.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
39-1
(Rev.1
Mar 2006)
MPC 40
Interpretation:
This section shall be interpreted as follows:
(a)
Verification by the direct on-board NOx monitoring method is only applicable to the reissue of IAPP Certificates at periodical surveys or their endorsement at intermediate /
annual surveys.
(b)
Note:
40-1
MPC 41
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that a physical verification must be
completed prior to the issue or endorsement of an IAPP Certificate. This verification may be
completed on a spare part representative of the working component (at the Administrations
discretion) but such a component must be suitably defined in the Technical File on-board NOx
verification procedures.
41-1
Note:
MPC 42
Interpretation:
This section shall be interpreted as follows:
The text in chapter 2 gives the certification procedures which shall be followed. Where
discrepancies exists with figure 2 and 3, the text of chapter 2 takes precedence.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
42-1
MPC 43
Interpretation:
This section shall be interpreted as follows:
Where a NO x reducing device or system is fitted in order to achieve compliance with
regulation 13 (in accordance with paragraph 2.2.5), these shall be identified in the Technical
File.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
43-1
MPC 44
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that:
(a)
The copy of the test report to be included in the Technical File of every engine shall
provide, as a minimum, the data necessary to verify the relevant Parent Engines actual
NOx emission value as detailed under item 1.15 of the EIAPP Certificate; and,
(b)
In those cases where the Engine Group / Engine Family is certified for more than one
application cycle the Technical File is to include, as a minimum, the Parent Engine Test
report(s) for those duty cycles for which the particular engine is certified as given on
the engines EIAPP Certificate and detailed under items 1.9, 1.14 and 1.15 of the
Supplement to the EIAPP Certificate.
Note:
MPC 45
Interpretation:
For application of this section the term according to those specifications shall be interpreted
as follows:
(a)
(b)
The specification need only address those aspects of the design of the component
which directly affect its function as a NOx critical component. For some components it
may be possible to define these components by means of an outline dimensioned drawing
within the conformity of production procedures or as a drawing directly included within
the Technical File.
Note:
45-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 46
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that, prior to the issuance of an IAPP
Certificate, compliance after installation can only be verified by using an on-board NOx
verification procedure approved by the Administration for that particular engine.
Note:
46-1
MPC 47
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the on-board NOx verification
procedures have been approved by the Administration taking into account MEPC Resolution
103(49) the Guidelines for On-board NOx Verification Procedure Direct Measurement and
Monitoring Method.
Note:
MPC 48
a definition of continuous NOx monitoring, taking into account both steady-state and
transitional operations of the engine;
.2
.3
a specification for the equipment to ensure that its reliability is maintained during
service;
.4
.5
a specification for the testing of the equipment to demonstrate that it has a suitable
accuracy, repeatability and cross sensitivity compared with the applicable sections of this
Code; and
.6
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that MEPC Resolution 103(49) Guidelines
for On-board NOx Verification Procedure Direct Measurement and Monitoring Method
defines the guidelines as developed by the Organization.
Note:
48-1
MPC 49
Note:
49-1
MPC 50
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted (in accordance with the Unified
Interpretation of Regulation 13 (3) (a)) that the limit and determined NOx values in g/kWh
stated on the EIAPP Certificate shall be given to the first decimal place.
Furthermore (in accordance with the Unified Interpretation of Chapter 2.2.9) it is the relevant
application cycle(s) Parent Engine value(s) which must be stated on the engines EIAPP
Certificate.
Note:
50-1
MPC 51
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that:
(a)
One of the test cycles specified in Chapters 3.2.2 to 3.2.6, applicable to the application,
shall be applied.
(b)
Where more than one test cycle is to be applied the average cycle weighted NOx
emission value (in g/kWh) for each cycle is to be stated on the EIAPP Certificate 1.15,
together with the corresponding limit value, 1.14.
(c)
A Parent Engine test for a particular duty cycle is to follow the appropriate test cycle. A
Parent Engine emission value shall not be constructed by, for example, adding data
from one test to emission values taken from another test.
(d)
In those instances where a constant speed engine as installed can be used either solely for
main propulsion or auxiliary purposes, then that engine should be certified to both the E2
and D2 cycles.
(e)
51-1
Note:
MPC 52
Speed
100%
100%
100%
100%
Power
100%
75%
50%
25%
0.2
0.5
0.15
0.15
Weighting
factor
Interpretation:
For application of the term variable-pitch propeller sets it shall be interpreted that the E2
cycle is applicable to any propulsion engine coupled to a variable pitch propeller, irrespective
of whether the system operates at constant speed or variable speeds.
Note:
52-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 53
Approval for serially manufactured engines: engine family and engine group
concepts
Chapter 4.1
General
53-1
Note:
MPC 54
Interpretation:
For application of these sections it shall be interpreted that where the measured performance of
a Member Engine to an Engine Family or Engine Group is fundamental to the verification that
that member engine is operating within the parameters defined by the approved engine family
or group, then that performance data (emissions, engine performance, ambient conditions) and
other necessary data shall have been obtained in accordance with NOx Technical Code Chapter
5.
Note:
54-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 55
The connection between the NOx critical component part / ID numbers as proposed for
the Engine Family or Engine Group and the drawing numbers (and revision status if
applicable) defining those components.
(b)
The means by which the Administration will be able, at the time of a survey, to verify
that the drawings used for the production of the NOx critical components correspond to
the drawings established as defining the Engine Family or Engine Group.
(c)
(d)
The implemented procedures that ensure any NOx critical component spare parts
supplied to a certified engine will be identified as given in the approved Technical File
and hence will be produced in accordance with the drawings as defining the Engine
Family or Engine Group.
Note:
It would also be interpreted that all items (a) (d) are applicable to Engine Family, Engine
Group and single engines.
MPC 56
Interpretation:
For application of these sections it shall be interpreted that where a Parent Engine (e.g. large
bore 2-stroke engine) cannot be adjusted (e.g. maximum pressure, compression pressure,
exhaust back pressure, charge air temperature) to the defined reference or maximum tolerance
conditions at the test bed the measured NOx emission values shall be corrected to the defined
reference and maximum tolerance conditions on the basis of sensitivity tests. This correction
shall be approved by the Administration. The resulting corrected average weighted NOx
emission value is to be stated under 1.15 of the EIAPP Certificate.
