Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4
Systems Design: Process Costing
Solutions to Questions
4-1
A process costing system should be
used in situations where a homogeneous
product is produced on a continuous basis.
XXXX
Work in Process, Firing................................
XXXX
Work in Process,
Mixing................................................
4-2
Job-order and processing costing
are similar in the following ways:
1. Job-order costing and process costing
have the same basic purposesto
assign materials, labor, and overhead
cost to products and to provide a
mechanism for computing unit product
costs.
2. Both systems use the same basic
manufacturing accounts.
3. Costs flow through the accounts in
basically the same way in both
systems.
4-6
The costs that might be added in
the Firing Department include: (1) costs
transferred in from the Mixing
Department; (2) materials costs added in
the Firing Department; (3) labor costs
added in the Firing Department; and (4)
overhead costs added in the Firing
Department.
4-7
Under the weighted-average
method, equivalent units of production
consist of units transferred to the next
department (or to finished goods) during
the period plus the equivalent units in the
departments ending work in process
inventory.
4-3
Cost accumulation is simpler under
process costing because costs only need
to be assigned to departmentsnot
individual jobs. A company usually has a
small number of processing departments,
whereas a job-order costing system often
must keep track of the costs of hundreds
or even thousands of jobs.
4-8
The company will want to
distinguish between the costs of the
metals used to make the medallions, but
the medals are otherwise identical and go
through the same production processes.
Thus, operation costing is ideally suited for
the companys needs.
4-4
In a process costing system, a Work
in Process account is maintained for each
processing department.
4-5
The journal entry to record the
transfer of work in process from the Mixing
Department to the Firing Department is:
4-1
31,000
19,000
12,000
7,000
62,000
4-2
101,000
101,000
4-3
Material
s
Labor
Overhea
d
35,000
33,000
33,000
$7.34
$2.60
$13.00
4-4
$ 7.34
2.60
13.00
$22.94
2,000
$13.86
$27,72
0
Conversi
on
Total
800
$4.43
$3,544
$31,26
4
out:
20,100
$13.86
$278,5
86
4-5
20,100
$4.43
$89,043
$367,6
29
$ 3,570
43,120
$46,690
$ 2,860
43,830
$46,690
4-6
42,000
Work in ProcessCooking.......
Work in ProcessMolding........
Wages Payable...................
50,000
36,000
Work in ProcessCooking.......
Work in ProcessMolding........
75,000
45,000
Manufacturing Overhead....
Work in ProcessMolding........
160,00
0
Work in ProcessCooking. .
Finished Goods........................
240,00
0
Work in ProcessMolding...
4-7
42,000
86,000
120,00
0
160,00
0
240,00
0
Tons of
Pulp
20,000
190,000
210,000
30,000
180,000
Equivalent Units
(EU)
2.
Material Labor and
s
Overhead
Units transferred out........................... 180,000
180,000
Work in process, ending:
Materials: 30,000 tons 60%
complete........................................ 18,000
Labor and overhead:
30,000 tons 40% complete.........
12,000
Equivalent units of production............ 198,000
192,000
4-8
4-9
Material
s
Labor
Overhea
d
42,000
42,000
42,000
4,000
46,000
4,000
46,000
Labor
Overhea
d
6,000
48,000
Material
s
46,000
46,000
$1.19
$0.49
$0.74
Materia Conversi
ls
on
2.
Cost of beginning work in process...........
Cost added during the period..................
Total cost (a)...........................................
Equivalent units of production (b)...........
Cost per equivalent unit (a) (b)............
3
.
Materia Conversi
ls
on
$ 1,500 $ 4,000
54,000 352,000
$55,500 $356,000
185,000 178,000
$0.30
$2.00
Material Conversi
s
on
Ending work in process inventory:
Equivalent units of
production (see above)...
10,000
3,000
Cost per equivalent unit
(see above).....................
$0.30
$2.00
Cost of ending work in
process
inventory........................
$3,000
$6,000
Units completed and transferred out:
Units transferred to the
next department............. 175,000 175,000
Cost per equivalent unit
(see above).....................
