ASSIGNMENT / TUGASAN

________________________________________________________________________
HBEM2203
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT /
PENGURUSAN SUMBER MANUSIA
JANUARY 2016 SEMESTER

________________________________________________________________________
INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS / ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR
1. This assignment contains only ONE (1) question that is set in both Malay and English. / Tugasan ini
mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam bahasa Melayu dan bahasa Inggeris.
2. Answer in Malay or English. / Jawab dalam bahasa Melayu atau bahasa Inggeris.
3. Learners are to submit assignment only in MS-WORD format unless specified otherwise. Please refrain
from converting text/phrases into picture format such as .gif / .jpeg / print screen / etc. / Anda dikehendaki
menyerahkan tugasan dalam format MS-WORD melainkan dinyatakan sebaliknya. Anda tidak dibenarkan
untuk menukar teks/frasa tugasan tersebut kepada format grafik seperti .jpeg / .gif / print screen / dan
lain-lain format berkaitan.
4. Download the language version of the assignment template concerned from the myVLE for preparation
and submission of your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman
font and 1.5 line spacing. / Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada
myVLE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda hendaklah ditaip dengan
menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan langkau baris 1.5.
5. Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. Do not copy the
assignment question and instructions to your answer. Only assignment answer developed within the
approximate word limit will be assessed. The number of words should be shown at the end of your
assignment. / Tugasan anda hendaklah mengandungi 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk
rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan
dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan anda. Pemeriksa tidak akan membaca jawapan tugasan yang
melebihi had patah perkataan yang dibenarkan. Jumlah perkataan hendaklah dinyatakan di penghujung
tugasan anda.
6. You must submit your assignment ONLINE via the myVLE. Refer to the portal for instructions on the
procedures to submit your assignment online. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted
assignment and proof of the submission for personal reference. / Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan
SECARA ONLINE melalui myVLE. Sila rujuk kepada portal untuk arahan mengenai prosedur
penghantaran tugasan secara online. Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan salinan tugasan yang dihantar dan
bukti penghantaran untuk rujukan sendiri.
7. You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file. / Anda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan
SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail.
8. Your assignment must be submitted between 7th 20th March 2016. Submission after 20th March 2016
will NOT be accepted. / Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan antara 7hb 20hb Mac 2016. Serahan
selepas 20hb Mac 2016 TIDAK akan diterima.
1

9. Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another persons assignment. You
should also not plagiarise another persons work as your own. / Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara
individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan orang lain. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja
orang lain sebagai kerja sendiri.
10. Please take note that PENALTY will be imposed on late submission of assignment as specified in the
Registrars Office circular 6/2012 (Refer to Registrars Announcement in myVLE). / Sila ambil maklum
tentang PENALTI yang akan dikenakan ke atas penghantaran lewat tugasan seperti yang tertera di
pekeliling pejabat Pendaftar 6/2012 (Rujuk Registrars Announcement di myVLE).
11. Please ensure that you keep the RECEIPT issued upon submisson of your assignment as proof of
submission. Your assignment is considered as NOT submitted if you fail to produce the submission receipt
in any dispute arises concerning assignment submission. / Anda perlu memastikan RESIT yang
dikeluarkan bagi penghantaran tugasan disimpan sebagai bukti penghantaran. Kegagalan
mengemukakan resit dalam sebarang isu yang timbul berkaitan penghantaran tugasan akan
mengakibatkan tugasan dianggap TIDAK dihantar.

EVALUATION / PENILAIAN
This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed
based on the Rubrics or Answer Scheme attached. You would be given feedback on the
assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. /
Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan
akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik atau Skema Jawapan yang dilampirkan. Anda
akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester
bermula.
PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION / PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH
Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If
plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: /
Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan
kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut:
No. /
Bil.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Similarity Percentage (%) /

Kadar Pertindihan (%)
0 30
30.01 50
50.01 70
70.01 - 100

Marks Deduction (%) /

Potongan Markah (%)
0
5
10
100

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
Topic 5 of the course module discusses job promotions and criteria for promotion in the
Malaysian Education Service. A few years ago the government announced that the
Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan (PTK) or the Assessment of Competency Levels was to be
replaced by a new approach of assessing teachers for promotion purposes. This new
approach was adopted last year (2015).
Undertake a study on the issue at a school of your choice. Collect the necessary data by
interviewing at least TWO senior teachers and referring to relevant documents and
records.
The study is focused on the following:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)

The teacher assessment system as practiced in 2014;

Critical evaluation of the system;
Characteristics of the new teacher assessment system adopted in 2015;
Commentary on the new system.