Note:
MPC 57
Chapter 4.3.9
.2
Interpretation:
For application of this section the term main selection criteria shall be interpreted as a
possible selection criterion if no knowledge about the emission behavior of an Engine Family
or Engine Group is available. In all cases the final selection criteria for the Parent Engine is the
highest resulting average weighted NOx emission, at the applicable test cycle, according to
section 4.3.9.1.
Note:
57-1
MPC 58
Interpretation:
In 4.3.10.2 the word entire shall be read as engine.
For application of these sections it shall be interpreted that the determined Parent Engine NOx
emission value shall be given under 1.15 of the Supplement to EIAPP Certificate for Parent
Engine(s) and all subsequent Member Engines within the Engine Family or Engine Group as
established from that Parent Engine test.
Note:
MPC 59
.2
method and design features of pressure charging and exhaust gas system;
- constant pressure
- pulsating system
.3
.4
.5
design features of the fuel injection system, plunger and injection cam which may profile
basic characteristics that effect NOx emission; and
.6
maximum rated power per cylinder at maximum rated speed. The permitted range of
derating within the engine group shall be declared by the manufacturer and approved by
the Administration.
Interpretation:
For application of these sections it shall be interpreted that rated power per cylinder at rated
speed is one parameter. Derating and uprating, in terms of power per cylinder and rated speed,
outside the approved power or speed ranges shall be interpreted as deviations according to
chapter 4.4.5.3.
Note:
59-1
MPC 60
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the 25OC seawater temperature defines
an ambient reference value for which compliance with the NOx emission limits as defined by
regulation 13 (3) must be demonstrated (tested or calculated with TSC Ref specified by the
manufacturer).
The application of this reference primary coolant value shall be considered in accordance with
the charge air cooling arrangement applicable to the individual installation as follows:
(a)
Direct seawater cooling to engine charge air coolers. Compliance with the NOx limits
shall be demonstrated (or otherwise justified) with a charge air / scavenge air cooler
coolant inlet temperature of 25OC.
(b)
Intermediate freshwater cooling to engine charge air coolers. Compliance with the NOx
limits shall be demonstrated (or otherwise justified) with the charge air / scavenge air
cooling system operating with the highest allowable in service coolant inlet temperature
regime comparable with an ambient seawater temperature of 25OC.
Demonstration of compliance at a Parent Engine test for a direct seawater cooled system,
as given by (a) above, does not demonstrate compliance in accordance with the higher
charge air temperature regime inherent with an intermediate freshwater cooling
arrangement as given under (b).
(c)
For those installations incorporating no seawater cooling, either direct or indirect, to the
charge air coolers e.g. radiator cooled freshwater systems, air / air charge air coolers,
then it shall be interpreted that compliance with the NOx limits must be demonstrated
with the engine and charge air cooling systems operating as intended for installation on
board.
Note:
60-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 61
Interpretation:
Where test bed installation prevents adjustment to the exhaust backpressure limit the effect
upon the NOx emissions shall be stated and justified by the manufacturer.
Note:
61-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 62
Note:
Mar 2006)
62-1
IACS Int. 2004/Rev.1 2006
MPC 63
Interpretation:
For calculation of the exhaust gas mass flow in accordance with Method 2, universal,
carbon/oxygen-balance detailed under appendix 6 the CW (soot) term shall be taken as
zero.
Note:
63-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 64
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the measuring instruments as detailed
under Appendix 4 is not to be considered a definitive listing. Where additional measuring
instruments are required in order to define an engines NOx emission performance, for example
the measurement of peak cylinder or charge air pressures, then those measuring instruments
shall also be calibrated. As given by 1.3.1 of Appendix 4 the recognised standards may be
national or international.
Note:
64-1
MPC 65
General
Interpretation:
Application of the term upper limits shall be interpreted as follows:
(a)
(b)
Note:
65-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 66
Interpretation:
For application of 5.9.2.1.3 the term equivalent shall be interpreted as referring to the use of
CLD analysers for the dry basis measurement of nitrogen oxides.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
66-1
IACS Int. 2004/Rev.1 2006
MPC 67
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that under Appendix 3 Chapter 3
Analysers, in accordance with 5.9.2.1, the measurement of hydrocarbons (HC), in terms of
ppmC1, must be undertaken using an analyser of the Heated Flame Ionisation (HFID) type. Gas
shall be sampled, and maintained, at a temperature of 463 K (190oC)+10 K. The calibration,
span check and other requirements of Appendix 4 shall also apply to the HC analyser for which
a suitable hydrocarbon (for example, CH4 or C3H8 in air) calibration and span check gas is to
be used.
Note:
67-1
IACS Int. 2004
MPC 68
Interpretation:
Recognising that successful measurement of gaseous HC requires an exhaust gas temperature
of at least 190 oC, the 70 oC requirement shall be interpreted as a minimum exhaust gas
temperature requirement at the NOx sampling probe where that differs from the HC sampling
probe. In the latter case a minimum temperature of 463 K (190oC) at the probe is required.
With regard to the HC sampling system, a heated filter and sampling line shall be provided
between the sampling probe and the HC analyser. The filter shall extract any solid particles
from the gas sample before the analyser and be changed as necessary. The temperature of the
heated filter and the wall temperature of the heated line shall be 463 K (190oC) 10 K.
Note:
68-1
MPC 69
Interpretation:
In the case of multiple turbocharger arrangements it shall be interpreted that where it is not
possible to sample the exhaust gas from a position after where the individual turbocharger
tailpipes have combined into a single duct then the exhaust gas must be sampled downstream of
each turbocharger and analysed. The individual measurement readings shall be averaged as
necessary to provide the emission concentrations which are representative of the emissions
from all cylinders.