$0.30
$2.00
Cost of units completed
$52,500 $350,000
4-10
Total
$9,000
$402,50
4-11
Pulping
Conversi
on
157,00 157,000
0
8,000
165,00
0
2,000
159,000
Pulping
Conversi
on
$ 4,80 $
500
0
102,45
31,300
0
$107,25 $31,800
0
165,000 159,000
$0.65
$0.20
4-13
157,000
$0.20
$31,400
$133,45
0
4-14
$ 5,300
133,750
$139,050
$ 5,600
133,450
$139,050
$47,280
$552,50
0
25,000
$6.40
$160,00
0
3. Cost reconciliation:
Total cost to be accounted for....................
Costs accounted for as follows:
Cost of ending work in process
inventory.............................................
4-15
Total
$599,780
$ 47,280
4-16
552,500
$599,780
4-17
Materia Conversi
ls
on
Transferred to next department................ 160,00
0 160,000
Ending work in process:
Materials: 40,000 units x 100%
40,000
complete...............................................
Conversion: 40,000 units x 25%
10,000
complete...............................................
Equivalent units of production.................. 200,00
0 170,000
Material Conversi
s
on
$
25,200 $24,800
334,80
0 238,700
$360,00
0 $263,500
200,000 170,000
$1.80
$1.55
Material
s
Conversi
on
40,000
10,000
Total
4-19
$1.80
$1.55
$72,000
out:
$15,500
$87,500
160,000 160,000
$1.80
$1.55
$288,00
0 $248,000
$536,00
0
4-20
$ 50,000
573,500
$623,500
$ 87,500
536,000
$623,500
Materia Conversi
ls
on
Transferred to next department*............... 95,000
95,000
Ending work in process:
Materials: 15,000 units x 60% complete.
9,000
Conversion: 15,000 units x 20%
3,000
complete...............................................
Equivalent units of production.................. 104,00
98,000
0
Material Conversi
s
on
$ 1,50 $ 7,200
0
154,50
90,800
0
$156,00 $98,000
0
104,000
98,000
$1.50
$1.00
4-22
$1.00
$3,000
95,000
$1.00
$95,000
$16,500
$237,50
0
4-23
$ 8,700
245,300
$254,000
$ 16,500
237,500
$254,000
50.0
Material
s
50.0
1.0
51.0
Conversi
on
50.0
0.8
0.7
50.7
50.8
4-24
$ 1,67
0
81,46
0
$83,13
0
51.0
$1,630
Material
s
$
90
6,006
$6,096
50.8
$120
Conversi
on
$
605
42,490
$43,09
5
50.7
$850
Materials
1.0
$1,630
0.8
$120
0.7
$850
$1,630
$96
$595
50.0
$1,630
50.0
$120
50.0
$850
$81,500
$6,000
$42,500
4. Cost reconciliation:
Cost to be accounted for:
Cost of beginning work in process
inventory
($1,670 + $90 + $605)........................
Cost added to production during the
period
($81,460 + $6,006 + $42,490)............
Total cost to be accounted for................
Costs accounted for as follows:
4-25
Conversi
on
$ 2,365
129,956
$132,321
Total
$2,321
$130,00
0
4-26
$ 2,321
130,000
$132,321
Materia Conversi
ls
on
Transferred to next department*............... 170,00 170,000
0
Ending work in process:
Materials: 15,000 units x 100%
15,000
complete...............................................
Conversion: 15,000 units x 60%
9,000
complete...............................................
Equivalent units of production.................. 185,00 179,000
0
Material Conversi
s
on
$ 14,60 $ 7,200
0
133,40 225,500
0
$148,00 $232,700
0
185,000 179,000
$0.80
$1.30
inventory:
Equivalent units of
production.........................
Cost per equivalent unit......
Cost of ending work in
process inventory..............
Units completed and transferred
Units transferred to the next
department.......................
Cost per equivalent unit......
Cost of units completed and
transferred out..................
4-28
15,000
$0.80
9,000
$1.30
$12,000
out:
$11,700
$23,700
170,000 170,000
$0.80
$1.30
$136,00
0 $221,000
$357,00
0
495,000
115,000
72,000
18,000
c. Manufacturing Overhead.......................
Accounts Payable.............................
225,000
181,000
42,000
740,000
f. Finished Goods......................................
Work in ProcessBlending
Department...................................
