Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Law of Life
The Law of Life
In science and especially biology, the laws of nature are not legislative enactments. Natural
events do not take place in obedience to natural laws. Natural laws as we call them govern
nothing. They are uniformities that have been observed uniformities of nature, and they are
classified according to universal formulae, mathematical formulae. For instance the Law of
Gravitation does not govern the motion of falling bodies and the coursing of planets, meteors and
satellites, it is a descriptive law which states in a conservative way, the observed action of things,
the changes of quality that take place under certain conditions.
Famous Hygienist, Dr. Robert Walter, formulated what he regarded as the primary controlling
law of life, which he discussed in his book, Lifes Great Law. Briefly it states: Every particle
of living matter in the organised body is endowed with an instinct of self-preservation sustained
by a force inherent in the organism usually called vital force or life force, the success of whose
work is directly proportional to the amount of the force and inversely to the degree of its
activity.
I think this Law could be better presented if it were every cell of the living organism is
endowed with an instinct of self-preservation, a living matter and the particle reference to the
organised body is superfluous. I think he was basing his Law on Newtons formulation of the
law of gravity. Looking at this law the living organism seeks to provide for its own interests, to
appropriate food, seek light and air, water and warmth, protect it and avoid injury. This inherent
tendency of self-preservation is essential to the existence of all living organisms.
Self-preservation is the primary controlling expression of life and normally it is subordinate to no
other law except in rare instances to the instinct of the preservation of the race in which case an
individual may sacrifice itself for the protection of the young or of the flock. It is important to
appreciate that the vital power or the life force or whatever you want to call it is inherent, it is not
manufactured by food, by air, by water, by exercise or any other substance or influence, it is not
the product of activity, otherwise increased activity would be the best means of increasing the
power and the inactivity of sleep and rest would be a waste of time.
Dr. Walters says, inversely as the degree of its activity. This is fraught with immense
consequences with human health and life, it makes all the difference in the world whether we are
increasing or reducing vital power by increasing vital activity, that we are doing the one no-one
can doubt, there can be no neutral ground in medical practice. Vital activity expends power or
increases it, if the latter rest and sleep are a waste of time, if the former then current medical
practice is engaged in exhausting vital power.
Activity expends and exhausts while passivity recuperates and preserves. However, we know
from our studies and observations that there is an important reciprocal relationship between rest
and sleep on the one hand and exercise and activity on the other. As Dr. Walter pointed out it is
the inactivity of sleep that recuperates power and the activity of labour that exhausts it.
Secondary to lifes great law there are other laws or uniformities that have been observed in
relation to living organisms. First is the Law of Action that states, Whenever action occurs in
the living organism as a result of an extraneous influence that action must be ascribed to the
living thing, which has the power of action, and not to the dead whose leading characteristic in
inertia. We might substitute instead of the word dead the word lifeless, theres no life in it
so it has no power of action.
Living is action. What Dr. Russell Trall the famous hygienist of the mid nineteenth century
called the Law of Vitality. He expressed it as follows: In the relations between the living
organism and lifeless matter the former is active, the latter passive, always.
This has enormous consequences for medicine and biology. The living is active the lifeless is
passive and yet we repeatedly hear the assertion that drugs act. Action presupposes an actor.
Thinking about Tralls statement, the living organism is active, the lifeless matter is passive, in
relation to the action of drugs, if it is purely chemical action, thats fine, but we are not talking
about chemical action when the action is biological, the organism uses chemistry sure but it is
not only chemistry. Action requires an actor something that is alive and if one wishes to argue
the point that the lifeless can act from where does it derive its energy. It derives its energy from
the living organism, so it is the organism that acts. Certainly we concede that the lifeless matter
may be the occasion for the action but it does not perform it.
The Law of Power states:
The power employed and consequently expended in any vital or medicinal action is vital power,
that is, power from within and not from without. This is merely a re-statement of the fact that it
is the living thing that acts and it is vital force that is consumed.
The Law of Selective Elimination
All injurious substances which by any means gain admittance within the domain of vitality are
counter-acted, neutralised and eliminated in such a manner and through such channels as will
produce the least amount of damage to the organism.
This law suggests an answer to the question of why certain drugs seem to act on certain organs
and tissues. For instance why does one drug act on the bowels, why does one drug act on the
liver, why does one drug act on the kidneys? As Trall himself pointed out, emetics do not act
on the stomach but are rejected by the stomach, purgatives do not act on the bowels but are
expelled through the bowels, and diaphoretics instead on acting on the skin are sent off in that
direction, diuretics do not act on the kidneys but the poisonous drugs are eliminated through that
channel.
The Law of Dual Effect
In hygienic literature there are a number of definitions of this. The original one of Walters I
quote: The secondary effect upon the living organism of any act, habit, indulgence or agent is
the exact opposite and equal of the primary effect.
A better re-formulation is: All materials which are taken into the body or which come into
contact with it from without occasion a two-fold and contrary action, the secondary reaction
being the opposite of the primary one.
Work and exercise arouse vital activity thus giving the appearance of increased vigour as the first
effect, the secondary effect tiredness, decreased vigour, fatigue, and exhaustion. Rest and sleep
on the contrary produced, as their first effect, weakness and languor but no one doubts their
recuperative value, rest and sleep are the only means whereby recuperation and re-invigoration
make be secured. These are secondary effects. Interestingly, in the living organism power is felt
or experienced only in its expenditure never when it is passive. One therefore feels stronger
while one is growing weaker, and feels weaker while one is actually growing stronger through
recuperation of the power.
It happens that a physician employs a certain stimulant in the treatment of a very depleted
patient. It seems to work like a charm, the patient responds readily, but it becomes necessary to
give the stimulant in increasingly larger doses and finally the body ceases to respond at all. It
seems to rebel against its use. In the days when brandy was a medical standby, after it had been
given in some low states of disease it would eventually lose its so-called power of action.
The Law of Vital Accommodation
The responses of the vital organism to external stimuli is an instinctive one based upon a self
preservative instinct which adapts itself to whatever influence it cannot destroy or control. This
explains the principle of toleration. Adaptation is essential in biology, it is life saving, it is
species saving; it is an essential element of life. A simple example of adaptation is exposure to
sunlight and the tanning that occurs. This may be good it may be bad. Lets examine it.
Source: http://www.arcadiahealthcentre.com.au/the-law-of-life/