Note:
MPC 70
Interpretation:
For application of the term test sequence it shall be interpreted that the test cycle may be run
from full power to low power, in accordance with the test cycles defined by 3.2, or from low to
full power. In both instances sufficient time shall be given at each mode point for the engine
performance (as indicated by the gaseous emission and engine performance readings) to
stabilise.
Note:
70-1
MPC 71
Interpretation:
For application of the term within 2% of the maximum torque it shall be interpreted that in
order to be consistent between the constant (D2 and E2) and the variable speed (C1 and E3) test
cycles the specific torque at each load shall be held within 2% of the maximum (rated) torque at
the engines rated speed.
Note:
MPC 72
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the response must be of sufficient
accuracy and resolution to enable verification of the zero and span response of the analysers in
accordance with 5.9.9.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
72-1
MPC 73
Test Run
Interpretation:
For application of this section the following interpretations shall be applied:
(a)
The term the calibration of the analysers shall be re-checked, shall be interpreted as the
the zero and span response of the analysers shall be re-checked.
(b)
The term if the difference between the two calibration results is less than 2% shall be
interpreted as if the difference between the two check results is less than 2% where the
2% is understood to be 2% of the span gas (and not analyser full scale) value, i.e.:
Maximum permitted difference in span or zero check readings (ppm or % as
appropriate):
= 0.02 Initial span check reading
73-1
Note:
MPC 74
Interpretation:
For application of this section the term as a minimum shall be interpreted as incorporating the
necessary data to fully define the engine performance and enable calculation of the gaseous
emissions, in accordance with 5.12, from the raw data units to the cycle weighed NOx emission
value in g/kWh. The data set given under Appendix 5 should not be considered definitive and
any other test data (i.e. engine performance or setting data, description of control devices, etc.)
relevant to the approval of a specific engine design and/or on-board NO x verification
procedures must also be given.
With reference to appendix 5 of the Code it shall be further interpreted that:
(a)
The term Deviation as given under Sheet 3/5, Measurement equipment, Calibration
refers to the deviation of the analyser calibration and not the deviation of the span gas
concentration.
(b)
The fuel properties as given under Sheet 3/5, Fuel characteristics, Fuel properties shall,
in those cases where a DM grade fuel is used, include sufficient data to justify the ISO
8217 grade (i.e. DMA, DMB or DMC) as given on EIAPP Certificate Supplement 1.12
and hence as a minimum shall give the analysis results for water content (ISO 37733),
carbon residue (ISO 10370) - full or 10% sample and, in the case of the DMA / DMB
grades, Cetane Number / Index (ISO 4264).
74-1
Note:
MPC 75
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the averaged results must be given to 2
decimal places for the CO2 / O2 species and whole numbers for the CO, HC and NOx species.
75-1
Note:
MPC 76
conc GEXHW
(15)
Gas mass = v
conc VEXHD
(16)
Gas mass = w
conc VEXHW
(17)
or
or
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that for equations (15) and (17) the term
conc applies to the averaged gas concentrations, as determined in accordance with 5.11,
measured or corrected in accordance with 5.12.2 (conc, dry / KW, r) to a wet basis and (in the
case of NOx) multiplied by the KHDIES correction factor for humidity and temperature in
accordance with 5.12.3.
For equation (16) the term conc applies to the averaged gas concentrations, as determined in
accordance with 5.11, measured or corrected in accordance with 5.12.2 (conc, wet KW, r) to a
dry basis and (in the case of NOx) multiplied by the KHDIES correction factor for humidity and
temperature in accordance with 5.12.3.
Note:
MPC 77
Interpretation:
It shall be interpreted that a survey would additionally be required where the component or
adjustable feature change was outside that already approved for the Engine Group or Engine
Family and as given in the engines Technical File. In such cases the change would need to be
documented in accordance with 6.2.3.2.2.
It shall be further interpreted that, in the case of the Engine Parameter Check Method, that the
change is to be such that the Engine Group / Engine Family Parent Engine emission value was
not exceeded.
Note:
MPC 78
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the term engine manufacturer is the
entity which applied for the engine certification.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
78-1
MPC 79
Chapter 6.2.3.5
Chapter 6.2 Engine parameter check method
Chapter 6.2.3 Documentation for an engine parameter check method
Chapter 6.2.3.5 Checklist for the engine parameter check method
Chapter 6.2.3.5 reads as follows:
For some parameters, different survey possibilities exist. Approved by the Administration, the
ship operator, supported by the engine manufacturer, may choose what method is applicable.
Any one of, or a combination of, the methods listed in appendix 7 of this Code may be
sufficient to show compliance.
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the term engine manufacturer is the
entity which applied for the engine certification.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
79-1
Note:
MPC 80
Appendix 4
Calibration of the analytical instruments (Refer to chapter 5 of the NOx
Technical Code)
1 Introduction
Chapter 1.1 reads as follows:
Each analyser used for the measurement of an engines parameters shall be calibrated as often
as necessary in accordance with the requirements of this appendix.
Tables 1, 2 3 & 4 right hand column headers read as follows:
Calibration intervals (month).
Interpretation:
For application of this section it shall be interpreted that the calibration intervals as defined by
Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Appendix 4 represent the duration of calibration validity applicable to
the particular measurement instruments listed.
All instruments used for the measurement of an engines parameters shall be verified as being
within the defined calibration validity period at the time of the measurement.
(MEPC/Circ. 473)
Note:
80-1
IACS Int. 2004/Rev.1 2006
MPC 81
Interpretation:
For application of this section the term The analyser shall not be more than shall be
interpreted as The analyser response shall not be more than to correctly reflect the intent
of this statement and ISO 8178-1 Section 8.9.1.
Note:
MPC 82
Interpretation
The 4.5% limit should be applied to all ships starting from the 19 May 2005 even if the
IAPP certificate was not already issued for the ships concerned. The same applies for
the 1.5 % limit starting from 19 May 2006. Checking for compliance pursuant to
issuance of the IAPPC is limited to checking the bunker delivery notes under
regulation VI/18.