950,000
225,000
181,000
42,000
950,000
Sales................................................
4-29
90,000
740,000
1,500,00
g. Accounts Receivable.............................
0
610,000
900,000
1,500,00
0
900,000
Accounts Receivable
1,500,00
0
Bal.
Bal.
Bal
.
(a)
(b)
(d)
Bal
.
Work in Process
Refining Department
38,000 (e)
740,000
495,000
72,000
181,000
46,000
Bal
.
(a)
(b)
(d)
(e)
Bal
.
Bal
.
(f)
Bal
.
Finished Goods
20,000 (g)
900,000
950,000
70,000
Accounts Payable
(c)
225,000
Sales
(g)
1,500,00
0
4-30
Raw Materials
618,00 (a
610,00
0 )
0
8,000
Work in Process
Blending Department
65,000 (f)
950,00
0
115,000
18,000
42,000
740,000
30,000
Manufacturing Overhead
(c)
225,00 (d
223,00
0 )
0
Bal.
2,000
4-31
Transferr
ed In
Costs
1,800
Material
s
1,800
Conversi
on
1,800
600
0
2,400
Transferre
d In Costs
$4,068
17,940
$22,008
2,400
$9.17
1,800
Materials
$1,980
6,210
$8,190
1,800
$4.55
210
2,010
Conversi
on
$2,160
13,920
$16,080
2,010
$8.00
Transferre
d In Costs
Materials
Conversi
on
600
$9.17
0
$4.55
210
$8.00
$5,502
$0
$1,680
1,800
$9.17
1,800
$4.55
1,800
$8.00
$16,506
$8,190
$14,400
Total
$7,182
$39,096
2. The unit cost computed above is $21.72 (= $9.17 + $4.55 + $8.00) versus $25.71 on the
original report for the units completed and transferred to finished goods. The unit cost on
the original report is high because none of the cost incurred during the month was
assigned to the units in the ending work in process inventory.
4-32
Transferred
In
200,000
10,000
210,000
Transferred
In
$
0
39,375,000
$39,375,00
0
210,000
$187.50
Conversio
n
200,000
3,000
203,000
Conversio
n
$
0
20,807,50
0
$20,807,5
00
203,000
$102.50
ending work in process, the higher the equivalent units for the
period and the lower the unit costs.
3. Increasing the percentage of completion can increase net
operating income by reducing the cost of goods sold. To
increase net operating income by $200,000, the cost of goods
sold would have to be decreased by $200,000 from
$58,000,000 down to $57,800,000. See the next page for the
necessary calculations.
4-34
$20,807,500
200,000 + 10,000X
$20,807,500
= $289.00
200,000 + 10,000X
$20,807,500
= $289.00 - $187.50
200,000 + 10,000X
$20,807,500
= $101.50
200,000 + 10,000X
200,000 + 10,000X
1
=
$20,807,500
$101.50
200,000 + 10,000X =
$20,807,500
$101.50
5,000
= 50%
10,000
4-36
Transferred
In
200,000
Conversio
n
200,000
10,000
210,000
Transferred
In
$
0
39,375,000
$39,375,00
0
210,000
$187.50
5,000
205,000
Conversio
n
$
0
20,807,50
0
$20,807,5
00
205,000
$101.50
5.
4-38
Appendix 4A
FIFO Method
Material Conversio
s
n
10,500
21,000
160,000
160,000
12,000
182,500
6,000
187,000
4-39
4-40
Material
Overhea
s
Labor
d
$193,32
0 $62,000 $310,000
27,000
$7.16
$ 7.16
2.48
12.40
$22.04
25,000
$2.48
25,000
$12.40
Materia
ls
400
$2.32
$928
4-41
Conversi
on
Total
200
$0.75
$150 $1,078
$650 $3,850
1,200
$0.75
$900 $2,292
24,000
$0.75
$73,68
$18,000
0
$79,82
2
$ 1,460
36,540
$38,000
$ 3,120
34,880
$38,000
4-42
4-43
Conversi
on
100
300
153,20
0
153,200
300
80
153,60
0
153,580
Materia
ls
Labor
Overhe
ad
1,000
2,000
2,000
37,000 37,000
6,000
4,000
44,000 43,000
37,000
4,000
43,000
Materia
Overhe
ls
Labor
ad
Cost added during the period (a).... $52,800 $21,500 $32,250
Equivalent units of production (b). . 44,000 43,000 43,000
Cost per equivalent unit (a) (b)...
