Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) is included in oleochemical group. Oleochemicals are
biodegradable, low toxicity and environment friendly type of chemicals. We are planning to
build a plant which produces 120 000 MTPA of FAME. We uses transesterification process with
base catalyst, a homogenous sodium methoxide. Base catalyzed transesterification is chosen
since it is faster than the acid catalyzed reaction, achieving 95% conversion.
Summary of Chapter 1
FAME is esters of fatty acids that are famously obtain from vegetables or animal oil through
transesterification of fat with methanol. The product of FAME can be divided into Light Cut,
Middle Cut and Heavy Cut. Light Cut methyl Esters, commercially used in organic synthesis,
manufacture of perfume, medicine, lubricating, grease, rubber, dye, plastics, greases and
lubricants, food additives, pharmaceuticals industry, food and beverage and as natural
antimicrobial ingredient in sanitizers for food contact surfaces and equipment, particularly in
meat. Middle Cut Methyl Esters (Laura, 2014). The Heavy Cut Methyl Esters are basically
industrialized as oils, surfactants and oil soluble materials. Apart from that, it is also widely
applied as detergent, cosmetic, special lubricant and textile assistant (Aadi, 2014). Glycerol is
also a valuable byproduct in biodiesel production by transesterification. some of its applications
are applied in cosmetic, pharmaceutical, automotive, food pulp, and paper textile.
1.1 Market Survey
The use of methyl ester has become increasingly widespread in the recent years, since they are
readily biodegradable and are less environmentally harmful. This causes the demand and
production of FAME to increase every year. The demand for these esters is going to rise in the
Asia-Pacific region due to the regions rapid economic growth and government regulations for
the control of the content of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the environment
(Transparency Market Research). The supply and demand was estimated to increase from 2005
till 2020. This increase is due to the demand for oleochemicals are swelling in end-user
industries such as cosmetics, food, plastics, and rubber (Evyap, 2014). As global consumer
preference for natural and environment-friendly products continues to rise, demand from markets
such as China, India and the United States will drive the Southeast Asian oleochemicals market
(Frost& Sullivan, 2014).
1.2 Synthesis Route
Generally, there are 4 alternative routes to synthesize FAME and these routes involve catalytic
process. They are the base catalyzed transesterification, acid catalyzed transesterification, lipase
enzymatic catalyzed transesterification and lastly the supercritical method. The base Catalyzed
Transesterification is chosen as it is the most advantageous. Methanol and palm oil in the ratio of
6:1 use sodium methoxide base-catalyzed transesterification of triglyceride with methanol to
produce triglycerol and FAME. Reaction under favorable operating conditions should be able to
achieve a maximum extent of reaction at the chemical equilibrium. Also, a higher conversion to
be achieved within limited amount of time will be feasible if the operating condition occur at a
relatively high reaction rate.
1.3 Objectives
1) To design a plant with production rate of 120,000 MTPA.
2) To produce methyl ester from base catalysed transesterification.
Summary of Chapter 2 Process Synthesis and Flow Sheeting
Level 2 decision
Focus on the input of raw materials and the output of product. Palm kernel oil and methanol is
chosen as the raw material. The output of product are the heavy cut, middle cut and light cut of
FAME (Adholeya & Dadhich, 2008). The EP are calculated based on 2 situations, using yield
correlation, obtaining a constant EP2 and Varying EP2 with X and molar ratio. Given below is
the formula in EP2.
EP2=Biodiesel value+Glycerol ValuePalm Kernel OilCost Methanol Cost
Level 3 decision
The level 3 is calculated by considering the recycled flow of the product stream. In this level,
Lievenspiel plot is used to determine the size of reactor, cost of equipment and the cost of
catalyst are also calculated in aiding the decision.
Level 4 Decision
In this part, the whole PFD is constructed. In the process, the equipment involve are distillation
column, reactor, decanter and flash tank. Three cstr is used as a reactor in series, converting the
reaction of PKO and Methanol to Glycerin and FAME. Decanter is used to remove glycerin after
the reactor and flash tank is used to remove the methanol in the first stage. Distilalation colum is
used to separate the Methyl Esters product. The material balance is calculated by assuming the
total input is equal to total output and no reactant/ product/catalyst accumulation in recycle
streams (i.e. equilibrium of reaction achieved). Energy balance is also calculated for this part.