MPC82-1
IACS Int. 2005
MPC 83
Interpretation
Bunker delivery notes, for fuel oil delivered to and for use onboard on or after the 19
May 2005, should be kept on board even if the IAPP certificate has not been issued
yet. However, at the time a survey is conducted for issuance of the IAPP certificate,
only such notes relevant to fuel present on board at the time of the survey, are
considered as a basis for issuance of the IAPP certificate.
MPC83-1
IACS Int. 2005
MPC 84
Interpretation
The minimum combustion chamber flue gas outlet temperature of 850C is equally
applicable to continuous-feed and batch-loaded shipboard incinerators[1]. Monitoring of
the combustion flue gas outlet temperature shall be required at all times for both types
of incinerators.
Note:
This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Members and Associates
from 3rd February 2006.
MPC84-1
MPC85
2.
3.
4.
Page 1 of 2
MPC85
MPC
85
(cont)
2. The double bottom protecting the pump-room can be a void tank, a ballast tank or, unless
prohibited by other regulations, a fuel oil tank.
3. Bilge wells may be accepted within the double bottom provided that such wells are as
small as practicable and the distance between the well bottom and the ship's base line
measured at right angles to the ship's base line is not less than 0.5h.
4. Where a portion of the pump-room is located below the minimum height required in
regulation 22.2, then only that portion of the pump room is required to be a double bottom.
End of
Document
Page 2 of 2
MPC86
MPC
SC
86
(June
(cont)
2006)
(Corr.1
Oct 2007)
Note:
1.
2.
The contracted for construction date means the date on which the contract to build
the vessel is signed between the prospective owner and the shipbuilder. For further
details regarding the date of contract for construction, refer to IACS Procedural
Requirement (PR) No. 29.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC87
MPC
MPC
87
87
(Jan
(cont)
2007)
Note:
This Unified Interpretation is to be applied by all Members and Associates on ships delivered
on or after 1 August 2010 as defined in MARPOL regulation I/28.9.
Page 1 of 2
MPC87
MPC
87
(cont)
End
Page 2 of 2
MPC88
MPC
MPC Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78
88
Regulation 9.1.1
(Feb
(cont)
2007)
For new ships, installations on board ships the keels of which are laid or which are at
a similar stage of construction on or after 1 January 2010.
(b)
For existing ships, new installations with a contractual delivery date to the ship on or
after 1 January 2010 or, in the absence of a contractual delivery date, the actual
delivery of the equipment to the ship on or after 1 January 2010.
Note:
This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1 July 2007.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC90
(b)
Note:
1.
This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1 October 2007.
End of Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC91
Interpretation
"A similar stage of construction" means the stage at which:
(a)
(b)
assembly of that ship has commenced comprising at least 50 tonnes or one per cent
of the estimated mass of all structural material, whichever is less.
Note:
1.
This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1 October 2007.
End of Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC92
Every ship of 400 gross tonnage and above and every fixed and floating drilling rig
and other platforms shall be subject to the surveys specified below.
(2)
In the case of ships of less than 400 gross tonnage, the Administration may establish
appropriate measures in order to ensure that the applicable provisions of this Annex
are complied with.
(a)
any ship of 400 gross tonnage or above engaged in voyages to ports or offshore
terminals under the jurisdiction of other Parties; and
Interpretation
1)
This UI pertains to the gross tonnage to be used when applying MARPOL Annex VI.
2)
Note:
1.
This Unified Interpretation is to be applied by all Members and Associates to ships the
keels of which are laid after 1 January 2008.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC 93
MPC
SC
93
(July
(cont)
2008)
Note:
This Unified Interpretation is to be applied by all Members and Associates on ships subject to
MARPOL I, regulation 23, as amended by Resolution MEPC.117(52), for which the building
contract is placed on or after 1 April 2009.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC 94
MPC
MPC Annex I of MARPOL 73/78 Regulation 12A.6-8
94
and 11.8 Oil Fuel Tank Protection, as amended
94
(July
(cont)
by Resolution MEPC.141(54)
2008)
Regulation 12A.6-8 and 11.8 as Amended by Resolution MEPC.141(54) reads:
6
For ships, other than self-elevating drilling units, having an aggregate oil fuel capacity
of 600m3 and above, oil fuel tanks shall be located above the moulded line of the bottom shell
plating nowhere less than the distance h as specified below:
h = B/20 m or,
h = 2.0 m, whichever is the lesser.
The minimum value of h = 0.76 m
In the turn of the bilge area and at locations without a clearly defined turn of the bilge,
the oil fuel tank boundary line shall run parallel to the line of the midship flat bottom as
shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Oil fuel tank boundary lines for the purpose of paragraph 6
7
For ships having an aggregate oil fuel capacity of 600 m3 or more but less than 5,000
3
m , oil fuel tanks shall be located inboard of the moulded line of the side shell plating,
nowhere less than the distance w which, as shown in Figure 2, is measured at any crosssection at right angles to the side shell, as specified below:
w = 0.4 + 2.4 C/20,000 m or
The minimum value of w = 1.0 m, however for individual tanks with an oil fuel capacity
of less than 500 m3 the minimum value is 0.76 m.
Note:
This Unified Interpretation is to be applied by all Members and Associates on ships subject to
MARPOL I, regulation 12A, as amended by Resolution MEPC.141(54), for which the building
contract is placed on or after 1 April 2009.
Page 1 of 3
MPC 94
MPC
94
(cont)
8
For ships having an aggregate oil fuel capacity of 5,000 m3 and over, oil fuel tanks
shall be located inboard of the moulded line of the side shell plating, nowhere less than the
distance w which, as shown in Figure 2, is measured at any cross-section at right angles to
the side shell, as specified below:
w = 0.5 + C/20,000 m or
w = 2.0 m, whichever is the lesser.
The minimum value of w = 1.0 m
Figure 2 Oil fuel tank boundary lines for the purpose of paragraphs 7 and 8
.
11
Alternatively to paragraphs 6 and either 7 or 8, ships shall comply with the accidental
oil fuel outflow performance standard specified below:
.