$1.20
$0.50
$0.75
4-44
2.
To complete beginning work in
process:
Materials: 20,000 tons (100%
90%)..............................................
Labor and overhead: 20,000 tons
(100% 80%)................................
Units started and completed during
the month*.......................................
Ending work in process:
Materials: 30,000 tons 60%
complete........................................
Labor and overhead:
30,000 tons 40% complete.........
Equivalent units of production............
Tons of
Pulp
20,000
190,000
210,000
30,000
180,000
Equivalent Units
Labor and
Materials Overhead
2,000
4,000
160,000
160,000
18,000
180,000
12,000
176,000
4-45
$25.40
18.20
$43.60
Conversion
300
60%
180
4-46
Conversion
400
60%
3,100
400
2,700
240
Materia
ls
Conversi
on
Total
$11,04
0
$6,400
$117,7
20
$135,1
60
4-48
355,00
Pounds started and completed during July*.....
0
Ending work in process:
Materials: 25,000 pounds 100%
complete.................................................... 25,000
Labor and overhead:
25,000 pounds 60% complete................
380,00
Equivalent units of production.........................
0
14,000
355,000
15,000
384,000
4-49
Materia
ls
Conversi
on
0
5,000
140,00
0
140,000
40,000
180,00
0
10,000
155,000
Material Conversi
s
on
$334,80
0 $238,700
180,000 155,000
$1.86
$1.54
4-50
$ 50,00
0
4-51
573,50
0
$623,50
0
$ 89,80
0
533,70
0
$623,50
0
4-52
Total
$89,80
0
$25,20
0
$24,800
$50,00
0
0
$1.86
$0
5,000
$1.54
$7,700
$7,700
140,00
0 140,000
$1.86
$1.54
$260,4
00 $215,600
$476,0
00
$533,7
00
Materia
ls
Conversi
on
0
7,000
150,00
0
150,000
20,000
170,00
0
8,000
165,000
Material Conversi
s
on
$139,40
0 $244,200
170,000 165,000
$0.82
$1.48
4-53
$ 13,40
0
4-54
383,60
0
$397,00
0
$ 28,24
0
368,76
0
$397,00
0
4-55
$8,500
$4,900
0
$0.82
7,000
$1.48
$0
$10,360
150,00
0 150,000
$0.82
$1.48
$123,0
00 $222,000
Total
$28,24
0
$13,40
0
$10,36
0
$345,0
00
$368,7
60
4-56
4-57
Transferred
In
0
1,350
600
1,950
Transferred
In
$17,940
1,950
$9.20
Material
s
0
1,350
0
1,350
Material
s
Conversi
on
180
1,350
210
1,740
Conversi
on
$13,92
$6,210
0
1,350
1,740
$4.60
$8.00
4-58
Transferred
In
Materia
ls
Conversi
on
600
$9.20
$5,520
0
$4.60
$0
210
$8.00
$1,680
$7,200
$4,068
$1,980
$2,160
$8,208
0
$9.20
0
$4.60
180
$8.00
$0
$0
$1,440
1,350
$9.20
1,350
$4.60
1,350
$8.00
$12,420
$6,210
$10,800
Total
$1,440
$29,43
0
$39,07
8
2. The effects of the price increases will tend to show up more under the FIFO method. The
reason is that the FIFO method keeps the costs of the current period separate from the
costs of prior periods. Thus, under the FIFO method, management will be able to see the
effect of price increases on unit costs without any distorting influence from what has
happened in the past.
4-59
4-60
Appendix 4B
Service Department Allocations
Departmental costs
before allocations......
Allocations:
Administration
costs
(20/25, 5/25).........
Facility Services
costs
(70/100, 30/100)*..
Total costs after
allocation..................
Service Departments
AdminiFacility
stration
Services
$2,400,00 $1,600,00
0
0
(2,400,000
)
1,920,000
(1,600,00
0)
Operating Departments
Undergradua Graduate
te Programs Programs
$5,700,00
$26,800,000
0
Total
$36,500,0
00
480,000
480,00
1,120,000
0
$6,660,00
$29,840,000
0
$36,500,0
00
*Based on the space occupied by the two operating departments, which is 100,000 square
feet.