Comparison of Manual and Simulation (mass balance)
Stream
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Aspen (kg/hr)
14221
1990.004
14221
0.54
18349.883
18350.287
2034.169
16316.117
1894.066
14422.051
Manual (kg/hr)
14202.4
1993.39
14202.4
0.54
17050.4
17019.5
2032.16
17277.1
1824.8
15452.3
Error (%)
-0.13096
0.16986
-0.13096
0
-7.62142
-7.81919
-0.09886
5.56218
-3.79581
6.66729
12
15194.7
14317.88
13
1125.87
1161.883
14
14068
13155.997
15
9174.5
8834.383
16
4974
4321.614
17
2289.75
2138.339
Comparison of Manual and Simulation (Energy balance)
Separators
Manual (kW)
Aspen (kW)
Error (%)
Reactor
Flash
1346.45094
4
-1179.61
214.143737
7
40.5068
3
613.346
93.3957
6
5.77056
-3.19868
6.48282
3.7072
13.1159
6.61256
Decante
r
DC1
45.22
178.669
-977.525
100
104.626
DC2
123.955
3
-133.75
192.676
9
DC3
-29.3475
-123.42
76.2214
4
Error happens when comparing the mass and energy balance for both simulation and manual
calculation. These deviations tends to happens due to many reasons, such as, assumptions made
on the purity of components in each stream, different relative molecular mass on both manual
and aspen and different equipments used in both manual (CSTR) and simulation (stoichiometric
reactor.
Summary of Chapter 3 Process Equipment Sizing & Piping
3.1.1 Reactor (3 CSTR in series)
Reactor
Dimension
CSTR 1
Volume(m3) =13.2
Diameter(m) = 2.38
Height(m) = 3.57
Residence time (hr) = 0.63
Thickness(m) = 0.0073
CSTR 2
Volume(m3) = 17.6
Diameter(m) = 2.617091
Height(m) = 3.925636
Residence time (hr) = 0.84
Thickness(m) = 0.0073
CSTR 3
Volume(m3) =12.01
Diameter(m) = 2.30
Height(m) = 3.46
Residence time (hr) = 0.57
Thickness(m) = 0.006388
Vertical Vessel
Stainless Steel
Decanter
Horizontal Vessel
Carbon Steel
2.89
8.67
56.87
1.595
4.785
9.556
Reflux Drum
Tray Spacing(m)
Column Diameter, Dc(m)
Column Cross sectional Area, (m2)
Column height, ht(m
No of trays
Diameter, Dt (m)
Height (m)
DC-101
DC-102
DC-103
Carbon
steel
0.61
0.46
0.15
13.14
21
0.97
3.89
Carbon steel
Carbon steel
0.61
0.542
0.23
16.88
27
0.96
3.85
0.61
1.171
1.078
21.5
34
0.68
2.69
5.1 Introduction
Safety system in industrial is a crucial countermeasure in any hazardous plants. Safety systems
are demonstrated to protect human, plant, and environment in case the process goes beyond the
control margins. Without process control, the operation or process may be unstable. Things like
corrosion, explosion and fire might happen because of the unstable process that make the
operation in dangerous state.
5.2 Identification of Hazard, (MSDS)
MSDS for all chemicals that are included in this process can be seen in the appendix. The
chemicals that are listed are the raw materials, Palm Kernel Oil, Methoxide and Methanol. The
DOW & FEI and Toxicity Index are done by referring the MSDS.
Chemicals
Methanol
Sodium Methoxide
Palm Kernel Oil
ME8
ME10
ME12
ME14
ME16
ME18
Reactivity Hazard
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Flammability Hazard
3
2
1
2
1
0
0
1
Health Hazard
1
3
1
0
1
0
0
1
The products includes light cut methyl esters, middle cut methyl esters and heavy cut methyl
esters. Table below shows the DOW &FEI and Toxicity Index for the Major Equipemnt.
Major Equipment
Reactor
Flash Column
Decanter
Distillation Column 1
Distillation Column 2
Distillation Column3
Fire
and
Explosion
Index
42.24 (Light)
115.44 (Intermediate)
38.72 ( Light)
103.3 (Intermediate)
83.48 (Moderate)
40.47 (Light)
Toxicity Index
1.6 (Light)
3.8 (Low)
9.5 (Moderate)
6.4 (Moderate)
3.4 (Light)
3.7 (Light)
applied to flow rate, liquid level, temperature, pressure, pH and other variable that can affects the
process and trigger incident.
