Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chekhov
Chekhov
There is infinite
boredom, caused by life in an endlessly large country with a harsh climate and a
very monotonous landscape. It's set in the 19th century, an era when in Europe
divorce was socially disastrous for your life, status and career. For this reason
the lovers Anna and Dmitri can not be together, thus being forced to consider in
full the fate of their unhappy marriages and their missed chances in life. The
story has a dark and gloomy undertone to it, but that is much how life was in that
place and time. I do think that Dmitri is refreshed by Anna's young and happy
nature, one that he is not accustomed to from any of his older, former lovers.
He is detached from the people around him. Hes surprised that he falls in love
with Anna. I believe because of this, he learns to feel love and grows a certain
respect for a woman that he has not felt before. The secrecy of their relationship
is not sustainable. Its making them miserable. Yet if the relationship were not
secret, I cant help but think it would lose its appeal to Dmitri.
1. Chekov writes about charming and intellectual people. Do you agree or not
and why?
The characters in the play speak in lofty, intellectual terms about moral
philosophy and the role of work in the new Russia; but Chekhov himself
seems somewhat conflicted
4) What is the climax of this quiet, subtle story? That is, what is the turning point
or key moment, in your opinion?
The climax happens when When Anna leaves, Gurov thinks it has been just
another episode or adventure in his life, nothing left but a memory that would visit
him only from time to time. But she haunts him, and he imagines her to be
lovelier and himself to be finer than they actually were in Yalta.
5) When Gurov describes his two lives, which one is more meaningful?
Do you think this is true for most of us or is his life very different from other
people's?
6) Is there something Chekhov wants us to learn from this story? What is
it?
Gurovs gradual metamorphosis: subtle details of action and dialogue illustrate a
profound revision of his rather cynical and egocentric attitude toward
relationships with women. He no longer thinks of women as childlike and a
waste of time.