4-61
Service
Departments
Admini- Janitori
stration
al
$150,00 $40,00
0
0
(150,00
0)
6,000
(46,000
)
$
0
Operating
Departments
Groceries
$2,320,0
00
Gifts
$950,0
00
Total
$3,460,0
00
116,250
36,80
0
$2,473,0
50
27,750
9,20
0
$986,9
50
$3,460,0
00
*Based on employee hours in the other three departments: 160 + 3,100 + 740 = 4,000.
Based on space occupied by the two operating departments: 4,000 + 1,000 = 5,000.
Both the Janitorial Department costs of $40,000 and the Administration costs of $6,000
that have been allocated to the Janitorial Department are allocated to the two operating
departments.
4-62
Costs...........................................
Allocations:
Administration costs1:
(35/700, 140/700, 315/700,
210/700)................................
Janitorial costs2:
(20/160, 40/160, 100/160).....
Maintenance costs3: (30/90,
60/90)....................................
Total cost after allocations...........
Service
Departments
Admini- Janitoria Maintestration
l
nance
$140,00 $105,00
0
0 $ 48,000
(140,000
)
7,000 28,000
(112,000
) 14,000
(90,000)
0 $
0 $
Operating
Departments
Binding Printing
Total
$275,00 $430,00 $998,00
0
0
0
63,000
42,000
28,000
70,000
30,000 60,000
$396,00 $602,00 $998,00
0
0
0
4-63
4-64
1.
Step-down method
Operating department
costs..................................
Factory Custodia
Adminil
Personn
stration Services
el
Maintenance
Machinin Assembl
g
y
376,300 175,900
270,00
Costs to be allocated............
0 68,760 28,840 45,200
Allocations:
Factory Administration
(270,000
@ 1,800 per labor-hour.
)
5,400
9,000
39,600
54,000 162,000
Custodial Services
@ 720 per square foot...
(74,160)
2,160
7,200
50,400
14,400
Personnel
@ 320,000 per
employee........................
(40,000)
8,000
12,800
19,200
Maintenance
@ 1,250 per machinehour................................
(100,000) 87,500
12,500
Total overhead after
allocations.........................
0
0
0
0 581,000 384,000
Divide by machine-hours
(thousands).......................
70
Divide by direct laborhours (thousands)..............
80
Overhead rate......................
8,300
4,800
4-65
4-66
2.
Direct method
Operating department
costs..................................
Factory Custodia
Adminil
Personn
stration Services
el
Maintenance
Machinin Assembl
g
y
376,300 175,900
270,00
Costs to be allocated............
0 68,760 28,840 45,200
Allocations:
Factory Administration
(270,000
(30/120, 90/120).............
)
67,500 202,500
Custodial Services
(70/90, 20/90).................
(68,760)
53,480
15,280
Personnel
(40/100, 60/100).............
(28,840)
11,536
17,304
Maintenance
(70/80, 10/80).................
(45,200) 39,550
5,650
Total overhead after
allocations.........................
0
0
0 548,366 416,634
Divide by machine-hours
(thousands).......................
70
Divide by direct labor-hours
(thousands).......................
80
Overhead rate......................
7,834
5,208
4-67
965,000,000
=
=9,650 per DLH
100,000 DLHs
4. The amount of overhead cost assigned to the job would be:
Step-down method:
Machining Department: 8,300 per machine1,577,00
hour 190 machine-hours...............................
0
Assembly Department: 4,800 per direct laborhour 75 direct labor-hours............................. 360,000
1,937,00
Total overhead cost...............................................
0
Direct method:
Machining Department: 7,834 per machine1,488,46
hour 190 machine-hours...............................
0
Assembly department: 5,208 per direct laborhour 75 direct labor-hours............................. 390,600
1,879,06
Total overhead cost...............................................
0
Plantwide method:
9,650 per direct labor-hour 100 direct labor- 965,00
hours................................................................