5.4 Major Equipment Control
The control for major equipment are listed in the table below.
Equipment
CSTR 1,2 and 3
Flash Tank
Decanter
Controllers
Flow Controller, Flow
Flow
Level Controller,
Controller,
Controller,
Temperature
Level
Level
Controller
Controller,
Controller,
Temperature
Pressure
Controller,
Controller
Pressure
Controller
Distilation 1 and 2
Flow Controller
(recycle top
distilate), Level
Controller (reflux
drum),
Temperature
Controller
(condenser), Flow
controller (Feed),
Level controller.
Distillation 3
Flow Controller
(recycle top
distilate), Level
Controller
(reflux drum),
Temperature
Controller
(condenser),
Flow controller
(Feed), Level
controller,
Analyzer
controller.
Standard
A
20
50
B
50
100
6.3 Process flow diagram of Waste treatment system based on the type of waste
The first stage of the waste treatment is the equalization tank which is mainly used for damping
of flow rate variations so that a constant or nearly constant flow rate is achieved. The second
stage is the biological treatment in the aeration tank to to reduce COD and BOD level of
wastewater. The third stage is the activated carbon adsorption tank to remove refractory organic
materials from wastewater. The last stage is the filtration where it remove particulate and
colloidal matter, removal of suspended solids,
Summary of Chapter 7 Site Selection and Plant Layout
7.1 Site Selection
The location that are chosen for this project is in Tanjung Langsat Industrial Area, Pasir Gudang,
Johor. There are many factors why Pasir Gudang is selected. Some of the reasons is because of
its location that are just 15.7 km away from the Johor Port which makes it easier for exportation.
Apart from that, its location from Sehcom Industries, one of the top major companies providing
palm kernel oil, is just 3.7 km away, which makes it convenient to build the site there. The price
per square feet are one of the cheapest ratings at RM 17-30 which is quite reasonable. Lastly the
incentives provided by Johor state is quite advantageous to build a plant there.
7.2 Plant Layout
FCI
range
0.15
Cost (RM)
3349464.08
0.06
0.02
0.03
0.02
1339785.63
446595.21
669892.82
446595.21
0.03
0.02
0.08
0.01
FCI range
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.05
669,893
446,595
1,786,381
223,298
9,378,499
Cost (RM)
893,190
893,190
446,595
1,116,488
3,349,464
12727963
Considering the onsite, offsite and components, the TCI calculated is 40,316,383.
8.3 Manufacturing cost and total production cost
Fixed manufacturing cost is the sum of the cost of the plant overheads, local taxes, insurance as
well as depreciation. The manufacturing cost calculated by adding up the cost of raw material,
waste treatment, utilities, operating labor, direct supervision & clerical labor, maintenance and
repairs, operating supplies and laboratory charges.
0.5(COL+CDS+CM&
R)
0.14FCI
0.1FCI
736,977
490,808
3,505,772
4,733,558
Based on the completed PFD, necessary equipment control were identified and placed onto
major equipment. The resulting P&ID allows HAZOP studies to be carried out. Possible
deviations, causes and consequences were identified through HAZOP. Fire and explosion index
and also toxicity index of major equipments are done based on the given guideline. Several types
of waste were identified as a result of the production of FAME. The waste treatment cost is RM
3,981,628. The plant will be located at Tanjung Langsat Industrial Area, Pasir Gudang, Johor.
This decisions are made based on the location, transportation, road facilities, and land prices as
well as the incentives that are provided by Johor State Government. Based on the thoroughly
inspected economic analysis, the payback period was found to be 2 years. The gross profit
margin is 0.33 and operating profit margin is 0.25 respectively while the net profit margin is
expected to be 0.17. The plant will generate yearly revenue of RM 524,691,717. All in all,
important elements such as safety and economic consideration have been taken extensively to
ensure that the plant is safe while economically feasible and viable. For future works, from an
economic point of view, additional revenue may be generated by purifying and selling the
glycerol by-product or enhancing the methanol recovery to lower operational costs. Capital cost
may be reduced with used equipment and obtaining government funding. The utility cost also
could be reduced so that the energy saving can be achieved as high as possible.
Appendix