0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views2 pages

Crim Law Notes

Aug 24 2010

Uploaded by

luckystar384
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views2 pages

Crim Law Notes

Aug 24 2010

Uploaded by

luckystar384
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CRIMINAL LAW

Lecture 8/24
Send email with name in subject line and criminal law and tell about yourself- where you
went to undergrad, any connection to crim law (work experience)
Bring name cards to class

Theories of Punishment
3 famous questions: why do we punish, who, and how
In US we used incarceration as punishment
US has highest number of incarceration in world, and highest per capita; has skyrocketed
since 80s
Has been subject of debate
We answer these questions through incarceration
Different sentencing theories:
1) utilitarianism: punishment should serve useful purpose, punishment is unpleasant;
goal > harm
-Jeremy Betham
-4 types:
*general deterrence- punishment sends a message and discourages others
*individual deterrence- encourages indiv. Not to do it again
-change behavior b/c youre afraid of being punished again
*incapacitation- prevent them from doing more harm
*reform/rehabilitation- person can learn through their mistakes by
becoming more productive
-changes your character
-fell out of favor in 1970s, replaced with retributive
-what works? And when is it fair to offer it?
*marginal deterrence- ex: if you steal $5 or more, get 100 year prison
sentence; person who might have wanted to steal $5 now might
steal
$5000
-whether or not deterrence works is a complicated question
-its the certainty of punishment, not the length, that can make the difference in deterrence
-if you get to high enough rate of incarceration in a city it can actually cause social instability
and actually cause more crime
Criticisms:
-uses people as an example, not respectable of persons free will
-can justify actions that are unfair (harm done to one person less than harm done to bunch of
people, so punish the one person)
2) retributive: focuses on free will; we punish you b/c you deserve it
-assault retrib.- its okay to hate criminals, they should be looked down upon
-protective retrib.- treating criminal as a human and giving the punishment they deserve; giving
respect to someone as a moral actor; restores moral balance

other things affect sentencing other than these theories, such as political pressures, social
pressures, etc.

ARTICLE
Utilitarianism: general deterrence, indiv. deterrence
Retributive element
just the pain and suffering of losing his daughter- natural punishment
Sanction- 1 day in prison for 7 years on her bday, volunteer 2 hrs a week, and do annual
blood drive on weekend following her death, 7 yrs probation, and monitoring/supervision by
social services
QUESTIONS TO THINK ABOUT:
What is the normative message that is sent through diff sanctions and how can they be
interpreted?
Imagine a parent without a spouse, would you send that person to prison?

You might also like