Refer to the guidelines rubric on the expected assignment content and also the basis for
which marks are to be awarded for the report. Students are reminded not to divulge the
identity of sites and respondents involved in the study.
[Total: 40 marks]

SOALAN TUGASAN

Topik 5 Modul Kursus membincangkan kenaikan pangkat dalam jawatan dan kriteria
kenaikan pangkat dalam Perkhidmatan Pendidikan Malaysia. Beberapa tahun yang lalu
pihak Kerajaan telah memaklumkan yang Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan (PTK) akan
digantikan dengan satu kaedah penilaian guru yang baru bagi tujuan kenaikan pangkat.
Kaedah penilaian mula digunakan pada lepas 2015.
Lakukan satu kajian tentang perkara tersebut di sebuah sekolah pilihan anda. Kutip data
melalui temuduga sekurang-kurangnya DUA orang guru kanan dan rujukan kepada
dokumen dan rekod.
Kajian ini berfokuskan kepada perkara berikut:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)

Sistem penilaian guru yang diamalkan tahun lepas, iaitu 2014;

Penilaian kritikal terhadap sistem tersebut;
Ciri sistem penilaian guru baru yang diperkenalkan pada tahun 2015;
Komentar tentang sistem baru.

Rujuk panduan pada rubrik yang disediakan mengenai kandungan tugasan dan juga
kaedah pemberian markah. Pelajar adalah diingatkan supaya tidak mendedahkan identiti
sekolah, objek kajian dan responden yang terlibat dalam kajian.
[Jumlah: 40 markah]

Assignment Rubrics

Criteria

Weight

Missing
Item
0
The
introduction is
missing.

Low

Fair

Above average

Excellent

1
The introduction is brief
and not focused on the
structure and objectives
of the paper.

2
The introduction either
does not adequately
preview the structure of
the paper but clearly
states its objectives, or
vice-versa.

3
The introduction
previews the structure of
the paper and its
objectives clearly.

4
The introduction is
interesting. It previews
(1) the structure and (2)
objectives of the paper
clearly. (3) Important
concepts are also clearly
defined.
Describes in detail the
(1) processes and (2)
rationale on
respondents selection,
(3) interviews conducted
and (4) documents and
records studied, if
relevant.
The main characteristics
presented are
comprehensive. It is
deemed to exceed
expectations.

Introduction

Data Collection
Method

There is no
description on
how data is
collected.

Brief mention of data

collection but without
adequate focus on
respondent selection,
interviews and study of
documents and records.

Brief description on the

processes of identifying
respondents and conduct
of interviews.

Describes in sufficient
details the processes and
rationale on respondents
selection, interviews
conducted, and
documents and records
studied.

Description of
the 2014 (or
previous years)
teacher
evaluation
system

1.5

No description
provided.

The description is rather

brief and lacks focus.

The description provides

less than adequate
coverage of the main
characteristics.

The main characteristics

presented are
comprehensive.

Critical
evaluation of the
2014 (or
previous years)
evaluation
system

1.5

No evaluation
presented.

The analysis on the two

teachers perceptions
presented is poor and
lacks focus.

The analysis on the two

teachers perceptions
presented is less than
adequate.

The main strengths and

weaknesses of the sytem
are discussed.

The main strengths and

weaknesses of the sytem
are discussed. The
student adds own
commentaries.

Max
Marks
4

Criteria

Weight

Description of
the new system,
implemented in
2015

1.5

Commentary on
the new system

1.5

Missing
Item
0
No description
provided.

Low

Fair

1
The analysis on the two
teachers perceptions
presented is poor and
lacks focus.

2
The analysis on the two
teachers perceptions
presented is less than
adequate.

3
The analysis on the two
teachers perceptions is
well presented.

No
commentary
provided.

Commentary provided
are not focused on the
benefits of the new
system. It is rather
vague.

Fairly good explanation

on the benefits of the
new system.

Fairly good explanation

on the benefits of the new
system and the possible
drawbacks of the system.

The conclusion is
recognisable, but does
not tie up the above
THREE elements of the
study.
Details are not in logical
order and distracts the
reader.

The conclusion ties up

the above THREE
elements of the study.

Conclusion

No conclusion
presented.

There is no clear
conclusion, the paper
just ends.

Organisation

Not applicable.

Many details are not in

logical order. There is
little sense that the
writing is organised.

Above average

Details are placed in a

logical order but
presented less effectively.

Excellent
4
The main characteristics
presented are
comprehensive. It is
deemed to exceed
expectations.
Convincing explanation
on the benefits of the
new system but also
pointed out the possible
drawbacks of the
system.

Max
Marks
6

The conclusion is
strong. It ties up the
above THREE elements
of the study. Well
summarised.
Details are placed in a
logical order and
presented effectively.

TOTAL MARKS

40