.8
For the purpose of maintenance and inspection, any oil fuel tanks that do not
border the outer shell plating shall be located no closer to the bottom shell
plating than the minimum value of h in paragraph 6 and no closer to the side
shell plating than the applicable minimum value of w in paragraph 7 or 8.
Interpretation:
1.
The distance h should be measured from the moulded line of the bottom shell plating
at right angle to it (Reg.12A, Fig.1).
1.1
For vessels designed with a skeg, the skeg should not be considered as offering
protection for the FO tanks. For the area within skeg's width the distance h should be
measured perpendicular to a line parallel to the baseline at the intersection of the skeg and
the moulded line of the bottom shell plating as indicated in Figure A.
Page 2 of 3
MPC 94
MPC
94
(cont)
Figure A
1.2
For vessels designed with a permanent trim, the baseline should not be used as a
reference point. The distance h should be measured perpendicular to the moulded line of
the bottom shell plating at the relevant frames where fuel tanks are to be protected.
2.
For vessels designed with deadrising bottom, the distance 1.5h should be measured
from the moulded line of the bottom shell plating but at right angle to the baseline, as
indicated in Figure B.
Figure B
3.
Paragraphs 1 and 2, above also apply to the reference to the distance "h" in
Regulation 12A-11.8.
End of
Document
Page 3 of 3
MPC95
SC224
Measurement of Distances
SC
(Aug 2008)
(cont)
LL74
(Aug 2008)
Several IMO instruments (e.g., ICLL, SOLAS and MARPOL Conventions, the IBC Code and
the IGC Code, etc.) require distances to be measured such as tank length, height, width, ship
(or subdivision or waterline) length, etc..
MPC95 Interpretation
(Aug 2008)
Unless explicitly stipulated otherwise in the text of the regulations in SOLAS, Load Line and
MARPOL Conventions and any of their mandatory Codes, distances are to be measured by
using moulded dimensions.
Note:
This Unified Interpretation is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1 April
2009.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC96
1.
Scope1
LL76 The scope of this UI is to define the requirements for the initial statutory surveys at new
(cont)
as detailed in IMO Resolution A.997(25), which are not addressed in UR Z23 for
LL76 construction
the following as applicable:(Apr 2009)
MPC96
(Corr.1 Jul
(cont)
2010)
MPC96
(Apr 2009)
(Corr.1 Jul
2010)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
This UI only covers the survey activities required and does not cover the technical
interpretations of the statutory requirements or approval of plans, designs and manuals
required by the Regulations.
2.
This UI does not cover the requirements for type approval or certification at vendors
works and for which evidence of acceptance is to be provided as indicated in the survey
tables.
3.
Survey Item
Approved Drawings
/Documentation
Conformity Verification
Tightness Testing
Function Test
Note:
Page 1 of 2
MPC96
SC234
(cont)
Onboard Verification of
documentation
LL76
Series of Vessels
As defined by IACS PR 29
(cont)
4.
Application
MPC96 This UI applies to all vessels for which the statutory certificates listed in paragraph 1 are to be
(cont)
6.
Specific flag administration requirements, if any, supersede the requirements
contained in this UI.
7.
The surveys required by this UI shall be carried out by exclusive surveyors of the
classification society, as defined in PR5. The surveyors are to be qualified to be able to carry
out the tasks and procedures are to be in place to ensure that their activities are monitored.
Details are specified in PR6 and PR7.
8.
The shipbuilder is to provide inspection and test plans for the items which are required to be
surveyed and/or tested prior to the commencement of the surveys and/or test.
9.
The shipbuilder is to provide product and type approval certificates for the applicable items
listed in Appendix 1 to be placed on board.
10.
The classification society is to be able to provide evidence, e.g. through records, check lists,
inspection and test records, etc. that its surveyors have complied with the requirements of
this UI.
Enclosure:
Appendix 1
Page 2 of 2
Description
COLUMN 1
A.997(25) Requirements
COLUMN 2
Survey Item
COLUMN 3
COLUMN 4
COLUMN 5
Conformity Verification
COLUMN 6
COLUMN 7
Tightness Testing
COLUMN 8
COLUMN 9
Function Test
COLUMN 10
Onboard Verification of
documentation
Page 1 of 22
(EI)
1.1.3.1
(EI)
1.1.3.2
(EI)
1.1.3.3
(EI)
1.1.3.4
(EI)
1.1.3.5
Fire Extinguishers
Fire Fighters' Outfits
EEBDs - Emergency Escape
Breathing Devices
Page 2 of 22
X
X
X
X
X
X
FUNCTION TEST
Fire Pumps
Fire Mains
Hydrants
Hoses and Nozzles
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
examining the fire pumps and fire main and the disposition of the
hydrants, hoses and nozzles and the international shore connection
and checking that each fire pump, including the emergency fire
pump, can be operated separately so that two jets of water are
produced simultaneously from different hydrants at any part of the
ship whilst the required pressure is maintained in the fire main
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
Safety Equipment
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
Table 1.