0
The plantwide method, which is based on direct labor-hours,
assigns very little overhead cost to the job because it requires
little labor time. Assuming that Factory Administrative costs
really do vary in proportion to labor-hours, Custodial Services
with square feet occupied, and so on, the company will tend to
undercost such jobs if a plantwide overhead rate is used (and it
will tend to overcost jobs requiring large amounts of labor
time). The direct method is better than the plantwide method,
but the step-down method will generally provide the most
accurate overhead rates of the three methods.
(193,860)
Administrative
Service Laborato Radiolog General
s
ry
y
Hospital
$158,84
$
0 $243,600 $304,800 74,500
2,160
(161,000
)
0 $
5,400
49,000
2,700 183,600
24,500
87,500
$345,60
0 $298,000 $332,000
0
$107,20
Fixed costs.............................. $87,000
0
$90,180 $162,300 $215,700 $401,300
Housekeeping Services
allocation
(13/145; 6.5/145; 10/145;
7.5/145; 108/145)............... (87,000)
Food Services allocation:
(0.8%; 2.4%; 1.6%;
7,800
(115,000)
4-69
3,900
6,000
4,500
64,800
920
2,760
1,840 109,480
95.2%).............................
Admin. Services allocation:
(30%; 20%; 50%)...............
( 95,000)
4-70
0
0
$
$
0
0
28,500
19,000
47,500
$623,08
0 $199,560 $241,040
0
$968,68
0 $497,560 $573,040
0
Custodia
Personn
l
Mainteel
Services nance Printing Binding
$201,00 $525,00
Total cost before allocations...................... $360,000 $141,000
0
0 $373,500
Allocations:
Personnel (15/200, 25/200, 40/200,
120/200)1............................................. (360,000) 27,000 45,000 72,000 216,000
Custodial services
(20/140, 80/140, 40/140)2....................
(168,000) 24,000 96,000
48,000
(270,000
3
Maintenance (150/180, 30/180) .............
) 225,000
45,000
$918,00
Total overhead cost after allocations......... $
0 $
0 $
0
0 $682,500
150,00
Divide by machine-hours...........................
0
Divide by direct labor-hours......................
175,000
Predetermined overhead rate....................
$6.12
$3.90
Based on 15 + 25 + 40 + 120 = 200 employees
Based on 20,000 + 80,000 + 40,000 = 140,000 square
2
feet
3
Based on 150,000 + 30,000 = 180,000 machine-hours
1
4-71
Custodia
Personn
l
Mainteel
Services nance Printing Binding
$201,00 $525,00
Total costs before allocations.................... $360,000 $141,000
0
0 $373,500
Allocations:
Personnel (40/160, 120/160)1................. (360,000)
90,000 270,000
2
Custodial Services (80/120, 40/120) ......
(141,000)
94,000
47,000
(201,000
3
Maintenance (150/180, 30/180) .............
) 167,500
33,500
$876,50
Total overhead cost after allocations......... $
0 $
0 $
0
0 $724,000
150,00
Divide by machine-hours...........................
0
Divide by direct labor-hours......................
175,000
Predetermined overhead rate....................
$5.84
$4.14
Based on 40 + 120 = 160 employees
Based on 80,000 + 40,000 = 120,000 square feet
3
Based on 150,000 + 30,000 = 180,000 machine-hours
1
2
4-72
$
94,248
7,800
$102,04
Total overhead cost...............................................
8
Direct method:
Printing department:
$5.84 per machine-hour 15,400 machinehours................................................................ $ 89,936
Binding department:
$4.14 per direct labor-hour 2,000 direct laborhours................................................................
8,280
Total overhead cost............................................... $ 98,216
b. The step-down method provides a better basis for computing
predetermined overhead rates than the direct method
because it gives recognition to services provided between
service departments. If this interdepartmental service is not
recognized, then either too much or too little of a service
departments costs may be allocated to a producing
department. The result will be an inaccuracy in the producing
departments predetermined overhead rate.
Inaccuracies in the predetermined overhead rate can cause
corresponding inaccuracies in bids for jobs. Because the
direct method in this case understates the overhead rate in
the Printing Department and overstates the overhead rate in
the Binding Department, it is not surprising that the
company tends to bid low on jobs requiring a lot of printing
work and tends to bid too high on jobs that require a lot of
binding work.
4-73