X
X
(EI)
1.1.3.6
(EI)
1.1.3.7
examining any fire detection and alarm system and any automatic
sprinkler, fire detection and fire alarm system and confirming that
installation tests have been satisfactorily completed
(EI)
1.1.3.8
(EI)
1.1.3.9
Page 3 of 22
X
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/5.2, 8.3, 9.5
and 10.5) (SOLAS
74/88 regs.II-2/7 and
11)
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/7.2, 7.3, 7.4,
7.5.1, 7.5.5, 19.3.3
and 20.4; FSSC ch.9)
(SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/11, 13, 14,
53 and 54)
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/10.6.3 and
10.6.4; FSSC chs.4 to
7) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/18.7)
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II2/4.2.2.3.4) (SOLAS
74/88 reg.II-2/15.2.5)
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(EI)
1.1.3.10
(EI)
1.1.3.11
(EI)
1.1.3.12
(EI)
1.1.3.13
Page 4 of 22
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/10.7, 20.2.1,
20.3 and 20.6.2)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II2/53)
(SOLAS 74/88
regs.III/11 to 16 and
31; LSAC section
6.2)
(LSAC paragraph
6.2.2.2)
X
X
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(EI)
1.1.3.14
(EI)
1.1.3.15
(EI)
1.1.3.16
(EI)
1.1.3.17
(EI)
1.1.3.18
(EI)
1.1.3.19
(EI)
1.1.3.20
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/11, 12, 13, 16,
31 and 33 LSAC
section 6.1)
(SOLAS 74/88
reg.III/31 LSAC
sections 2.5, 3.1 to
3.3 and 4.1 to 4.9)
X
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.III/15; LSAC
section 6.2)
(SOLAS 74/88
reg.III/31; LSAC
sections 2.5, 5.1 and
6.1)
(SOLAS 74/88
regs.III/14, 17 and 31;
LSAC section 6.1)
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.III/19)
Posters or Signs
(SOLAS 74/88
regs.III/9 and 20)
Page 5 of 22
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
examining the provision and stowage of the distress flares and the
line-throwing appliance, checking the provision and operation of
fixed on board communications equipment, if provided, and testing
the means of operation of the general alarm system
(EI)
1.1.3.23
Page 6 of 22
(SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/12.2 and
III/6)
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/6 and 18;
LSAC sections 3.1,
7.1 and 7.2)
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/7 and 32 to
37; LSAC sections
2.1, 2.5 and 3.3)
FUNCTION TEST
(EI)
1.1.3.22
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
(EI)
1.1.3.21
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(EI)
1.1.3.24
(EI)
1.1.3.25
(EI)
1.1.3.26
(EI)
1.1.3.27
Bridge
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.V/17 and 19)
Bridge
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/17)
Page 7 of 22
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
(SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/43 and
III/11)
(International
Regulations for
Preventing Collisions
at Sea (COLREG) in
force, regs.20 to 24,
27 to 30 and 33)
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
(EI)
1.1.3.28
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.1
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.2
Navigation Equipment:
Magnetic Compass
Navigation Equipment: Pylorus
or Compass Bearing Device
Navigation Equipment: ECDIS
including back-up arrangements
Nautical Charts and Nautical
Publications
Navigation Equipment:
Daylight Signalling Lamp
radar reflector
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.3
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.4
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.5
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.6
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.7
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.8
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.9
Page 8 of 22
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/19)
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/19)
X
X
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.10
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.11
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.12
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.13
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.14
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.15
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.16
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.17
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.18
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.19
FUNCTION TEST
Navigation Equipment:
Electronic Plotting Aid
Navigation Equipment:
Automatic Tracking aid(s) or
Automatic Radar Plotting Aid
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
Navigation Equipment:
Transmitting Heading Device
Navigation Equipment:
Propeller rate of Revolution
Indicator
Navigation Equipment:
Variable-Pitch propeller pitch
and operational mode indicator
Navigation Equipment: Rate of
Turn Indicator
Page 9 of 22
(EI)
1.1.3.28
.20
(EI)
1.1.3.29
(EI)
1.1.3.31
(EI)
1.1.3.32
(EI)
1.1.4.1
(EI)
1.1.4.2
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
1
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
2
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
3
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
4
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/20)
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/22)
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/23)
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II2/10.8; FSSC ch.15)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II2/61)
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II2/4.5.5; FSSC ch.15)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II2/62)
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
checking the deck water seal for automatic filling and draining
Page 10 of 22
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
5
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
6
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
7
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.1
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.2
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.3
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.4
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.5
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.6
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.7
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
X
X
Page 11 of 22
X
X
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY ITEM
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.8
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.9
failure of the power supply to the automatic control system for the
gas regulating valve and to the instrumentation for continuous
indication and permanent recording of pressure and oxygen content
in the inert gas main
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
8.10
(EI)
1.1.4.2.
9
(EI)
1.1.4.3
(EI)
1.1.4.4
examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the cargo pump room,
confirming that the installation tests have been satisfactorily
completed and that its means of operation are clearly marked and,
when appropriate, checking the operation of the remote means for
closing the various openings
examining the protection of the cargo pump-rooms and confirming
that the installation tests have been satisfactorily completed
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
X
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II2/10.9; FSSC chs.5, 6,
7 and 8, as applicable)
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II2/4.5.10) (SOLAS
74/88 regs.II-2/55 to
58)
X
X
X
X
Bilge monitoring
(EI)
1.1.5.1
confirming that the fire control plans are permanently exhibited or,
alternatively, emergency booklets have been provided and that a
duplicate of the plans or the emergency booklet are available in a
prominently marked enclosure external to the ship's deckhouse
Required Documentations
(EI)
1.1.5.2
Required Documentations
(EI)
1.1.5.3
confirming that the training manuals and the fire safety operational
booklets have been provided
Required Documentations
Page 12 of 22
X
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II2/15.2.4) (SOLAS
74/88 reg.II-2/20)
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/14.2.2 and
14.4)
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/15.2.3, 16.2
and 16.3)
X
X
(EI)
1.1.5.4
(EI)
1.1.5.5
(EI)
1.1.5.6
(EI)
1.1.5.7
(EI)
1.1.5.8
(EI)
1.1.5.9
(EI)
1.1.5.10
(EI)
1.1.5.11
(EI)
1.1.5.12
(EI)
1.1.5.13
(EI)
1.1.5.14
(EI)
1.1.6.1
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
Required Documentations
Required Documentations
(SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/8 and 37)
Required Documentations
Required Documentations
Required Documentations
Required Documentations
Required Documentations
Required Document
Required Documents
Required Documents
Required Documents
Required Documents
Page 13 of 22
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.III/35)
(SOLAS 74/88
reg.III/36)
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/19)
(SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/16)
(SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/27)
(SOLAS 74/00/02,
reg.V/21)
(SOLAS 74/00/03,
reg.V/28)
(SOLAS 74/00,
reg.V/29)
(SOLAS 74/02, reg.
XI-1/5)
(FSSC ch.15
paragraph 2.4.4)
(SOLAS 74/88, reg.
II-2/62.21)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FUNCTION TEST
ONBOARD VERIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION
INSPECTION AFTER
INSTALLATION
INSPECTIONS DURING
INSTALLATION
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
(LI)
1.1.2
(LI)
1.1.2.2
(LI)
1.1.2.3
(LI)
1.1.2.4
(LI)
1.1.2.5
(LI)
1.1.2.6
Inclining Experiment
X
X
Page 14 of 22
ON BOARD VERIFIATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
FUNCTION TEST
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
TIGHTNESS TEST
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
Load Line
CORRESPONSENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
Table 2.
(LI)
1.1.2.8
(LI)
1.1.2.9
Garbage chute
Spurling Pipe
(LI)
1.1.2.10
(LI)
1.1.2.11
(LI)
1.1.2.12
Bulwarks
Freeing Ports
Cable Locker
(LI)
1.1.2.13
(LI)
1.1.2.14
Gangways
Walkways
Other means
Machinery Casings
Gangway and Access
Hatchways
Freeing arrangements
Page 15 of 22
ON BOARD VERIFIATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
FUNCTION TEST
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
(LI)
1.1.2.7
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
TIGHTNESS TEST
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
CORRESPONSENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
(LI)
1.1.2.15
(LI)
1.1.3.1
Uprights
Lashings
Stability
Protection of Crew
Page 16 of 22
X
X
X
X
X
ON BOARD VERIFIATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
FUNCTION TEST
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
TIGHTNESS TEST
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONSENCE WITH
APPROVED DRAWINGS /
DOCUMENTATION
X
X
X
X
X
FUNCTION TEST
ON BOARD VERIFICATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
MARPOL Annex 1
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED
DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATIONS
Table 3.
(OI)
1.1.3.2
(OI)
1.1.3.3
(OI)
1.1.3.4
(OI)
.1.1.3.5
(OI)
1.1.3.6
(OI)
1.1.3.7
X
X
Consumables
Stopping Device
Incinerators/Homogenisers
Standard Discharge Connection
Tank Arrangements
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 17 of 22
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Slop Tanks
Cargo Tanks designated as slop
tanks
Discharge Monitoring and
Control System
Audible and Visual Alarms
Automatic and manual means to
stop discharge of Effluent
Starting Interlock
Accuracy Flow Meter
FUNCTION TEST
X
X
X
X
X
Page 18 of 22
ON BOARD VERIFICATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED
DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATIONS
(OI)
1.1.4.7
(OI)
1.1.4.8
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
1
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
2
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
3
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
4
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
5
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
6
(OI)
1.1.4.8.
7
Pipelines
FUNCTION TEST
ON BOARD VERIFICATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED
DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATIONS
Pressure Test
Steam Heaters
Means of Communication
Flexible Hoses
Page 19 of 22
(OI)
1.1.4.9
(OI)
1.1.4.9.
1
(OI)
1.1.4.9.
2
(OI)
1.1.4.9.
3
(OI)
1.1.4.10
(OI)
1.1.4.11
(OI)
1.1.4.12
(OI)
1.1.4.13
FUNCTION TEST
ON BOARD VERIFICATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED
DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATIONS
Page 20 of 22
(OI)
1.1.4.14
(OI)
1.1.4.16
(OI)
1.1.4.17
(OI)
1.1.4.18
Closing arrangements
Stability Manual
Tank Arrangement
Tank Arrangements
X
X
X
SOPEP/SMPEP
X
X
Operations Manual
Page 21 of 22
FUNCTION TEST
ON BOARD VERIFICATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED
DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATIONS
(OI)
1.1.6.3
(OI)
1.1.6.4
(OI)
1.1.6.5
(OI)
1.1.6.7
(OI)
1.1.6.8
(OI)
1.1.6.9
(OI)
1.1.6.10
FUNCTION TEST
ON BOARD VERIFICATION OF
DOCUMENTATION
SURVEY AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
SURVEY DURING
CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION
ORIGIN OF THE
REQUIREMENT
SURVEY ITEM
CONFORMITY VERIFICATION
A.997(25) REQUIREMENT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
APPROVED
DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATIONS
X
X
X
SOPEP/SMPEP
Stability Information
End of
document
Page 22 of 22
MPC97
MPC
SC
97
(July
(cont)
2010)
Note:
1.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC98
MPC
98
(cont)
(Jan
2012)
b.
in the absence of a contractual delivery date, the actual delivery date of the engine to
the ship*, provided that the date is confirmed by a delivery receipt; or
c.
in the event the engine is fitted onboard and tested for its intended purpose on or after 1
July 2016, the actual date that the engine is tested onboard for its intended purpose applies
in determining the standards in this regulation in force at the time of the replacement or
addition of the engine.
The date in a), b) or c), provided the conditions associated with those dates apply, is the
Date of major conversion According to Reg. 13.2.2 to be entered in the IAPPC
Supplement.
In this case the Date of installation, which applies only for identical replacement engines,
shall be filled in with N.A.
If the engine is not tested before 1 July 2016 due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the
control of the ship owner, then the provisions of unforeseen delay in delivery may be
considered by the Administration in a manner similar to MARPOL Annex I UI4.
_________
Footnote:
*) The engine is to be fitted onboard and tested for its intended purpose before 1 July 2016.
Note
1.
MPC99
MPC
MPC Oil residue (sludge) tank discharge
connections to the bilge system, oily bilge
99
99
(Dec
(cont)
water holding tank(s), tank top or oily water
2011)
separators (MARPOL 73/78 Annex I Regulation
12.2)
MARPOL 73/78 Annex I (as amended by MEPC.187(59)) Regulation 12.2
2. Oil residue (sludge) may be disposed of directly from the oil residue (sludge) tank(s)
through the standard discharge connection referred to in regulation 13, or any other approved
means of disposal. The oil residue (sludge) tank(s):
.2. shall have no discharge connections to the bilge system, oily bilge water
holding tank(s), tank top or oily water separators except that the tank(s) may be
fitted with drains, with manually operated self-closing valves and arrangements for
subsequent visual monitoring of the settled water, that lead to an oily bilge water
holding tank or bilge well, or an alternative arrangement, provided such arrangement
does not connect directly to the bilge piping system.
MARPOL 73/78 Annex I Unified Interpretation to regulation 12.2.2 introduced by
MEPC.1/Circ.753
2 There should be no interconnections between the sludge tank discharge piping and
bilge-water piping other than possible common piping leading to the standard discharge
connection referred to in regulation 13.
Interpretation
Screw-down non-return valves arranged in lines connecting to common piping leading to the
standard discharge connection required by regulation 13, to prevent sludge from discharging
to the bilge system, oily bilge water holding tank(s), tank top or oily water separators, provide
a means equivalent to an arrangement that has no interconnection or no discharge
connections as so specified in regulation 12.2 and Unified Interpretation thereto.
It is understood that the common piping may serve only one purpose and that is to connect
the discharge lines of the bilge and sludge pumps to the standard discharge connection
referred to in regulation 13, or any other approved means of disposal.
NOTE
1. This Unified Interpretation is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from
1 July 2012.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC100
SC
SC
256
23
(June
2012)
Under certain provisions of the SOLAS and MARPOL Conventions, the application of
regulations to a new ship is governed by the dates:
MPC
100
(June
2012)
Note:
This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 28 June 2012.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC 101
MPC
101
(Jul 2012)
Interpretation
Section 2.3 of the Supplement ("as documented by bunker delivery notes") allows for an "x"
to be entered in advance of the dates indicated in all of the relevant check boxes recognizing
that the bunker delivery notes, required to be retained on board for a minimum period of three
years, provide the subsequent means to check that a ship is actually operating in a manner
consistent with the intent as given in section 2.3.
Note: This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies not later than the first IAPP
renewal survey carried on/after 1 January 2013.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC102
For existing ships, the verification of the requirement to have a SEEMP on board
according to regulation 22 shall take place at the first intermediate or renewal survey
identified in paragraph 1 of this regulation, whichever is the first, on or after 1 January
2013
The International Energy Efficiency Certificate (IEEC) shall be issued for both new and
existing ships.
2.
For existing ships a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) required in
accordance with Regulation 22, shall be verified onboard according to Regulation 5.4.4,
and an IEEC shall be issued, not later than the first Intermediate or Renewal MARPOL
Annex VI Chapter 2 survey, whichever is the sooner, on or after 1 January 2013, i.e. a
survey connected to a intermediate/renewal survey of the IAPP Certificate.
3.
The Intermediate or Renewal survey referenced in 2. relates solely to the timing for the
verification of the SEEMP onboard, i.e. these IAPPC survey windows will also become
the IEEC initial survey date for existing ships. The SEEMP is however a survey item
solely under the new MARPOL Annex VI Chapter 4, and is not a survey item relating to
IAPPC surveys.
4.
In the event that the SEEMP is not found onboard during the first intermediate/renewal
survey of the IAPP Certificate on or after 1 January 2013, then the RO should seek the
advice of the Administration concerning the issuance of an IEEC and be guided
accordingly. However, the validity of the IAPP Certificate is not impacted by the lack of
a SEEMP as the SEEMP is a survey item solely under the new MARPOL Annex VI,
Chapter 4, and not under the IAPPC surveys.
NOTE
1. This Unified Interpretation is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1
January 2013
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1
MPC103
MPC
MPC Identical Replacement Engines
103
103 (MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 13)
(Jan 2013)
(cont)
Regulation
MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 13
13.1.1.2 each marine diesel engine with a power output of more than 130 kW which
undergoes a major conversion on or after 1 January 2000 except when demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the Administration that such engine is an identical replacement to the engine
which it is replacing and is otherwise not covered under paragraph 1.1.1 of this regulation.
13.2.2 For a major conversion involving the replacement of a marine diesel engine with a
non-identical marine diesel engine or the installation of an additional marine diesel engine,
the standards in this regulation in force at the time of the replacement or addition of the
engine shall apply. ...
Interpretation
In regulation 13.1.1.2 the term identical (and hence, by application of the converse, in
regulation 13.2.2 the term non-identical) as applied to engines under Regulation 13 is to be
taken as:
An identical engine is, as compared to the engine being replaced*, an engine which is of the
same:
design and model;
rated power;
rated speed;
use;
number of cylinders;
fuel system type (including, if applicable, injection control software); and
(a)
(b)
for engines without EIAPP certification, have the same NOx critical components
and settings**; or
for engines with EIAPP certification, belonging to the same Engine Group /
Engine Family.
NOTE:
1.
Page 1 of 2
MPC103
MPC
103
(cont)
_______________________
* In those instances where the replaced engine will not be available to be directly compared
with the replacing engine at the time of updating the Supplement to the IAPP Certificate
reflecting that engine change it is to be ensured that the necessary records in respect of the
replaced engine are available in order that it can be confirmed that the replacing engine
represents an identical engine.
** For engines without EIAPP Certification there will not be the defining NOx critical
component markings or setting values as usually given in the approved Technical File.
Consequently in these instances the assessment of ... same NOx critical components and
settings... shall be established on the basis that the following components and settings are
the same:
Fuel system
(a) Fuel pump model and injection timing
(b) Injection nozzle model
Charge air
(a) Configuration and, if applicable, turbocharger model and auxiliary blower
specification
(b) Cooling medium (seawater / freshwater)
End of
Document
Page 2 of 2
MPC104
MPC
SC
104
260
(Mar
MPC
LL
104
78
(cont)
(Mar
2013)
LL
HSC
78
9(cont)
(Mar
MLC
2013)
1
Interpretation
(cont)
2013)
For the purposes of the application of the IMO Conventions and Codes (Performance
Standards, Technical Standards, Resolutions and Circulars) for Fibre-Reinforced Plastic
(FRP) Craft, the term the keels of which are laid or which are at a similar stage of
construction should be interpreted as the date that the first structural reinforcement of the
complete thickness of the approved laminate schedule is laid either in or on the mould.
(cont)
HSC
9
(cont)
NOTE
1. This UI is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Societies from 1 January 2014.
End of
Document
Page 1 of 1